Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1496497498499501

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    Most gobshites will. I’ve a few magic beans here..

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭Roman Emperor


    Not so sure - the decline of the settler-colonial experiment is a gradual one and it has already begun.

    It will be like a death by a thousand cuts - young educated professionals will tire of living in a state of perpetual war under Netanyahu or Bennett and will gradually abandon the sinking ship to live in places like Germany or Cyprus.

    There'll be a grand exodus of the Recreational Israelis, the ones with dual citizenship and American or British passports.

    Crippling sanctions along with a destructive brain-drain will render the Zionist experiment insolvent.

    It will be an incremental decline, with not everyone recognising the writing on the wall at the same time, and when the end does eventually come, the Samson option will be superfluous - anyone who cared enough to implement it will be long gone.

    For those Jews forced to remain in the hollowed out shell of the Zionist project, I trust their new Palestinian masters will show restraint and pragmatism and build a society where everyone enjoys equal civil rights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    Lol "death by a thousand cuts" thanks for saying the quiet part out loud, about your strategy for destroying the worlds' only Jewish state.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Even if you supported this war, Trump is patently unqualified to conduct it. He has no military experience, and this is often the case with political leaders who cant win wars. He cannot stick to a strategy, let alone a peace deal or trade deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭Roman Emperor


    I'm just an anonymous poster on an obscure internet forum - I don't have a strategy - simply stating the painful reality.

    Personalising the discussion or brandishing the Antisemite Card is an exercise in futility.

    The reality is that Trump wants the war over before the global economy crashes.

    Netanyahu wants perpetual war in order to realise the Greater Israel project.

    While Israel continues to occupy southern Lebanon the Hormuz Strait will remain closed - with predictable consequences for the global economy.

    One doesn't need to be a brilliant political strategist to understand that Trump will have to put manners on Netanyahu.

    And he'll need to put manners on Netanyahu fairly lively - because we're rapidly reaching the point of no return.

    J D Vance laid it on the line for the Israelis the other day - reminded them who's really in charge.

    Make no mistake, the US and Iran will do a deal that bypasses Israel and Netanyahu will just have to suck it up.

    Furthermore, now that America has proved itself incapable of defending it's allies in the region, it's a certainty the Gulf states will reach a modus vivendi with Iran, further isolating Israel and leaving them surrounded by adversaries.

    Provoking an unnecessary American attack on Iran has proved to be a strategic disaster for Israel.

    America has a pathway out of this catastrophe, however humiliating it might be - Israel doesn't.

    The clock is ticking - it's the beginning of the end.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    Sean W, might be unaware, that the 60 day ceasefire is the period when US and Iran iron out the fine details of the agreement. While Donald Trump continues his predictable bluster, his primary goal is to stand at the 'Board of Peace' podium and claim credit for the deal.* Ultimately, neither side will achieve all of their objectives.

    *I would like to see a caricature of Trump visualising that he has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

    This might be the deal breaker:
    Iran has declared that a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon is a non-negotiable demand. Trump stated he could achieve this by securing the withdrawal of Israeli troops to the border and establishing formal recognition of Lebanon’s borders. Signalling a permanent expansion of border buffers, Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz confirmed troops will not withdraw from occupied areas in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.

    "Israel has seized land in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria since October 2023, framing the moves as security measures
    "Analysts warn this expanding territorial footprint could trigger fresh cycles of violence across the region

    18 Jun 2026
    https://www.arabnews.jp/en/middle-east/article_172385/

    Starry: We all want this over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    How can anybody continue to defend this scumbag? He just threatened the Iranians negotiating in Switzerland.

    Speaking to Fox News, the US president also threatened to take over the Hormuz strait and appeared to threaten to kidnap the Iranian negotiators, saying: “You close it and you won’t have a country. You won’t even make it back to your **** country.”

    Trump’s threats prompted the negotiators to walk out of the high-stakes discussions in protest. The comments also contrasted with the tone of Vance, who hailed progress during the first round of the direct US-Iran talks after their initial deal and said Trump had asked him to use the negotiations to turn over a “new leaf” with Iran.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    Well… I can add… Jared Kushner has a massive conflict of interest because of his dual role as an unofficial US diplomatic negotiator and the fact he operates a $6.16 BILLION investment firm, Affinity Partners, which is largely funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar.

