Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Exceeding the speed limit whilst overtaking

  • 25-03-2006 10:29PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭


    Is it an offence to exceed the speed limit whilst overtaking?

    I would be interested in your views / comments and any references or links to uphold a "No" answer... I cannot find any in the statute book but was asked the question recently.


    Cheers


    TJ911...


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭Diamondmaker


    I was pulled for 66mph in 50 zone. Lanes were merging to 1 ahead and I was on out side lane adjacent a tightly packed inner lane. I was very close to front car. I put on the power to get into inside lane at top of queue rather than barge in to middle (as I thought the o/t would be safer)....then bang !pulled in by the boys ahead.... no sympathy.
    Also I have done advanced driving and the instructor assured me that it is stilll illegal when o/t.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Are you sure you weren't going 66mph in a 50kmph zone ;) ? That would a big difference in speed!

    As to the current law on overtaking, no idea :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭Diamondmaker


    No it was 2 years ago and was on Blanch Dualler on way to Ashtown round about before DG Opel. 66mph in 50mph zone.


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,796 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    OP, I'd say that any overtaking that involves travelling at a speed that is beyond the speed limit would be considered an offence. You are only supposed to overtake someone who is travelling at a very slow speed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 650 ✭✭✭EireRoadUser


    Circumstances always decifer the outcome I wreckon.
    If it's pi**ing rain and your doing 53 in a 40 zone ,a guard is going to do you big time . Who is going to sit in the rain while muppets drive up too close of each other and skid so fast they are twirling like prima ballerina's.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,217 ✭✭✭✭Sangre


    The only reason you'd need to go over the speed limit when overtaking someone is when the car ahead is doing the speed limit. So why do you have to overtake them then? Thats probably how a court will look at it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    2nd attempt.let's hope this coherent&in English.

    Some EU countries provide for overtaking speeds.
    However, as per the Irish rules of the road:
    No vehicle other than exempted vehicles (fire brigades, ambulances, Garda cars) may exceed the maximum road speed limit at any time.


    If one must exceed the speed limit by a considerable amount, then chances are that they're either overtaking a car which is travelling close the speed limit or they're overtaking several cars at a time. In either case, it is dangerous. As such, you deserve what you get. Especially if it has been raining.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 650 ✭✭✭EireRoadUser


    go slower


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    Bang on Karoma. Its pretty basic stuff and obvious.

    Eire,
    WTF???:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Eire,
    WTF???:confused:
    I thought it was just me. phew! :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 650 ✭✭✭EireRoadUser


    The worst thing a driver can do is ignore other drivers on the road.

    Going exactly the speed limit all the time will not save your life ,you need to keep the eye out.

    My old man has 8 penalty points for breaking the speed limit, he never goes over 60mph even on motor ways though. And he never overtakes.

    Hes just the one who might pass by a speed camera doing a couple of mile an hour more than he's suppose to.

    I really think sometimes the government encourage drivers to try and get away with speeding ,because they always seem to be sneaky with it's tactics in catching people. Be honest with people and they will be honest back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Trojan911


    Cheers all,

    I would have to go with the fact that exceeding the speed limit would constitute an offence under the RTA.

    I have spoken to various Garda sources, including traffic corps and all have said "They think you can but can't find legislation / proven cases to back it up", nobody seems to know. I guess it is yet to be challenged in the courts....

    TJ911... :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,268 ✭✭✭mountainyman


    Trojan911 wrote:
    ...
    I would have to go with the fact that exceeding the speed limit would constitute an offence under the RTA... I guess it is yet to be challenged in the courts....

    It won't be challenged successfully. YOU CANNOT LEGALLY EXCEED THE SPEED LIMIT WHILE OVERTAKING.
    I am sure the judge woudn't hammer you on it.

    MM


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,268 ✭✭✭mountainyman


    66 MPH in a 50 MPH zone is 26 KMH over the speed limit

    This is understandable but how could it be legal?

    MM


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    Trojan911 wrote:
    Cheers all,

    I would have to go with the fact that exceeding the speed limit would constitute an offence under the RTA.

    I have spoken to various Garda sources, including traffic corps and all have said "They think you can but can't find legislation / proven cases to back it up", nobody seems to know. I guess it is yet to be challenged in the courts....

    TJ911... :)

    theres no challenge possible. If you need to speed to overtake then you shouldnt be overtaking.



    MM,
    16 KMH I presume you meant? :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,786 ✭✭✭✭Hagar


    I had look at one of the signs. It just said 60kph.
    There was no small print that said "may be exceeded if overtaking".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,779 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    They are installing a new speed detection system in Northern Ireland. It has two sets of cameras miles apart. Car are photographed at each end the the average speed is worked out.

    Here is an interesting quote from the Irish Times article:
    the strength of the system was that it allowed someone to exceed the limit briefly, as in the case of over taking, providing their average speed remained under the limit.

    The implication here seems to be that the PSNI are not overly worried with a small amount of speed when overtaking. That does seem reasonable.

    Full article here: http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/motoring/2006/0222/2418148504MOT22TRAPS.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Trojan911


    Hagar wrote:
    I had look at one of the signs. It just said 60kph.
    There was no small print that said "may be exceeded if overtaking".

