Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

I know it is cruel but...

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,432 ✭✭✭Steve_o


    You are indeed going to hell, that was a horrible story and i can't believe you laughed at it!!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    Shabadu wrote:
    Ha!

    Tar, just shut up, please. We are never going to agree with this. I only have my degree in Culinary Arts with huge section on Nutrition to back me up, I know it can't *possibly* compare to a few on-line articles you have read, but what the hey.
    What are you talking about with regards nutrition, but hey, I don't have a mother that has worked with this stuff for fourty years now do I?
    She couldn't have possibly let me know anything about nutrition when I wanted to become a vegetarian and constantly when I was growing up? but also back to my first point, what are you on about with that statement?
    Answering a point is more than flashing a degree and saying I know better.
    If you claim to know more about nutrition(which I'm sure you do btw), make a point against anything I say, that's what i'm here for.
    Plus the thing is, what has nutrition got to do with anything, both diets are healthy, it's about ethics, the environment etc.
    Even if you care about the use of ossil fuels it is enough to get people to be vegetarian. Because of animal farming they are being used seven times faster.
    As for you don't agree, so what? I'm not trying forcing it on anybody,that is my opinion, I was expressing it when people brought up PETA for no solid reason to dodge what actually happened in that video.
    Do you seriously not see the correlation between how you believe that animals are not as good as humans and how people through history believed women are not as good as men, blacks as white, jews as the aerian race?
    no? fair enough. It is just my opinion that it is but the same.
    You seem to find it so ridiculous that an animal could be equal to a member of the precious human race, why?
    I simply believe humans are arrogant in believing this. Oh we are better than you, when is the last time you created technology, started religions and launched nuclear weapons at people. If anything I think animals are above us because of their simplistic life and the fact that they rarely kill but to survive and because they don't know better. When people give an argument as to why we kill animals, it's because it is natural, we have always done it. When they are asked why we are better than animals it is because we have evolved to a technological point beyond them.
    Humans are wiping themselves out, we are great.Give me a reason you are better than a dog, lets say, that doesn't boil down to saying 'oh we are smarter, better surely it cannot feel pain like we do.Our emotions must be so much stronger.
    people are arrogant about humans being better so therefore murdering a human is the most serious offence whilst murdering an animal is none? none?
    In fact, kill a million animals, they are too dumb too enjoy life...kill one human..oh man, youi in **** dawg!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,659 ✭✭✭Shabadu


    Dear GOD Tar. It's an ethical issue, is it? Your post was a tad garbled, but there was talk of preserving fossil fuels, saving the planet, saving the animals, meat is murder, animal rights equating with human rights, blah.

    Lets deal with this point: To save the planet we should cut down on using fossil fuels, to save the ozone we should cut down on the release of Methane. Grand, I 100% agree. Do you know what would speed this along nicely? Kill all domestic animals. Face it, they're not hugely important in nature's cycle as we have perverted their evolution by making them food. If we slaughter all cats, dogs, pigs, poultry, bovine, equestrian and ovine animals, think of how our methane levelss would drop over night! Think of how much less electricity we'd use to feed them and house them! Kill all domestic animals now! It makes sense ethically, we should preserve the planet for the wild animals. They have equal rights with us you know!

    This utter bullshít about animals having equal rights with humans. You can't tell a bear not to eat a salmon, or a lion not to eat a gazelle because they have "EQUAL RIGHTS!" The *reason* we evolved is that we changed from being omnivores who fed on fruit, nuts and carrion, to carnivores who actively hunted meat instead of scavenging. I suggest you read "The Naked Ape" by Desmond Morris for further information on hunting protein and it's efffect on the development of human emotion, society and culture. Our physiology has changed we have become so dependent on some essential nutrients we get from meat, namely the Omega Fatty acids.

    Did you know that the only time the human body creates omega oils is when we breastfeed? It is absolutely essential to developing the newborns mind. We can't synthesise these oils any other way, so we must try to find them in nature, in oily fish, and flax.

    How many animals do you contribute to killing when you buy a loaf of bread? How many animals were tilled into the soil by crop harvesters? I don't see you going out and commiting suicide because your food caused the death of an animal that has "EQUAL RIGHTS!" with your own?

    Face it- You are a hypocrite. If a building was burning down and a Human baby and a hamster were trapped inside and you could only save one, you'd save the baby. Don't bullshít me with this equal rights crap. Who said life was fair? We don't cry for the plankton when a whale eats it? Grow up.

    I am better than a dog because I have cognitive faculties, and the ability to improve the quality of life for all animals in a constructive way. That dog would be put down if a person wasn't looking after it anyway.