    Self explanatory
    House Committee on the Judiciary
    Democrats / Ranking Member Jamie Raskin

    Ranking Member Raskin Opens Sweeping Investigation into “U.S. Special Envoy for Peace” Jared Kushner’s Foreign Entanglements and Staggering Conflicts of Interest
    April 17, 2026

    https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/ranking-member-raskin-opens-sweeping-investigation-nto-us-special-envoy-for-peace-jared-kushner-s-foreign-entanglements-and-staggering-conflicts-of-interest

    Press Release [all of this is so interesting]
    In Letter, Raskin Warns Kushner’s Dual Role as U.S. Negotiator in the Middle East and Financier Funded by Middle Eastern Governments Poses Grave National Security Risks and Likely Violates Federal Law
    [...]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,647 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Some tankers leaving the strait this morning. Probably Trumps threats yesterday will not of eased Western insurers and shipowners reluctance to move out yet.

    China set up it's own ship and cargo insurance business a few years ago for those who were prevented from buying insurance because of sanctions and Iran has also started offering insurance services which just started a few weeks ago.

    The big test for oil will be to see how many are willing to enter through the strait given the chance of being stranded

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    That's just wishful thinking. Even if you're 100% correct about those various Israelis leaving, there will still be plenty left behind. And they will stay, irrespective of the economic circumstances. For an example of that sort of thing, you just need to look at the Free State / Ireland, from its independence in 1922 right up to the 1980s. Lots of our talented youth exported. The country survived, even through a shrinking population and economic stupor.

    It's about as likely to happen as the settle-colonial experiment of the USA being abandoned for its original Native American population, or for that matter the settler-colonial experiment of any American/Carribean country being abandoned for its orignal native population. Pure fantasy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,647 ✭✭✭brickster69


    America has today allowed Iran to sell oil to them legally and use USD banking and insurance services if they so wish. How kind of them to do that for them, it's as if the US is the only country in the world that want's to buy oil and no one else does.

    The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has officially issued an Iran-related temporary 60-day general license authorizing the production, delivery, and sale of Iranian-origin oil, petrochemicals, and petroleum products through August 21, 2026.

    The license grants a provision in the memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed last week between Washington and Tehran to establish an emerging nuclear and war-ending framework.

    It permits the export and importation of Iranian-origin crude oil, petroleum products, derivatives, and petrochemicals into the United States.

    The waiver covers essential support operations like banking transactions, insurance, and maritime transportation services (such as vessel management, bunkering and Piloting)

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,286 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Its funny that you use as an example the europeans and native Americans, I think the israelis would be quite disgusted by that analogy.

    The israelis do have issue that no matter how far they expand they are still surrounded by enemies. They need a large enough population to defend themselves which was obviously not an issue comparable to Ireland losing population to emigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Trump is so tough with ordinary people in his own country and allies like Denmark and Canada but when the billionaires turn up he’s more private dancer than president:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    92% of Israelis believe Iran won the war per times of Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    The israelis do have issue that no matter how far they expand they are
    still surrounded by enemies. They need a large enough population to
    defend themselves which was obviously not an issue comparable to Ireland
    losing population to emigration.

    I don't realistically see that as a problem. It's an issue they've been dealing with since their foundation in 1947.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,286 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    It is a problem if their population ever starts to decline. They rely on their conscription army for defence which is why to compare them with Ireland losing population to emigration is odd as it doesnt have the same implications.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭Roman Emperor


    All of that is to assume Israel continues to enjoy American support -something that's not at all certain.

    It's now clear that Trump is unwilling to trade global economic stability for Israeli security.

    Iran is the new kid on the block and is in a better position now than ever before to put manners on Israel - and the United States won't intervene, because the United States can't intervene - remember, Hormuz is the joker in the pack.

    The population of Palestine is split 50/50 between Arabs and Jews - take away the recreational Israelis, the powerbrokers of the settler colonial experiment, and it doesn't take a genius to see the writing on the wall.

