Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Irelands neutrality stance in WW2 unfairly criticized? (see Mod note 217)

1106107109111112114

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Stop the trolling. It is a fact there would have been a barometer on each of the 400 to 600 ships in the North Atlantic on any given day in 1944, and rest assured they took very regular readings. The 6000 staff of the UK met service in 1944, plus the thousands of met staff in the other services, would not have relied exclusively on a weather report from the lighthouse in Mayo for the success of the D-day landings. You do not quite understand the planning and professionalism that went in to D day if you think so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,093 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    We sent weather reports throughout the war = fact.
    I.E. we aided the Allies.

    What was in those reports or who else was also sending reports or who got value from them is simply immaterial.

    Try again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Never said we did not send the weather reports. The lighthouses were subsidized by the British anyway. They also had weather reports from thousands of other stations. Weather was very important during the war: that is why the met office had a staff of 6,000 in 1944.

    We got oil and coal from them during the war so they supported us there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,093 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Never said we did not send the weather reports.

    So we aided the Allies.


    Finally, with nowhere left to go, you admit it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 150 ✭✭casey jones


    Im sure there was a barometer on board, ships moving with differing objectives, varying positions, not consistent. Even one of the two weathership's readings had to be discounted as they became unreliable.

    But you're the expert, maybe write to the Royal Meteorolgical Society, the BBC and the House of Representatives among others to correct the record. Bloody treacherous Irish, infiltrating those organisations! I was going to include met eireann who have a lot of information on this event but you would discount them as being part of Irish propaganda anyway.

    Irish neutrality IMHO was the best of a bad lot of choices at a time of great peril for this country and western civilisation. The US and USSR were the overwhelming contributors to allied victory. The US with its huge industrial capacity and the USSR with the massive defeats inflicted upon Germany, 3 out of 4 German casualties were on the eastern front. The US and USSR entered the war when they were attacked, not before. Britain and France did declare war in Sept 1939 but didn't engage Germany by land until they were themselves attacked May 1940. Britain did well to hold out in 1940 but crossing the channel was beyond German capability, as demonstrated by the huge preparations and dominance required for D-Day.

    Im out of this thread, its an interesting topic on a lot of levels but I'm done debating with trolls.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,093 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Joining you. @Francis McM embarassing themselves for the umpteenth time has grown boring.
    If someone adds something new maybe but the trolling is toxic now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    We aided the Allies in more important ways than that actually. Anyway, met reports from Ireland were useful but they had thousands of weather reports from elsewhere, and each of the 400 to 600 ships in the Atlantic had a barometer. Ask any mariner, they always took regular readings, hourly if I recall correctly. Some would have had military and met trained personnel too.

    Incredible the naivety of people who think the expert planners of D-day would have left the biggest and most important amphibious landing in history, (there were 7000 vessels involved, and 13,000 allied aircraft ) depend solely on the weather report of a civilian in Mayo, who with all due respect could have been sick, replaced by a newbie, drunk, distracted while taking the reading, made a mistake, had a hangover, gone to a wedding and had an inexperienced person fill in , had a mis-reading or equipment malfunction, whatever.

    But believe whatever you want to believe.

    Nearly as naive as thinking Dev was naive enough to be trusting good friends with Hempel the Nazi Party member and Hitler's rep and diplomat who must surely have known about Hitlers's extermination camps, what was happening in Europe and Hitler's final solution. Not credible to think he did not. If Dev was betrayed by not being told about the the extermination camps / final solution by Hempel, why did Dev stay good friends with him and honour him after that? Would'nt have made sense, so obviously Dev knew all along too.

    Even Irish America was appalled.

    https://x.com/IrishTimes/status/1872809702016598229


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Ignoring the copy pasta trolling, the issue of large numbers of Allied ships providing hourly or even daily transmissions of barometric readings during the Battle of the Atlantic is contradicted by the fact that strict radio silence was essential as U-boats could use RF transmissions to detect convoys.The conditions under which radio silence could be broken were quite limited. There is a very good book on the development of electronic warfare (radio, radar etc) in WW2) called "Instruments of Darkness" by Alfred Price and it is available on Amazon Kindle. It also covers some of the electronic warfare aspects of the Battle of the Atlantic and the U-boats using receivers to detect RF emissions from convoys and airborne ASW radar .The issue of the Irish Treaty Ports would have been irrelevant as the receivers used by the U-boats to detect radar signals had a very limited range (typically less than 10 miles).

    Post edited by jmcc on

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Ships could and did signal aircraft during WW2. Whenever ships did not want to break radio silence, they could use a variety of visual and electronic methods to communicate with friendly pilots. To give but just one example, ships sometimes used focused, directional lamps (Aldis lamps) to send Morse code. As the crow flies, it is only 75 or 80 miles from Lough Erne to Belmullet. Could be done in about a quarter of an hour by a Mosquito if required, which had a top speed of about 400 mph. Ships also used weather balloons extensively during WW2.

    Allied ships did take barometric pressure readings on an hourly basis during WW2, alongside other weather metrics like temperature, wind, and visibility. It was all logged and gave ships warning of incoming storms etc, so they could sometimes have time to alter course or secure decks before striking severe weather.

