Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

"Irish Independant" letters do it again. Sexist or wha' !

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,930 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Boggle wrote:
    Remember reading somewhere that while men do have more fatal car crashes, they also tend to do a hell of a lot more mileage.
    Doing more mileage is irrelevant to your annual insurance premium. It's down to "how likely is this person to have an accident this year"
    gom wrote:
    The older you are more likely to get sick due to old age and need medical care so should they pay more PRSI as a result?
    But those people are more likely to have paid more PRSI over their lifetime also.
    The assessors can't follow you around for a 6 month trial period, and get to know your favourite colour before they set a premium.
    I'm not sure if they ask the question, but car colour and temprement have been linked, at least anecdotally.
    gom wrote:
    Should a Muslim be charged higher Life Assurance than a Christian as Muslims are expected to go to Mecca once in their lifes where it is possible he/she will die in a crowd crush???
    But what about Mary and Biddy at the Bingo Hall / Jumble Sale?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,552 ✭✭✭✭GuanYin


    An actuary friend of mine maintains its a very complicated system used to work out the insurance quotes but admits the fact that there are more men on the road increased the likelihood that men will be involved in a car accident. He reckons as female drivers are rising in number it would be due to balance out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 964 ✭✭✭Boggle


    Doing more mileage is irrelevant to your annual insurance premium. It's down to "how likely is this person to have an accident this year"
    Wat I (think I) was referring to was the myth that women are inherently better drivers than men.
    More miles per year - more likelihood of crashes.... Sounds like they should be taking more heed of that mile per annum box on the ins form. Definitely a better yardstick than whether I'm a bloke or not!
    I'm not sure if they ask the question, but car colour and temprement have been linked, at least anecdotally.
    In Japan (I think - but I'll check this out and get back) they actually penalise you for the sportier colour cars.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 75 ✭✭Swarfboy


    Don't know anything bout the gender divide ......all I know is this...
    A friend recently....female (whom everybody called responsible) tried to get a taxi late one night... realised it was going to be a long wait and got in her car... Drove down a bad road (bog road) and hit the ditch flipped the car and killed herself.... Stupid b*tch.!
    Now she's gone ............
    So what does any of this crap matter about.......
    All people are stupid at some time and we all hopefully will reach the conclusion that we just don't understand anything....if we live long enough..
    I certainly don't anymore.!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,928 ✭✭✭✭rainbow kirby


    Insurance companies base their premiums on their statistics from previous years. And statistically, women have fewer accidents. Young men have more. Therefore the company puts a higher loading on the young male driver, as the probability of him having an accident is higher, ie. the company is more likely to have to pay out.
    It's all probability. Simple as that.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭jor el


    Insurance is based on probability. The assessors can't follow you around for a 6 month trial period, and get to know your favourite colour before they set a premium. They have to use a profile they've already built up from prexisting statistics.
    Indeed, however, when you pass your driving test it's supposed to mean you are a competant safe driver, so you should then get an insurance quote based on this assessment. But the insurance companies don't seem to take that into consideration and they'll still generalise on a man/woman, under/over 30 basis. I think the real issue is the fact that we don't really have a working driving test system in place in this country. This is why Hibernian do their own driving test because they know the offical test is a joke.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭Seanie M


    Whether you're male or female, I think provisional drivers have to be taken into account too. I know some of each sex, and the men are far far more confident behind the wheel. BUT, that confidence can sometimes be their demise. Men sometimes do have a poor attitude to driving. Thus, an inexperienced provisional male driver may have a greater chance of getting into an accident because of his cockiness and eagerness to get out there. Whilst I also believe that a female provisional driver can be the cause of accidents due to slower reaction speed, inability to judge distance and some other things that men are (according to the brains) more superior at.

    We men do travel more mileage, react quicker, may like faster driving when the road is good, and collectively become experienced better than females, who think they should be thought of the same after less mileage, slower reaction speeds and wrong judgements.

    I think men do make better drivers, but because our brains/bodies allow for it. Sorry ladies, but its true - you do beat us on brain power/memory at times mind you!

    Also, as an immature side note - if the likelyhood of getting into an accident is based on probability, then the probability rises the longer you are on the road (no matter what the cause). I say speed up and get the hell off the road quicker, and the probability lowers!

    :)

    Seanie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


Advertisement
Advertisement