Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1183918401842184418451852

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Murphy.....heard he has a really really (like really) high ceiling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Based on performances for Ulster he's been average at best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It's not moving goal posts to point out a failure to adequately plan for player succession in positions of obvious need. Continuing to select players in their mid 30s when there are a rake of younger lads with clear potential in those positions is setting us up to fail.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,404 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Robbie henshaw wasn't in his mid 30s three seasons ago though, which is what you've claimed.

    He's only 33 now ffs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah there were very few complaints about Ioane being selected on the wing ahead of Lowe at the time. Ioane on good form and Lowe coming back from injury made it a solid choice. But there was no terrible option between the two.

    Now people are suiting up to play Captain Hindsight. But in reality, it wasn't a bad choice at the time.

    I don't know enough about Paddy McCarthy's injury to know if that was foreseeable or just really unlucky. It looks really unlucky to my untrained eye.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Lowe was due to start against the Lions on May 9th, and was withdrawn in the warm up, and I think most realised at that point his chances of being selected for the European Cup Final were minimal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Ok, you got me. His performances have been in decline for years, is the point, yet he and Aki continue to get selected. All of our incumbent centres are on the wrong side of 30, outside of McCloskey , offer little in attack. Farrell made little effort to introduce new options there, despite there being a number of young promising guys available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    In fairness I’m not doing that. I think you know my thoughts on Cullens selections over the years. I've been openly critical of him as a selector.

    Big Picture – I would say Andy Farrell is not best pleased at all with some of Cullens decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,757 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I went to one of these schools also, there are a dozen or more of them. The player list above is a list of former students of these schools bar a small handful. Mandatory rugby until 13 or14 when I attended. And my school wasn’t nearly as insane about it as a lot of the others, yet still has several pros in Leinster. There is no world in which this machine is not dropping a massive advantage into Leinster’s lap annually.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Exactly the idea that 'Leinster Rugby' are the sole reason and cause of all the great and the good players to come from the likes of St.Mary's is not the reality. At all.

    Go back to, i dont know the early 1900s, it is the schools that are churning out these players on the back of their own programmes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    To be fair, I don’t think anyone is saying it’s exclusively a money thing.

    No more than recently you aren’t saying it was exclusively a cultural thing.

    But, in the main, money seems to be a pre-requisite. Are we to believe Michael’s would’ve produced as many players in the last number of years without money? Of course not.

    And given that these are 2 things (along with other natural advantages Leinster have) that the other provinces can’t replicate to the same scale / degree, I think the change to funnel Central Contract money, where the biggest imbalance in the system lay, was completely necessary.

    Bearing in mind that Leinster now still broadly retain the same level of contribution towards their budget that they had for the previous decade when 1) Ireland were still extremely successful and 2) Leinster were still one of the most consistent teams in Europe

    Yet we’re now supposed to believe that is now hindering Leinster at every turn, holding Leinster back, a Development tax or any of the other hyperbolic overreactions we’ve heard in the last week or so? Often from people who have complained most about the over reliance on Leinster.

    They’re the points your missing entirely in all of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,594 ✭✭✭OldRio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There are schools like that though, with a big interest in rugby, an often fee-paying student base, good facilities etc, in other parts of the country too, and they aren't producing players as effectively.

    Equally, once again, there are schools in the UK where the facilities are state of the art, the budgets are enormous, they have big enrolments etc, and don't produce lots of elite pro rugby players.

    Once again - it's incredibly simplistic thinking that this is just driven by money alone. If the IRFU actually thought that, they'd find the money and plow it directly into a few schools and hope to produce another 2 or 3 Blackrock's across the country. The reality is they know it's not that simple.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,404 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Robbie Henshaw and Bundee Aki cumulatively played exactly 15 minutes of this seasons Six Nations.

    but hey, dont let facts get in the way of a good whinge.

    They (Henshaw and Aki) are aging out. They have already lost that 12 jersey to SMCC. Behind Stu we have Osbourne, Forde, Gavin and Postlethwaite who have all been capped either full or A, and Nankiville, who will be available in 2028 and could give a few years if still at his current level.

    There is no lack of options for that 12 jersey for the next 16 months and beyond



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    There haven't been too many options but I agree with your general point regarding Bundee and Henshaw.

    The outstanding younger candidate was Osborne - but he was been moved from pillar to post at Leinster thanks to Henshaw, Jordie and then they went and signed another NZ centre.

    Personally I think Ireland need to move away from Bundee this summer.

    I will say this though, he's playing some brilliant rugby again.

