Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BESS Thread

1356758

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭Running Bing


    gilroyb wrote:
    I really liked Mankiw, excellently structured I thought. Never used Begg, it was on the reading list, but I never used it.

    Sorry to hear Ruane is going, thought she was a great lecturer. Very engaging and kept you on your toes. I thought Mankiw was great, Id never done economics before and it gives a great and very interesting introduction. Begg was a horrible book though, nearly destroyed any interst I had in the subject of economics. First years are lucky they got rid of it. Has everybody got there course choices in?

    PS I see "Operations Star" Certificates are being handed out tommorow for management 1. That brings me back to primary school:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 pollytcd


    I know you can like meet with the lecturers and stuff... but might not be able to make an exam next week and wondering where i stand on this.

    Someone said first year bess dont do deferals or repeats... its a myth right>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭Nietzschean


    to be allowed sit a repeat in most courses you must have at least atteneded your first exam unless youve a med cert or something afaik anyhoo...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭europerson


    pollytcd wrote:
    I know you can like meet with the lecturers and stuff... but might not be able to make an exam next week and wondering where i stand on this.
    The Economics department won't let you defer an exam.
    Someone said first year bess dont do deferals or repeats... its a myth right>
    There are repeats (the Supplementals), but you won't be given a deferral unless you're dying or in hospital or the like.


  • Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    pollytcd wrote:
    I know you can like meet with the lecturers and stuff... but might not be able to make an exam next week and wondering where i stand on this.

    Someone said first year bess dont do deferals or repeats... its a myth right>

    There are indeed repeats for JF'ers. As Nietzmeh said, you normally will have to make a serious attempt at the exams. What do you mean by deferrals?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭Stargal


    Yeah, it has to be a very serious reason for missing the exam. Ring/drop in to the BESS office first thing in the morning and talk to them about it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 222 ✭✭Black_Couch


    Just wondering if anybody has last year's take home exam questions?
    This was from the take home. Highest in the year might I add, and not mine. 77 i think it got.

    nation state redundant.pdf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 222 ✭✭Black_Couch


    Doh! was a sample in the lecture slide. Still looking to any of the second year bess heads for last years take home! Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 47 BessBoy


    Help - im confused- and going into senior soph, fingers crosd.
    I now hear that the js course applied finance is available for ss. I didnt take it, but found investment analysis fascinating, despite the best efforts of the lecturer. So, id like to take it. but i have heard that its hard and needs a lot of work.
    has anybody got a basis to comapre it to the course by jim stewart? which is easier/better .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭europerson


    Still looking to any of the second year bess heads for last years take home! Thanks.
    Find it attached.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 222 ✭✭Black_Couch


    europerson wrote:
    Find it attached.

    Appreciate it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭gilroyb


    One piece of advice for JF sociology students, and to a limited extent politics/economics students. If you happen to be talking for or against the increased nature of interconnectedness among societies, the word is globalisation. If you are trying to argue that it doesn't exist, spelling it with a z kind of ruins your arguement. If you're trying to say it does exist but just adds to cultures, then again spelling it with a z hurts your arguement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    Hahaha thats a fantastic point gilroyb - yeah that sort of mistake would severely damage any argument in relation to globalisation alright :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭europerson


    That's very clever, all right. Thankfully, I never use American spelling, so I haven't fallen into that trap!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭shay_562


    If you happen to be talking for or against the increased nature of interconnectedness among societies, the word is globalisation. If you are trying to argue that it doesn't exist, spelling it with a z kind of ruins your arguement. If you're trying to say it does exist but just adds to cultures, then again spelling it with a z hurts your arguement.

