Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tournament V Cash

123457

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    nicnicnic wrote:
    Now talk of a challenge I would do one but I will admit that if i was to go up against a cash regular in there current comfort zone levels they would no doubt beat me on the other hand if that player was a $1/2 regular and we were to play say 20k hands at $5/10 of higher out of both our comfort zones I would feel confident
    how would you be representive of nlh cash experts with the above being the case, if you want to have some personal knob measuring contest who best player kind of thing then i'll go for it but realisticly your were not the intended objective of my post
    well what do you want when you said a "cash regular"? Did you really think you would get action from mrflash or dvdfan?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    RoundTower wrote:
    well what do you want when you said a "cash regular"? Did you really think you would get action from mrflash or dvdfan?


    lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    LuckyLloyd wrote:
    You want HJ I assume?
    not particularly Hector brought up a challenge kinda thing I kinda added to it but my view was the ground where it was played out should be somewhere both the cash and tournament weren't comfortable, higher stakes is what I came up with


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭Fatboydim


    unfortunately we are going to be constrained by what people are willing to do, if I had the bankroll to play $5 $10 id be playing it already

    I find this quite revealing and indeed refreshing. I read so much on forums like here, Hendon Mob and 2 + 2 where it's almost comparing penis size what levels you play at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,754 ✭✭✭ianmc38


    I'd take 10-33% of HJ if he was to play 5/10 (assuming a 30 buyin bankroll). Maybe we can get a syndicate together?

    I'm not sure how the terms would be worked out though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭BigCityBanker


    ianmc38 wrote:
    I'd take 10-33% of HJ if he was to play 5/10 (assuming a 30 buyin bankroll). Maybe we can get a syndicate together?

    I'm not sure how the terms would be worked out though.


    ditto - i am also willing to stake some %'s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,434 ✭✭✭cardshark202


    ianmc38 wrote:
    I'd take 10-33% of HJ if he was to play 5/10 (assuming a 30 buyin bankroll). Maybe we can get a syndicate together?

    I'm not sure how the terms would be worked out though.

    This seems like a bad idea, I doubt many if any players would accept it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,754 ✭✭✭ianmc38


    This seems like a bad idea, I doubt many if any players would accept it

    why not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,434 ✭✭✭cardshark202


    Syndicate staking just doesn't seem like a good idea. I also think its easier to come up with agreeable terms if the staker is one person as opposed to several.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,754 ✭✭✭ianmc38


    yeah i get ya. it depends how many buyins the proposed match will be over. im not sure if id feel comfortable staking a 10 buyin game on my own nor do I have the bankroll to stake a 30 buyin game, though I doubt Nicky would be too keen on playing for 30k.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    ianmc38 wrote:
    though I doubt Nicky would be too keen on playing for 30k.

    I aint got balls that big


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    2 Things, first of all it doesnt need to be me representing cash game player In fact I think I would be a bad choice as Ive played a lot of tournaments. I reckon Valor might be a good choice, although it would of been better before the WSOP.

    Second its just a bit of fun, i think its bizarre and silly to suggest we get someone to play 50k hands of a limit far above their bankroll, I doubt NicNicNic would feel the same if was him being asked to play 10k buy in tourneys or whatever the equivalent is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    2 Things, first of all it doesnt need to be me representing cash game player In fact I think I would be a bad choice as Ive played a lot of tournaments. I reckon Valor might be a good choice, although it would of been better before the WSOP.

    Second its just a bit of fun, i think its bizarre and silly to suggest we get someone to play 50k hands of a limit far above their bankroll, I doubt NicNicNic would feel the same if was him being asked to play 10k buy in tourneys or whatever the equivalent is.

    I agree the more I think about the stupider my idea becomes to me. this is after prolonged debate with my cash coach who has convinced me that to take on such a challenge would be committing bankroll suicide.


    this is probably the last time that I will be on the side of the tournament donks as over the next three month period I intend to become a ring expert and cash snob. lol donkaments.


    edit

    ok ill own up my initial plan was to get Valor to play the $5/10 for me, would of been funny a Valor Vs Valor challenge


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭Fatboydim


    It's been fun watching this argument rage. Even though that was never the intention of the op. But since it has raged the answer is actually very simple.

    There are some very good players who prefer to play tournaments to cash.
    There are some very god players who prefer to play cash over tournaments.