    You don't murder an animal- you kill it for FOOD. FOOD TAR. IT IS AT THE BASE OF MASLOW'S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS. Why don't you go convince a Bengal Tiger to "GOE VEGGIE!".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭junkyard


    The way I see it is that people should respect animals in general and not be cruel to them. I can appreciate the fact that animals are used for food etc., but when they are to be killed it should be done as humanely as possible and with as little stress to the animals in question. Thats my opinion anyway.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    Shabadu wrote:
    Your post was a tad garbled, but there was talk of preserving fossil fuels, saving the planet, saving the animals, meat is murder, animal rights equating with human rights, blah.
    sorry, was done in quite a haste as i had a calculus and algebra to run off to. Gotta hurry now too as study...
    Lets deal with this point: To save the planet we should cut down on using fossil fuels, to save the ozone we should cut down on the release of Methane. Grand, I 100% agree. Do you know what would speed this along nicely? Kill all domestic animals. Face it, they're not hugely important in nature's cycle as we have perverted their evolution by making them food. If we slaughter all cats, dogs, pigs, poultry, bovine, equestrian and ovine animals, think of how our methane levelss would drop over night! Think of how much less electricity we'd use to feed them and house them! Kill all domestic animals now! It makes sense ethically, we should preserve the planet for the wild animals. They have equal rights with us you know!
    Wild animals, domestic, humans, they all have equal rights. Who are we to say they are less important if they are less necessary to the cycle of life?
    we made them that way, it is your opinion, there is no need to breed animals for domestic use as people do. I am against it. The only dogs etc I have ever had are ones my family has rescued from being killed. If they were not breeding as they are now made to do then they would kill themselves out, if they could not survive on their own? One should not be killed over another. Yes if they all were slaughtered that would help, but em, if it is us that is causing the problem with nature in the first place, why would we not step up, why would slaughtering them be the right choice?
    In fact, when the human race destroys itself it will be a great day for the earth, who is more important, us or every other race on this planet?
    If they died over us, the problem would not be solved, it would slow down but then again it is even too late for that because the substance we use for everything,oil, is all but gone. We are practically doomed. The fact is, nobody needs to be slaughtered, you just have to stop mass breeding them. How about billions of animals aren't forced to be born every year to be brought up and killed? What is the huge need to do it? because you like meat? that is an excuse that is leading to the destruction of a whole planet?
    DeVore wrote:
    We are a virus with shoes. The introduction of man has had phenomenally bad effects on wildlife and the natural habitat of every continent as we migrated there. We are simply, too smart. We don't form an equilibrium with nature, we simply consume until there is nothing left (Oil, Cod, Oxygen...)
    We produce so much waste that our habitats become uninhabitable (Waste Dump protests, Nuclear fuel etc). We reproduce at an astonishing rate despite the lack of prey which normally keeps other animals in check (mass starvation in Africa, China's one-child policy).

    But if you really want to look at it simply, how many times in your life have you heard the phrase "Worst XYZ in history" "Most devastating ABC since records began". Since each of those is (supposedly) a freak occurance, well outside the norm of such events, isnt it a little surprising that we seem to hit such "exceptional peaks" almost every year now? Most violent storm ever, worst earthquake, driest summer on record, wettest winter etc etc etc. I dont think a single record that stood when I was born, remains now.

    Something is itching mother nature and this is her way of stratching it. I'm sure every other species on Earth is relieved.

    DeV.

    ps: get a before and after shot of the IceCaps in just 5-10 years. And then more before that. Frightening.
    This is quite true, virus is the perfect word for common day humans, the planet cannot sustain us and that is a fact.Mother earth will scratch us out. In a few generations what do you think the world will be like? no oil, no fossil fuels. This is because of how we live.
    Yes of course vegetarianism is a tiny help but everything helps. Frankly people should turn their backs on most 'comforts' tbh.
    We are the only ones whom do not fit into nature apart from bastardised animals like domestic animals that we have made so.
    The only question is what will destroy humans first, the multiple ways we are destroying everything or will we destroy each other.
    frankly I'm sure most people don't care because they will be dead, what about your children and their children?
    To put it quite frankly humans not existing is going to be good because of how we act. I'm trying to change one aspect of it, you are right, this many animals should not exist, it is not natural. Stop mass breeding them.
    How many animals do you contribute to killing when you buy a loaf of bread? How many animals were tilled into the soil by crop harvesters? I don't see you going out and commiting suicide because your food caused the death of an animal that has "EQUAL RIGHTS!" with your own?

    Face it- You are a hypocrite. If a building was burning down and a Human baby and a hamster were trapped inside and you could only save one, you'd save the baby. Don't bullshít me with this equal rights crap. Who said life was fair? We don't cry for the plankton when a whale eats it? Grow up.

