Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Public consultants doing private work

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Well, when we had our first baby, we couldn't afford private care, even though we wanted it, so you are being condescending.

    Every woman should have the same opportunities under the public system, people who can afford to buy better can take themselves off to a fully private system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    I would take issue with your attitude also to be honest, "if I can't have it no one should have it" is basically what you are saying.

    Also when no fully private system exists not much good saying to go that way plus you reduce the numbers significantly who could afford it. The current costs while not insignificant are manageable for a lot of people but making it more expensive means less can avail of it.

    Another point not mentioned is if you have a fully private system you may well pull expertise out of the public system, not a good result either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    That isn't what I am saying. You can have it in the private sector in a private maternity hospital, but Slaintecare is absolutely clear, the public system should be for the general public based on need and without favour for those who can afford to pay more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,705 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    You are damn **** right I would say it to the woman in tears.

    I have seen plenty of rich women in tears because they didn't get special treatment, it doesn't mean they were right.

    This entire thread your whole argument is that you want to be able to pay more money and get special treatment from doctors while they are on a shift where they are supposed to be treating everybody equally.

    The problem has been explained multiple times and you ignore it every time to just repeat that you should be able to pay extra to have the consultant go to you rather than the other patients in the ward.

    Absolutely nauseating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,197 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    there is a very well known gerontologist who was the consultant for a family member of ours. A useless pig ignorant article.

    He was simultaneously and verifiably attached to The Mater public , Mater Private, Cappagh, Earlsfort Clinic, VHI, Charter Medical and a private care home in south dublin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Restriction of entry to medicine is largely because the State limits what are very expensive medical school places.

    Private maternity care seems to meet a unique financial obstacle in the because to risk: the costs of some cases brought by patients can run into tens of millions. This makes practitioners' liability virtually unaffordable/unobtainable. You would need to waive your right to compensation - and I wonder who would do that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    There's many like that. I know of one who seems to pop up in every private Hospital in Dublin as well as his public clinic.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    Yes she was working two jobs to afford it as she was so rich.

    I am not even making this argument for myself, we had the option of private and we availed of it. If we have another child we will still be able to avail of it. In 20 years time though people may not and I take issue with removing this choice for people when I understand how important it was to have this option for my wife and other women I know or have heard speak on this. I would like it to be there as an option for my children when they are at this stage in life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,962 ✭✭✭csirl


    While the State holds the purse strings, I dont think its all on them. The professional bodies lobby and influence - and are usually good at it.

    It's not just the medical professions - it just so happens that we have a shortage of spaces on education courses for many of our regulated professiona.

    I bet the medical profession reps would have kittens if the government announced a substantial increase in CAO places.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    What you still don't get is that the choice isn't there for most people, it is only there for privileged people like yourself, and you still want the taxpayer to pick up some of the tab.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,570 ✭✭✭arctictree


    Exactly, I dont see any unemployed Doctors! Lots of kids with straight A's are well able for it but cannot do it because entry is restricted. We have the ridiculous situation where many students go abroad to study it while simultaneously we have many people coming into this country to study medicine who have not gone through the CAO system. And generally they leave after qualification. Veterinary studies is the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,164 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    You can keep saying this but this still boils down to the care of a public patient suffering when you are in fact in a public system. Doctors on public shifts should treat all in order of priority and needs. Not based on you spending five grand extra for care. As a taxpayer in a public hospital, you should be afforded the same quality of care and not based on fiscal means.

    On top of that, in the case of the Rotunda, it was consultants violating their contracts. They agreed to being public only.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,160 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    This isn’t by any means unusual.

    You’d wonder how they have so much free time after doing their public contract hours….

    If you want to dig deeper into that one you’ll be surprised at what you’ll find.

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    The ridiculous part of it is that the HSE imports doctors who were trained abroad, but the State does not allow foreign students who have come here to study under the Irish system to stay in the country afterwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 221 ✭✭thenuisance


    This is about the enforcement of a contract - as simple as that. If I work on contract for Bank of Ireland and do some work on the side for AIB in a Bank of Ireland office on a Bank of Ireland computer - do you think that would be OK from Bank of Irelands perspective?

