Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Why can't we classify the Green Line south as a Metro now?

124»

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    So some real extreme crayoning here. How about we run the Metro West fo Bray and keep going! Run it past Bray head and then turn in to meet the DART line at Greystones.

    This would relieve the capacity issue of the single track under Bray Head.

    I wouldn’t suggest this for Luas, it would be too far, but for a fully segregated Metro or semi-metro it would be a very doable distance and journey time.

    Of course I’m not suggesting this will happen anytime soon, but 30 to 40 years from now as Dublin keeps growing, it might be necessary.

    Yes, there are more at grade level on this section, then North of it.

    However having looked at the route again, I don’t believe it would be difficult to convert to Metro or semi-metro, I actually think it would be relatively straightforward.

    The line South of Sandyford is actually highly segregated, with no street running. Much of it runs besides roads, but is either fenced in or would be very easy to fence it in. There are also signifiant sections completely off road and fully segregated and bridges over the M50 at two locations, N31 and others.

    Really it looks to be built to a high spec, the only issue is the level crossings.

    And looking at those level crossings, I’d say some could be merged and rest look relatively easy to close, plenty of space around them to go over or under. Certainly easier then Dunville Avenue and much easier then the level crossings on the DART line.

    Of course there would be a cost to doing that, so it would come down to demand levels and CBA, but really I don’t see any technical difficulty here, actually quiet good quality and relatively straightforward to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    An opinion has to be factual though. There is no overground route to Woodbrook, it just isn’t there anymore. Once upon a time you could do it with some CPO’ing west of the old Bray Road and there was uninterrupted access to where Woodbrook station would be. That is not the case anymore, there are literally apartments now going up to stop this happening.

    So unless you plan to acquire brand new dense blocks, there is no overground link possible, same as your criticism of Bray.

    In fact in the Luas study referenced below, Option 2 and 3 proposed Metro to Cherrywood and a feeder bus to Woodbrook and Bray with a P&R facility for Woodbrook under option 2 for DART solely.

    This is the Luas route for Bray. There’s very little reason why it couldn’t be Metro for the same costs as a Woodbrook one would be.

    IMG_3552.jpeg

    The vast majority of this is not built on.

    The lands through the old Bray golf course already require space is left for Luas around the housing development (this is something that did not happen with Woodbrook).

    The Bray Transport bridge is already identified in terms of getting over to Bray Daly with Irish Rail owning a car park immediately across the road from the station.

    There are local issues (as is anywhere) with that bridge but I don’t see how these are bigger than trying to negotiate your way to Woodbrook with the current development. Even the headbangers in Bray who don’t want that bridge agree it needs a new bridge so one is getting built anyway.

    Back to Woodbrook.

    You will have to do something west of the old Bray Road in terms of land which wouldn’t be any different to acquiring the strip of land I posted above in terms of entering Bray. The next part to me seems more complicated than the bridge. How do you get to the station through that massive new Castlethorn development? There is literally no way to it anymore.

    IMG_3553.jpeg

    This is woefully out of date. North of where those houses were getting constructed is now more apartments and houses under construction. Basically the whole map around that “Woodbrook JPC Construction Site” has houses and apartments getting built on it. The houses basically now go right up to the graveyard so I don think there is even a sliver of land north of Crinken Church to get through. So that leaves some kind of underground. Is that cheaper?

    Either way I don’t see how it is simple for either but there is actually more thought into Luas into Bray. Overall it just makes more sense regardless. If you are going to spend money (which either would require), why would you connect to a golf club and graveyard rather than an urban area which has loads of transport connection possibilities from the south east? It’s a no brainer.

    Maybe this debate could and should have been had (ie restoring the old Woodbrook Halt) before this but what’s done is done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    It's a lot bendier than just ploughing on along the original alignment though and personally I don't really see a downside to plugging it all in to a branch off an N11 Luas, which itself would be a similar, high quality tramline, but with road crossings. The two sections would be a natural match for each other without any modifications.

