Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

GENERAL World Cup Thread

16061626466

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,318 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Sorry, i should have been clearer, he does the punditry for LOI for RTE when they bother their b****x to show a game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Jaffa3000




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Jaffa3000


    It’s head to head not goal difference.

    https://www.fifa.com/en/tournaments/mens/worldcup/canadamexicousa2026/articles/groups-how-teams-qualify-tie-breakers

    Screenshot below is from the official World Cup app.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    is the fox coverage worth watching?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,929 ✭✭✭archfi


    US stadiums look amazing

    "What does that even mean, vetting?"

    -Michael Martin



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Don’t think I had heard of any of these players pre-tournament…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,874 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    yeah…would normally recognise at least a couple of us/aussie names from English leagues…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,971 ✭✭✭Benedict XVI


    There was a great building spree in the 90s and 00s, where multipurpose "cookie cutter" stadiums were replaced with more individualistic unique ones.

    Many of the MLB ones were designed like ones from a century earlier and are fantastic.

    The problem now though is that there is a bit of regression going on.

    Football (American) teams are building new climate control controlled ones with translucent roofs, because they can be used all year round and become candidates to host a Superbowl or college football (American) National Championship game.

    But as a result football (American) games being played in them are losing the element of weather, the number of games being played in wet or snowy or windy conditions on a winter Sunday afternoon are diminishing.

    The Buffalo Bills have bucked the trend however, opening a new stadium without a roof, in a cold weather city later this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,919 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Nice of USA to add a bit of Hollywood,having Russell Crowe involved with the team .....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    God how quick was that goal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If this finishes 1-0 where does that leave Scotland? If we assume both Brazil and Morocco beat Haiti, then if Scotland get battered by Brazil they'll be struggling to qualify?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    I’m on them not to qualify so probably nick a draw here and then go through after Brazil batter them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Scotland in trouble, do well to keep to 2-0 vs Brazil



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,384 ✭✭✭secman


    Had thought 3 -0 to Morocco, did well to keep it 1 nil



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,340 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Why is Doyle saying stone wall penalties?

    The McGinn one, I have seen them given. Morocco couldn't have argued had it been given.

    But the McTominay one. There was zero contact. Never a pen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    look on here whenever a 50/50 penalty call is turned down in the premier league season. “Stonewall” is thrown around with wild abandonment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭Manc-Red_


    Saturday/Sunday

    IMG_9636.jpeg IMG_9916.jpeg IMG_9917.jpeg IMG_9918.jpeg IMG_9919.jpeg

    Better Born Lucky Than Rich.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    there was a guy on here saying that the ref was corrupt. Scotland gave it a go in the second half and might have snatched a draw but overall they were second best team in the game. They didn’t have one shot on target in the whole game. Too little and a little bit too late in attack from Scotland. Morocco settled for the 1 nil lead, should have scored one or two more



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭JIdontknow


    to be honest I didn’t think it was a peno on Mctominay either, he was looking for it. On whatever channel I was watching it on they brought in some female referee or something on audio who also said it should have been given that there was contact on the left leg… but from what I saw I didn’t think it was a pen. Scotland weren’t great, a lot of loose sloppy passes and easy turnover of possession. To be fair to the referee he left the game flow which was good to see. Morocco look a well organised team and have a few tricky skilful wingers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    So because of the Head to head rule, 4 teams in groups a-d have nothing at all to play for in their last game, but if it was goal difference they'd all still have something to play for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭JIdontknow


    I read about the change but were teams aware before the tournament began or was it decided last minute / during the tournament that it would be head to head not goal difference? I presume it was known before the World Cup kicked off?


    edit - I see they introduced it in last years club World Cup



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,390 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    From the clips I'm seeing go viral it appears to be Henry and Ibrahimovic just absolutely tormenting Alexey Lalas in the studio at every chance they get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,968 ✭✭✭Cake Man


    Turkey are some enigma of a footballing nation. For a huge population (90m) that’s footballing mad, has a decent enough pedigree in European football (i.e. Turkish clubs always reasonably well represented in European competitions) and regularly produce some really good talent (Guler, Calhanoglu, Yildiz, Hakan Sukur, Tugay, Buruk Yilmaz, Rustu Recber, Arda Turan to name a few current and past players) - they don’t half punch well below their weight.

    Hard to believe 2002 was the last WC they reached before this latest implosion. Looking through their squad they’ve plenty at decent level European clubs, they should not be getting bet by Australia or Paraguay. I’d say there’ll be an inquisition in Istanbul this week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,197 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Good spot.

    Its a crazy rule...Turkey could go out and beat USA 9 nill and can't get into third.

    Also say you loose by a flukey goal to your competitors for say third...get unfortunate red, a bad ref call or broken leg to star player by the team against you..

    Can go out in next game , play say England off the park , beat a tournament favourite 5 nill have best performance in history of county, and not make 3rd.

    It is a group , there is only 3 games ..placing additional weight on one game of the 3 is a nonsense.

    And thank God these dead rubber last games will put and end to it. (Imo)

    Going out with a better record to a team in your group ..over 3 games is an intellectual and sporting nonsense.

    We have done a great job making soccer attacking and about goals....keep it that way..

    Good spot @kowloonkev



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,636 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    There's pros and cons with the head to head. It seems like it will lead to more dead rubber games.

    The issue with goal difference, especially in an expanded competition with more weaker teams, is that come the last match a team can rack up a high score against an already eliminated side.
    It would seem unfair in that scenario if Team A has beaten Team B, for Team A to go out because Team B beat an already eliminated team 5-0.

    Although in some ways it is even more unfair on the cross group 3rd place rankings if you have one awful team in a group then you can boost your goal difference.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Jaffa3000


    But they haven't got a better record if they lost to the other team. Not like head to head is some new invention either, UEFA use it in the Euros and on the continent La Liga use it.

    A minnow beating a tournament favourite 5 nil and going out isn't going to happen. Additionally the only reason that scenario is even there is due to the 48 team World Cup, not head to head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Jaffa3000


    Might be of interest to some, the BBC knockouts are populated based on the current rankings of all the groups. Some mammoth games there (although obviously unlikely to happen)

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/world-cup/schedule#KnockoutStage



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,874 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Being ahead because you beat the team you are directly competing with is more fair than who beat some minnow by more goals.

    Pretty sure most competitions I watch have switched to it.



Advertisement
Advertisement