    Any player who shows a preference is likely to excel at their prefered game.

    Players range from very poor to excellent across both disciplines. However there will inevitably be more donkeys playing tournaments as this is entry level to the game. And tournaments have satellites which means that some very poor players can get to play big events.

    Generally in cash games the higher buy in levels have less donkeys, due to the fact that most people are sensible enough to buy in at lower levels until they fing the game they are comfortable at. Brian McFadden is of course an exception to this.


    So in conclusion... It's like asking who is more skilful the Omaha player or the hold 'em player? And the answer is the seven card stud player :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,854 ✭✭✭zuutroy


    Fatboydim wrote:
    Brian McFadden is of course an exception to this.

    Is he a donk?...I thought I read some super tabloid headline that said he was up 100 buy ins in a session :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭Fatboydim


    zuutroy wrote:
    Is he a donk?...I thought I read some super tabloid headline that said he was up 100 buy ins in a session :rolleyes:

    I was in the SE the night he was throwing money away. Playing Omaha without realising that you could only use two of your hole cards to make a hand. We were all queuing up to get in the game and it wasn't because we were Westlife fans. LOL Mcfadaments.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,854 ✭✭✭zuutroy


    He was playing Omaha?...Wow...suppose he was trying to be post modern!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gholimoli


    I have seen a lot of posters on different forums (fora?) say that they win at cash then try tourneys and lose, or win at tourneys and then lose at cash.

    My take on this is that Cash games are about the fundamentals since they are relatively unchanging (low relative blinds)
    a) Tells : you will gather more indepth tells on players over a period of time. This is because you are mostly playing against the same people week in / week out.

    b) Play more post-flop : Because of the low blinds relative to your stack, and the option to reload - you should not be forced to go all-in with marginal hands too often.

    c) Pot odds are more relevant : Because you play more post-flop, you will be calculating pot odds more often. Because you can reload and keep going, you should always be making +EV decisions - they will pay off in the long run. Playing cards like suited connectors should pay off since the amount you lose when you do not hit will be offset by the time you win.

    d) Cash games require a "long run" thinking. You do not get disappointed when a fish sucks out on you, because this means that he will make the same mistake again and you will eventually get all his chips.

    e) Patience is the key to cash games. Cash games do not have the "adrenaline rush" of tournaments, and some people may find it a 'grind' to play this way.

    Tourneys are about reacting to situations in the tourney. To do this you need to use more advanced strategies.
    A) Tells : You need to pick up tells on people much quicker than in a cash game. You may not have played with an opponent before. You will get much less opportunity to use any tells you pick up, as people get moved / knocked out. However, the one time that you do use the tell to your advantage could mean you winning the tournament.

    B) Play tends to be more pre-flop and flop : Especially towards the end of the tourney with higher relative blinds.

    C) Pot odds are still relevant, but since you do not play as much post-flop, there are fewer situations where they are relevant. Other tournament related factors may come into play (Survival, Prize money differences, etc.)

    D) Short term thinking since the tournament is over in a finite time. Survival becomes a factor.

    E) Aggression helps win tournaments. You can take advantage of Tournament Life Syndrome and scare people out of pots

    Tournament players need to adjust very quickly to the changing circumstances of the tournament - rising blinds, new players arriving at the table, how the table dynamics change when someone moves or is knocked out. Tournament players need to add more plays such as blind stealing to their arsenal in order to adjust and survive (not to say you do not do this in cash games as well it is just not as relevant and you could do well in cash games without ever stealing blinds).

    In conclusion, I feel that playing cash games will not give you the "buzz" you might get from winning a tournament, but will mean that you are practiced in the fundamentals and post-flop play. This will serve you well in the early stages of a tournament and in deep-stacked tournaments. However, you will have to learn to adjust to new situations and people much quicker, and you will need to be more aggressive if you want to switch to tournaments.

    In moving from tourney to cash games you will need to be more patient. Your skills in picking up tells quickly will be helpful, but beware people will have longer to study your play and may eventually pick up tells on you. You will have to be more selective in picking your spots for making moves and being aggressive. Some of your moves may not work, or will only get you small pots. Be prepared to play more post-flop and make more pot odds calculations.