    To be honest I think if Dublin keeps growing it's much easier to cater to population growth in North and West Dublin rather than trying to shoehorn in more housing between the Wicklow Mountains and the coast, where it's comparatively much more difficult to provide rail based transport. North and West Dublin is flat, open land. It's why I would definitely prioritise extending ML to R&L or Donabate, though I've come to believe R&L station is an ideal place to build a new town around, centred on a purpose built transport hub for north county Dublin. Could be a big interchange station with 4 heavy rail platforms catering to Intercity services and ML for onward connections to the airport etc. Such an extension would open up considerably more than is available even at Leopardstown.

    We don't always have to do big bang either. We could agree to preserve an alignment north to R&L from Estuary and south to Woodbrook along the original Harcourt alignment and then add a station every few years, no pressure, no deadlines to get to x by y. Just continuous extension of the route at both ends. The N11 Luas could be the same, once it got to Brewery Road or somewhere to be connected to the rump Luas south of Sandyford depot. I think being able to divert the rump Luas onto the N11 actually significantly facilitates the Sandyford-Charlemont conversion to metro and then I'm not sure I'd be wanting to convert that branch to metro.

    I think if we are going to tunnel anything through Bray head it should be a second heavy rail bore. There would be more bang for the buck in allowing full DART frequencies to Greystones and perhaps Wicklow. But then again, I've always believed we will some day have to get serious about Bray Head and dual the track through it.

    I'll say this though: I would take any of your ideas in a heartbeat over what we have now! They would all be great in their own ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The original alignment comes in from Shankill roundabout and tapers in to the former Shanganagh Junction. It doesn't come in at 90 degrees to Woodbrook. I see no impediment to using the original alignment to bring a metro down to meet the DART that way. Yes, some CPO of the adjacent golf course would be required but there's no way to avoid CPO no matter what is done, Woodbrook, Bray, anything down there will require some CPO. I believe using the original alignment, which is mostly well preserved except at Cherrywood itself, would require the least amount of CPO.

    @spillit67
    can you please put a pin on a google map where the under construction apartments are that prevent the original alignment from being used to take metro to meet the DART at Woodbrook?

    The proposed Luas to Bray would not be cheap or easy to do as metro. There would be loads of additional structures required for that. Even south of Sandyford depot would need a bunch of works to bring it up to fully automated metro standard.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Uhhhh… this is very interesting! This is a post Metrolink report, so it indicates that TII are seriously considering “Metro” to Brides Glen. So it looks like my comments about Metro to Brides Glen being doable are right and TII thinks the same.

    So looking at this plan, I think I would go with it, but with one tweak. So “Metro” to Brides Glen and then Luas from Brides Glen to Bray.

    But the tweak I’d make is make sure the section running alongside the N11 is upgradable to Metro. The idea being in future you could continue it South and then turn in to Greystones and this section also upgraded to Metro. The Bray to Fassaroe branch would then become a Luas shuttle connecting to Metrolink at N11.

    I think that would give you the best compromise of getting the most out of the Green line as Metro, while also leaving room for future expansion and growth. Ling term of course.

    I couldn’t agree more about R&L. While Donabate would be okay, like yourself I think R&L would be a tremendous opportunity for a transport hub and for both towns to grow towards each other with TOD in between.

    I’d also add that there would be room for one or two other new TOD towns along the route of the M1 on the way to R&L.

    As you say, it doesn’t need to all be done straight away, but for the love of good create a strategic plan for it now, protect the corridor and the lands near the station at R&L and yes you could gradually extend toward R&L over time.

    I’d also agree that this is a priority over South Dublin, that yes, North and West Dublin have vastly more development potential then South Dublin and Wicklow, which are really stuck between the Dublin and Wicklow Mountains on one side and the Sea on the other side. Plus lots of the area is conservation land of various types.

