Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

199100102104105114

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Boycotting the game escalates what, I'm not following? Escalates genocide?

    Let's say your intentions were pure (and the fact a self confessed neutral cannot condemn a country who so many actual neutral experts are telling you are committing a genocide, which is in itself a contradiction)....

    ....What specifically does your approach do to advocate for peace, which of course in the context of a genocide means reduce the suffering / change the behaviour causing it?

    In other words, leaving intentions aside, pls explain how your approach in effect differs from indifference?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,486 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Err, no Paddy, just the last God knows how many pages where your support for Israel and disdain for Palestinians sticks out like a sore thumb.

    You're really not very good at this are you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,486 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    And what do you mean by a "vested interest"? And precisely how does someone's nationality have anything to do with a "vested interest"?

    And so what if they support a team you don't like them supporting? You think you have the right to demand they fess up just because you think they should?

    The title of the thread is clear - arguments for/against the match being played are on point. Regardless of a poster's nationality.

    Posters make their point and others critique it. That's it.

    Your original post had a strong bang of sneering at non-Irish posters (who you've failed to point out) and a veiled accusation that non-Irish posters somehow had no right to contribute. Your back peddling won't save you.

    I'll just put your assertion on nationality down to an Ill-thought out post.

    As for your last para, that has absolutely nothing to with anything in relation to this thread. Pure deflection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Can you point to a single post where I've supported Israel?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,415 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    If you arent vehemently criticising Israel multiple times a day and accepting nothing less than a boycott of the game, by default you are therefore supporting Israel, a standard that even the Palestinian FA falls foul off at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    You don't have to "say the words" for your posts to functionally support it.

    Repeatedly opposing every form of pressure/ boycott/ criticism/ protest, refusing to acknowledge or criticize an extermination campaign against millions of innocent people, refusing to condemn a country who is slandering our country over the last few years, whilst consistently smearing the victims as rapists etc - doesn't magically become neutral because you add "I don't support it" at the end. It is functional support.

    Like everything in life, youre posts are judged on what you say, you can label yourself however you want.

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You're going to have to learn at some point in your life, that just because you don't like something, or agree with it, doesn't mean that it is "complete and utter rubbish" no matter how many times you aggressively insist that your opinion is fact.

    Of course the FAI are going to refer to financial constraints and future viability because, while we all know their finances, that is both an easy way for them to step away from making a difficult decision and secondly, that is what they have been saying for the last 40+ years since I've been listening to them.

    And over that same period, time and again there is evidence of them not being overly familiar or concerned about good financial practices. The Robbie Keane 500K being the latest example of that which you yourself insist on ignoring also.

    Any normal person would be some bit bashful and would not shill so strongly for an organisation that has shown itself to be as self-centred as it has done for so long. I know they are needed, I know there are a lot of good people within, but stop painting as some paragon of virtue when it comes to financial planning and integrity and how it impacts the viability of the organisation. We know their history and I'm not saying the still have a John Delaney in the mix but they've a lot of ground to make up before they can be assumed to have any trustworthy standing in this area.

    And I've news for you, every sports organisations picks options to play friendlies based on several factors and the number one thing from a boards perspective (outside of the sporting needs for sports organisations obviously) is how many people will be interested in this fixture? And an Ireland vs Celtic match could be huge in that respect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Only you know for sure whether or not you fundamentally support what it is Israel is doing, but irrespective of that, you are supporting Israel because you are advocating for the same thing that they want.

    So maybe your support isn't deeply ingrained, but it is tacit. And for me personally, given what we've seen these past x number of years, I have no time for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You really think if someone insists on taking part in a discussion over several months that people aren't going to form opinions based on what that person is saying?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    I have not opposed every form of protest or a boycott. I have opposed dumb ideas and actions that make absolutely no sense or have absolutely no impact.

    A boycott of two football matches by a country that does trade worth upwards of €3bn a year to Israel. It wont serve any purpose.

    The sentiment below is something I very much believe in. The Zara Belfast protest is another "symbolic protest" at a shop that has no actual trade links of benefit to Israel. Its all for show, for social media likes. For people wanting to make them feel better about themselves. And it serves no purpose. "Every purchase enables genocide" said one protestor, but you can be guaranteed that mantra is not one she follows through on in her own life when there is no social media videos being made.