    Life is not fair, why not try to make it fairer?
    eek at that suicide statement tbh. Killing yourself or excluding yourself from society changes nobodies mind and you are forgotten like a drop in the ocean.
    Might save a few animals lives from me not eating bread as I am dead but much more would die if I do not exist.
    I am well aware of the animals that die for me to live. I keep it to a minimum. As the famous quote goes, we should live life as vegetarian as we can.
    I AM a hypocrite in some regards as animals die because of me. I am more than aware of this and the fact that everybody is a hypocrite, everybody. The fact is, I never claim I am perfect, I claim to try to be the best person that I can and that is what I ask of myself. I don't mind if people are hypocrites as long as they know it and it knocks them down a peg or too. On the hypocrite scale, it's best to be as low as possible. Because everybody is a hypocrite however is not an excuse for apathy. 'Oh you kill animals too therefore it's fine for me to do it' hope they sleep well at night, I couldn't and can't anyway. If there is something I rip myself apart over, it is this. I disgust myself, just not quite as much as other people who don't even try to better humanity disgust me tbh.
    As for the hamster and baby, not a hypocrite there, I save both or die trying to do so, therefore none or all. when you say 'we' as regards plankton, that is not you and me. you maybe. Not me.I just hold the same opinion on the grandeur and beauty of every animal and everything in existance as Einstein. Cow, human, whatever gets killed by that whale. I feel for them all equally. I would give my life to save anybody,anything, die trying. Maybe you can't understand that and I don't mind, that is just who I am, but I do not pick one over the other. How and ever, i'm a hypocrite in the fact that I would save somebody that loves me like a mother over some person I don't know. This is not because I love them, but because they care for me and I won't let them down. I would rather punish myself, burn in hell(if it existed) that let somebody that cares about me die. Some wrongs I would take on myself to commit but I would punish myself for it quite a bit to at least make me suffer in some way.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    continued as too long....
    I am better than a dog because I have cognitive faculties, and the ability to improve the quality of life for all animals in a constructive way. That dog would be put down if a person wasn't looking after it anyway.
    You have that ability hmm, do people use it? furthermore it does not make you better, it means you could live a better life in your opinion.
    Please don't say, oh that dog would have to be murdered anyway without us'
    we made it that way. Humans should feel guilty about doing that to a wonderful species not cast them aside as being useless without us.
    You don't murder an animal- you kill it for FOOD. FOOD TAR. IT IS AT THE BASE OF MASLOW'S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS. Why don't you go convince a Bengal Tiger to "GOE VEGGIE!".
    Food? The only rational reason to kill is to survive and there is no other option available. I'll agree with maslow to that extent, things need to throw thinks out the window to sate physiological needs but not as much when they evolve to a point. When you are starving would you just just discard a child to one side to die for food? Maslow says you would from that line of thought imo, but I am quite critical of the person anyway, a pet hate of mine. Maslow's views on combining religion and science are ridiculous, imo maslow is a religious/scientist fruitcake, oh an read all the counters to maslow please before what you take what he says as fact. :). Ok to take the bottom rung of that hierarchy which is very flawed, imo, in general. First off, humans don't do that anymore. We do not kill for physiological need, wee kill for comfort(can't believe maslow actually put that in the rung), we kill to be happy theses days.It is not necessary, what he says is about what is necessary.
    Maslow's theory applies fine to animals on that point. The rung firmly stresses on homeostasis, fact is, yes food is what that is on about but it has nothing got to do with meat whatsoever. We do not need it anymore even if we ever did, is is not one of the fundamentals that it once was, it is drilled into people that it is but there is no reason for it to be. Physiological needs can control thoughts and behaviors but they do not need to anyway, we have evolved beyond the point where we can justify anything on 'instinct' yet people do.
    I would suggest you read about transcendental phenomonology(husserl is best) to try and look at things outside of instinct and phycologism
    because these are humanities downfalls. Husserl is great for looking at things without prejudice to ones self and the self in general if you are able to think like he can- not easy.
    This utter bullshít about animals having equal rights with humans. You can't tell a bear not to eat a salmon, or a lion not to eat a gazelle because they have "EQUAL RIGHTS!" The *reason* we evolved is that we changed from being omnivores who fed on fruit, nuts and carrion, to carnivores who actively hunted meat instead of scavenging. I suggest you read "The Naked Ape" by Desmond Morris for further information on hunting protein and it's efffect on the development of human emotion, society and culture.
    hmf, I have read books on both sides tbh, but not that one. Arguements on what you say about needing protein to develop are varied. Acclaimed nutrionists/ scientists on both sides disagree, did we need meat for protein when it was fairly abundant anyway. Some say, even if it was needed then they would still go for the fact that it is not needed from meat now. I'll try to get that book if you say it has good info. The reason that bear kills is because it needs the food to survive. If I did I would probably kill too. The fact is, do we need to kill, no we do not.
    The bear and lion have not, they need the meat to live. Does a bear go and hunt without food as an intention? It becomes hungry and wants to live. We have evolved as you say but guess what, we have done it so much that we don't even need meat anymore. Meat has actually become more of a loss than a gain as far as resources spent goes.Be it water, electricity, everything. We simply do not need it anymore, we are evolving constantly. Our ancestors needed meat you say, they probably did to survive- We don't.
    Our physiology has changed we have become so dependent on some essential nutrients we get from meat, namely the Omega Fatty acids.

