Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Irelands neutrality stance in WW2 unfairly criticized? (see Mod note 217)

1104105107109110112

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,078 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It is not remotely the ‘facts’.

    It’s the pathetic pleading of a fantasist in the hope somebody will chime in to support you.

    Think up something new



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,157 ✭✭✭adaminho


    I see they are using that quote that was based on a novel still!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    If anything I said was not the facts, you would be the first to point out what the facts were, but you cannot, you were caught out every time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,078 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Just wants to rehash in the vain hope of winning something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    You claimed "most of the Allied countries turned their backs on refugees".

    I pointed out "Not saying they could'nt or should'nt have done more, but there were about 70,000 Jewish refugees who were accepted into Britain by the start of WW2, and an additional 10,000 people who made it to Britain during the war. We let in extremely few, even though we had plenty of space and were an agricultural country capable of growing food."…. to which you had no answer.

    What most of the Allies did do - in fact what all of the Allies did do - was work to defeat the Axis powers. And help liberate the people / prisoners held in terrible conditions by the Nazis and Japanese etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,078 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Says the poster who just ignores facts as inconvenient truth to their rants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭casey jones


    It was more than a weather forecast, it was hourly air pressure readings from a single fixed location. The allies had 2 weather ships hundreds of miles out to the west of Ireland but readings from one became unreliable on morning of 3rd June. Weather ships had to contend with tides, currents the u boat threat all contributing to the difficulty maintaining a fixed position, hence leading to a lack of consistency. There was considerable disagreement between US and UK forecasters about whether to go ahead on 5th June, the US being in favour, UK not so. The Bemullet readings were key to postponement which undoubtedly saved many lives as acknowledged by US afterwards.

    Typical of you to denigrate an actual key contribution we made to saving lives while indulging theories about lives lost due to our neutrality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,078 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    In line with every other country we did what we could which like others was limited.
    What the Allies did was decide as sovereign nations what the best course for them was.
    Get over it, we did exactly the same in a unique set of circumstances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Did what we could which like others was limited? Rubbish, most joined the Allies before war end. The neutral countries are grey on the map.

    Even neutral Portugal gave the use of the Azores to the Allies as a base.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,078 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    ah look it’s the map.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Rubbish. The Allies had ships all over the North Atlantic, inc just 5 miles from Belmullet if they wanted to. They could anchor if they wanted to. By June 1944 they also had sonar / ASDIC etc to help combat the U-boat threat. In 1944 the UK mt office reached its wartime peak with a total strength of approximately 6,000 personnel. They were not going to put the D-Day invasion - the largest seaborne and amphibious invasion in history - at risk by relying on one weather report from a lighthouse in Belmullet…..for all they knew, the lighthouse keeper could have been sick that day / injured/ had a hangover / made a typo or whatever. Belmullet was just used to confirm what the 6000 professional meteorologists knew already, who had collected data from thousands of sources.

    By all means, believe the Irish propaganda that the weather report was critical to the success of D-day. Its importance is greatly overstated given there were 6000 personnel in the UK Meteorological Office then, and you can be sure the Americans and Canadians had met. people too.

    If that is all our government did to help liberate Europe it was not very much, giving the weather from the lighthouse in Belmullet.

    Hundreds of thousands of Irish people made contributions to D-day in their own way, directly and indirectly. More than a few paid with their lives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,914 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Debunked claims about numbers (debunked by cyclingtourist as not being an Admiralty estimate), quotes summarising quotes from other books because they supported the auhtor's view. No book names cited, naturally.At least the bleating about the Irish Treaty Ports seems to have stopped.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    It is your criticism which was debunked. The 5070 (British sailors lives lost as a result of Irish neutrality) number came from the Dominions office in London which was involved in war-time planning, and got its information from the British Admiralty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,078 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    …and made up the number.

    If they didn't make them up, show us the methodology they used…did they for instance factor in the chances the ships position was known to the Germans because the Admiralty told them, as we all know?

    If they are accurate then there will be detail and methodology we can examine.
    If not they are as credible as Hastings sailors sailing past Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,601 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Nice story with Timmy Mallot and that Irish forecast.

    RTE news: An absolute joy: Timmy Mallet completes cycle around Ireland

    https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/2025/0616/1518737-timmy-mallet-completes-cycle-around-ireland/

    Are today's forecast or weather less predictable than back then. Because I wouldn't trust a forecast today like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The Admiralty office do not make up numbers. They are well respected around the world as being accurate and professional, second to none, as the Americans would say.

    Given the known, much higher number of Allied deaths in the Atlantic, I think it is not an unreasonable number. It would not take in to account how much the war may have been shortened if some - say 5 or 10% of the three thousand or so ships sunk in the Atlantic were not sunk and instead made it to Europe with their cargoes and personnel intact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,914 ✭✭✭jmcc


    More pseudo-scientific bolloxology based on a made-up number. Not a British Admiralty number. Apart from being from a poster that has a long history of having his claims debunked, the fact that the Germans were reading BAMS messages about convoy routing resulted in convoys being targeted. This fact would probably not have been known to the people making up the number.

