Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1550551553555556559

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,625 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    How do they enforce the rules? Do they round up the folks that have not registered for the QID, gotten accommodation and employment and then deport them or is it a matter so the person self deporting? I am just curious how they go about it and could similar be done here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    I dont know but if you dont have a QID you cant get employment or accommodation. Then you are kind of fuckked and you have to self deport. I mean begging is illegal and there is no social welfare system for non nationals. Yeah Qatar will kick you out if you dont go. Either you come in and be a productive member of society or you get. Does that seem unreasonable considering you pay 0% income tax?

    How would they go about it here? Simple if you dont have gainful employment and accommodation within 90 days back from whence you came. You are not entitled to a social welfare fund that you did not contribute to. Solve a lot of problems very quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,625 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    I was reading the discussing on vetting and on what vetting is taking place. For me I have always thought this was stupid argument and by that I mean some of the countries the Asylum seekers are coming from are basket cases and wouldn't have functional bureaucracies that we would have here and we probably have no agreement with those countries to do verification checks so how can they be checked and verified as to who they are and if they are criminal or not. All that can be done is to check that they haven't applied for the asylum or committed a crime in another European country. Even names can be changed from place to place. This is why I don't believe that when people come here to claim asylum that they are just put in an IPAS centre and then are allowed to roam around without a care in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Yes but from the very off, both countries approach to human rights and civil liberties in general is enough to put a lot of refugees off ever travelling there or feeling safe — not that either of them is even particularly easy to reach in the way that Europe can be reached and traversed at vast entry points. Qatar and UAE are also autocracies where law can be implemented without question or meaningful opposition.

    To emulate their systems, you also have to emulate some of the things that allow those systems to be perpetuated. It requires certain sacrifices of particular freedoms and rights (not least among them, fundamental human rights) to enable you to have a tough unquestioning policy that can be implemented in Ireland the same way.

    That's before you even get to the part where the practices and behaviours of these countries have been accepted (even rewarded really) due to the fact that they are both states whose oil reserves power the global economy and who have spent many years building sovereign wealth funds in the West which has given them clout and influence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,681 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    The data you post does not show what you have asserted



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    No. Do you personally want to visit the Levant, Pakistan or Afghanistan? I presume "No". There fore we going forward do not accept passports from those areas. Anyone with an Interpol Person of Interest may not enter. No passport no entry. Simple as. Yes it will make Europe off limits to certain people with no intention of integrating or bringing anything positive to Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,177 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The left in Ireland would never support looking through people's social profiles etc. We've seen the meltdowns in relation to the USA doing stringent checks.

    I'm on the verge of a site ban. Please don't rage bait me, I'm easily triggered especially late at night!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Yes, yes they do. Qatar is interested in protecting it citizens and prosperity. The EU is hellbent on importing the most dangerous migrants from awful places that wish to do us harm. The refugees do not bother with Qatar or UAE because they know the answer before they arrive due to past experiences. No we would not have to give up our rights to refuse people who have no intention of integrating or contributing to society.

    Ireland is a global power by our location and oil reserves too. We have an unlimited supply of fish, we have Uranium, "more and better quality oil with a stable government than Saudi Arabia" (*source Providence Resources), and the trans Atlantic internet cable, Ireland also has the IFSC. I see us just as influential as Egypt, if not more so.

    Also "No" is a full sentence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    OK but let's examine this for a moment, because what you are saying is a commonly argued point which is positioned more or less as claiming that we just the tap off for the more problematic regions of the world and therefore no more problematic refugees.

    So first of all, you would essentially be ripping up international treaties and excluding people from asylum based purely on their nationality. Men, women, children — it doesn't matter. Those fleeing genuine demonstrable danger — it doesn't matter. You would essentially be ending the international system of asylum for anyone by pure virtue of their place of birth and effectively leaving them to their fate. Under this policy, it's not a question of their intent to bring anything positive, they are (e.g.) Pakistani and that alone suffices to deprive them of any right to asylum.

    OK so maybe you see that as a moral loss worth taking for your own perception of the greater good. So you adopt that policy — then tomorrow a group of lads arrive from London after coming from Pakistan and your policy says they are to be rejected immediately. OK, so now what? Rejecting them has not made them disappear into thin air so you are now left with a question of how you deal with these rejected applicants. Force the UK to take them back? Charter flights and demand that Pakistan accept these flights and simply rely on the certainty that Pakistan absolutely will accept? What happens when this doesn't happen? Don't you just end up back at square one?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Marcos


    "Say what you want about the leftists but they are generally peaceful when they protest"*

    I'm sorry but I have to address this. While I hold no candle for any of the fringe rightwing groups, the only political violence I have seen has come from the left. This has been going on for the last 10 years from Pegida members being chased down O'Connell and Marlborough Street and assaulted. To members of Saoradh, heavily linked with the New IRA, the same group who killed Lyra McKee, attacking a National Party conference in 2022. To hitting protestors in a car, or to attacking Justin Barrett's muppets in St Patricks park last year. To left wing paramilitary groups issuing death threats to political opponents.