    Also, the Allies operated 16 weather ships in the North Atlantic and six ships in the tropical Atlantic. Do you think they all took their summer holidays in the run up to D-day?

    And some people think the expert planners of D-day, with its 7000 vessels and 13,000 aircraft, relied on the weather report of a civilian lighthouse keeper in Mayo for its success? lol.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Again on the importance of data on weather conditions, I think that Hempel (or one of the German diplomats) had a fairly sophisticated weather station at his home. It was mentioned in the Codebreaker book on Richard Hayes. The author wrote a second book on intelligence operations in Ireland during WW2 but I have not read it yet, On he importance of the Irish weather report for D-Day, there were only certain day sin each month when the tides were best for a landing. A few days after D-Day, a large storm wrecked some of the operations that the Allies had set up to supply the beachheads. Wikipedia has a good article on it and mentions the Irish contribution.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_forecasting_for_Operation_Overlord#Weather_data

    Regards…jmcc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,329 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Yes I sent meteorlogical readings four times a day when I was in the merchant navy, but then that wasn't during a war and we didn't need to conceal our location.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Just thinking that Malcolm Redfellow from P.ie would have loved this thread. For shipping, weather data could be a matter of survival. With D-Day, it was the difference betwen gale force winds and cloud cover and more favourable conditions. The storms were moving down towards the coast of France and could have made a complete mess of D-Day if the wrong day had been chosen.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    How seriously they took the weather can be gauged by the fact the U.K met office had a staff of 6,000 in 1944, and no doubt the other Allies had plenty of met people too.  



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭adaminho


    How many of the 6,000 Were honoured by Congress?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 150 ✭✭casey jones


    16 weather ships, in May...1945. You forgot that bit, the war was over! In June 1944 there was 2 weatherships available to Stagg, only one providing reliable readings from 600 miles west of Ireland.

    Waffle about visual comms when jmcc pointed out that your 400-600 ships wouldn't have broken radio silence to transmit weather readings.

    As for the imaginary flight from lough Erne, maybe it hooked up with the imaginary weather ship 5 miles off the Mayo coast that you posted about.

    Anything to diminish the reports from Blacksod lighthouse! The historical record is very clear, just let it go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Sorry to disappoint you, but Ms Sweeney did not get a Congressional Gold Medal. Only about 108 individuals in the world did. Churchill was one of them.

    The Americans do give out plenty of other honours though.

    The Americans do have a funny way of looking at things sometimes though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    As noted already, if ships did not wish to break radio silence ( they could for some emergencies) they were other ways of signalling, for example by morse code using lamps.

    "Every naval vessel and merchant marine ship carried signal lamps (often called Aldis lamps or Morse lamps) to flash messages in Morse code. Visual signaling was vital for communicating orders or course corrections without breaking radio silence and alerting enemy submarines"

    This was frequently done. The met office were also said to have used data gathered from special recce (reconnaissance) flights, ship observations, UK weather sites and pinched what they could from the Germans – once they broke their weather codes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭adaminho




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    The Irish Times covered the award from Congress.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/us-honour-for-98-year-old-woman-whose-mayo-weather-report-changed-d-day-landing-1.4598678

    Francis McM tried to misrepresent its significance, waffled about the Congressional Gold Medal and then waffled about imaginary flights being signalled from imaginary ships. This Irish contribution saved Allied lives. Historical facts are inconvenient for Francis.McM's anti-Irish neutrality and anti-de Valera agenda.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    No waffle as the Congressional Gold Medal. Only thirty-one individual foreigners have been awarded the Congressional Gold medal. Some people may be under the impression she received one, that was not the case. Churchill got one many years ago, he was one of the 31. The Allies gave out over ten million medals to do with WW2. The met staff received medals too for WW2, as did tens of thousands of other Irish people. As you say the Irish contribution saved peoples lives, and many Irish people did indeed pay with their lives in WW2. Probably about 10,000 people. Truly brave people to whom we owe a great debt of gratitude for helping to save the world from Axis forces.

    Nb. There were no imaginary flights from Lough Erne - there were real flights. RAF Castle Archdale on Lough Erne generated over 3,000 operational sorties and thousands more training flights. Lots of brave men flew out over the Atlantic from there but were never seen again / did not make it back to base alive.

    Light signalling using morse frequently took place. All ships in WW2 had Aldis lights. Thousands of Irish people would have used them and risked their lives serving on ships using them. Some of the 6000 met office staff did serve on ships in the Atlantic.

    Post edited by Francis McM on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I said the Americans do have a funny way of looking at things sometimes, meaning they sometimes have been accused of taking severe historical liberties. Take the film U571 foe example. It gives the impression the Americans were the first to capture a naval Enigma machine.

    The film depicts an American crew capturing the first naval Enigma machine. In reality, this was achieved by the British Royal Navy, months before the U. S. even entered WW2. The crew of HMS Bulldog boarded the German submarine U-110 in May 1941 to capture an intact Enigma machine and crucial codebook. And Polish people helped the British with the Enigma before that. Even Tony Blair said the American production was an insult to the Royal Navvy. So how America chooses to remember the war a few generations on is open to debate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Absolutely pathetic! Francis McM tries to misrepresent the significance of the award by waffling about the Congressional Gold Medal and other medals awarded by the US in WW2. Even Churchill would have been appalled at Francis McM's antics.

