Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Access To Pornography Linked To Rise In Rape?

13»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,698 ✭✭✭InFront


    The time where society is most civilised there is the highest 'penetration' of porn. I'm not really seeing a link. And please don't refer to the 'good old days' as they were anything but.

    Regarding the study, all would indicate to me that some people have addictive personality. I wouldn't attach any merit to it unless the drug addiction started after the pornography addiction.

    (I swear I'm not trying to pick on you today!)

    Yes you are, you wish to confuse me into becoming some athiestic pornographer.

    But really, it depends on how you measure civilised. In terms of science and technology, we are still advancing in leaps and bounds, the future looks terrific. But without wishing to put on any rose tinted glasses, and not personally having lived through a time where I can recall a different ireland, it is wrong, in my opinion, to say that society has become more civilised. We have simply become civilised in different ways - we are moving laterally instead of forwards.
    This is the 'Americanisation' of global cultures.
    Instead of closed, Catholic Ireland with repressed young people, we have closed, American Ireland with repressed young people. Instead of slaves to traditional Catholic social pressures there are slaves to modern American image pressures. "You must behave like x" has evolved, and become "you must behave like y". Individuality is greater, but community is lesser. There comes with the cancelling out of old factors an entirely new equation (equilibrium). The new social equilibrium, in my opinion, is not an advanced one, but a different one.

    If you encounter societies in which publicly available (or imposed) pornography is absent, we see a different social equilibrium. Frequently, the respect that there is for sex and the institution of family are greater, but the regimes that tend to foster these great attitudes have their downsides too. That is well documented.

    Hopefully it is not a case of either/ or. 1950's Ireland was not all bad, and American culture is not completely bad, there can be compromises. I would like to see an Ireland with the social and personal freedoms, and economic fame that we currently enjoy, but with the morality, community, responsibility and self-control that it has lost. That sounds a bit wishy washy I admit, and I am afraid that the old fiend, P: Probability, is again set against such a thing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 126 ✭✭haunted-room


    Gautama wrote:
    I'm not surprised by this. Banging a prostitute is essentially rape. If the girl/guy had a choice between having sex for €50, or no sex for €50, she/he would chose the latter.

    I think you need to look up the definition of rape:rolleyes: . Banging a prostitute high class or lower class is not rape

    I get paid every week from work, if I had the choice to get paid without working Id take it. Dosnt mean im being forced to work against my will


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Gautama


    Banging a prostitute high class or lower class is not rape

    You've got a very naive view on this topic. It may not be rape per se, but prostitution is essentially rape. You don't really think the guy/girl wants the intercourse?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 126 ✭✭haunted-room


    Gautama wrote:
    You've got a very naive view on this topic. It may not be rape per se, but prostitution is essentially rape. You don't really think the guy/girl wants the intercourse?

    No, I know they dont want it, but its still worlds apart from rape
    Also, having seen and read interviews with some high class escorts, although for them its not about the sex obviously, but they have said they are happy doing the job they do. Most people wont believe that becuase of the view society has on the sex trade


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,240 ✭✭✭✭Sangre


    InFront wrote:
    Yes you are, you wish to confuse me into becoming some athiestic pornographer.

    But really, it depends on how you measure civilised. In terms of science and technology, we are still advancing in leaps and bounds, the future looks terrific. But without wishing to put on any rose tinted glasses, and not personally having lived through a time where I can recall a different Ireland, it is wrong, in my opinion, to say that society has become more civilised. We have simply become civilised in different ways - we are moving laterally instead of forwards.

    I think it quite easy to measure, if it wasn't how are we able to condemn actions as good or bad? Anyway, I'll start; equality to genders, races, religion, creeds and sexuality. Removal of any discrimination of these and the promotion of women outside the workplace. Freedom of religion and religious practice. The right to life ( removal of death penalty).

