Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Jury finds O'Reilly guilty of murder

«1345678

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭MooseJam


    justice prevails


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 556 ✭✭✭baztard


    Good to hear.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Fvcking murdering ba$tard.

    Brilliant news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,566 ✭✭✭GrumPy


    ppffft. They took their time?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,408 ✭✭✭Huggles


    Great news, im so happy for the family.

    What a bastard he was, normal men just leave there wife not bludgeon her to death.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,337 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Mobile phone got him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭old boy


    well what you give out comes back, jury take a bow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Creamy Goodness


    ppffft. They took their time?
    i heard the table from the hotel room got stuck whilst being lowered out the window.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    Great, now we don't have to hear about it morning, noon and night.
    All due respect to the family of the bereaved but I don't see why this case attracted attention far and above what is given to many murder cases tried in the State.
    The media circus surrounding it has been relentless, RTE news have had it as their headline on almost every bulletin for the past fortnight, tabloids have been making radio ads citing the trial as their headline; I think the only thing that rivalled it for attention this week was Harry &*^%in' Potter...
    How many other murder cases have been going on around the country at the same time? How much coverage did you hear of them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭wyndham


    His colleague should be inside with him for providing a false alibi, even though he retracted it somewhat on the stand.
    Given the extent of communication between O'Reilly and his bit on the side on the day of the murder, it surprises me that no conspiracy charge was forthcoming.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,967 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    Justice was served.

    Conviction for murder in Ireland a mandatory sentance for jail for life but how long is a life sentance?

    Does life mean life or will he be out in maybe ten years for good behaviour?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,834 ✭✭✭Sonnenblumen


    Boggles wrote:
    Mobile phone got him.

    Why do murderers insist on using their own phones, it is as stupid as leaving finger prints at the scene!

    Phone proved he was telling lies, but otherwise all other 'evidence' is circumstantial. IMO a brave but risky jury outcome, and I hope it is the truth and we'll not discover a miscarriage of justice .........Perhaps he might one day admit the crime and our conscience can be spared.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Wertz wrote:
    Great, now we don't have to hear about it morning, noon and night.
    All due respect to the family of the bereaved but I don't see why this case attracted attention far and above what is given to many murder cases tried in the State.
    The media circus surrounding it has been relentless, RTE news have had it as their headline on almost every bulletin for the past fortnight, tabloids have been making radio ads citing the trial as their headline; I think the only thing that rivalled it for attention this week was Harry &*^%in' Potter...
    How many other murder cases have been going on around the country at the same time? How much coverage did you hear of them?


    Shaddup, you were the same in the Maddy thread too. If you don't like the news, don't watch it :D

    As for me, I'm looking forward to hearing about the finer points of the trial. And I bet there's a book or two in the offing too!.

    What an absolute bollix (O'Reilly, not you Wertz.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Why do murderers insist on using their own phones, it is as stupid as leaving finger prints at the scene!

    Phone proved he was telling lies, but otherwise all other 'evidence' is circumstantial. IMO a brave but risky jury outcome, and I hope it is the truth and we'll not discover a miscarriage of justice .........Perhaps he might one day admit the crime and our conscience can be spared.


    "OUR" concience?.. I don't think so buddy. I think the vast majority of the population will celebrate this verdict with a perfectly clear concience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,834 ✭✭✭Sonnenblumen


    Wertz wrote:
    Great, now we don't have to hear about it morning, noon and night.
    All due respect to the family of the bereaved but I don't see why this case attracted attention far and above what is given to many murder cases tried in the State.
    The media circus surrounding it has been relentless, RTE news have had it as their headline on almost every bulletin for the past fortnight, tabloids have been making radio ads citing the trial as their headline; I think the only thing that rivalled it for attention this week was Harry &*^%in' Potter...
    How many other murder cases have been going on around the country at the same time? How much coverage did you hear of them?

    Perhaps if you paid more attention you might realise why this particular trial received so much media attention. But before you ask, don't bother I've no interest to explain it to you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭aequinoctium


    he was quite the idiot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Duiske


    Great news. Have to say, the Gardai did an excellent job on this case. And well done to Vilicom for the call trace work. Brilliant stuff !!.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 91 ✭✭Tigrrrr


    He was indeed an idiot, but for what it's worth, circumstantial evidence was his stupidity. Apparently juries can convict on it now. It would have been better for justice if he was implicated directly on clear evidence as opposed to popular concencus and the evidence that was presented.

    Nevertheless, obviously that means nothing to the family and friends of Rachel O'Reilly. I wouldn't put any money on the conviction standing up in the event of an appeal though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Wertz wrote:
    Great, now we don't have to hear about it morning, noon and night.
    All due respect to the family of the bereaved but I don't see why this case attracted attention far and above what is given to many murder cases tried in the State.
    The media circus surrounding it has been relentless, RTE news have had it as their headline on almost every bulletin for the past fortnight, tabloids have been making radio ads citing the trial as their headline; I think the only thing that rivalled it for attention this week was Harry &*^%in' Potter...
    How many other murder cases have been going on around the country at the same time? How much coverage did you hear of them?