    Israel surrounded on all sides by adversaries, no American money or weaponry or diplomatic cover - and most important of all, hundreds of thousands of vengeful Gazans who have nothing left to lose, and armed to the teeth by Iran.

    Squeaky bum time in the settler colonial plantation - yes ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,647 ✭✭✭brickster69


    After just 5 weeks of fighting, this conflict has become the most unpopular war since WW2 for Americans and is the only war that was more unpopular from the start.

    iran.png

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    I would love to hear Trump blame Netanyahu for their failed Joint Operation Epic Fury. It's not a flight of fancy to think Netanyahu will blame former Israeli PM Ehud Olmert for laying the groundwork for his continuing genocidal policies. There is something going on when they turn on each other. Ehud has been writing opinion pieces in Haaretz.

    However, Ehud Olmert stops short of saying GENOCIDE has been committed...

    A cynical person might think Ehud Olmert is trying to whitewash his own complicity as chief architect of the “SLOW-MOTION” GENOCIDE against Palestinians

    The historical record is mirror-clear. And as I speak, historians are actively documenting the ongoing genocide and pointing right back to Olmert’s tenure (2006 until 2009, when Netanyahu succeeded him).

    Historians have already pointed to below 3 MAJOR actions and policies during his godawful tenure:

    (1) Olmert's admin sanctioned the mathematically calculated minimum number of calories needed to keep Gaza s population alive. - 2,279 calories per day to avoid outright malnutrition.

    It’s the literal blueprint for what has happened in Gaza, since 7/10, under Netanyahu - engineered starvation as a weapon of war.

    The Hague will point to Olmert’s policy as historical proof of intentional, systematic deprivation. It was done to enforce the broader BLOCKADE, that Olmert approved and oversaw as PM.

    (2) PM Olmert initiated the land, sea, and air BLOCKADE of the Gaza Strip - fuel, electricity, medicine and commercial... He shut down entry points. And;

    (3) Operation Cast Lead (commenced on 27 December 2008) - the massive 22-day military assault on Gaza was totally disproportionate (aerial bombings, destruction of infrastructure...). 300 children were killed. Large areas razed to the ground: https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/mde150152009en.pdf

    ^ PM Ehud Olmert’s approved policies have been called out as being disproportionate. And I note Hamas is bad.

    Overall, the buck stops entirely with Ehud Olmert.

    "Opinion: Israel Is Conducting a Systematic Campaign of Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes Against Humanity in the West Bank"

    "These are unprecedented and harsh accusations against the Israeli government and the defense establishment, especially from a former prime minister. But after years of restraint, I have no choice but to make them"

    Ehud Olmert, June 18, 2026
    https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2026-06-18/ty-article-opinion/.premium/israel-is-conducting-a-systematic-campaign-of-ethnic-cleansing-in-the-west-bank/0000019e-db02-d7a4-a99f-dfce00a20000

    Starry: I can't see Trump ever being made accountable. He's too rich.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    Simply the Best !! Scroll to: 2:36 / 4:21 and you see the sad young girl standing there who had dreams…. Perhaps of having children of her own, a career as a ballerina, a leader, a scientist…. I think of the massacred 150 Iranian primary school children, killed by US Tomahawk cruise missiles, whose hopes and dreams will never be realised.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    It's a problem, but it won't be an existential one. Israel will still exist, and continue to exist. Per head of population they possibly have the most capable military on the planet. And that's before taking into account their ultimate defensive weapons. Wishful thinking won't change that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,286 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    If a country relies on conscripted army then population loss is existential. South Africa found that out as did Rhodesia. I dont think israel is at the stage but it is wishful thinking on your part to say that it couldnt be a problem for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    America needs a major reset in its relationship with Israel: cut the Israel Lobby down to size, register AIPAC as a foreign agent, reduce aid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Israel built up a lot of its military capability before getting the significant backing of the U.S. Most importantly (with no input from the U.S.) they have their own nuclear weapons. That won't disappear even with the unlikely scenario of total withdrawal of all American support.

