Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1676677678679681

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,832 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I do think there's a difference between a leadership election voted on by mps or by party members. If party members get to pick the next prime minister it feels wrong. At least the mps are elected by the wider public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,755 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    What order would you rank them? As in if you had to pick a PM now from that list, who would it be?

    For me, my immediate feelings based on likability would probably be Brown, Major, May, Starmer, Cameron, Blair, Sunak, Johnson and last by some distance, Truss.

    Blair was the most successful of all of them, by a distance also, but he can't wash the blood off his hands from the Iraq war, particularly given he never even tried to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,997 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Would pick Brown as my favourite PM, but not on the basis of likability. Brown is very crotchety, but has a great sense of justice, and he was right, she was a bigot.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yes, I agree. I utterly despise leadership elections by party members, feels insanely undemocratic when they are the party in power (and I don't like them regardless).



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He was absolutely right about that, it is an interesting sliding doors moment in UK politics really. He shouldn't have apologised but it was also the beginning of "us" demanding unachievable subservience to wildly competing ideals/positions.

    Still think Blair (massive black mark aside) is far and away the best PM of the last 60 years though. The country just worked better under him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,435 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    True, however, history in the Middle East didn't start 3 months ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,700 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,435 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I don't disagree that many voters care more about local issues than they do international, or certainly middle east ones, but that doesn't mean that this particular issue isn't something that is worth paying attention to.

    Sure, I don't disagree with the premise per se, but look at the discussion.

    According to many people, Starmer didnt fail because he lacked authority or a coherent vision of what he wanted to achieve; he failed because is a backer of 'Genocide'.

    Look at Burnham, someone posted something about him saying something quite banal about Israel 12 years ago, yet the knvies are out.
    Burnham is already a failure because of this, not because of his economic policy, tax policy, foreign policy or whatever other vision he has, domestic or otherwise; his mutterings about Israel make him a dead duck already. This is the level we are at.

    It's like calling a potential PM a failure because of his taste in socks or toothpaste.

     These same structures are being undermined and all but defanged because powerful countries, institutions and individuals feel that they can ignore them if they wish while insisting they be used to protect their interests in the next breath.

    You said earlier that the issue in the UK and elsewhere, and the swings to the left/right in the population, were due to changing society/Social Media. "Democracy" is the issue, and I kind of agree.


    While this is true, the growth and internationalism, globalisation, treatism, NGO's and all the things we are in hoc to yet powerless to change are also a reason behind this. If a nation state votes to do X but can't because of "well treaty this says that, we can't do it, suck it up.." then what is really the point of democracy? This is more of a philosophical question, but we in Ireland are going to be grappling with this question as well. The UK and other countries in Europe are at the eye of the storm. In other words, while all those things are lovely and admirable, it also means that we have abstracted away democracy and the ability of voters to make their voices heard and enact change. The blowback in the rise of populists, especially the populist right, is not a surprise.

    And if none of this matters to you, as others have pointed out, the cost of living that IS impacting Joe in Slough is partially an outcome of the whole of Western Society being manipulated in to allowing Israel wreak havoc in the middle east.

    Interesting you blame Israel for this, and not the right wing theorcractic islamofacist regime in Tehran that is actually blocking the Strait. That says a lot.
    If we are all so concerned about Internationalism, Human Rights and so on, why are we letting Tehran get away with their behaviour over the course of the past decades?
    You want Israel brought to heel, grand. Let's do that. But why let Iran get away with it as well? What shall we do with them? Who are the world's policemen that will bring both Iran and Israel to heel?

    So, sure, let's throw Bibi and a bunch of his cabinet in Jail for Gaza and let's throw a bunch of the IRGC into jail for murdering up to 40,000 of its own people? But how? Please explain this to me, as it seems internationalism applies only to us and Israel, yet countries like Iran, well, that is in the too-hard basket…



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,747 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I think if Israel is going to act in a way that affects our every day lives like this, then its only fair that we have a say in things that effect us. They dont get to say it's none of our business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,700 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Israel should not get a free pass to do what they want and deny the consequences which is what they have attempted with the brainwashing/corruption going on. Anyone saying they should get a free pass will get the Captain Boycott treatment by those who have decency.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,700 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Farage does not like being questioned about his £5m bung from the crypto billionaire. The interviewer this morning hit a nerve there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Blair was lucky on the economy. Think he'd be viewed very differently had the credit crunch happened on his watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    What specifically?

    Ultimately the GFC was massively a US driven thing and you can't not have exposure to the US market unfortunately.

    The UK's response to the GFC was far worse than it should have been because they elected austerity obsessed Conservatives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Interesting you blame Israel for this, and not the right wing
    theorcractic islamofacist regime in Tehran that is actually blocking the
    Strait.

    If we're going with adjective soup, how about Israel is at fault because it is ruled by an evil right wing
    theo
    rcractic (sic) genocidal judeofacist regime in Jerusalem overseen by individuals who are on the run from justice that is actually carrying out a blockade of Gaza and multiple towns and villages in the West Bank, and in very recent times has murdered thousands in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, the West Bank. That says a lot it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I'm not angry at all, I'm simply pointing out a truth.

    Regarding the Pope - a) we are discussing Britain, according to the header; and b) the Vatican is openly a theocracy. It doesn't pretend to be something else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,462 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Brown also has the distinction of actually being qualified for the role insofar as one can be. I could say the same of Starmer perhaps.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,462 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,970 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    "What's it got to do with you".

    Sums up the sheer contempt the likes of Farage has for the public. The hubris of these types is never anything but astonishing. He must think people are fools if he believes that the majority are going to accept his bullshit about this 5 million pound bung.

    Nobody hands over 5 million quid and expects nothing in return, even if they're a billionaire.

    "I can spend it on Ferraris if I want."

    Is Farage talking about cars or certain radio presenters, I wonder. 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,649 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    more of a car crash on BBC (Oh I see this was posted already) BBC did a better job of it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,361 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Imagine voting for anything to do with that scumbag.

    They'll get pulled apart by political commentators/analysts come the build up to the next election. Jesus, i#'d sooner vote tories



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,853 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    10 years on from brexit, sone new polls out (guardian):

    774.jpg

    The 7% who cant afford essentials but are "better off", wtf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,294 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Farage

    i can spend on Ferraris if i want

    Reform voters

    We love Nigel because he's a man of the people, he's one of us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,591 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Hopefully all the politicians and people who backed the initial Cass report will now back her call for a trial of puberty blockers. Hand up who thinks they will?

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Life is still sht but there's less Polaks and Iteyes around the place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭midlander12


    What a cheeky scumbag - most attacked politician in Britain, apart from the two MP's that have been murdered presumably?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,755 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This time, 10 years ago, we were saying the exact same thing about he who must not be named.

    I often think that would the world be like today if instead of in 2016 we had turned towards Brexit and Trump, imagine if we had turned towards genuine progressive policies and individuals instead, if the Overton pendulum (window) had swung in that direction to the same extent it has done towards conservative ideals and charlatans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,435 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,007 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    if there were 2 tangoing, sure, but as it's not the case then no.
    it's just one tangoing and slaughtering and raping and all else based on religious extremist ideology, backed to the hilt by the west.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,759 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Iran is not the only country with a less than open society and a regime that stifles any opposition using lethal violence and total control of the media (and rigging any elections).

    Afghanistan, Belarus, Russia, China, Pakistan, and many other …stans. Add in African and South American rogue states. Israel qualifies in some regards - particularly in the states treatment of Palestinians.

    What is different with Israel is the attitude of some European states, and that of the USA, who all support it, no matter what they do, or the war crimes they commit. The USA even supply the huge bombs in huge quantities they use to defensively bomb residential tower blocks in Gaza or Beirut.

    Starmer could see no wrong with regard to Israel - no matter what they did. He is also prepared to be, like most of his predecessors, to be the USA's special best friend even though the USA has no intention (and never had) of reciprocating any favours given by the UK in any way.

    Whatever his qualities, Starmer excelled in being boring, and indecisive. Neither qualities a leader wants to excel in. He even has a boring voice.

    He never learned the politician’s mantra - do not answer questions that might embarrass yourself, and do not explain anything you know nothing about. [I am reminded of Simon Harris thinking Covid 19 was the 19th variant!]

    Starmer will not be remembered with fondness - if at all.



Advertisement
Advertisement