    The Brendan Smith and Malcolm McArthur cases in their day also gave us wall to wall coverage. It is the nature of cases like this.

    The time of year had some influence on it plus the 24 hour news world we live in. But most importantly was the question of the outcome and how he appeared to have gone about the whole thing and whether it could be made stick. Better than TV for many people; echoes of the OJ case. Remember this is not the first attempt to get the man to court.

    But one can ignore headlines, TV and radio ads, not read newspaper stories and turn off TVs.

    As for the verdict I believe it's the right one all things taken into account.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,469 ✭✭✭Pythia


    Glad to hear it.
    I hope he goes away for a long long time for what he did.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    Did RTE bring any special coverage of it? TV3 brought a news report just after 7.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭timmywex


    good to hear, just saw this on breaking news when it was put up, fair juice to all the news and media for getting the result out so fast, it was up 2 minutes after the judgement was given!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    Perhaps if you paid more attention you might realise why this particular trial received so much media attention. But before you ask, don't bother I've no interest to explain it to you.


    Don't flatter yourself, I'm not naieve enough not to see why this trial holds all the classic Hollywood ingredients for it to become a media feeding frenzy....it's just this type of sensationalism pisses me off.
    It pisses me off because it turns me into an indifferent spectator on what is an important event to the victim, the perpetrator and their respective family and friends. It's really no-one else's business what goes on in the court (yes, yes I know it's in the public domain, trialed by your peers, etc), if it bothers you that much to know then by all means find out....but this forcefeeding from all sides of the Irish print/TV/radio news at the expense of reportage of other trials going on at present is wearing.
    The public shouldn't be bombarded with every minute detail every hour of the day for almost 3 weeks....and like I said, where was the coverage of any other ongoing murder trial(s) in the country?

    Mairt: maddy thread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,834 ✭✭✭Sonnenblumen


    Wertz wrote:
    Don't flatter yourself, I'm not naieve enough not to see why this trial holds all the classic Hollywood ingredients for it to become a media feeding frenzy....it's just this type of sensationalism pisses me off.
    It pisses me off because it turns me into an indifferent spectator on what is an important event to the victim, the perpetrator and their respective family and friends. It's really no-one else's business what goes on in the court (yes, yes I know it's in the public domain, trialed by your peers, etc), if it bothers you that much to know then by all means find out....but this forcefeeding from all sides of the Irish print/TV/radio news at the expense of reportage of other trials going on at present is wearing.
    The public shouldn't be bombarded with every minute detail every hour of the day for almost 3 weeks....and like I said, where was the coverage of any other ongoing murder trial(s) in the country?

    Mairt: maddy thread?

    Please keep digging and soon we'll not see you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Please keep it on topic.
    Take your flirting to PM.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    WTF? How is that flirting and how am I OT?

    [edit] Ah wait, I see... "justice is served", "I knew he did it", "throw away the key" etc.
    Now am I on topic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Hmmm. I too often wondered why this, of all cases, attracted such massive attention. I suppose his cockiness throughout. Possibly his Late Late appearance shortly after the murder. He was so calm - not shocked calm, but completely blasé.
    Glad he went down, but every shred of evidence was circumstantial - I wonder will this set a precedent for future cases. I mean, it was pretty darn obvious that O'Reilly did it, but what about other cases riding on purely circumstantial evidence? An appeal, or several, is on the cards, no doubt.
    And I wonder will there be some sort of support from men's groups on the strength of his emails criticising his wife and her alleged treatment of their sons? As well as his concern about custody once they broke up? I wonder if John Waters, Roger Eldridge et al will voice their concern - not in support for a convicted murderer, but maybe making a "look what men can be driven to"-type argument. I remember similar points were made the time that guy in Cork abducted his little girl and went into hiding for about 18 months, only to shoot her and himself when the net closed in.

    Wertz: you didn't post a comment on the 43-page Maddy thread? Good on you - you obviously don't waste as much time on Boards as some of us do!! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,506 ✭✭✭muletide


    Great news - murdering scumbag. What a cowardly Baxtard beating his wife with a dumbbell. Hope he gets hell in prison


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Tha Gopher


    I recall an article from the time describing the wife as, actual words I cant recall, but in recollection a bit, i dunno, tough in regards to certain areas., someone who, as they say, didnt tolerate fools kindly. Combined with the mother in laws complaint to the social, I dunno, yes, i believe he killed her, but i think to completely plead not guilty despite the evidance is insane. Shouldve went for manslaughter. I dunno, I think i need to hear all sides before deciding.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Wertz wrote:
    WTF? How is that flirting and how am I OT?

    [edit] Ah wait, I see... "justice is served", "I knew he did it", "throw away the key" etc.
    Now am I on topic?
    The flirting comment was sarcasm.
    The OT comment was directed at Sonnenblumen.


Advertisement
Advertisement