    That fact more than any exaggerate claims about the unavailability of the Irish Treaty Ports cost lives. The BAMS messages were being read from the start of the war to at least 1943. Dimbleby mentioned the seriousness of the breach in that BBC video clip posted upthread. But to Francis McM, it is just a soccer match and those lives lost are the score.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,295 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    And Britain wasn’t a bully? Will you listen to yourself. On an Irish forum too! By the time he died, Churchill was an anachronism even in his own country, hanging on desperately to the trappings of the British Empire. Thank God it went with him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I never mention a soccer match. The Allies also had Enigma, you should read a few books on it some time. It was not all one way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Hundreds of thousands of Irish fought and help the Allies, either directly in their forces or else in hospitals, factories etc.

    They were not bullied.

    The Irish who were bullied were the ones like the Irish seamen captured by the Germans and put in slave labour Nazi concentration camps (44% of them died) , the 650 Irish who were captured by the Japanese and starved, beaten, sometimes crucified and 150 of whom died….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,914 ✭✭✭jmcc


    You treat these lives lost as the scores in some kind of soccer match. Enigma was used primarily by the Germans not the Allies.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    And the Allies largely cracked it (Enigma). Read a few books on it.

    I do not treat lives lost like a football match. You used that comparison.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,914 ✭✭✭jmcc


    I have read many books on the subject. The Allies did not have a general solution for Enigma and could not read every Enigma message. There were times when the Allies were periodically locked out of reading some variants of Enigma traffic such as when the U-boats changed from the three rotor Enigma to the four rotor Enigma. Allied shipping losses increased. The way that you treat those lives lost as some kind of soccer match score to pursue your anti-de Valera and anti-Irish neutrality agenda is disrespectful to their memories.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,601 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Faux compassion for allied losses on this thread isn't credible. The mantra on this thread has always been it's not Irelands problem it was someone's else war.

    Also we don't need to break out the rosary beads for on a historic discussion on something that happened 80+ years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭casey jones


    Overstated by bbc.com on 3rd June 2024 ?

    The Irish lighthouse keeper who gave D-Day the go-ahead

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyjj7dddvmjo

    Or by the US House of Representatives

    In June 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives honored Maureen Flavin Sweeney with a special medal and placed a proclamation of her achievements in the U.S. Library of Congress.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Paper does not refuse ink. The vast bulk of the met. work for D-day was done by some of the 6,000 full time staff in the UK met office, plus met people from Canadian and American forces, drawn from information gathered from numerous locations. Including ships a number of miles from Belmullet, and elsewhere, as needed. They were not going to let the success or otherwise of D-day depend on one lighthouse keeper in Belmullet. You can believe the lighthouse keeper gave D-day the go ahead if you want. Sure, the information was received, along with numerous other bits of information to build a complete picture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    If you read many books on the subject you should remember that the German Navy transitioned U-boats from the standard 3-rotor Enigma to the 4-rotor version in early 1942. Yes, that threw Allied codebreakers at Bletchley Park into a long blackout for the critical U-boat naval ciphers but that was overcome in late 1942. The British captured an M4 machine and codebooks from a U boat, which allowed codebreakers to reverse-engineer the wiring of the new 4th rotor.

    WW2 was far from a soccer match and having known a few of the people involved very well, the last thing I can assure you that I would want to be is disrespectful to their memories. I do not think the British authorities, in calculating losses during the war, are or were disrespectful to their memories either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭casey jones


    Take it up with the bbc then, how foolish to put out a fake story on the 60th anniversary of D Day! And the House of Representatives.

    The importance you attach to a made up number of lives lost due to Irish neutrality contrasts with your condescending, dismissive view of anything that doesnt support your ideology. And it is made up, its impossible to say 368 ships would not have been sunk, so many variables in even one attack.

    Paper doesnt refuse ink indeed.

    Had we given the air pressure readings to the Germans you wouldnt be dismissing it as irrelevant.

    The numbers working in the met were largely due to absence of the kind of automated modelling available today. Even with all those inputs and resources opinions in Stagg's team varied greatly on whether to go ahead on 5th or 6th June or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    In 1944, there were generally 400 to 600 Allied ships in the North Atlantic on any given day. As well as land based stations throughout these islands, more than a few of those were also capable of making a weather report if needed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,295 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Fundamentally, you don’t see us as an independent nation in WWII with its own agency that had suffered hideous oppression over many centuries. We were still Britain’s little helper to you with an obligation of some mysterious sort to the abusive Mother Country.



Advertisement
Advertisement