    NB : This is not a definitive, or even accurate synopsis. This is just my initial ideas on the differences between Cash and Tourney play.
    this is so wrong,so bad,so untrue and so funny all at the same time.

    lol donkaments.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭Van Dice


    Fatboydim wrote:
    It's been fun watching this argument rage. Even though that was never the intention of the op. But since it has raged the answer is actually very simple.

    There are some very good players who prefer to play tournaments to cash.
    There are some very god players who prefer to play cash over tournaments.

    Any player who shows a preference is likely to excel at their prefered game.

    Players range from very poor to excellent across both disciplines. However there will inevitably be more donkeys playing tournaments as this is entry level to the game. And tournaments have satellites which means that some very poor players can get to play big events.

    Generally in cash games the higher buy in levels have less donkeys, due to the fact that most people are sensible enough to buy in at lower levels until they fing the game they are comfortable at. Brian McFadden is of course an exception to this.


    So in conclusion... It's like asking who is more skilful the Omaha player or the hold 'em player? And the answer is the seven card stud player :D

    QFT


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭luckylucky


    Roundtower wrote:
    well what do you want when you said a "cash regular"? Did you really think you would get action from mrflash or dvdfan?
    nicnicnic wrote:
    lol

    Was this funny!?
    Maybe I'm missing the joke but I thought it looked condescending towards 2 of our regular posters.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    well to spell it out for you I think I would have an edge against Nicky there but the two regular posters I mentioned wouldn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭luckylucky


    RoundTower wrote:
    well to spell it out for you I think I would have an edge against Nicky there but the two regular posters I mentioned wouldn't.

    Eh really, is that what you meant. Jeez thanks for spelling it out for me. :rolleyes:

    To spell it out for you I thought it was unneccessary and in bad taste.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭Hitman Actual


    2 Things, first of all it doesnt need to be me representing cash game player In fact I think I would be a bad choice as Ive played a lot of tournaments. I reckon Valor might be a good choice, although it would of been better before the WSOP.

    From the tounament-to-cash side, someone like ollyk1 or 5starpool would be good candidates as well, and I think I fit the bill too. Valor is the obvious choice from a cash-to-tournament perspective, but I doubt it's really profitable for him bother with tournaments as opposed to cash. Maybe a casual experiment over, say, a year would be better.

    Ste05 is another good candidate from the cash-to-tournament side, I think.

    But a couple of things: playing outside your bankroll is a totally different challenge to the argument in this thread. And I also think that all the players mentioned will be profitable anyway. So is the point of the challenge to prove which 'discipline' is easier to adapt to?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    luckylucky wrote:
    Was this funny!?
    Maybe I'm missing the joke but I thought it looked condescending towards 2 of our regular posters.

    well i didn't mean the lol to come across as condescending Dvd puts a lot of work into his posts and clearly into his game so I apologies if thats how it came accross. flash is my No1 golf tipster so I didnt intend dissing him either


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    RoundTower wrote:
    well to spell it out for you I think I would have an edge against Nicky .

    I would agree with this statement for two disciplines PLO and growing hair


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭phantom_lord


    nicnicnic wrote:
    flash is my No1 golf tipster so I didnt intend dissing him either
    he's actually a real person???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭Goodluck2me


    nicnicnic wrote:
    I would agree with this statement for two disciplines PLO and growing hair
    id back you against him in PLO, sure he couldnt even beat me, ive won EVERY PLO game against him. ill put up 2K for you nicky ok?


    ACE2007 should be in the cash-> tournaments one too. as should Trippie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,798 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    I agree DVD definitely makes an effort to improve and is a real trier.

    I don't see what the fuss is about anyway. There's no shame in being worse at poker than Nicky. After all, someone has to be.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 218 ✭✭CelticPhantom


    Gholimoli wrote:
    this is so wrong,so bad,so untrue and so funny all at the same time.

    lol donkaments.
    Hi Gholi,

    Would you care to expand on why you think so? I am not being defensive, I genuinely would like to get a handle on the differences and how you should change your approach to move between playing Cash versus Tournaments.

    I have gotten some good, insightful feedback from others, which is allowing me to refine how I view Cash games and Tournaments.

    I still feel that situations tend to change more in Tournaments than in most Cash games. Therefore, skills required to deal with these changing situations are more useful in Tournaments. Whereas there is more play on the Turn and River in Cash games, and so skills required for playing later streets is more useful in Cash games.

    TIA for your input to helping me understand.


Advertisement