    I think if we are going to tunnel anything through Bray head it should be a second heavy rail bore

    I’m not sure if this is a reply to me, but I’m not suggesting tunnelling under Bray Head. I’m suggesting running past it along the N11 and then turning into Greystones above ground. Avoid that trouble completely.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Show us the route, you haven’t actually done that. I literally posted on the image the direction of where new developments is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The route can be easily followed on google maps. It starts at the Brides Glen viaduct, passes to the north of Leopardstown Racecourse, down through Brides Glen, across the original viaduct, down through Shankill over the main road there, between the houses and out onto the mainline. The southern part is almost entirely clear of development. Anyone who doesn't want to live near a metro station can have their house bought off them like the Dartmouth Square lot and sold later for a profit.

    FireShot Capture 098 - Google Maps - [www.google.com].png

    Edit: I didn't think I needed to show "my" route as it's the original alignment, which can clearly still be followed on google maps, 60+ years after it closed to traffic. That's how well preserved the alignmnet still is. We are blessed to have it and would be mad to ignore it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It doesn’t show how it will get there. But how exactly is going down the Ballyogan Road easier than navigating the Luas Bray route?! Struggling here on the logic.

    Based on no Metro to Sandyford but having a N11 Lua, I personally have always thought a passing line would have been the way to go down the Ballyogan Road.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I’m not sure what you mean by this comment? Do you mean how do you upgrade Ballyogan Road to Metro?

    It looks doable, just fence it in and close the level crossings. Yes there are a few level crossings, but it looks like you could merge some of them and the remaining ones look to have plenty of space to go over or under.

    Of course you could be a bit more radical and skip Ballyogan Road completely by taking the old Harcourt Street line from Sandyford to Carrickmines. Ballyogan Road could become part of the new N11 Luas line instead, perhaps extend it into Carrickmines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭Economics101


    I thought that this thread was about Luas-Porto Metro comparisons, and it seems to have drifted off into yet another exercise in drawing fantasy lines on maps.

    Back to the original: Porto had a narrow-guage suburban rail system until the 1980s, and much of the Metro is on the old railbed (a bit like the Harcourt St line). Main difference is that there were 2 or 3 branches which provided the basis for a network of sorts. However when it came to the very centre of the city, the Portuguese put in a tunnel section linking the old narrow gauge station (Trindade) with the main intercity station (Campanha). A bit like a tunnel from Charlemont to Connolly.

    Moral of the story: each city has its own unique heritage of old rail assets, unique topography (Poro is very hilly in places), etc, so you can't expect Dublin to be "like" Porto, or Manchester or almost anywhare else.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Sure, we already covered all that. And following on from that we started chatting about how you might implement some elements and lessons from Porto to Dublins somewhat similar system. In particular what tunnels you might build in the city center similar to Porto.

    But I’d also disagree with what we are talking about being fantasy lines, some of these lines are proposals in reports from NTA and TII, so far from fantasy and at least have been considered by the authorities.

    Also like Porto, these lines are built around the existing Red and Green line and historical Harcourt St line, so these are far from fantasy.

    Fantasy would be proposing multiple new Metrolink lines, not discussing how you might upgrade the Green line to Metro or how you might extend it to Bray!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Deary me, you might want to look up what DLR have been doing on those lands of late!

    There’s also no space beside the rail there that will get planning beside the graves, the buffer zone is gone.

    Explain to me what CPOing is more appropriate for Shankill and not Bray, bearing in mind that Bray clearly requires less than this “plan”?

    Honestly it’s amazing how some comment on transport here. Let’s spend loads of CPOing so we can get to a graveyard quicker than a major urban and recreation area!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,737 ✭✭✭Consonata


    What urban/recreation area? And you are being deliberately obtuse saying the point is to get to a graveyard. Its to get to Bray!

    There are significant amounts of people who live in Bray who work in Sandyford/Stillorgan etc.

    The benefit of the extension is inbuilt redundancy too. It lets IE potentially close sections of the dart coastal route whilst still having an alternate railway option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    If one really, really wanted to "get the metro to Bray" it could be driven parallel to the DART line to a metro station just north of Bray Daly for a few hundred million. I don't really see the benefit of it as DART will provide a near metro level service between Bray Daly and Woodbrook but whatever.