    This Irish contribution to the Allied war effort saved Allied lives. Obviously, despite his "concern" for Irish and Allied lives lost in the Battle of the Atlantic and WW2, those lives lost and saved don't seem to matter in the fanatical anti-Irish neutrality and anti-de Valera agenda pursued here by Francis McM.

    As for the mention of a mythical Mosquito flying from Lough Erne to collect weather reports from imaginary ships, Mosquitos were largely made of plywood but they were not seaplanes.

    Post edited by jmcc on

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    And just like that it is on to another diversion to a fictional movie that is irrelevant to the thread. Ironically, the scriptwriters probably knew more about Enigma than Francis McM.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Probably complain that Cork man Cillian Murphy didn't invent the Atomic bomb fast enough in Oppenheimer next!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,329 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    As regards 'unfair criticism' of Irish neutrality (the thread subject) Churchill was the originator.

    His dated ideas about Britain and its imperial past provided the motivation..

    While he was a great wartime leader he was stuck in the past like a lot of his later unquestioning admirers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Like Francis McM, he seemed to think of Ireland as a British colony. The world had changed after WW1 and Irish Independence was arguably the start of the end of the British Empire. The costs of WW1 had almost ruined the UK and the US had begun to replace the UK as the dominant global power. The economic effects of WW2 accelerated that. Ireland's neutrality was a continual reminder to Churchill of an imperial past that had no future.

    Churchill, much like Francis McM, seemed to blame de Valera for the policy of neutrality despite, unlike Francis McM, being aware of Irish contributions to the Allied war effort even while officially being neutral. Without Churchill as leader, the UK would probably have opted for an armistice with Germany. Hitler was apparently a fan of the British Empire so its subsequent decline after WW2 might have been delayed.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I was just pointing out the reality of the Congressional Gold Medal versus some other of tens of millions of medals, as some people seem to think a medal is a medal.

    I am well aware the Mosquito was not a seaplane: I mentioned it as it was the fastest two seater airplane the Allies had in 1944, and I mentioned it could cover the distance between Belmullet and the geographical area of Lough Erne in about a quarter of an hour. It could fly well over 400 mph and the distance as crow flies is only 75 or 80 miles. Had the Allies wanted, weather information could be relayed without breaking radio silence from a professional met person on a ship near Belmullet to St. Angelo is about 15 minutes.

    Do you really think the Allies, with a combined total of 20,000 vessels and planes or whatever for D-day, would risk everything by relying one ONE weather report from a civilian (part time postal clerk, part time weather observer) in Belmullet? That the UK met office staff of 6,000 and thousands of other met people in the Allies were all waiting on that one report from Mayo?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    And even the BBC shows how important the Irish weather data was for D-Day:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyjj7dddvmjo

    "The weather report from Belmullet was enough for the chief
    meteorological officer, Group Captain James Stagg, to advise that the
    invasion be postponed by 24 hours."

    Obviously, Group Captain Stagg and the Allied commanders thought more of this data and these reports than Francis McM. Irish weather reports were being supplied to the Allies:

    "But weather reports were still being received from neutral Ireland under an
    agreement signed between the two governments in May 1939.

    Information from 10 Irish weather stations - including Blacksod - was supplied
    hourly. And on 4 June the crucial information came through."

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    You mean the reporter for BBC NI on 4th of June 2026 reported that in 1944 " on 4 June, confirmation came from Belmullet when Ted Sweeney reported: “Heavy rain and drizzle cleared, cloud at 900 feet and visibility on land and sea very clear.” It is implied in the report thar the decision to postpone D-day was made because of Belmullet alone, even though the Allies had reports of weather from hundreds of locations.

    Somehow I think the Allies had other confirmation as well that at that point in time off the coast of Ireland the rain and drizzle cleared and "visibility on land and sea very clear". They were not going to let a combined force of 20,000 vessels / aircraft depend on the weather report of a part-time postal clerk / civilian weather reporter, for obvious reasons.

    They were a bit more professional than that. Still, believe what you want to believe though. Why not get US backing to make a film showing the 6,000 staff in the UK met office, as well as thousands of other Allied met staff, were all anxiously waiting for the weather report for D-day to come through from someone looking out the window in Belmullet? And hoping it was the regular postal clerk / weather reporter there, hoping she had not the day off and got someone else to fill in for her?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Historical facts debunk another Francis McM claim. Anyone surprised?

    "Group Captain Stagg believed a ridge of high pressure was building up from the Azores.

    A ridge that would give a window of better weather.

    And on 4 June, confirmation came from Belmullet when Ted Sweeney reported:
    “Heavy rain and drizzle cleared, cloud at 900 feet and visibility on
    land and sea very clear.”

    At 04:15 on the morning of 5 June 1944, Eisenhower met with his senior staff and told them: “OK, We’ll go.” "

    Post edited by jmcc on

    Regards…jmcc



Advertisement
Advertisement