Controlled demolition?

mang87 · 10-07-2005 06:58PM #1

Picked this up on another forum.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2005/060705controlleddemolition.htm

qz · 10-07-2005 07:03PM

Interesting. Conspiracies are fun!

Kare Bear · 10-07-2005 07:06PM

Thats pretty convincing.:eek:

Töpher · 10-07-2005 07:39PM

Thats more than convincing! :eek:

NotMe · 10-07-2005 07:54PM

If they had the bombs why bother with the planes?

mang87 · 10-07-2005 08:05PM

NotMe wrote:

If they had the bombs why bother with the planes?

Errr, I don't think you understand...

Kare Bear · 10-07-2005 08:14PM

If they had the bombs why bother with the planes?

If they used just bombs it would be a little harder to explain.

NotMe · 10-07-2005 08:19PM

Ok the US government hired the islamic guys to fly planes into the towers to cover the fact that they actually destroyed them... to give them a reason to go to war... :rolleyes:

BlitzKrieg · 10-07-2005 08:29PM

actually i think the idea was America finds out OBL is gonna attack (well known detail which people believe GWB was too stupid to notice) so they fill the towers with explosives to ensure they collapse therefore they can get America going in its western Jihad...

but your right its a conspiracy theory,i'm pretty sure there is a website proving most of those facts wrong...

Mac daddy · 28-08-2005 04:25PM

mang87 wrote:

Picked this up on another forum.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2005/060705controlleddemolition.htm

Thats pretty damm scary......

Wertz · 28-08-2005 04:36PM

Mac daddy wrote:

Thats pretty damm scary......

The maker of this documentary has put the whole DVD/AVI on multiple torrent sites and is encouraging people to d/l and watch.
It's an interesting hour or so, but it has holes that can be poked in the theory and some unsupported "facts"....still begs a few further questions though.

Gazza22 · 28-08-2005 04:50PM

Ah pretty convincing though i would be highly sceptical of it actually having a shread of truth...

Interesting to watch anyway...

Son_of_Belial · 28-08-2005 06:01PM

Bullshít. Say it with me now... BULL-SHÍT!!

fred funk }{ · 28-08-2005 06:28PM

Son_of_Belial wrote:

Bullshít. Say it with me now... BULL-SHÍT!!

I totally agree, anyone who believes that the yanks blow up the WTC and covered it up by getting someone to fly two planes into it is really stupid.

Consperacy theory's are fun to listen to but take them with a pinch of salt.

Cop-on!

Guy:Incognito · 28-08-2005 07:02PM

You can clearly see a guy pressing a big plunger marked "tnt" above the grassy knoll.

Dave! · 28-08-2005 09:10PM

^
lmao

whiskeyman · 28-08-2005 09:39PM

mang87 wrote:

Picked this up on another forum.

And it can be swiftly moved into the "Conspiracy Theories" forum I think...

Rb · 28-08-2005 10:03PM

Heard this before, and its what I personally believe that it's what happened the WTC.Theres so much more proof in favour of this conspiracy than there is for the US Governments explanation.
Was all on Sky One "Conspiracies" series.

whiskeyman · 28-08-2005 10:09PM

rb_ie wrote:

Was all on Sky One "Conspiracies" series.

yeah, was that the show after "Posh & Becks - Their Story" and before the Rebecca Loos interview?
Professional TV journalism alright...

Lump · 29-08-2005 12:38AM

What a load of CÓCK

John

kawaii · 29-08-2005 12:50AM

Goovy little soundtrack...

Rest was crap

The_B_Man · 29-08-2005 01:00AM

That whole bin laden thing was getting old anyway, we need new stuff something to keep us watching! Soon this will get old too and someone will make a new homemade video with a catchy bass line and a drum beat and blame it on the train companies for wanting more customers on trains or air stewards for wanting hazard pay or something! either way we're guaranteed a catchy beat!!

JackKelly · 29-08-2005 01:06AM

basically, :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Pigman II · 29-08-2005 06:15PM

Just curious. Were those clouds of dust (9:15 - 9:50) shooting out the side of the building (where the bombs allegedly were) even in the original footage? I have no memory of them personally.

Also is the bit where an 'small piece of debris' falls off the side of the side (10:10 - 10:27) not just a suicide jumper?

WellyJ · 29-08-2005 06:42PM

Pigman II wrote:

Just curious. Were those clouds of dust (9:15 - 9:50) shooting out the side of the building (where the bombs allegedly were) even in the original footage? I have no memory of them personally.

Also is the bit where an 'small piece of debris' falls off the side of the side (10:10 - 10:27) not just a suicide jumper?

Yeh definately thought that myself, looks much more like someone jumping than a "Piece of Debris"

The tripod shaking 9 seconds before the tower collapsed is pretty odd though, and if those explosions occurring well below the impact points are actually real and not Photoshoppage then its something to think about.

Controlled demolition?

Comments