Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cork - Light Rail [route options identification and initial design underway]

1313233343537»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It’s a wonder public transport struggles to get sold here with the brain types involved.

    Brands are straightforward, you come up with something distinctive yourselves or (as in a lot of other cities), a colloquial name becomes the brand longer term.

    And once again for the hard of reading, I literally said keep it as Luas through the planning process and to construction for these reasons. It’s mad how many people cannot or don’t want to read on a discussion forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I’m reluctant to engage with you given previous experiences, but I think it should be said: I did read exactly what you wrote, and I understood that your proposal was to rebrand once in service. I happen to disagree, and I gave my reasons for that disagreement, along with a counter-example in the form of France.

    Please try to be civil. Someone having a different opinion to you is not a direct insult to you; nor is it a sign of mental insufficiency. My reply was written to criticise your idea, not you. Had I wanted to be insulting, I could have used a phrase like “hard of reading”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Yes brands are a problem apparently, except for when they aren’t and suit you (Luas).

    The amount of inane posts on here from some people. “It’s not the right mode!”- only certain brain types get exercised about this sort of thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Not what I said. I said that we have a brand for tram systems in this country already, it has high recognition and high value. Creating a different one for the same thing just because it's in Cork seems like needless effort. A unique brand can backfire if the system has teething troubles. Biggest advantage is that Luas is also free: have you an idea what branding agencies charge for this kind of thing? I do, and I'd rather it was spent on the service.

    And please give it a rest with the thinly veiled slurs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Which is not what I said.

    I said for Cork I’d put in a brand for their high frequency rail overall.

    Luas brand is good and great to get it through planning, that’s accepted. But longer term I’d like to see Cork (and it would have been my preference for Dublin too but that ship has sailed) to have its own distinctive brand.

    What are you waffling on about? “If the system has teething problems”- if it has teething problems it would be the same thing for Luas in Cork. It’s a nonsensical point.

    Again this comes down to a certain brain type - “it’s not the right mode!”.

    All I am talking about is creating something unique- signage, naming, colours- for Cork. It’s not controversial.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I’m not sure why you keep talking about the project name! Non of us are talking about the project name, we are talking about what the service is called when up and running!

    Your idea that we should use a different brand once up and running is frankly a terrible idea and simply makes no logical sense.

    Luas is what people in Ireland simply call trams. It is an incredibly popular service and a very successful brand. Probably one of the most successful brands developed in Ireland in the past 20 years.

    But you want to throw away all that great branding for no obvious reason and for no benefit!

    It feels like this comes from some weird inferiority complex, oh we don’t want to have the same name as Dublin, we have to pretend it is something different, even though it is exactly the same system as Dublin. It comes across very insecure.

    it isn’t like Cork has unique name for its bus and intercity rail services, they are Bus Eireann and Intercity, same as they are Limerick, Galway, etc. And of course the buses are now increasingly being branded TFI Bus, the same as Dublin.

    CACR could do we a new brand name, but I’d like them to pick one that could be used in Limerick, etc. too in future, maybe Arrow, maybe something else.

    In the end, Luas is what Irish people call modern tram services, Cork is going to get Luas and it will be called Luas once operational.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    No it isn’t. They call the service Luas because it’s being well established.

    Many don’t have a clue about what the difference between modes are. I know this is tough for some of you but not everyone is into trains. Nobody normal talks about the DART and the Luas being different mode.

    I accept the Luas is a good brand now and valuable for planning. If it continues on like that it’s fine too. I am simply referring to trying to get something unique for Cork- name, livery or whatever- that other cities have and is useful.

    Nobody in Boston cares that the Green Line is a different mode to the Red Line except the anoraks like you. They do know the name and brand though, it’s iconic and used to market the city. There is no “confusion” because normal people don’t think like that.

    IMG_3665.jpeg

    Pop culture

    It features in Cheers, Good Will Hunting, the Town and the Departed- it’s a calling card for the city

    Branding (there is even an official store in the city)

    https://mbtagifts.com/collections/fine-art-prints-system-maps

    If any sports is on there- they will flash up the stations there and guess which sign they go for?

    We all accept brands are important. I understand the view on the Luas and how it’s accepted and useful for getting people on board with the project. Where we differ is I think long term there is a chance to do what others cities have and make something unique. It isn’t “terrible”, it happens in many places and helps those cities establish an identity. Again to point out, literally nobody except posters on the likes of this website care for these different modes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,921 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    There is clearly a distinction between the commuter rail and the subway in Boston though, despite both falling under the T brand. Nobody cares about the differences between the green line and orange/red/blue lines because they are actively grouped together as "the subway" in all mapping and communication by the MBTA



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Commuter rail and subway have very similar service levels in terms of journey times and punctuality, and can be considered to be all part of a single “rail travel” system for a city. Really, nobody cares that the Metropolitan line in London is a commuter railway, the Victoria line a metro, and Central and Northern a hybrid of both - they all have similar enough service levels that they can just be considered as “Underground lines”.

