Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

equal rights, equal pay - not fair?

  • 07-03-2007 03:44PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,946 ✭✭✭


    Right, in work today i witnessed something that made me angry towards the whole equal rights payment lark between men and women. I wont go into the details of it, ill just give the facts, and you can decide if its fair or not.

    I do deliveries which compose of 3 different products. Product A, B and C. Im not sure on the exact weights of the product, so i will put in random weights for arguements sake. My day requires me to load in the morning at 6am and work till the jobs done. I work to 6/7pm most days. Today is an exception because i worked late last night.

    Product A weighs 5kg
    Product B weighs 10kg
    Product C weighs 20kg

    Apparently, its illegal for women to lift over 15kg in the work place. Insurance wont cover it either.

    5% of our market takes product A
    10% of our market takes product B
    85% of our market takes product C

    In my work we work in pairs because of the work load. If i was to work with a woman, i would have to lift all 3 products, she would only have to lift 2. The vast majority of our stops would take product C in bulk. How is it fair that she takes equal pay for the days work, when she only has to work for 2 out of 10 stops and i have to work for 10/10 stops, and do the ones she doesnt have to on my own, which mind you is very tiring and hard.

    I think its terrible. I totally support female rights and equal pay in an enviroment that enables equal work loads, but in a situation like mine i think that its totally unfair, and there is no way a woman should be entitled to equal pay for the work done.

    What do you think?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭Crucifix


    It does seem odd that the insurance company can discriminate and your workplace can't (I assume anyway).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Thomas_S_Hunterson


    You could get on to your union or fellow employees and try to negotiate a piece rate,so that all employees are paid based on the amount of work done,
    (ie. based on the number of products delivered and the weight of the products)

    You're asolutely right however, it is completely unfair. The law itself is demoralizing to women and blatantly sexist and it results in this ridiculous situation which is unfair to both sexes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 129 ✭✭Jocksy


    Take it easy.
    Men and women aren't equal and everybody knows that. Positive/negative discrimination occurs for both sexes and long may it continue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,800 ✭✭✭county


    red_ice wrote:
    Right, in work today i witnessed something that made me angry towards the whole equal rights payment lark between men and women. I wont go into the details of it, ill just give the facts, and you can decide if its fair or not.

    I do deliveries which compose of 3 different products. Product A, B and C. Im not sure on the exact weights of the product, so i will put in random weights for arguements sake. My day requires me to load in the morning at 6am and work till the jobs done. I work to 6/7pm most days. Today is an exception because i worked late last night.

    Product A weighs 5kg
    Product B weighs 10kg
    Product C weighs 20kg

    Apparently, its illegal for women to lift over 15kg in the work place. Insurance wont cover it either.

    5% of our market takes product A
    10% of our market takes product B
    85% of our market takes product C

    In my work we work in pairs because of the work load. If i was to work with a woman, i would have to lift all 3 products, she would only have to lift 2. The vast majority of our stops would take product C in bulk. How is it fair that she takes equal pay for the days work, when she only has to work for 2 out of 10 stops and i have to work for 10/10 stops, and do the ones she doesnt have to on my own, which mind you is very tiring and hard.

    I think its terrible. I totally support female rights and equal pay in an enviroment that enables equal work loads, but in a situation like mine i think that its totally unfair, and there is no way a woman should be entitled to equal pay for the work done.

    What do you think?


    never heard of this before,but why would i,still needs clarification though,but if it is true take it up with your boss


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭littlebitdull


    Its unfair. I presume you are both being paid x amount for the full days work. In this case it can hardly be called equal pay for equal work when one person is doing the bulk of the work.

    Worth checking it out further.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ^ maybe thats just in their employment-liabilty policy?

    I say have her do the driving and lift everything else.

    And if you work in twos: she is only lifting 10kgs of prduct C ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,069 ✭✭✭Gaspode


    The rule was brought in to protect women's health, as dspite whatever we say about equality, women are (on average) smaller and physically not as strong as their male colleagues. Therefore, lifting weights out of their 'range' could lead to long term health problems.

    Like many such rules, it was a crude attempt to provide protection to one group, but inadvertently caused dicrimination towards another.

    I agree that you should approach your union and management and try to work something out. Make sure the female colleagues are with you first though - if you're not united on this then management are unlikely to do anything about it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 Señor Butts


    ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,602 ✭✭✭Saint_Mel


    deswalsh wrote:
    Make sure the female colleagues are with you first though - if you're not united on this then management are unlikely to do anything about it.

    I cant see the female workers going for this if it means their wages will be less


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Thomas_S_Hunterson


    Saint_Mel wrote:
    I cant see the female workers going for this if it means their wages will be less
    Sadly that is the hipocrisy of the whole situation


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    deswalsh wrote:
    The rule was brought in to protect women's health, as dspite whatever we say about equality, women are (on average) smaller and physically not as strong as their male colleagues. Therefore, lifting weights out of their 'range' could lead to long term health problems.

    Like many such rules, it was a crude attempt to provide protection to one group, but inadvertently caused dicrimination towards another.

    I agree that you should approach your union and management and try to work something out. Make sure the female colleagues are with you first though - if you're not united on this then management are unlikely to do anything about it.

    what about all those stories we've heard of Mothers lifting up whole cars to protect their children, etc?

    I say we just scare the life out of all of them; then they'll work.....:cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Judt


    Basically we've overshot the mark on equality legislation: We take to to mean that everything should be divvied up 50/50, but then introduce special clauses that screw things up. Essentially things should be divvied up according to ability, but with no artificial barriers in place to bar women from taking a job. Eg in this situation the workload and money should be divvied up accordingly, but women should not be barred from doing the job just because they're women. If they can only lift up to 15kg then only put them on the jobs at <15kg. Discriminating against men is still discrimination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 25,006 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    TBH, why would a woman be hired in the job if she's legally not qualified to do it?

    A woman could hardly claim she was being discriminated against in this particular job if a more suitable candidate (i.e. a man capable of lifting all three products) got the job ahead of her.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭CiaranC


    But this surely this unfairness would be offset by the fact that nobody in their right mind would hire someone for a job that they obviously are unable to do?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Is it a case of Nepotism??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Thomas_S_Hunterson


    Overheal wrote:
    Is it a case of Nepotism??
    I think you might need a dictionary there!;)

    I can't see how nepotism is relevant


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I fully believe in equal pay for equal work.

    It's tough to justify it on a microscopic scale, like you're doing. If you have an issue with the fact that you're doing more than your fair share of the work in a partnership, then it's your resposibility to highlight this with your manager.

    If you just say nothing, then it's your own fault that you're doing all of the work.

    If company policy is that you lift all the heavy items, but you both share the smaller items, then you have a blatant case of wage discrimination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,380 ✭✭✭pred racer


    There is no legal limit to what anyone can lift, as anyone who has done the safe-pass or other safety/ergonomics classes will know. (there used to be and it was something stupid like >30lbs was a 2 person lift)now the health and safety guidelines state that you should not lift anything heavier than you feel comfortable lifting, and if memory serves there is no distinction made between men and women.(memory doesnt always serve:p ) except the understanding that lighter and smaller people will not feel comfortable lifting loads as heavy as a bigger, heavier person.

    Give the HSA a call they will tell you.

    can your insurance company enforce other health and safety limits on you if you have complied with the statutory ones?

    BTW Im all for equal work equal pay and I dont agree with positive discrimination at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭dame


    deswalsh wrote:
    The rule was brought in to protect women's health, as dspite whatever we say about equality, women are (on average) smaller and physically not as strong as their male colleagues. Therefore, lifting weights out of their 'range' could lead to long term health problems.

    Sssh, don't let the Fitness Forum hear that! ;)

    I agree with Sleepy, she shouldn't have been hired for that particular job if it was known in advance that she'd have to lift weights she legally/for insurance reasons wouldn't be allowed to.