    Eventually this virtue signalling stuff becomes tiresome and will drift into nothing because most of the people behind it will get bored or find some other obsession. The volume of people at these events is tiny for the most part which also speaks volumes about where peoples priorities lie.

    .

    We then got the Mary Manning /Dunnes angle thrown into the mix. Look what that achieved i am told, conveniently overlooking that it was an actual boycott of SA goods. I proposed that the same should then happen with Israeli products and im told thats "dumb". Is it dumb?, or is it the selfish needs/wants of such a protest too big an ask of such a virtuous bunch?

    The Palestinians are far from innocent in all of this, I also am very much opposed to the culture that exists there so im not going to support them or their plight, especially given they have been doing exactly what the Israelis have been doing. If people take issue with that, not my problem. I support neither one or the other.

    The FAI raised a motion with UEFA, Its not like they have sat on their hands and done nothing at all. They have done more then most but now are getting hammered for not doing more by the very people who are willing to talk, but not take action. So either put up, or shut up is my take.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    You expect perfection from every walk of life. The FAI is far from perfect, have never claimed they are, have repeatedly stated they were to blame for not using robbie Keane properly for example.

    however the very people you praise for the motion to ban Israel for example, are partially to blame for the mess the FAI got into as they sat on their hands and said nothing when John Delaney was destroying the association. Funny how you lack any sort or moral consistency. Only last week you claimed the vast majority of the country wants the FAI to boycott the games yet that was debunked. Then you claimed the FAI members were a vast majority. The same members who sat by and let Delaney run amok.

    The here and now and the future is what the FAI have to consider. Not the past. They have to make decisions, no matter how unpopular, because thats their responsibility. They have shown more courage and moral conviction then most have.

    But, like in many aspects of life, the FAI do a lot of good, positive things. Ive seen it at grass roots level. My kids have facilities and coaching that didn't exist even 10 years ago and most certainly didnt exist 20 years ago. None of that gets headlines oddly enough.

    Ireland v Celtic. Give it up lad. Its not going to happen. If friendlies were the way to go, the nations league wouldn't exist. You have dug that hole so deep you must be nearing Australia at this stage.

    And your love affair with Celtic, the IDF soldier loving club of your dreams is bizarre given the rest of your waffling. Are you secretly an Israeli fan, just in denial?

    .

    What am I advocating for that Israel want exactly?

    Is it two football matches? Damn right I want them to go ahead. That does not equate to supporting Israeli state. It's just means I want what's best for Irish football.

    If thats the metric, then every one of you calling for a boycott is a hypocrit because you all live your lives on the back of Israeli developed goods, services and applications.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I'm only talking about Celtic because you guys keep referring to it ffs.

    And I'll take no judgement on morals from someone who doesn’t possess any.

    And stop talking about your kids when you get upset when people mention them. It's getting tiresome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    So thats a no then. You cannot point to a single post. thanks for the clarification. Very honest of you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    We are talking about Celtic because you made such a song and dance about it in April and you still cannot accept it was nonsense.

    You tried to control the narrative, I had to agree to your terms before posting and then that was the idea.

    And its also hypocritical given celtics love affair with IDF soldiers, yet you have a monumental issue with Robbie Keane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I didn't look, nor am I going to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Where to start.

    You say you don't oppose protest, only "dumb" protest.

    But every actual protest mentioned is suddenly dumb, pointless, virtue signalling, too small, too symbolic, too inconvenient, not pure enough, or aimed at the wrong target.

    Functional support - to keep it all going.

    You say a football boycott is pointless because Ireland still trades with Israel. Then when broader economic boycotts are discussed, you call people hypocrites for not being perfect enough. So symbolic action is too small, wider action is too hard, consumer action is impure.

    Functional support - to keep it all going.

    The Dunnes strike started with a small number of workers refusing to handle South African goods. By your logic that was tiny/ symbolic/disruptive/ pointless. That is not the case.

    You don't have to support Hamas, Palestinian politics, or any culture to support civilian men women and children not being bombed, starved, displaced or collectively punished.

    Functional support- denigrate Israeli victims, while letting israel off the hook.

    You say Palestinians have been "doing exactly what Israelis have been doing"

    That is a false equivalence. Palestinian civilians, including children, are not Hamas terrorists.

    This is the logic of collective blame, only against Gazans (you can't address Israeli crimes) - functional support of what experts tell us is a genocide.