    I can't remember any rightwing organisations proudly trumpeting their attacks on left wing conferences or the like, or attempting to knock down left wing protestors. And if they did we would never hear the end of it. Imagine a right wing paramilitary group issuing death threats, there would be absolute mayhem and it wouldn't be allowed to stand. Rightly so IMO. The media would be all over it and continually reminding everyone that engages in wrongthink that these are the people they are associating with.

    I think I can safely speak for the majority of people when I say that political violence like this is a bad road for anybody to go down. Things are getting bad enough with the increased polarisation due to US Cultural War talking points being imported wholesale over here. The left are as guilty of this as anyone, it is imported via social sciences in academia while the right get theirs via social media. In a properly functioning society people can disagree without resorting to political violence.

    *In light of what I'm written I'm going to assume that the word generally is doing the heavy lifting here. Or is it like those who described the George Floyd protests as generally peaceful?

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    No. Where did you see it written that Ireland is the fairy godmother of the world. It doesnt. Their right to asylum does not automatically over ride Irish citizens rights to safety, prosperity housing and employment.

    "The Republic guarantees religious and civil liberty, equal rights and equal opportunities to all its citizens, and declares its resolve to pursue the happiness and prosperity of the whole nation and of all its parts, cherishing all the children of the nation equally, and oblivious of the differences carefully fostered by an alien Government, which have divided a minority from the majority in the past." That predates any refugee treaty and It is the IRish Government perogative to protect Irish Citizens before anyone else.

    This mythical pakisitani family seeking refugee is not our problem. If I had to give a Euro to every begger on the street I pass every day I would be broke myself. They are Pakistani nationals they are Pakistan problem. The bill goes back to the Pakistan embassy in Dublin/London. Same as Irish nationals deported by the United States or elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    That's all well and good — but you are not answering the question.

    Whether you think they are eligible or deserving of asylum or not, and whether you believe Ireland should look after them or not, what do you once they arrive and they are rejected under your proposed policy? Again, rejecting them does not make them vanish or teleport back to Pakistan - you have to actually do something with them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭Phat Cat


    How do you know? Have you even bothered to look up the figures yourself? You seem to be dismissing other people's posts quite freely without having much insight into the facts yourself.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,692 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    There has to be safeguards of course. But I think if a non citizen is calling for violence against civilians, the state should have the right to cancel pending asylum claims. If someone is already a citizen they constitutionally can't be deported unless the citizenship is revoked, and that hardly ever happens.

    There is an obvious contradiction between claiming to be seeking refuge in a country, and then committing terrorism in it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    What sort of a question is that? I cant answer it without looking at the case file? A family turn up with no history or documentation and ask could we enter? No sane immigration officer would let them in. With the bare information that you have furnished they are Pakistani and been thrown out of Britian? Why were they thrown out of Britian or felt the need to leave? It should be easy to get the MI-5 file on them, seeing as MI6 and the gardai go hand in hand. Why did they not head home to Pakistan first?

    And its not because they are Pakistani, if they were Canadian, Japanese, South African or any other first world nation. IF you didnt see the circumstances coming and didnt have a "go bag with the Red file" then no entry. When you seek to emigrate to a country you need to show where you are coming from with documentation, qualifactions, bank statements with money and so on. No country wants to talk to you without them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    …a feat which would take some doing and probably affect the ways in which all of us are able to travel.

    I wouldn't be one bit upset at compulsory passport checks at every entry to the state. This should be done in conjunction with the UK to preserve the CTA. Moving between the island of Ireland and the island of Britain also should require mandatory passport checks. And said checks need to be scanned checks, not a quick look and a wave on through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,270 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I apologise for going on and on about the costs that bogus AS impose on taxpayers, but the profits being made are massive.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2023/1208/1421004-hotel-international-protection/

    A Travelodge firm recorded a pre-tax profit of €8.65m from operating a Dublin hotel exclusively for International Protection (IP) applicants last year.

    Pumkinspice Ltd secured a contract in early 2022 from the State to house IP applicants at its newly-constructed, 393 room hotel on Townsend Street in Dublin 2.

    The directors state that "the hotel secured a State contract and traded exclusively under this contract in 2022".

    New accounts for Pumkinspice Ltd show that, in its first year to trade, the hotel firm recorded revenues of €18.54m from the State contracts.

    I make that nearly 50% net profit margins.