    Talk of graveyards and whatnot is just, well, odd. Glasnevin will be a major interchange station and also happens to be beside a graveyard and a rather large one at that. There's not much else there and the vast majority of passengers using Glasnevin will be changing there, not arriving or leaving on foot. Woodbrook would be the same. It's irrelevant that there's a graveyard beside it, or a golf course for that matter.

    The DART line can be slewed to the east a bit into land CPO'd from the golf course and/or lands can be CPO'd from the graveyard (no graves there yet) to make space for metro tracks. There's absolutely loads of green space to work with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It’s not odd because the graves have been allowed right up the edge of what planners will permit.

    If it were as simple as you suggest, it would have been considered. It hasn’t been because of haphazard development.

    If you asked me some years ago, I wouldn’t have had an issue with a Woodbrook tie in on balance.

    It still would have been flawed though. Bray is the urban area and where the demand is. The entire bus network has been configured to bring people to Bray Daly station from North Wicklow. The M11/M50 was not built providing good access to Woodbrook for the purpose of a P&R facility.

    To me quite a few decisions needed to be made to make it possible. More foresight years ago was needed.

    Thats why the Luas idea is the best one with the spur. Combined with the N11 Luas, you can get a lot of capacity out there and funnel it into the city by various places of interest. Whilst some people lament the time it will take, I still think 56-60 mins from Bray to the city centre is good. We need some sensible policies around motorway access further north combined with it imo, something radical enough to discourage use.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Graves on one side, but a fairway on the other. CPO the fairway and slew the DART tracks over to make space or just go up and over the DART tracks and build the metro station where the fairway is now. Can you provide a source for this:

    "the graves have been allowed right up the edge of what planners will permit."

    None of these things are particularly "simple". The current Metrolink is not the same as the original Metro North. If we apply your logic then because during the original Metro North planning, Glasnevin was not considered it was considered impossible but what do you know, Metrolink is going via Glasnevin after it was considered. Just because something has not been publicly considered yet, doesn't mean it's impossible. It's pretty obvious that the alignment is largely in tact. Precedent running behind the back gardens of south Dublin was set with the building of the existing Green Line. It's nothing new. The outline stuff on the TII website is extremely high level and really just aspirational. No detailed studies of any of these options to Bray have been performed yet. The fact that Cherrywood is now suddenly shown as "metro" reinforces that as we haven't heard any concrete proposals to extend metro beyond Sandyford depot.

    Anyway, as I stated above, using the original alignment would still allow an extension to Bray Daly if it was deemed really necessary. Existing bus routes are a non-argument for me. Buses are the most flexible means of transport and can be reoriented as new rail infrastructure comes online. A new bus interchange is peanuts compared to rail infrastructure.

    The N11 Luas is a different project to me. I see no problem having metro to Woodbrook and N11 Luas to Bray, but ideally not also going to Bray Daly, but instead serving the western and southern parts of the town and offering interchange to metro as it crosses the N11 near Shankill. That's a clean way of building very straight, high quality alignments that offer more options. These are distant projects though. It's not going to fly politically bringing more rail to Bray before a bunch of other places have it. We are talking decades away.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,758 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Look, the whole reason for terminating Metrolink at Charlemont was because of the unreasonable legal challenges of the NIMBY crowd it might effect. That was dealt with by buying them out.

    After the discovery of a giant sewer under the canal, the most logical plan should have been to bring the metro onto the bridge at Charlemont. Avoid the Presbyterian church on Adelaide Rd by passing west of it (just) and rise just south of it. Metro would have to be routed under Earlsfort Terrace from SSG. Peter Place would need a bit (a lot) of CPO.

    Tunnel distance would be much reduced, and it just leaves the platform height, and O/H line power to be sorted. O/H power and line segregation could proceed as the tunnel is built, not waiting till the tunnel is completed.

    Luas would be diverted down Adelaide Road, probably as far as GCD eventually, and then onto Ringsend.