    These changes in Ireland are only a few decades old, almost non-existent in the 1950s repressed Ireland you have referred to. Do you disagree these are the makings of a civilised society? Or are they unmeasurable?

    Why not go further back in time where the possession of pornography was highly illegal and immoral e.g. 19th century. A time of slavery, corruption, huge murder rates (much higher than now), blatant inequality and repression.

    Obviously pornography didn't change these but it certainly does not make a society less civilised. Its growing popularity hasn't seemed to affect Ireland's advancement.

    And before some trots out the 'family/inclusion' excuse; for once there is actually child protection services, adoption, family counselling etc. Now people with problems can go get help rather than trapping them in the 'nuclear family' or better yet kicking pregnant girls out of the home.

    The 'institution of family' invariably means woman subservient to men, tied to the kitchen place. It also holds no place for the non-heterosexual. I'd would much prefer a nation of individuals rather than groups of 'communities' forcing their morals and standards onto everyone else who resides with them


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,698 ✭✭✭InFront


    But really, it depends on how you measure civilised. In terms of science and technology, we are still advancing in leaps and bounds, the future looks terrific. But without wishing to put on any rose tinted glasses, and not personally having lived through a time where I can recall a different Ireland, it is wrong, in my opinion, to say that society has become more civilised. We have simply become civilised in different ways - we are moving laterally instead of forwards.
    Sangre wrote:
    I think it quite easy to measure, if it wasn't how are we able to condemn actions as good or bad? Anyway, I'll start; equality to genders, races, religion, creeds and sexuality. Removal of any discrimination of these and the promotion of women outside the workplace. Freedom of religion and religious practice. The right to life ( removal of death penalty).

    If I throw in something random or out of place here I may be getting mixed up between the 2 threads, and it is late...

    I wouldn't measure a civilised society exactly as you would, it varies. At the very least you need to have in place a social structure that respects dignity. The dignity of the community, and of the family, and of the individual. While this extends from the utopian ideal of eliminating murder, paedophilia, street violence and various other 'bad stuff', it basically pivots around the central point of self control and self-discipline: the assumption of responsibility.

    The society that we have in Ireland today is not one that exercises self control nor self dicipline, and as such, I would say is uncivilised. Responsibility is some diffuse thing - gangland crime, road deaths, child abuse - the belligerents are a law unto themselves.
    Dignity of the individual, his family, and his community are out the window.

    Pornography is just one example of this sheer abandon. We see semi naked women all around us, we are smothered with the sale of sex as a marketing tool, in this way sex becomes a thing that can be acquired. You can control it with money and material. I find attitudes towards sex in Ireland very depressing to be honest. To me, it represents one of the ultimate forms of loss of independence, discipline and conscionable actions. There is no desire to rectify this in Irish society, absolutely zero.
    These changes in Ireland are only a few decades old, almost non-existent in the 1950s repressed Ireland you have referred to. Do you disagree these are the makings of a civilised society? Or are they unmeasurable?

    I would take issue with your suggestion that these things are the mark of a civilised society. Maybe they are, I don't know what route Irish people would like to see be taken on the definition of the family, for example, I think those particular isues are all very fuzzy, I can't say I have personally made up my mind on some of them. The point is simply that there is a much more basic shortcoming in our society that right now runs deeper than women's maternity rights or something. It is a deep absence of respect and self control.
    We should work our way up from the bottom.
    Why not go further back in time where the possession of pornography was highly illegal and immoral e.g. 19th century. A time of slavery, corruption, huge murder rates (much higher than now), blatant inequality and repression.
    I'm not claiming that the 19th century is what we should aim for, of course not. All of the things you mention are the results of self serving, unapologetically selfish attitudes towards one's own self and to his society. This is the stuff of pornography as it is corruption and slavery.
    Obviously pornography didn't change these but it certainly does not make a society less civilised. Its growing popularity hasn't seemed to affect Ireland's advancement.