    And who knows, the way things are going with Lancaster, a 37 year old Aki at RWC could still happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,477 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    He's been better than that typhoony. But I wouldn't be in a rush to put him an Ireland squad either. Doak is far and away the dominant half back partner in the Ulster team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Only because of injury. We've tried no real options for the 13 position. How many minutes have anyone outside of the 4 incumbents gotten in matches? There's 10-12 matches until the WC, how many of those will Farrell dedicate to give new lads a proper go? Probably not many, unless forced to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,404 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    4 incumbents??

    are we starting games with 17 players on the field now then?? dont tell the refs!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think the comment on Osborne's stalled momentum at 12 being because of Leinster signing players (one of whom isn't even a 12) is a bit harsh. Osborne has gotten a great opportunity to seize the 12 jersey at Leinster post 6 Nations this year, he's started 7 times there out of the 11 games since then, and has been pretty poor it has to be said.

    That's on him, no one else really.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,404 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    just goes to show how ridiculous yours is. Youre like a stopped clock…. eventually youll be right.

    youre asking 'apart for the 4 choices for these 2 positions (ignoring Osbourne of course) what other options have we.

    well we've plenty.

    Its up to those newer players to play well enough to oust the older ones. Its shouldn't be too difficult as they are aging out. You're issue is it isn't happening fast enough and are arguing from a point of view of comfortable hypothetical.

    The thing is, i agree with you. Ringrose has been extremely ineffectual at 13 for ireland for a couple of seasons now. However, there is no other irish player out there who has done anything good enough in green to oust him. Osbourne and gavin have both had run outs at 13, and i would argue that both would do as sufficient as job at least as ringrose if they had to step in this summer.

    SMMC has already ousted the other 2 at 12.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Well for starters, because of all the praise Farrell has often given to Prendergast who he clearly rates. Farrell added him as a training panelist in the previous 6 Nations.

    Plus I just don’t see Easterby making such a call as stand-in coach knowing Farrell is returning at the end of the season.

    Do you think Easterby made that call entirely off his own bat?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,757 ✭✭✭ersatz


    these schools have plenty of resources to put towards sport because the state pays teachers salaries so fees tend to go towards smaller classes and teaching/extra curricular resources, like sport. Highly simplistic to argue that it has nothing to do with money. It is a necessary though not always sufficient input, but it simply doesn’t happen without cash. Sure, some schools in some places do it badly even with resources. But, having gone to one of these schools, you should understand that for many of them, and parents/alumni, jct/sct is an arms race and their ambitions towards it are almost purely cultural and abstract. It is a shared culture to prioritise rugby which is the social glue that allows these schools to express class solidarity. I’m only half joking here. Debating is also popular, but nothing else comes close to rugby to fulfill that register in Dublin. There are probably 10 schools in that basket, they produce a lot of rugby players, and also business men, barristers, etc. Leo/leinster (Joe might have professionalised it) have been good at aligning schools coaches w Leinster and refined the pipeline, but the raw resources are falling into their lap like an orchard producing fruit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Genuinely what do you think the impact of the money is though on schoolboy rugby players?

    I've already shown that the coaching is by and large provided by teachers, so the money isn't going there.

    The facilities are good obviously - but that in and of itself doesn't necessarily make players better.

    I don't think it's exclusively money or exclusively culture, but I would have it weighted 80% towards culture over money in terms of the key factor. My logic for that? Lots of schools have the money Blackrock have, none have the depth of rugby culture, and none replicate their track record of success in player production.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Aki, Henshaw and Ringrose have pretty much been the only players selected in the centres for the last 6+ years. McCloskey finally got a run of games this season, due to injury. Irish coaches continue to make the same mistake, in only giving players chances when injury forces their hand. Young guys never get the chance to make a case, because they don't get picked.

    It's not just an Ireland thing, the selections for Leinster have had the same problems. Henshaw started a load of games, despite being a shadow of himself. Ringrose has had a blessed career, faced almost zero challengers for the jersey. A prudent coach would use the the years post WC to deliberately try out new players, it's what our peers do, and they reap the rewards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,757 ✭✭✭ersatz


    yeah, it was mandatory until 14 when I was in school. I stopped playing for a while because training was a pain in the arse to get home from and they called my parents about it and insisted I attend. The 1/2 day Wednesday tradition is so that games can be played in daylight in winter. Everybody plays, or at least attends training. I imagine that’s gone but this was the case long before rugby became a pro sport.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Bussing across town on Wednesdays to Cabra was always fun 😊



Advertisement
Advertisement