    Did you know that the only time the human body creates omega oils is when we breastfeed? It is absolutely essential to developing the newborns mind. We can't synthesise these oils any other way, so we must try to find them in nature, in oily fish, and flax.
    Ok yes I know about them and everything they do for a child especially, you say you got that other info from that book? or is from your course? it is incorrect.
    Some fatty acid basics I learned in biology and reading general things, looked at the needs of the body in particular due to my needs,
    You are right about us not being able to create linolenic and linoleic acids in our body apart from breast feeding. We need these in the in the normal functioning of all tissues of the body. In fact for omega 6, it is not a problem of having enough in your diet, The diet of the western world has become heavy in omega-6 fats which is quite bad for you.
    Omega-6 fats are found in leafy vegetables, seeds, nuts, grains, and vegetable oils (corn, safflower, soybean, cottonseed, sesame, sunflower). Other omega-6 fatty acids, such as gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), can be found in more rare oils, including black currant, borage, evening primrose, and hemp oils. People infact get a lot of these.

    OK Omega-3,
    Plant Foods Rich in Omega-3 Fatty Acids;

    Green leafy vegetables (lettuce, broccoli, kale, purslane, spinach, etc.)
    Legumes (mungo, kidney, navy, pinto, or lima beans, peas or split peas, etc.)
    Citrus fruits, melons, cherries.
    Ground flaxseed.
    Alpha-linolenic acid(omega-3 fatty acid) is found in many vegetables, beans, nuts, seeds, and fruits. The best source of alpha-linolenic acid is flaxseeds or flaxseed oil. More concentrated sources can be found in oils such as canola, soybean, walnut, and wheat germ. Omega-3 fatty acids can be found in smaller quantities in nuts, seeds, and soy products, as well as beans, vegetables, and whole grains.

    Table of natural oils,
    Omega-3 Content of Natural Oils

    Flaxseed 53-62%
    Linseed 53%
    Canola 11%
    Walnut 10%
    Wheat germ 7%
    Soybean 7%

    We need little omega-3 oil anyway. A teaspoon of flaxseed oil in a day adequatlely meets the RDA. It is another anti-vegetarian old wives tale, like protein.

    As for it being needed from fish, sigh- needed from no animal.
    You have heard that fish are good sources of essential fatty acids, common misconception. The high amounts of fat and cholesterol and the lack of fiber make fish a poor choice. Fish are also often high in mercury and other environmental toxins that have no place in an optimal diet.

    Fish oils have been popularized as an aid against everything from heart problems to arthritis. The bad news about fish oils is that omega-3s in fish oils are highly unstable molecules that tend to decompose and, in the process, unleash dangerous free radicals. Research has shown that omega-3s are found in a more stable form in vegetables, fruits, and beans.

    Whether you are interested in promoting cardiovascular health, ensuring the proper growth and development of your child, or relieving pain, a vegetarian diet rich in fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds, and legumes can help you achieve adequate intake of the essential fatty acids.

    Now if you disagree with anything at all in those facts about fatty acids I will give you a solid reference that has got nothing to do with a pro vegetarian argument.
    If you believed what you do purely because of that book, tut tut.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,659 ✭✭✭Shabadu


    tl; dr

    Not so much 'dr' as 'skimmed and realised it was the same hyperbole you always trot out when discussing vegetarianism'.

    Sorry Tar, I unequivocally disagree with your misplaced notions on ethics, and what humans do and do not need to survive.

    You have your opinion, I have mine. No amount of blathering is going to turn around the other's opinion, and btw, "If you believed what you do purely because of that book, tut tut."?

    You only believe what you do from what you've read.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,424 ✭✭✭joejoem


    Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

    Dont hurt the cuddley animals. Animals should be treated with respect while alive and put down in a respectful manor.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    i presume tl = too long and dr = didn't read.
    I'll take it as such.