    And yet the left-wing parties support this!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,384 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    People before profit except this profit before Irish people



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Unfortunately a small but significant proportion of the population still maintain that this is about helping asylum seekers rather than the obvious for profit industry it is. I aay maintain rather than believe as only a miniscule number of people truly believe asylum seeker policies exist to help people in need.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭_Quilombero_


    I expect the government will buy more of these big hotels like they did with Citywest since they're making noises about moving away from private properties.

    They'll fork out tens of millions for the buildings and still need to outsource the daily management duties to a private companies, so the payday wont stop any time soon.

    More super centres coming to a town near you soon!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,384 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    They should convert a few of them into jails for the "doctors and engineers"

    There was also a man arrested at the airport on Monday with a fake passport



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Resplendent Moose


    36.4 million people went through Dublin Airport last year, but yet there's somehow a flood of illegals?

    A personal invitation to dance, as Nero plays for the last time
    Tonight you will mix with the prophets without honour...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,936 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Leader of the fastest growing party in the UK lays out his parties terms and conditions clearly. I wonder where these people will go🤔

    Best start building a few more gaffsfolks

    Screenshot_20260616-082417.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    That's only scratching the surface though. Passport checks are an important measure yes, but they do not make Europe inaccessible to irregular migration or IPAs.

    Going back to an example I have used many times, during Covid we saw lockdowns on a global scale across the developed world involving the closure of airports to all but essential travel and the requirement to have taken additional steps in order to travel (such as getting vaccinations, which many in the developing world could not access as easily). The EU closed external borders while individual member states closed their own internal borders.

    These policies contributed to a significant and sharp decline in inward migration and asylum application — but even this did not actually halt them entirely. And most people would agree that the lockdown policies were not sustainable. So that's what you are facing when it comes to migration and asylum, we've already seen that major globally-aligned lockdowns have a material effect but don't actually stop movement of people. That gives you an idea of how much is required to actually full-on stop it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭creedp


    What a time to be an IPAS contract holder🥳 But hear no evil, see no evil. Can’t let a scintilla of negativity be generated by the great unwashed taxpayer. It could be the flap of the butterfly wing moment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    What would be the proposed alternative and would it come at a cost saving? Realistically we need to have dedicated centres but they will cost money to put in place and to staff and maintain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,926 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    Didn't inward migration also massively drop post 2008? As in, a lack of handy money sloshing around also affects immigration. Maybe we should cut all the BS about borders and checks and applications and this and that and just reduce the conditions available and the inward numbers will look after themselves. Maybe don't hand out rooms in nice hotels and fun money. Someone will say, oh you want a recession, no, I think we should stop the ridiculous spending on this.

    But there is no political will to do that, the idea is to drive up the population by any means necessary while enriching the connected.

    All of your posts allude to massive immigration just being inevitable, but this just isn't the case, the phrase 'if you build it they will come' is a pertinent one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well, you're making my point for me really. Yes, economic collapse also leads to a reduction in the numbers of people coming (though not halting it). So we have seen that global shutdowns and economic meltdown are both pretty influential in how migration numbers go — but don't actually stop them — and neither of them would be considered sustainable (obviously).

    I'd have to challenge a couple of your points here too. First of all, most of the inward numbers of immigrants are working and are on visas or via EU pathways. So they aren't being 'given' cushy rooms in hotels or 'fun money'. They are coming here and have acquired jobs and are earning a wage. Granted, we had a large spike of Ukrainian refugees in 2022 onwards, something experienced across many European countries after the outbreak of the war there. But aside from that, the percentage of foreign nationals in this country who are IPAs is pretty small compared to the numbers who are on regular visa / EU pathways. So, if it were all a ploy to drive up the population and enrich the connected, the IPA community are a drop in the ocean and you should be looking elsewhere when it comes to population growth.

    Finally, I don't believe that massive migration is inevitable. I just don't think there are many on here or in Right wing politics or media who are all that honest about what it takes to reverse it. They just say — stop this, end this, prevent this, common sense — yadda yadda yadda, but they dutifully avoid getting into discussions on how they propose to achieve these things. Because that's where things start to unravel and their steadfast belief that it's all down to lefty liberals, 'fun money' and being too snowflakey collides pretty firmly with a giant indestructible bollard with 'Reality' written on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,270 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Process the claim within a week, and have daily flights leaving the country with 100 failed AS on each daily flight.

    Massively reduce the time spent processing the claim, from 68-81 weeks, towards the Swiss 24hrs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Resplendent Moose


    Interesting figure, 100 on each flight. Care to share how you came up with that?

    A personal invitation to dance, as Nero plays for the last time
    Tonight you will mix with the prophets without honour...



Advertisement
Advertisement