    Israel is now less surrounded by adversaries than it was in the past. Relationships are relatively normal (compared to past history) with Egypt and Jordan. If Israel had better leadership (which hopefully will happen with the upcoming elections), then the opportunity is there to build much more co-operative relationships with Lebanon and Syria… they have a lot of mutual interests, and common issues (Hezbollah being the big one). Even without that, neither Syria nor Lebanon are currently threatening Israel's existence, and neither looks like they are likely to develop any interest in doing so. They both have their hands full trying to rebuild their countries.

    The population of Palestine is split 50/50 between Arabs and Jews - take
    away the recreational Israelis, the powerbrokers of the settler
    colonial experiment, and it doesn't take a genius to see the writing on
    the wall.

    You, that's nonsense. You're arguing that if you take away reality, then fantasy will thrive. Even childish labelling won't make it any closer to reality for you.

    If you spend your life fantasising about settler colonialists, as you call them, uping and leaving from somewhere they have lived all their lives, you're going to be sorely disappointed until the day you die. The settler colonialists are not just going to up and leave anywhere in either North or South America, in Oceania, in Africa, or even in Ireland. That's all history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,910 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Israel is now surrounded by unrepresentative dictatorships.

    If and when those countries become democracies ,how kindly will they look upon an expansionist neighbour in their midst?

    Tomorrow is a long time .

    Will the Arab populations look at what happened to Gaza and say,"well after October 7 they had it coming?"

    Will they similarly excuse the West Bank hegemony as necessary for Israel's defence in depth?

    I fear greatly for Israel's survival-and in the not too distant future with the advent of drone warfare.

    Post edited by amandstu on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    I said it would be a problem. But it won't be an existential problem. The white population in SA and Rhodesia were a small minority in their countries. I presume the anology in Israel would be the Jewish-Palestinian ratio (that's very crudely putting it, the reality has a lot more nuances than that). That's unlikely to become the case in Israel. And if it started to trend that way, then the highly proportional nature of Israeli elections would probably lead to increasing Palestinian influence in government, rather than the destruction of the state (See Northern Ireland for that kind of outcome).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,286 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think the Jewish would consider it a problem if they were no longer the majority. It would no longer be israel, the only Jewish state. This is why the israelis are trying to have their cake and eat it, not have a Palestinian state but not allow the Palestinians to vote in israel elections.

    I dont think its an attractive place for immigration now as near constant war for 2 years and surrounded by either enemies, unstable democracies or dictatorships. The middle East will continue to be a basket case for many years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    That "If" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. Generally, in democracies, domestic issues around money and resources are what governments tend to primarily deal with, and what voters care about, unless they themselves are attacked. It would be great for everyone, including Israelis, if their neighbours all became democracies. That looks extremely unlikely. Lebanon is trying, but it's looking like a very difficult struggle for them right now.

    To me, the biggest threats to Israel are internal, with the increasing rightward drift of the electorate, and the increasing proportion of the population who are ultra-Orthodox and completely non-productive to the state (and are actually a huge drain on resources). That trend will end badly if it continues without some major changes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    I broadly agree there. I don't think anyone in the Israeli government would want to annex either Gaza or the West Bank if it meant including their current Palestinian population as Israeli citizens. I don't think Gaza was even "in play" until Trump opened the gates with his Mar-a-Lago on the Med lunacy. So instead we have the creeping ethnic cleansing, pushing Palestinians into decreasing enclaves of land, without actually incorporating anywhere directly into Israel.

    From an Israeli perspective, the current continuous conflict is unsustainable. It's sucking out too many resources from the economy and society. And of course it isn't in any way attractive for immigration. I don't think it would stop the more extremist kind of settler immigrants, though, unfortunately. Possibly the opposite.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,647 ✭✭✭brickster69


    I think the upcoming judgement for crimes against humanity and genocide will have a huge negative effect on the Israeli regime.

    Financially it will be a disaster given the reparations they would have to pay. The global community would be obliged to impose sanctions, cut investment, no weapons and cut imports from them. Probably loads of foreign companies would be off like a shot as would most dual passport holders.

    Lets face it not many people would like to be associated with a country convicted of something like that.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



Advertisement
Advertisement