    There is absolutely no reason why healthcare should be any different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,408 ✭✭✭Enduro


    There are limits on training doctors that don't apply in other areas. Unlike most degrees, Medicine has a lot of extremely important "hands on" teaching, with the students actually out in the real world in the Hospital system. You can't just magically increase the capacity of teaching in these locations or simply decide to cram more students in. I'm very much against professions gate-keeping entry to restrict competition, or similar, but there is a genuine capacity and quality issue here. All the big hospitals are teaching hospitals. A recent HSE reorganisation of the hospital systems was explicitly grouping them into their associations with each Medical University. It's all very integrated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Yes, I am aware of similar conversations regarding increasing the number of nursing places. One of the biggest blocks to doing that is the limited availability of placements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 983 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    As long as 50% of places are going to foreign students at upto 50K per annum, there will be shortages of doctors, dentists, vets, etc.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,002 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Plenty of foreign students are getting university places with no intention of getting training places after graduation, but they fund everyone else. It is a far more complicated picture



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 983 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    BBut That's the bottleneck. Restrict the foreign students, fund the universities and in 5 years or so you have way more qualified doctors, etc. Also helps with accommodation. Won't happen because given the choice between funding infrastructure or raising money, we always go for the cash. Growth above everything! Always for the free lunch.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,002 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    There aren't enough training places for every graduate to get one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭littlefeet


    Someone else had the idea first, but it would be a great money spinner for the HSE.

    Could a maternity hospital have en-suite private rooms (not private care) that a paitent could book and pay for? For maternity, make it very Instagramable, with upgraded menus and a few spa-like elements; in the private rooms, it would be a great money spinner and popular with some women.

    Or could they do the same for all public care? Give patients a choice to pay for a private room, not private care



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    https://about.hse.ie/our-work/major-capital-projects/national-maternity-hospital-at-st-vincents-university-hospital/

    "The hospital will include:

    • 244 beds, each in a private room with its own bathroom (80 more beds than Holles Street)"

    It is coming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,085 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    So it fecking should. Sleeping in multi-bed wards when you're seriously ill, or have just given birth, is barbaric.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Yes, and our current government has taken the initiative to change this with the new Maternity hospital.

    It is also barbaric to take a consultant away to look after someone who doesn't need him but has money, while the pregnant women who does need him is left with just a midwife.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    Can you produce any evidence to show this is happening as there is no way a midwife would be left dealing with a situation requiring a doctor or consultant. There are lots of doctors and a number of consultants working at any given time it's not just the one private consultant floating around and a load of midwives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Of course it is happening, maybe he doesn't hand off to a midwife, maybe he hands off to a lesser qualified doctor, but before he heads off to his private patient like your wife, he has to leave someone who needs him more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,283 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Ireland seems to be going against the trend:

    https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/when-private-insurance-buys-faster-access-public-care

    When private insurance buys faster access to public care

    Supplemental private health insurance is becoming more common in universal healthcare systems as a way to secure faster access to specialists, diagnostics, and elective care. This column examines how such insurance affects healthcare use and access. New evidence from Sweden shows that gaining coverage increases and expedites healthcare use, while much of the extra care is still delivered and financed within the public system through referrals back from private providers. As coverage is concentrated among higher-income workers while health needs are greater among lower-income individuals, the benefits and spillovers are distributed unequally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭littlefeet


    That does not happen no consultant would leave a complicated public cast to see a private patient. I don't think you understand how little the consultant in private care is involved in active birth. The big advantage of private care is during pregnancy you get to see the consultant at each visit and and an appointment with a time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    The issue there is that the extremely expensive and highly personalised healthcare is now becoming unaffordable for universal healthcare systems. A gap is opening up whereby life-saving healthcare will be unavailable to most, with the wealthy elite having access to lifesaving and life-lengthening treatments not available generally.

    This is driving internationally the movement towards private care.



Advertisement
Advertisement