    Similarly, if you operate a service that using light-rail vehicles such that it offers the same kind of service as a metro, then you can call that line a “metro” on your communications and timetabling (Brussels does this, Stuttgart goes further and says “our Stadtbahn is the U-Bahn”, and locals do call it the “U-Bahn”). But gaining entry to the club of “metro lines” is because it achieves a similar quality of service, not because it’s a rail-based system.

    Luas as a whole could not be grouped with DART or Metro because within the city core, it does not provide the same speed or punctuality as those services (contrast again with Stuttgart, which is segregated through the city centre and achieves metro-like service quality as a result). Same for CACR versus Luas Cork. This isn’t some kind of nerd’s distinction, it’s something that has real bearing on ordinary users’ journey planning: you can rely on a segregated train/tram getting you to your destination within 1 or 2 minutes of the expected time, but with a street tram that can be 5 minutes or more if traffic is heavy.

    In Dublin, as elsewhere, these services have different brands, because they're different things. In descending order of reliability:

    Metro = Fully segregated, suburban / DART = Fully segregated, far suburban
    Luas = Partially segregated, suburban
    Bus = on-street, suburban

    Calling all of these “DART” would be a bit stupid, but there is some logic to branding the MetroLink line as DART - the difference in experience (time, reliability) is pretty small, mainly because DART itself blurs the line between commuter rail and metro within the city, much like the Berlin S-Bahn does. This would never happen, though, as Irish Rail owns that brand, and they have nothing to do with Metro.


    The concept of a City transit authority with its own branding is not the same as a unified brand across services. The former makes sense, the latter is a bit silly. Thing is, we have a national “transit authority” brand already: Transport for Ireland. In a country this small, there’s not much reason to build branding silos for each city - especially when we have unified ticketing; something that can be obscured if you only see “Dublin Transport” or “Transport for Cork” plastered on every stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    They don’t fall under the same brand.

    This is the T- it encompasses bus rapid corridor (being a former rail line), light rail, and metro style heavy rail underground (including some third rail). What makes it distinct is frequency and cost.

    The commuter rail is the commuter rail (fyi I take it regularly and unfortunately you have to pay more for it). If you are moving to a neighbourhood, you’ll get a mention of a T stop or commuter rail, they aren’t bucketed together.

    It will be interesting to see once the electrification projects start completing what happens. There is a push for the Fairmount Line to becoming the Indigo line and fall under the “T”.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Sorry once again, you are just that type of person.

    Nobody in the real world gets this hung up on modes. You regurgitating the obvious to a bunch of anoraks is embarrassing, quit it.

    At the end of the day, if they can get the Cork Luas and the CACR up to 10-15 min frequencies then people will start to view them as part of a mass rapid transit system. My view- bucket them together eventually and come up with a brand. The CACR has zero buzz partly because it’s a crap brand.

    Personally I’d do the same in Dublin. I know I know, getting to 5 min service on the DART would be “Metro” like. Waffle waffle waffle x or y mode- nobody normal cares for this stuff. They view both the Luas and DART as frequent mass transit. We already did a pointless heavy lift on the Luas brand when they should just have been DART lines. We are doing it again with Metro. Anyway, that’s done. For Cork, I’d like to see some unique branding and livery, there’s still the chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It is you who is getting hung up on modes. It’s not about modes, it’s about quality of service. A segregated bus and a tram are fine to lump together as “lines” in the same service, but mixing trams and buses, or trams and segregated rail just forces users to remember which route numbers are the slow, on-street services and which are the fast ones.

    Branding services under a common name implies that they are the same quality. An on-street tram can never be as reliable in terms of journey times as a segregated rail line.

    You have never once conceded any point in any discussion I’ve seen you have in the years I’ve been on here, so I don’t expect any now.

    I would be grateful if I you would tell me something else, though: specifically what type of person it is you believe I am. You’ve alluded to it a couple of times now, and I’m curious, seeing as you seem to regard the type of person you think I am as somehow inferior to whatever type of person you believe yourself to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,921 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    All of the MBTA falls under the T branding including the commuter rail. Not sure how you are missing this if you get the commuter rail frequently? Each train has the T in a circle brand on it. Same across all of the maps, facilities and marketing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Logo stretched out but the T is the “subway” denoted by coloured lines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Yes it is a quality of service.