    OP, if you're supposed to be working in pairs then are you lifting more (over the course of the day), than you're insured to lift? Discuss it with management. Maybe they can reassign her to a different role within the company and get you a male partner to share the workload properly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    I wonder what your female colleague was thinking when you were doing most of the work. Surely she must have seen something wrong with it too. Keep us posted on the issue...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ^ Yeah keep me informed too: but dont post me on the issue...I have places to be and I get horror flashbacks of the movie tron: I can't be posted on a thread all day/night.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 944 ✭✭✭Captain Trips


    red_ice wrote:
    Right, in work today i witnessed something that made me angry towards the whole equal rights payment lark between men and women. I wont go into the details of it, ill just give the facts, and you can decide if its fair or not.


    I think a similar situation is the wimbeldon thing, where women will get paid the same for only three sets, etc., and the women's final being less popular.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,649 ✭✭✭Catari Jaguar


    Is she getting paid the same amount? In general women get paid I think about 16% less than men. Which is huuuge! So maybe in this one instance you feel it's unfair. In the vast majority of other jobs men are being treated much much better. Welcome to how it feels to be treated unfairly in the workplace. Consider your self lucky you're not in the majority of people who wear a bra.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    Lil Kitten wrote:
    Is she getting paid the same amount? In general women get paid I think about 16% less than men. Which is huuuge! So maybe in this one instance you feel it's unfair. In the vast majority of other jobs men are being treated much much better. Welcome to how it feels to be treated unfairly in the workplace. Consider your self lucky you're not in the majority of people who wear a bra.
    Come on lil' kitten, don't be quoting tabloid figures. All those surveys saying that men are paid more forget a few simple facts:

    1. Although there is now equality, this didn't always exist. As a result, there are still a lot of older women in the workplace who are at a lower level than men in their age group (ie. low/middle management while the men are in senior management). This has nothing to do with current culture or work practices. This is more to do with the fact that they may have been disadvantaged earlier in their careers.

    2. Women are more likely to take career breaks or work part time while pregnant or starting their families. They are not being forced to, it is their own choice. You might argue about men looking after the infants while the mother returns to work etc, but most (not all) women prefer to be at home with their young children than stuck in an office (maternal instincts and what not).

    3. 20-30 years ago would have seen more males than females studying accountancy, sciences, IT engineering etc (i.e. most of the high paying careers). Although these college courses are more balanced now, it will take another 20-30 years before these graduates make their way up the career ladder.

    I have never seen a woman discriminated against in the workplace or in college. I cannot (unfortunately) say the same about men.

    Feminism is not about equality. It is about discriminating in favour of women. red_ice's story is the perfect example of feminists getting what they want. If anyone was to enforce equality here (pay the man more for doing work or forcing the woman to do the same work for the same wage), they would get beaten to death with handbags;)

    Men and women are not supposed to be equal! They are different (both have their pros and cons). Got a problem with that? Blame Mother Nature (See what happens when you let a women rule the world;))

    red_ice, you need to talk to your union or management (if approachable) and insist on equal treatment. If the company insists that women should not lift more than 15kg, then your union should insist that men are not to lift more than 15kg. This will hopefully force your company to break Product C in half (if possible - can it be transported in smaller loads?), or pay employees by the amount of work they actually do (as mentioned above, expect a handbag in the face if this happens though!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,946 ✭✭✭red_ice


    I dont work with a woman, a situation came up at a place i was delivering to which was being run by a bunch of bitchy women. Im only insured to take product C into area A of the place i deliver to. The women in the store were ordering me to take the product to an area which involved me going up 2 sets of 30 steps (i counted). I never got a please or anything, i was being told. I told them im not insured, and they said "we are not allowed by law to take them up the steps, so do it or i will talk to your boss and have you fired". So i called their bluff. I told them to call my boss.

    I get this crap every time i do these deliveries, and the funny thing is its 80% of the time its women who give me sh1t. Im a pleasant bloke, a smile with hello/please/thank you will go along way (regardless of gender), and ill help them out. These people tried to blackmale me as such into doing their job, which by law they are not allowed to do. My boss got on the phone to me, and didnt give out, he was very level headed and insisited i leave the product where it is. An hour later the owner of the place i delivered to called up my boss, gave him stick and threatened him - litterally. Anyways, he was saying i was to blame yaddah yaddah...