    There has never been a perfect society, nor is there one in existence today. However, there are steps that can be taken to limit the promotion of the uncivilised society. Discouraging pornography and various other social misbehaviours, as well as promotion of strength of character, and promotion of family and community values is something that should be improved upon imo.
    The 'institution of family' invariably means woman subservient to men, tied to the kitchen place.
    I would suggest you re-examine that assertion. I find it a bit bewildering that you see the promotion of a healthy family life, with active parenting, as leading to the inevitable servitude of women. Many people who come from good families with wonderful parents have mothers who work outside the home. I don't know why you would think otherwise, or why you believe mothers cannot balance active parenting with employment.
    It also holds no place for the non-heterosexual. I'd would much prefer a nation of individuals rather than groups of 'communities' forcing their morals and standards onto everyone else who resides with them
    Surely by its very nature a civilised society does not impose its non-legislative moral values on anybody.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,658 ✭✭✭✭The Sweeper


    Gautama wrote:
    You've got a very naive view on this topic. It may not be rape per se, but prostitution is essentially rape. You don't really think the guy/girl wants the intercourse?

    I think you need to talk to some prostitutes.

    It may astonish you, but there are people who go into prostitution because it suits them to do so. They can make a lot of money, work their own hours and pick their clients.

    All prostitution is not the same. Some are born into it, some are sold into it, some are driven into it and some choose it. It's an astonishing concept, but it's true. It came to light in the pre-Christmas investigation into the serial killing of prostitutes in England - nobody could understand why some women were still working.

    Everyone assumed they were feeding their drug habits.

    One woman interviewed said no other job in the world would pay her as much money while still leaving her free to be with her children all day.

    Another woman interviewed said she wanted to work to help pay off the things she wanted for Christmas.

    It is possible for a prostitute to be raped. But having sex for money doesn't mean you're being raped. And you really can't describe something as "not rape per se but still essentially rape". What the hell is 'rape per se'? Is that rape like happens in a back alley when a stranger assaults a woman he's randomly chosen? Is it when someone a woman knows suddenly attacks her? Is it a father assaulting his children regularly over a number of years? Is it date rape between parties too drunk to control what's happening?

    If prostitutes won the lottery tomorrow they probably wouldn't go out looking for any more clients. But if I won the lottery tomorrow, I probably wouldn't go into work either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    Gautama wrote:
    I'm not surprised by this. Banging a prostitute is essentially rape. If the girl/guy had a choice between having sex for €50, or no sex for €50, she/he would chose the latter.
    that could be said of any job in the world. i would rather my job paid me to stay at home. does that mean we have legalised slavery in this country?



    @infront, your definition of a civilised society is very different to mine. although i'm an atheist i like to follow jesus' rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

    in other words, i'll do whatever i want as long as what i'm doing doesn't negatively effect those around me

    to me the sign of a bad society is one where people start telling what i can and can't do and its none of their f*cking business. that's called a dictatorship.

    no murder, no rape, no theft. they're all obvious. however, me watching porn affects nobody except me and a person who chose to pose for a picture and was paid very well for it. that makes it nobody's business but my own.
    InFront wrote:
    Surely by its very nature a civilised society does not impose its non-legislative moral values on anybody.
    is that not exactly what you're suggesting?

    InFront wrote:
    If you encounter societies in which publicly available (or imposed) pornography is absent, we see a different social equilibrium. Frequently, the respect that there is for sex and the institution of family are greater
    that may be true but the banning of porn is only one part of such societies. that goes along with a whole host of other things, like ireland in the 1950's. porn was banned but so were tampons and james joyce' ulysses. if you didn't go to mass you were a social pariah. you can't just ban porn and expect everyone to suddenly start behaving the way you think they should, which is of course not the way i or the majority of people on this thread think they should


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 27,498 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    I don't think porn or access to it causes people to rape.

    I 'do' think some rapists act out what they have seen on hardcore porn.

    It's not a direct causal link though.


Advertisement
Advertisement