    You may say you support neither side. But when every argument you make attacks those objecting to Israel's conduct, minimises pressure on Israel, blames Palestinians collectively, let's Israel off the hook for far worse crimes, and demands impossible purity from protesters that has not been in any other in world history, including ones you were involved in,.it is functional support.

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, talks like a duck…….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,415 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    But does that duck oppose genocide and want the Irish to punish themselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    No, he's worried about Robbie Keane and whether 500K is enough to afford therapy because someone wrote a mean tweet about him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,280 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    To be not against the mass killing of a people is not the same as not supporting either side. Its just being gutless.

    Its a very unclear moral position to take. But its probably as clear as Robbie Keanes defense of staying in Israel while the mass killing was happening.

    There is no way that the match wont go ahead now but I guess some will harp on that this match will somehow be good for peace!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Well its a better option then worrying about a backwards sh1thole thousands of miles away.

    You say a football boycott is pointless because Ireland still trades with Israel. Then when broader economic boycotts are discussed, you call people hypocrites for not being perfect enough. So symbolic action is too small, wider action is too hard, consumer action is impure.

    Functional support - to keep it all going.

    The Dunnes strike started with a small number of workers refusing to handle South African goods. By your logic that was tiny/ symbolic/disruptive/ pointless. That is not the case.

    Yet when I stated my support for the FAI decision one person in particular came back at me about own poorly run the FAI has been as a Reason not trust their statements. The most recent statement is below. There was others previously

    but stop painting as some paragon of virtue when it comes to financial planning and integrity and how it impacts the viability of the organisation. We know their history and I'm not saying the still have a John Delaney in the mix but they've a lot of ground to make up before they can be assumed to have any trustworthy standing in this area.

    So the FAI cannot be trusted, but they should be the ones to boycott Israel, and we then play Celtic, the club who loves signing Ex IDF solider. What sort of protest is that? We wont play one team because its Israel but instead let's play Celtic who have signed 6 Israelis in last 25 or so years, and at the same time they, celtic fans, will castigate robbie Keane because he worked in Israel for a year.

    .

    .

    .

    So if people want a boycott of Israel and use Dunnes as an example, why not go down that very same route? Will people all over the world be willing to do that though? I think the answer would be a resounding No.

    We have also seen the OTB brought to the Dail and its about as useful as a chocolate teapot. Largely because it has no legal basis. The Irish government cannot stop Intel in Ireland dealing with Intel in Israel.

    If you are going to protest, why not go for something meaningful instead of endless pointless "gestures". The "symbolic protests" are at the stage now where large amount of people are not interested anymore. The whole world these days knows what is happening in any part of the world almost instantly. The "symbolic gestures" are pointless especially when the targets of them are in no way involved in Israel.

    How much exposure did the Zara protest get, especially given what has happened in Belfast in the past week? I would say if you conducted a survey in Belfast now, pretty much nobody would even know it happened beyond those present.

    .

    Zara Belfast does not trade in Israel

    Intel in Dublin does.

    The protest was outside Zara Belfast. Utterly meaningless, served no purpose bar making a few virtue signalling idiots feel better about themselves.

    .

    We then had one poster who wants the FAI to leave UEFA. And if that means the FAI go out of business so be it. That literally means all organised football activity in the country stops. Dead in its tracks. But yeah let's do it for the morals.

    No governing body means no football. Every piece of administrative support structure is gone. Insurance, referees, coaching, player safety and safeguarding (especially given so many kids play).

    Gutless?

    Did you protest about Ireland playing Saudi Arabia in 2002 world cup or Qatar friendly in football? Or the friendlies v Oman ?

    Will you protest about the cricket team playing Afghanistan ?

    Is there a clear definition of whose lives are more valuable therefore that's where we start to develop morals?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,750 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Well its a better option then worrying about a backwards sh1thole thousands of miles away.

    Hey you know the phrase from football, "Form is temporary, class is permanent"

    The same is true about not having any class, and you, have no class.

    Have the day you deserve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    You keep repeating yourself, it's about 10% valid points, all the rest is deflection, whataboutery, purity tests, pretending you don't understand how protests work, demonising victims, collectively blaming them, letting perpetrators off the hook and refusing to discuss them (which is not neutral). That is all functional support.