    Cheers Hagar,

    As simple as that...... Why didn't I look, D'OH .....:p

    TJ911...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,727 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    MrPudding wrote:
    They are installing a new speed detection system in Northern Ireland. It has two sets of cameras miles apart. Car are photographed at each end the the average speed is worked out.
    Just another tool, one where people can't claim "oh, it was only for a moment"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,727 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    My old man has 8 penalty points for breaking the speed limit, he never goes over 60mph even on motor ways though. And he never overtakes.
    Does he also do 60mph through the centre of town? He has to be doing something wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,057 ✭✭✭TheMonster


    would imagine its clearcut
    if you need to exceed the speed limit to pass out then the person you are passing must be doing the speed limit so why pass them out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,732 ✭✭✭maidhc


    TheMonster wrote:
    would imagine its clearcut
    if you need to exceed the speed limit to pass out then the person you are passing must be doing the speed limit so why pass them out.

    That doesnt necessarily hold true, to pass someone out safely you must do the speed they are doing + 10/15/20 mph. If a person is doing 50mph then it is quite conceivable you might do 70 to overtake them safely.

    Unfortuantely the speeding legislation predates speed cameras, and were originally "more what you would call guidelines" (to paraphrase Captain Barbossa). They are now enforced as if they have some basis in logic, which often they dont.

    I think the distance over time method is a good idea though provided it has reasonable tolerances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭optiplexgx270


    theres no challenge possible. If you need to speed to overtake then you shouldnt be overtaking.



    MM,
    16 KMH I presume you meant? :D
    Try your maths there again :rolleyes:

    66mph-50mph/5*8=25.6kph


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,727 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    maidhc wrote:
    That doesnt necessarily hold true, to pass someone out safely you must do the speed they are doing + 10/15/20 mph. If a person is doing 50mph then it is quite conceivable you might do 70 to overtake them safely.
    You mean before you meet the other guy, also doing 70, coming in the other direction?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,732 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Victor wrote:
    You mean before you meet the other guy, also doing 70, coming in the other direction?

    I mean so you spend the least amount of time at the wrong side of the road when overtaking something like an articulated lorry!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    maidhc wrote:
    I mean so you spend the least amount of time at the wrong side of the road when overtaking something like an articulated lorry!

    Going around a large vehicle would cause wind resistance, blow outs, etc and if you need to get around fast then you mustnt be able to see oncoming traffic clearly.

    It still doesnt explain why your overtaking a vehicle doing the speed limit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,732 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Going around a large vehicle would cause wind resistance, blow outs, etc
    Please explain. How does overtaking cause a blowout or extra wind resistance. Cars pass out lorries every day on roads all over the country, many of them motorways/dual carriage ways.

    and if you need to get around fast then you mustnt be able to see oncoming traffic clearly.

    I like driving on the left, and fell uncomfortable at the wrong side, even on a clear straight stretch. IIRC the rules of the road reflect these sentiments.
    It still doesnt explain why your overtaking a vehicle doing the speed limit

    Refer to post #23, par 1 above, reproduced for your convenience:
    to pass someone out safely you must do the speed they are doing + 10/15/20 mph. If a person is doing 50mph then it is quite conceivable you might do 70 to overtake them safely.

    For the record I have 0 penalty points and a full NCB (touch wood) :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    maidhc wrote:
    Please explain. How does overtaking cause a blowout or extra wind resistance. Cars pass out lorries every day on roads all over the country, many of them motorways/dual carriage ways.
    Put simple? the wind is blocked by the larger vehicle and when that wind is re-introduced it can cause to swerve. Also add that the larger vehicle is now in your slipstream. As for blow outs, overtaking no but the higher the speed the more dangerous the blow out.
    maidhc wrote:
    I like driving on the left, and fell uncomfortable at the wrong side, even on a clear straight stretch. IIRC the rules of the road reflect these sentiments.
    So now your nervous when performing this operation? The more you speak the more I urge you not too overtake at speed however please note you would still be on the right (left) side of the road if overtaking on a motorway so there would be no need to break the 120kmh limit.
    maidhc wrote:
    Refer to post #23, par 1 above, reproduced for your convenience:
    The original post asks if the speed limit applies when overtaking. the response is if the car you overtake is doing the limit why overtake? Your counter has no basis. In your scenario you say your doing 60 or 70 overtaking a car doing 50, but whats the speed limit in this scenario? Is it 60? then why overtake doing 70?????
    maidhc wrote:
    For the record I have 0 penalty points and a full NCB (touch wood) :)
    And? So do a lot of little boy racers until they go head first into an oncoming car or get a blow out or encounter wind after overtaking. In fact most people have no penalty points because they slow down for the cameras and guns not because they dont speed or drive dangerously.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 650 ✭✭✭EireRoadUser


    I'm on my way home on a sunday night ,I'm driving about a half an hour with about an hour to go.
    I'm stuck behind what seems to be an elderly woman or man ,judging by the gentle swaying of the car which is about 10 years old.

    My prediciment is I have a 5 seriers bmw behind me and the guy has a whole bunch of traffic behind him .Everytime I think the guy in front is making progress he slows down and the guy behind me gets annoyed.

    We are all travelling at 8 kilometers below the speed limit on a good open country road.
    In order for me to overtake and keep my distance when i pull back in again I will more than likely have to break the limit.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    Everytime I think the guy in front is making progress he slows down
    He always speeds up in the areas that you could overtake as well doesnt he? I swear that 1 bad driver gets around. :D
    We are all travelling at 8 kilometers below the speed limit on a good open country road.
    If he fails to allow traffic to go past while travelling under the limit without reason he is actually breaking the law.
    In order for me to overtake and keep my distance when i pull back in again I will more than likely have to break the limit.
    Granted but that doesnt make it legal which was the whole point to this thread.


Advertisement