Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

Not just drones working to disarm putin's terrorist state but people within are taking steps to help Ukraine.

But the drones from Ukraine are making an impact throughout the russian federation:

https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/ukraine-hits-tyumen-oil-refinery-2-000-km-1781971600.html

and in occupied parts of Ukraine:

https://bsky.app/profile/specialkhersoncat.bsky.social/post/3mopuaj64fs22

If only putin's terrorists would stop trying to build a bigger empire for their dear leader and go back home we could have less threats of nuclear war from terrorist state sympathisers.

Heres Kerch port apparently

Putin has a Phd, likely fairly earned. He's not and wasn't stupid. He was acting quite rationally given the wests near endless acts of cowardice in response to Orc provocations.

Nothing was done in response to Litvinenko's assasination, the Skripal attempted assassinations, the murder of a UK citizen with Novichok and attempted murder of a police constsble. Then nothing was done about the little green men in Donbas, nor about the act of war when the Orc military, shot down a civillian airliner full of Dutch and Australian civillians. More nothing was the response to the seizure of Cimea.

When the Orcs invaded Ukraine, the wests response was to offer Zelensky a ride out of there, not to tell Putin troops were on the way.

Putin overestimated the capabilities of his own corruption rotted military and undrestimated Ukrainian capablities and determination; the gutlessness of the west he sussed to a T. His decision to invade was not entirely irrational at the time, even if hindsight grants a contrary assessment.

The Russian troops in crimea are toast

My hot take on it is Ukraine will make some form of ultimatum where Russian troops and settlers need to leave by x date or they will be starved out and then they drop the bridge.

A load of air defence around the kerch berch taken out as part of the Ukrainian attack on the port.

Notional or real? If you were tin-pot African dictator with money to spend on air defence systems, would the S400 still be on your shopping list?

There's a lesson in this for our American friends too. We've been reassured recently (on this platform) that the Patriot system is far superior because it can do so much more (terms & conditions apply). But Urkaine and Iran have both shown that the "so much more" is/can be largely irrelevant because many of those features only work with equipment that was designed for an entirely different style of warfare.

Remember a while back there were repeated pro-Russian or 'Peace' posters on this thread. They seem to have vanished mostly. Why? has the money dried up? or is there another reason?

How many of Venezuela's air defences were actually switched on at the critical moment ?

( And how competently used would those systems have been in the first place ) , a couple of tor point defence systems is not the same as a multi-layer system..

Air defence has always been chasing it's tail a bit , planes and missiles get better and more complex - so air defence gets better and more complex, and on and on .. wether it's wild weasels or stealth tech ,

I suppose sometimes it's not that either a target is invulnerable or unable to be hit from the air , but more is it unaffordable or unrealistic attack and destroy or to defend..

Especially if resources are limited - defending the Kerch strait may so many resources as to be shooting yourself in the foot , conversely hitting the bridge may cost far more than it's worth when there's many other worth while targets out there ..

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/06/18/crimea-will-turn-into-an-island-ukraines-defence-minister-says-in-a-message-to-russia

Ukraine might as well leave the Kerch bridge in situ. The orc & planter rats need a way to get back to Mordor. They'd better start marching home. The cars & the ferries won't have any fuel LOL! 😎

Go on home Russian soldiers go on home! 🤩

The Americans took out Nagasaki and Hiroshima, targets in a belligerent country, the belligerent country who had in fact drawn the USA into the conflict.

The piece you've shared was a threat to

Nuke Germany and the UK if the War in Ukraine Continues

A threat to attack other countries because it couldn't come close to achieving its own goals in Ukraine. Ratcheting up this threat is tacit admission of failure, not to mind the international response if it were ever attempted.

wow,

Orwell Rd getting desperate???

the end is near people..