    Whether you actually don't want people to speak up about what is going on or protest it in any way because you support it, or there is some other bizarre reason why all the above massively coincidental things are being put forward regarding this topic alone (and not anything else you are neutral on which makes no sense), it doesn't really matter - your actions are functionally the same as support.

    To give an analogy, if a man is caught dug balls deep in the rear end of a sheep, he can say "I was just pissing and the sheep backed into me."

    Massively implausible, it could be true, but does it really matter what his intentions were - that c*nt is shagging a sheep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    How much exposure did the Zara protest get, especially given what has happened in Belfast in the past week? I would say if you conducted a survey in Belfast now, pretty much nobody would even know it happened beyond those present.

    So now the protesters should have possessed a crystal ball and known that the Irish hating, Israel genocide loving bigoted loyalist c*nts in the north were going to start burning people out of their homes because of the colour of their skin and should have held off?

    Or are you saying they shouldn't have peacefully protested in Zara and instead rioted and started burning people out of their homes to get more publicity?

    More guff.

    And as well you know, because you had your causes, this is how peaceful protest works. People do what they can, target for the most visibility, and momentum builds.

    The fuel protests here.

    Petrol stations blocked up. They weren't protesting petrol stations.

    The M50 blocked. They weren't protesting the M50

    OConnel Street blocked. They weren't protesting OConnel Street.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    To bring it back to basics. The FAI boycotting two games will change nothing. Its not going to create a snowball effect.

    If a boycott happened, By mid october, the FAI will be left dealing with the consequences and the rest of the world moves on with only a Tiny percentage of the world population aware of it. Then we will have Brian Kerr bemoaning the FAI announcing cutbacks to activities or redundancies because they are sacrificing €10-15m in much needed income, a move he supported to begin with.

    Im not letting anybody off the hook because I never put them on a hook to begin with. Thats for political leaders to do. Thats their job.

    Protests against innocent bystanders are meaningless.

    If "my actions" equate to support, does every person who buys products or services which emanate from Israel equate to support? Please define what supporting Israel actually entails?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    You're still arguing against a position nobody is taking - nobody is claiming the FAI boycotting two games will end the war.

    You keep demanding that a boycott produce a huge global effect before it's allowed to have any value, that doesn't happen on any protest anywhere. People do these things because they think it is right, and snowball affects do happen. You have no way of knowing. The Dunnes Stores strike didn't end apartheid, by your logic it was wrong.

    As for "that's for political leaders to do", that's convenient again isn't it? That bizarre rule doesn't seem to stop you calling Palestinians rapists, curious one that.

    Political leaders are responsible, so everyone else should carry on as normal and say nothing? What about the marriage/ abortion referendum/ fuel protests etc etc.

    And come on, buying a product with some connection to Israel automatically means you support everything the Israeli government does? What nonsense. As I said, people protesting in marriage and abortion referendums were still going to mass and using hospitals that didn't give abortions, that is life. Doesn't mean their points weren't valid or their protest was insincere or virtue signalling from ivory towers. They made change happen. But here, paddys purity test is all that matters.

    There is a difference between unavoidable participation in a global economy and actively arguing against every form of pressure, boycott or protest aimed at changing behaviour, as you do, along with smearing victims and letting perpetrators off the hook.

    What practical difference there is between whatever the feck it is you are doing and defending it, because the outcome is exactly the same. Functional support.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Will the people of Belfast, by and large even be aware of the Zara protest? No

    Does Zara Belfast trade with Israel? No. But because there is a Zara in Israel its a target? Thats nonsense. The profits all end up in the parent company in Spain. And the police were required as it wasn't peaceful.

    There is a whole range of companies with actual real and continuous trade links to Israel but let's harass workers in a shop that does no trade with Israel. Its a bit like me whinging to the DAA helpdesk because my Ryanair flight was delayed.

    That there isnt mass protests the world over against big powerful corporations who do vast amounts of trade out of Israel, nearly 3 years after October 7th, should tell you something.

    The fuel protestors targets were the M50 and other big roads/motorways, petrol stations and OConnell Street. They got the attention of the entire country and eventually the government took notice because it was going to lead to major issues especially from Whitegate which would embarrass them for their ineptitude. Thats solid targetted protest. Hit where it actually hurts and they had widespread support because the issues affect everyone around the country.



Advertisement
Advertisement