    The two major blocks of Dunville Ave, and St Raphaela's Road should be dealt with anyway, and now - not waiting to be part of Metrolink. Dunville Ave just needs to be closed with pedestrian ramp/bridge provided for access. St Raphaela's Rd needs to go over or under the road. Maybe put the station on the bridge itself.

    Of course, any such change would need to be built into the contract to allow for changed south of SSG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Sorry bud, you clearly aren’t actually up to date with what has happened.

    There is a 100 year sporting lease just signed. Lands were already swapped between developers, the council and the golf club in constructing the new station and parts of housing development.

    Unfortunately this is already baked it.

    The “logic” is based on facts and actually knowing what has happened in the area.

    Your “simple” solution is not there, digging in and adding complexity to justify it at this stage is just being obtuse.

    On no level does your project make sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Oh a lease, well that's that then. CPOs can force the sale of freeholds but not leaseholds. That's a new one on me. Still waiting for that link to the the story about the graves being too close for the planners ;-)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Phisborough is beside Glasnevin Junction. A tight compact populated urban area, with a shopping center and a stadium with one of the most well supporter soccer clubs in the country. Sure it will mainly be an interchange. But there were loads using it as a local station too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Of course there will be some local patronage (although let's be realistic about the numbers a few home league of Ireland matches bring a month) but I think most people choose to live in Phibsborough because it's close enough to town to walk or cycle. I wouldn't pay for a montly or annual ticket if I lived in Phibsborough and worked in town. The salient point I was making is that Glasnevin "works" as a station without Phibsborough, because of the interchange it provides. The same would be true for a Woodbrook interchange. The likelihood is that ultimately the golf course would sell up and be developed. The land would be far, far more valuable as housing and money eventually talks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I would have thought someone with such a robust plan would be aware of the issues with graveyards. These were specifically cited with the Woodbrook development planning including maintaining sightlines and buffer zones.

    In terms of the Shanganagh Cemetery Masterplan and the Woodbrook SDZ, the old line was never protected. Meanwhile the existing rail line very much was front of mind.

    Now we are talking about further CPOs. There were multiple agreements made between the existing landowner, the golf club, the council, the developer and Irish Rail with regards to those lands. This has encompassed parkland expansion, housing development, the new station, the golf club, cemetary and even as far as the old Bray dump (near where the Luas will actually go- here the council did a deal with the golf course to bring about another local amenity). The Harcourt Line was never protected. Unravelling this is not going to happen easily.

    Your “simple” solution is not actually there. It’s an increasingly complicated plan (more and more CPOs).

    I’m also confused by the logic of doing the Bray Luas anyway and then extending Metro to Woodbrook.

    Luas Bray solves the capacity issue along the Green Line and N11 corridor for 50 years at least.

    I am struggling on the logic of MetroLink to Woodbrook as when a longer term piece. Again it is not integrated with local transport (bus transit is basically built around either Bray Daly station or the N11 corridor). It doesn’t have good integration from the motorways at all, in fact it’s terrible and not what you’d want to be doing at all. At best trains from further south will get to Bray and look to dump passengers off there (if not Wicklow as mooted), bringing these trains any further north would clearly impact 5 min DARTs (again assuming we don’t add in another line or something between Bray and Woodbrook, which seems to have the complexities involved that you are against for Bray Luas). Again all of this is to just get to a housing development, a park, golf course and cemetery. It doesn’t make any sense. If your long term goal was to get a Metro that South, you’d still obviously go to Bray Daly. If it’s going to be complicated, do it to the place that makes the most sense.

    Realistically if they want to get Metro further south than Sandyford, they’d just use the old alignment to Cherrywood. It has easier access from both motorways and doesn’t have the complexities of going further south.

    I am failing to see the demand though. 2 Luas lines does what is needed in this area. The mixture of the alignment that is still there from the old Harcourt Street line and the old Bray Golf course lands being preserved gets you most of what you’d want in terms of getting another rail line further south.

    As a longer term future proofing for growth, Metro to Cherrywood is the answer. But I don’t think this would happen even in our great grandchildren’s lives. 2x Luas lines along with DART will provide all the capacity needed.



Advertisement
Advertisement