    I understand the first half (and hee! That's among the funnier mistakes you could make. Or else I just have an intensely sad sense of humour), but the latter makes no sense to me. If you're arguing that globalization has destroyed the nation state (which seems to be the type of question we're getting this year) and completely subsumed our culture, then surely using the Americanized spelling only helps to prove your argument? (hell, you could even call attention to it in the essay to show you know what you're doing when you spell it that way). Especially when all of our Political Science notes are spelled with a 'z'. (I'd check sociology, but that would require hunting through my e-mail and I don't have the energy right now)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    only if you were to clearly state and argue that the Americanised spelling was a good thing - as generally on a whole if it weren't backed up, most lecturers would look at it as a bad thing(tm)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    282837691a371075231b319515071l.jpg

    Blasted google!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭shay_562


    only if you were to clearly state and argue that the Americanised spelling was a good thing

    Ah, but that would be a value judgement, and our essays are supposed to be factual and not influenced by our own values. It's a real science, don't ya know. :rolleyes:

    Point is, you can call attention to the fact that traditional English spellings are becoming Americanized without saying it's a good or bad thing - it just is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    I'm a purist anyhow - never shall i smell Sulfur! :P anyone who can't understand the idea of a "ph" sounds doesnt deserve my time :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭europerson


    &#231 wrote: »
    I'm a purist anyhow - never shall i smell Sulfur! :P anyone who can't understand the idea of a "ph" sounds doesnt deserve my time :D
    I used to have big rows with my LC Chemistry teacher over that: apparently, sulfur is the "internationally-recognised spelling among the chemical community". I don't care. It's sulphur whence I come.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭Hermione*


    You mean sulphur is spelt with an f in America? That's just wrong! :eek: American spelling is just silly, why the hell would you spell pyjamas with an a and not a y? It's not that hard to understand. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭europerson


    In actual fact, he contradicted himself, because he used to (rightly) give out to people who said aluminum instead of aluminium.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    Sulfur is NOT internationally recognised. I think the British school system may have possibly "standardised", as they put it when the issue came up, by now, but it is most definitely not internationally recognised.

    also aluminum drives me spare.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭Hermione*


    europerson wrote:
    I used to have big rows with my LC Chemistry teacher over that: apparently, sulfur is the "internationally-recognised spelling among the chemical community". I don't care. It's sulphur whence I come.

    Hmm, in my physics class, it was sulphur. But then my teacher was a past pupil of the school, so obviously she's had a good enough education to avoid such foolishness ;). 'Sulfur' looks stupid ... if I saw that in a book, I'd never think of sulphur. :rolleyes:

    Edited to add the smiley that europerson's quote reminded me I'd intended to put in and forgotten about. Thanks europerson!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭europerson


    That teacher used to say to me that, if I were working in a large international chemical company or the like, people wouldn't know what I was talking about, if I used the word sulphur. I say that stinks like hydrogen sulphide.
    Hermione* wrote:
    Hmm, in my physics class, it was sulphur. But then my teacher was a past pupil of the school, so obviously she's had a good enough education to avoid such foolishness.
    Well, my teacher was a clever man, but he had what one might term eccentricities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    europerson wrote:
    That's very clever, all right. Thankfully, I never use American spelling, so I haven't fallen into that trap!
    Europerson is the annoying person who actually changes the language in MyMail from English (US) to English (UK) upon signing in. It makes no difference, as far as I know, but the man does it anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    Actually that really annoys me. cant believe ISS didn't think to set it properly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭europerson


    I do that as a protest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭gilroyb


    shay_562 wrote:
    I understand the first half (and hee! That's among the funnier mistakes you could make. Or else I just have an intensely sad sense of humour), but the latter makes no sense to me. If you're arguing that globalization has destroyed the nation state (which seems to be the type of question we're getting this year) and completely subsumed our culture, then surely using the Americanized spelling only helps to prove your argument? (hell, you could even call attention to it in the essay to show you know what you're doing when you spell it that way). Especially when all of our Political Science notes are spelled with a 'z'. (I'd check sociology, but that would require hunting through my e-mail and I don't have the energy right now)

    Well generally sociologists aren't the biggest fans of globalisation, so by spelling it with a z you're basically saying you're just giving in to the evil capitalists without a fight. A few political 'scientists' are fans of capitalism, but of those that are they generally still hate America, so it's best not to remind them of something they hate while their correcting your exam.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 222 ✭✭Black_Couch


    Does anybody know what an LLB is or something like it? I heard u can do an extra year and end up with a law degree after you get your original ba or bbs etc., surely this can't be true? Considering people spend a full 4 years studying to get a law degree.


Advertisement