    I don't mind if you read it or not, I don't mind that you think my views on ethics are misplaced. I think the same of you and people are allowed to disagree. It is what I wholeheartedly believe and why I stopped eating meat.
    I go on about it because it is not some little fancyful thing to me. It is the equivalent to racism to moi. I would like to think most people would have done something to stop rascism and the dessimation of the jews back in the day. Some people did, they could not sit by, would you if you were back then?
    Simply put, i believe we are a bad as ever and I don't want to sit by so i think about ethics for most of the day and do debates etc. I do not mind that you disagree, what annoyed me was you said, stop posting because we do not agree, some people may that read it and even if they don't atm I want them to think about it. If people do not think about things, things can't change. Put yourself in my shoes, you believe that mass murder goes on akin to concentration camps but by a huge factor more. Would you do nothing?
    Second thing that annoyed me was the, i have a degree, i am right but i wont explain why. Not this in itself. It was that you went on to then say something completely wrong about nutrition, nearly the opposite of what the case is. I do not mind points against me, I mind 'untruths'.
    They promote common misconceptions that actually lead to descrimination against me and other vegetarians which we have to live with.
    also, there is no hype in my post, pick it out if that were the case and if it was hype, i would retract it. I see none on reading it again.
    Finally again, I realise you disagree, I am not trying to convince anybody of anything. I want them to think for themselves and make a decision like you and I have.

    oh a edit: guess i will too. I may believe what I have read indeed but not from a novel or unofficial text. You gave out to me because you thought that my david stroud comment ages ago(well not ages) was taken by fact by me when he is not a nutritionist. Then you do what you thought I did??
    My facts always come from the health institutions of the world and unbiased biological texts, ie not about vegetarianism or meat eating whatsoever. Why would you believe anything about nutrition from that book, You mentioned your degree, did he reference to official documentation, i would guess not because there would be none.



    JoeJoem, I don't think they should be put down at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,424 ✭✭✭joejoem


    i presume tl = too long and dr = didn't read.
    I'll take it as such.

    I don't mind if you read it or not, I don't mind that you think my views on ethics are misplaced. I think the same of you and people are allowed to disagree. It is what I wholeheartedly believe and why I stopped eating meat.
    I go on about it because it is not some little fancyful thing to me. It is the equivalent to racism to moi. I would like to think most people would have done something to stop rascism and the dessimation of the jews back in the day. Some people did, they could not sit by, would you if you were back then?
    Simply put, i believe we are a bad as ever and I don't want to sit by so i think about ethics for most of the day and do debates etc. I do not mind that you disagree, what annoyed me was you said, stop posting because we do not agree, some people may that read it and even if they don't atm I want them to think about it. If people do not think about things, things can't change. Put yourself in my shoes, you believe that mass murder goes on akin to concentration camps but by a huge factor more. Would you do nothing?
    Second thing that annoyed me was the, i have a degree, i am right but i wont explain why. Not this in itself. It was that you went on to then say something completely wrong about nutrition, nearly the opposite of what the case is. I do not mind points against me, I mind 'untruths'.
    They promote common misconceptions that actually lead to descrimination against me and other vegetarians which we have to live with.
    also, there is no hype in my post, pick it out if that were the case and if it was hype, i would retract it. I see none on reading it again.
    Finally again, I realise you disagree, I am not trying to convince anybody of anything. I want them to think for themselves and make a decision like you and I have.

    oh a edit: guess i will too. I may believe what I have read indeed but not from a novel or unofficial text. You gave out to me because you thought that my david stroud comment ages ago(well not ages) was taken by fact by me when he is not a nutritionist. Then you do what you thought I did??
    My facts always come from the health institutions of the world and unbiased biological texts, ie not about vegetarianism or meat eating whatsoever. Why would you believe anything about nutrition from that book, You mentioned your degree, did he reference to official documentation, i would guess not because there would be none.



    JoeJoem, I don't think they should be put down at all.

    I can respect that, but I do believe we are carnivores, so we should eat meat and go to carnivals.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    joejoem wrote:
    I can respect that, but I do believe we are carnivores, so we should eat meat and go to carnivals.
    Go for it, carnivale! ;)
    If I did not respect that what I believe - is my opinion -and that opinion is based on personality, iq, outlook on life etc etc Then I could not live in society but I do respect other peoples opinions no matter how averse to mine.
    Religions, racists, honestly I have no belief that I should look down on a persons beliefs. If they believe something, have at their cause. It's what I do.
    Enjoy your steak for me :/


Advertisement