Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Text message speak...

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Really? Care to explain that one to me?
    When you are used to typing properly, you tend to spell words properly and using text speak would require further thought.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Creamy Goodness


    B-K-DzR wrote:
    Really? Care to explain that one to me?
    try typing something your don't understand or can't read then come back to us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    DaveMcG wrote:
    I think mine offers 160 characters
    Oh right. Mine actually facilitates 913 characters - it's just that they're in "blocks" of 160, 145 and, for some reason, 152. And my phone is a very basic, run-of-the-mill model.
    Rob_I wrote:
    the only thing more annoying than a problem is people who continuously moan about said problem
    And people complaining about people complaining about a genuine grievance of theirs is pretty irritating too.
    Also, I'm a regular Boards user - I don't think I've ever seen a thread damning text-speak. I've seen posts that do so, but not entire threads.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,937 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    Text speak users should be tarred and feathered like that drug dealer in the North a few days back. Harsh, but fair I think you will find.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,162 ✭✭✭BKtje


    Terry wrote:
    When you are used to typing properly, you tend to spell words properly and using text speak would require further thought.
    If you can do both then text speak would be quicker to type out even when using a full keyboard (reading of course wouldnt be but that isn't the point that was being made).

    The point i thought the original person poster was making was that if you can do both and you have a keyboard, that it is actually harder to type in text speak than in normal speak. That's what i wanted explained or clarified.
    Cremo wrote:
    try typing something your don't understand or can't read then come back to us.
    See above.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    5starpool wrote:
    Text speak users should be tarred and feathered like that drug dealer in the North a few days back. Harsh, but fair I think you will find.
    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    B-K-DzR wrote:
    If you can do both then text speak would be quicker to type out even when using a full keyboard (reading of course wouldnt be but that isn't the point that was being made).

    The point i thought the original person poster was making was that if you can do both and you have a keyboard, that it is actually harder to type in text speak than in normal speak. That's what i wanted explained or clarified.
    Typing text-speak isn't going to have the same flow as typing normally. And you'll probably have to look around the keyboard more - e.g. for numbers. Yeah, I definitely agree that typing text-speak would require more thought. Surely a person would automatically type "tonight" but would have to think somewhat about "2nite"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭Orlee


    This is an email I received from my 14 year old sister who was on holidays in America.
    Hay!!

    erm you'll never no!! lol
    haha ye the O.c i WISH!!
    i do hav some pics!!
    I GOT AN IPOD!! WOOHOO!!
    its de same 1u hav Every1 bought it 4 moi b-day!!
    mmmmm lunch!! ye we have to!

    XXxXXxxXXxxXXxxXX

    LUFF YHoO!!

    Absolute gibberish and way to many excalmation marks

    my reply was
    "Write to me in English or Im not reading or replying to your mails!"

    She was not impressed


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Ouch! That truly hurts my eyes. I pity English teachers, I really do. Or any teachers. Notice the way she does go to the trouble of putting certain letters in caps and, as you said, including exclamation marks. So she obviously is aware of punctuation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    Orlee wrote:
    This is an email I received from my 14 year old sister who was on holidays in America.



    Absolute gibberish and way to many excalmation marks

    my reply was
    "Write to me in English or Im not reading or replying to your mails!"

    She was not impressed
    Shiva H. Vishnu! what the hell is 1u. I thought the point of txt spk was to reduce the character count, why would you put in moi instead of me?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭Orlee


    all her friends are like this - Her MSN and Bebo are practically in another language!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Someone said earlier that they asked a 13-year-old why they insist on using the wretched thing - his reply was that it's "cool".

    God, it's quite pitiful when not communicating properly has become "uncool".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,162 ✭✭✭BKtje


    I can read that the same speed as english. Can you spot the guy who's been reading text speak/ short hand internet english for over 7 years :p

    It does look very ugly though doesn't it? ;)

    EDIT: At least 1337 speak hasn't caught on in the real world :p
    EDIT2:
    what the hell is 1u.
    one you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Dudess wrote:
    Someone said earlier that they asked a 13-year-old why they insist on using the wretched thing - his reply was that it's "cool".

    God, it's quite pitiful when not communicating properly has become "uncool".
    That was me.
    I bollocked him out over it. Something along the lines of 'you'll never leanr to spell properly. This won't be acceptable in exams' and so forth. I probably mad things worse.

    Typo left in for comedic effect.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    B-K-DzR wrote:
    one you
    And what the f*ck does "one you" mean?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,854 ✭✭✭Sinfonia


    Dudess wrote:
    And what the f*ck does "one you" mean?!
    Nothing, out of context. She said "the one you got" or something.

    Anyways, that teenage bebo speak these days (with all THiS kinDa StUfF!!!! lol xxXXxx), is just the same as 1337 5p34k or when Snoop Dogg says "shizzle", it really doesn't matter.
    We should probably be getting angry about more important things. Like foreign policy or sumtin i duno lol x


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    I hate it. Have trouble understanding most of it. How hard is it to use predictive text which by all accounts is quicker.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    SumGuy wrote:
    Anyways, that teenage bebo speak these days (with all THiS kinDa StUfF!!!! lol xxXXxx)
    that shíte really grinds my gears! I mean píss off with your caps addiction, I don't want to know!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭Max_Damage


    I often wonder what the English language will be like in 50 years time, or even 20 years. Text speak is like Newspeak (from Nineteen Eighty-Four) in a different form.

    *Doubleplusungood*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,035 ✭✭✭GhostInTheRuins


    If I was to try to use textspeak, it would take me longer to text/type because I'd be constantly thinking "How the hell can I make this word shorter". :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Also Starring LeVar Burton


    D.T. Jesus wrote:
    If I was to try to use textspeak, it would take me longer to text/type because I'd be constantly thinking "How the hell can I make this word shorter". :confused:

    I'd be in exactly the same boat, but it seems so pointless texting like that. I have often text back to my friends asking why they couldn't text back with full words and punctuation and the answer I got from most of them is that they didn't know how to use predictive text and that txt speak was easier. Now I'm no phone expert myself, but predictive text is fairly simple stuff, isn't it? You'd have to be pretty thick not to be able to figure it out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    You'd have to be pretty thick not to be able to figure it out.
    You'd think that, wouldn't you? Yet my brother, a partner in a law firm and only in his early 30s, nope, can't do it for the life of him.

    My best friend: one of the most intelligent people I know. Again, can't get his head around the auld predictive texting.
    SumGuy wrote:
    it really doesn't matter.
    It kinda does though. As Max_Damage says:
    I often wonder what the English language will be like in 50 years time, or even 20 years. Text speak is like Newspeak (from Nineteen Eighty-Four) in a different form.

    *Doubleplusungood*
    The point of Newspeak was to reduce the English vocabulary to the bare minimum, thus future generations would not have enough scope for committing thoughtcrime - there wouldn't be enough words for them to do so. God, yet another of Orwell's predictions coming true!
    Language being f*cked around with - not good. I'm not saying text-speak is part of some conspiracy for world domination (although I might run that by tunaman!) but the eradication of words and phrases is quite a horrible thought.
    D.T. Jesus wrote:
    If I was to try to use textspeak, it would take me longer to text/type because I'd be constantly thinking "How the hell can I make this word shorter".
    Heh, me too. That's exactly the point Terry was making earlier about it being more difficult to type text-speak than proper English.
    I wonder if other languages are being similarly raped?


Advertisement
Advertisement