    When i got back to the warehouse we got talking about the situation and the boss said about the equal rights thing, and that if he gets a female applicant he sadly has to try avoid taking her on due to the workload and so on for the original points made. Everyone who works in this place gets a nice wage and is treated equal.

    What gets me ryaled up is the fact that im getting told to do stuff outside my place of work by bitchy polish women who wont do their job, and expect equal pay to that of their male counterparts in the work place to when it comes down to it, do the majority of the work.

    The situation i witnessed was to the customer. 3 people working in the same place, 1 of which is a bloke had to lift 50 of product C up the stairs on his own, and more than likely did product A and B.

    Its a disgrace.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,909 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Sleepy wrote:
    TBH, why would a woman be hired in the job if she's legally not qualified to do it?

    A woman could hardly claim she was being discriminated against in this particular job if a more suitable candidate (i.e. a man capable of lifting all three products) got the job ahead of her.

    Indeed. I used to be shop steward for the main union in a large Irish company. There was a case where a job earning slightly more money became available and a woman asked to apply. She was told that the job required a high degree of heavy lifting and as such they would only be taking applications from men. She tried to take a case of dicrimination but I had to explain that she hadn't a leg to stand on.

    Companies are allowed to specify men or women only in certain situations and it isn't discrimination. Women can be disqualified from jobs requiring heavy lifting and men can be disqualified for jobs such as sensitive work in women's shelters.

    OP are there actually any women doing your job?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,563 ✭✭✭connundrum


    Life isn't fair. You see it every day.

    If there's actually something you can do about it, then do it. If not then be quiet.

    I've had it up to my tits with people moaning about certain situations, having given zero effort to changing said situations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,946 ✭✭✭red_ice


    connundrum wrote:
    Life isn't fair. You see it every day.

    If there's actually something you can do about it, then do it. If not then be quiet.

    I've had it up to my tits with people moaning about certain situations, having given zero effort to changing said situations.

    er, im not arsed about the situation, my job is my job. I wouldnt do it if i didnt want to. I was making the point about women getting equal pay for something they dont deserve. So you and your tits and go lick out a tramp :]


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    Lil Kitten wrote:
    In the vast majority of other jobs men are being treated much much better.

    Have you any bloody idea what you're talking about???
    There are LOTS of jobs that almost no men work in....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,025 ✭✭✭slipss


    Lil Kitten wrote:
    Is she getting paid the same amount? In general women get paid I think about 16% less than men. Which is huuuge! So maybe in this one instance you feel it's unfair. In the vast majority of other jobs men are being treated much much better. Welcome to how it feels to be treated unfairly in the workplace. Consider your self lucky you're not in the majority of people who wear a bra.

    lol I heard that aswell today, that women in Ireland get paid 14 or 16% less than men. I heard it on womens day last year aswell. There was some feminist on a radio station (i think 103.8FM) and she was giving out about the report that had come out stating that women are paid 14% less than men, I can't remember what it went like exactly but it was something along the lines of:

    Feminist:.......and it is a total disgrace that in this day and age women are still getting paid 14% less than men. This report shows how seriously lacking this country still is, as far as discrimination against women in the work place goes.

    Radio DJ: Well I don't think thats really fair, did you real the whole report?

    Feminist: Yes of course I read it all.

    Radio DJ: Well I have the report up on the computer infront of me here, and in the paragraph imediately after the one in which it states women earn 14% less than men, it goes on to say that on average men work 10% to 20% more hours than women per year. So does that not seem to suggest that things are perfectly fair?

    Feminist: Ehm well I'm not sure I recal reading that part of the report, but ehm well...

    Radio DJ: OK well I'm afraid, we're out of time, we'll have to leave it there, thanks very much for speaking to us here today. Next the News and weather.


Advertisement
Advertisement