    So if something comes within 10-15 mins and is seen as rapid, it would come under this city wide brand.

    You ARE hung up and your last point proves that. Literally nobody apart from weirdos here gets hung up on DART versus Luas and “on street trams”. They are both seen as mass transit within Dublin.

    What’s there to concede here? You have an issue that I think an eventual city wide brand is a good idea for Cork, both in terms of branding it internationally and getting further lines open. I don’t disagree with the effectiveness of Luas as a means to get initial buy in, that was my initial point too. You are the one brandishing stuff as terrible and what not. It does work in other cities, that’s a fact. You can go the other way on that and that’s fine, no big deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Frequency of departures is not how people who use public transport view their transportation problems. They want certainty around arrival times; the departure time is generally something they have good flexibility to choose already.

    You cannot have certain arrival times unless you have predictable journey times. Predictable journey times go out the window when your vehicles are sharing roads with car traffic. That’s why I believe that a fully segregated busway is superior to a fully on-street tramway. The higher capacity of the tram doesn’t matter in this case if all it’s doing is making 400 people late for work at the same time. Nor does it matter that there’s another one two minutes behind that’s just as badly delayed.

    If you’re arguing that entry to this proposed “city brand” is predicated on the service having highly predictable travel times, then we are not in disagreement on that point (but I still disagree with the idea that such a branding exercise would be a good use of money). If you’re saying that a five-minute frequency bus that can take between 20 and 35 minutes to reach its destination should be included because it’s frequent, then I disagree with you. I’ve already got a 20-minute frequency bus service near my house, but I cannot predict with any accuracy what time it will get me into the city. I do use this bus regularly, but I always have to give myself an extra 20 minutes over the timetabled duration when I need to be in the city at a certain time. Adding three times as many buses to the route will not fix that problem.

    CACR will probably need a brand simply because it’s such an unwieldy name - ideally I’d prefer something that can be used in all of the provincial cities. First, because pouring money into branding agencies is a diminishing return. Second, common branding allows less obvious moving of vehicles between services as demand patterns change: painting trains is not cheap, and having “off-brand” trains undermines the whole idea of having the brand in the first place. In a way it’s a shame that DART is an acronym that contains the name Dublin, but as operational reasons make sharing of trains with other cities impossible, at least there’s no monetary cost to it being tied to Dublin.

    But Luas Cork has a brand already: Luas. I’m not sure you can even put Luas and CACR lines into the same basket, because they do not provide the same guarantees around journey times. If the Cork Luas were more separated from traffic, yes, but as designed it sits between bus and rail in terms of reliability, and some sections put it very much at risk of bus-like delays.

    So, you propose a unified branding for public transport services in Cork. Call it whatever you want; but first tell us what are the entry criteria for a service to use this branding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Once again, if it’s rail and frequent it is rapid transit to people. That’s it.

    The reason why Luas consistently comes up as a good enough means to get to Dublin Airport is because people view it as so. At best you’ll get a “it would be great if it went underground”.

    Nobody cares, and this idea of a “risk” of an underperforming service seems contrived to me. The risk remains if branded Luas, just that people will say that in Cork they got a crap Luas and Dublin got a good one.

    CACR and Cork Luas will be viewed the same as DART and Luas are in Dublin- if you live beside a line you are blessed and have rapid mass transit. You might get comments like the above “I wish it went underground” (Cork Luas) in time, same as you do in Dublin.

    I’m not in the business of arguing over segregated busways or not.

    My view on Metro in Dublin is we put a rod on our own back by making it this big thing, something international in nature and beyond us. We are somewhat aligned here in looking to use established brands to sell it. Where we differ is longer term for a full Cork “network” is my view that you should align the brands relevant to there and look to grow further from there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I wonder do you use buses at all if you don't think predictable arrival times are important to travellers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 corkoniense


    Jaysus I really kicked off a bun fight on names……………anyway CoMeT (or Cork Metropolitan Transport), an umbrella name for the various local public transport operations (city bus network, tram "network", commuter rail, and public bikes). Like so many other medium sized European cities. "Luas" is yet another reminder of the political/administrative reality that we are the "south-west" region of the greater Dublin area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 corkoniense


    Thanks for this explanation. One thing I forgot to mention in my submission was that I had been hoping for a kind of synergy between the tram (sorry Luas) and Bus Connects. However I see now that BusConnects seem to be removing the Bishopstown to city centre route; this is madness IMO! If more space is taken up for the priority trams, surely the buses should be able to piggy back on some of this? At the end of the day it is about getting the genuine "wealth creators" (the people who do regular jobs) to work and home quicker.

    Plan to cut Cork suburb section of BusConnects is ‘shortsighted’



  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement