Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1676677678680682

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭midlander12


    Anyone watching live? Is that the European anthem playing in the background?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,832 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    That's another PM cast to the side. They need to get a handle on their electoral system urgently or this will be the norm forever, 1-2 year terms of office.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Great to see him gone! Shafted Corbyn in a thoroughly dishonest and disingenuous manner. His legacy will be his staunch defence of Israel while they slaughtered and starved children...Good riddance to him.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Unless Burnham is a complete fool, and as much as I'm not a fan I don't think he is, there is no way he is calling an early GE.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭midlander12


    Nominations for leader not closing until 9 July. So he'll be there for a while yet. Even if there's only one candidate, it'll be late July anyway.

    EDIT:- I think that might be nominations only opening on 9 July.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭Slideways


    He is painfully wooden

    That was quite a clumsy resignation speech. “I did great, but now I’m going”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,243 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Timeline laid out as per Guardian live updates, new leader in position middle of next month if no opposition to one candidate, but if a contest they will be in place when the summer recess ends mid-September. Nominations for new candidates to be in by 9th July as mentioned earlier and from there is depends if there is a contest or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Not watching live but there is a good chance it's that lad who is always outside with the boombox and EU flags.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭midlander12


    It is, the BBC later confirmed it. Same crowd played Things Can Only Get Better when Sunak was calling the GE.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,107 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Good. British instability is generally good for Ireland and good for hastening the reunification of this island.

    But their political system isn't really the problem, its the Fleet Street hold on Westminster and Whitehall.

    Britain had just two prime ministers over 18 years at one point in my lifetime. Same political system. Different personalities.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,992 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Have to think it would be healthier for Labour and for Burnham himself for there to be some sort of contest for the Labour leadership.

    However given that Burnham looks to have overwhelming support, is anyone going to be willing to try or indeed able to secure the nominations required



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,755 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Listened to a very interesting podcast recently that basically said the old Political system is breaking down and that shorter terms and more dramatic swings from one ideology to the next are likely to be the norm for x amount of time. X could be any number of years.

    The breakdown is partly due to "democracy" in that there is less control of the various processes that allow individuals and parties and ideologies to develop and particularly the impact the internet and social media has had on societies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,700 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    On my birthday as well :)

    They better check his pockets as he leaves



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,748 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I despise Starmers support for Israel, and not stopping the auction of land in the UK a days ago. I strongly disagree with the designation of PA as terrorist and especially of designating people as such based on verbal or written opinions in support of them. However he was a big improvement on Northern Ireland and ties with the EU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,435 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I think the obsession with Israel over every little thing some politician said or did not say is pathetic and hilarious at the same time.

    Do you think average Joe, who lives in Slough, gives a flying **** over what Andy Burnham said 12 years ago in relation to Israel, and will that affect his day-to-day life?

    No, it won't. This is the problem with this mindset: they want their politicians to be social workers and high-minded moral priests, pontificating about the rights and wrongs of the world, about countries thousands of miles away, while their own country is run into the ground. It does NOT go down well with the public.


    Burnham has a huge job on his hands, namely, how to get the economy going again, while facing down the Labour backbenchers when it comes to cuts, funding defence and tackling immigration.

    Its very easy to give out about Israel as it costs nothing, but Labour should be looking at things like the Triple Lock, but hey, that is hard and electorally unpopular… so yea, lets talk about Israel for the next 3 years and see what happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,435 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Show me a poll from the UK where Israel is in the top 3… no make it Top 5 things..

    You wont find it.

    It's a minority issue peddled by the 2%



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,748 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Edit: 65% in a recent Pew Global Poll in the UK have a negative opinion of Israel.

    The conflict in the Middle East is a major driver of the cost of living because of the oil price, and commodities blocked in the Strait of Hormuz.

    The University of Leeds has removed 2 Jewish chaplains, including one saying that Palestinians should receive "biblical" punishment, and that they saw no difference between Palestinians and Hamas. One was in the IDF.

    But earlier this month social media posts from Mrs Pariente, dated before her appointment, included claims that deaths in Gaza had been faked, using the slur word “Pallywood”, and a claim made last November that “The life of an Israeli has a higher value than the life of a pali.".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,967 ✭✭✭rock22


    People can be concerned about more than 5 issues . The fact that someone might put cost of living as their most urgent issue does not mean they are not concerned about the genocide in Gaza and the invasion of Lebanon even if there are four other issues that are of more immediate concern.

    And on Israel, the British people polls during the height of the conflict were increasingly concerned about Israeli action as these poll results showed.

    https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/52694-british-attitudes-to-the-israel-gaza-conflict-july-2025-update

    https://actionforhumanity.org/blog/82-of-britons-oppose-israels-actions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,435 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I tend to find these discussions that its the medias fault a bit insecure.
    The UK is more right wing than Ireland, and it has some right-leaning publications, but it also has many left-leaning publications. The power of the press is no where that it once was.


    Maybe, just maybe, the general public is more right-leaning than one would have you believe?

    Blaming the press for the woes of the Labour party, Starmer or whatever, is loser talk. They should look at themselves more than blaming the media, something despots do in other countries.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    People can be concerned about more than 5 issues 

    They don't tend to vote on more than 5 issues though and righting the economy in the UK is by far the most important thing for any new PM to do - and also the hardest.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,748 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Despots wanted to control the press because they knew it influenced public opinion. I'm not calling for the state to control it, but it's a fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,435 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Edit: 65% in a recent Pew Global Poll in the UK have a negative opinion of Israel.

    And?

    Has the Israel issue ever been in the top 3, top 5 or top 10.. issues that concern the broader electorate?
    I think not, and that is the point.

    I think many people are tired of their politicians acting like Ambassadors only, while ignoring glaring issues at home.



    The conflict in the Middle East is a major driver of the cost of living because of the oil price, and commodities blocked in the Strait of Hormuz.


    And? I dont agree that the cost of living issues are solely to do with Israel, there is a certain country called Iran who is blocking a certain strait as we know.

    But what can one do? Pontificate about Israel? Or actually do something?

    Forget Net zero?
    More drilling in the North Sea?
    Anything else?

    The world is getting more unstable, so what is Burnham going to do about it? Pointificate about Israel being bad, or actually do something to protect the UK's national interest?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,233 ✭✭✭Randycove


    Tried to post a link to LinkedIn, but it didn’t work so deleted it



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,748 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    The strait was open before Israel and it's puppet the USA attacked Iran.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Streeting backing Burnham. Coronation awaits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    No one here seems more obsessed than yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Living ex-PMs - Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak, Starmer.

    Wreath laying at the Cenotaph gets ever more complicated.

    For recent comparison, during the last few months of Blair's time in office, Thatcher and Major were the only living ex-PMs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,997 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Many countries get by for a period with an interim Government. What gives the UK an exceptionalism to this? What is the obsession with a PM having a mandate from a GE? A GE doesn't elect a PM, the MPs do that.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,009 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    To be clear, Burnham's Govt won't be an "interim" government.

    And the answer is it suits the opposition (Burnham himself called for one during one of the many Conservative handovers). I doubt it is any different elsewhere we just have less exposure to their media and politics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,755 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You're completely missing the point, in a number of ways.

    I don't disagree that many voters care more about local issues than they do international, or certainly middle east ones, but that doesn't mean that this particular issue isn't something that is worth paying attention to. And that's for several reasons.

    Probably the most relevant concern with respect to UK politicians unreserved support for Israel is what that says about those politicians. Why is it that they should concern themselves so much about it, if their constituents, if what you say is correct, don't care about it at all really. Why should these politicians be negatively impacting those constituents with actions that are largely seen to be more favourable towards the interest of a foreign group than the citizens of the UK.

    Whether it is Boris Johnson, as Foreign Secretary, meeting an ex JGB officer, or Nigel Farage getting a 5M payment from a Thai based cryptoguru or Priti Patel secretly meeting Israeli officials, all of them are at the very least indicators of a focus which is likely not necessarily in the best interest of the UK people, as a whole.

    Aside from that, Western Governments through their direct and indirect support for Israel are enabling and permitting them to carry out a genocide. If Never Again meant what it was supposed to mean 80 years ago, then we should be abhorred at the inaction of our Governments to appropriately reign the Israeli's in to account.

    Lastly, our societies are built on various structures which might no be perfect were developed at least with the idealistic intent to be for the betterment of society as a whole. The UN, the ECHR, the ICC etc are all parts of this structure which were intended to provide the tools to give the best chance of peace and security for the most possible people. These same structures are being undermined and all but defanged because powerful countries, institutions and individuals feel that they can ignore them if they wish while insisting they be used to protect their interests in the next breath.

    Every time someone yawns and says Israel has no relevance in UK or EU politics, they are partially saying they don't care if the institutions are weakened, as long as Israel isn't admonished or curtailed.

    And if none of this matters to you, as others have pointed out, the cost of living that IS impacting Joe in Slough is partially an outcome of the whole of Western Society being manipulated in to allowing Israel wreak havoc in the middle east.

    Israel isn't the biggest concern of Andy Burnham, nor should it be, but it is a concern and it shouldn't be ignored or waved away as you or others wish to do.



Advertisement
Advertisement