Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Etiquette when over taking in Bike Lane

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,493 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    a bike used for training would generally be considerd as bike "constructed or adopted as a racing cycle"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,915 ✭✭✭blackbox


    It's a ridiculous reason for not having a bell on your bike.

    The law should be changed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    You're probably right. It can join the back of the Road Safety Suggestions queue. And when implemented I presume it'll be accompanied by a public awareness campaign to advise non-cyclists that on hearing a bell they don't need to immediately become offended and passive aggressively defensive.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,223 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    It isn't really an issue. I don't have a bell either of my two road bikes, nor do I need one. If I come up behind someone slower than me (pedestrian or cyclist) I have other ways of getting their attention without being a dick. I also slow down to a speed where I won't cause a collision.

    In the grand scheme of "let's change the road traffic laws", it would be way down the list (not that the laws are really enforced anyhow)!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Why? As explained multiple times in thread, there are many ways to get someone's attention that are often met with better outcomes, Changing a law that will make no measurable difference to road safety is an obscene waste of government time when there are actual laws in place that can actually improve road safety if enforced.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    On the bell issue - I do find it amusing that on the one hand "why don't you have a bell - I can't hear you warning me?!!" but also "no you can't have a horn on your bike - it's too loud!!".

    As usual, where common sense should be able to regulate almost all interactions on a bike, arguments for new, more oppressive regulation are rarely put forward with genuine pedestrian/ cyclist safety in mind. Pettiness is usually (not always, tbf) the order of the day. "Where's your bell??" … "Why, would you not have tried to run me off the road if I had politely rung it?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,840 ✭✭✭cletus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,493 ✭✭✭✭ted1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,840 ✭✭✭cletus


    Ah, right. I thought you were saying the interpretation was wrong, apologies,😳😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,840 ✭✭✭cletus


    Yes, it should be changed. All reference to a requirement for a bell on a bicycle should be removed from legislation. While they're doing that, they can update the requirements for lights on a bike as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭TerrieBootson


    According to the regs you can't have a horn, only a bell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭TerrieBootson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,840 ✭✭✭cletus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭TerrieBootson


    Maybe you can source where the law says "generally considered"? It's clear what the 1963 intent is



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,223 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The law states:

    93 (1) Every pedal cycle (other than a cycle constructed or adapted for use as a racing cycle) while used in a public place shall be fitted with an audible warning device consisting of a bell capable of being heard at a reasonable distance, and no other type of audible warning instrument shall be fitted to a pedal cycle while used in a public place.

    As "racing cycle" is not defined, it is clearly open to general interpretation. I can race against myself whilst travelling to work on a fixie. I can race against moving congested traffic. I can race against other cyclists. I do not need to be a pro-racer to meet what is written into this law.

    S.I. No. 190/1963 - Road Traffic (Construction, Equipment and Use of Vehicles) Regulations, 1963.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,840 ✭✭✭cletus


    That's my point. It doesn't matter about "generally considered". The law doesn't even say you have to be actively using the bike to race or train. Simply, if it has been constructed or adapted for use as a "racing cycle", it doesn't need a bell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭CoffeeImpala


    You're one who originally thought it was an exemption for training.

    Perhaps you might enlighten the rest of us as to what is your new found understanding of the clear intent of the 1963 legislation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    Exactly,

    Bike to race or train can literally be any bike.

    I've changed the wheels and a few bits and bobs on mine (your average commuter hybrid) to make it just a bit better and not have run of the bill crappy parts. Does that mean that its now modified and I can take off my bell?

    That is one of, if not the most open to interpretation laws we have.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    MOD VOICE: Let's save a lot of time here, you are not required to have a bell under a specific condition set out in law. This is indisputable. As far as this thread is concerned, if you have a bell, that is your choice, and if you don't, you either are compliant with the exemption by your own word or you are breaking the law (which will get you a ban). No more talk on if you are required to have a bell or not. Feel free to discuss the merits of one if you so wish, but the next person to imply you have to have one, gets a thread ban.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,572 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I used to have no bell. I used to and still do cough or call out if passing someone.

    I found the high frequency of a bell actually cut through better so I added a bell to my commuter bike. Must add one to the folding bike that doesn't have one.

    Bells were invented for a reason they work well. These days people have earphones in so can't hear anything.

    There are electric horns but they tend to be obnoxious. Subjective opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,288 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    how many other anachronistic laws are there in relation to bikes anyway?

    IIRC the one on a light on your bike states the minimum surface area of the light and not actually how bright it is. and the vast majority of bike lights being sold, and in use, violate the law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    I'm aware of that. But it wasn't the point I was making. As Cletus says above, the regulations need to be modernised so that the ridiculous requirement for a bell (but definitely not a horn… don't want to be startling people now) is removed and people allowed to exercise common sense on a common sense mode of transport. Lighting regs (again as mentioned by Cletus) could also do with being brought into line with modern standards and regularised.

    But my point - again - was simply that the above won't happen because the bleating on about bells has nothing to do with wanting safer cycling, but everything to do with putting cyclists back in their boxes.

    Edit: just saw Cram's post - Mods feel free to delete



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    I'd say most of them are, going by the discussion around passing/ left of lane recently.

    The lack of meaningful regulations around lighting tells me everything I need to know about the actual interest in cycling safety by the legislature. Literally the most important safety feature you can have on your bike, and we're referred to mid 20th century standards?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,288 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i would say that one is not anachronistic, just that it's widely misinterpreted.

    IIRC one of Eamon Ryan's 'to do' list items was a 'One Bill To Rule Them All' Road Traffic Act, to replace the layers upon layers of supersedence and fog created by amendments, but that didn't happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,059 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    One scenario I find more useful with bells than most others is for warning "hypothetical people" that you're coming. Blind corners on two-lane cycle tracks, passing a high-walled van, that sort of thing. Most of the time there's nobody coming the other way on the wrong side, or nobody about to step out in front of you without looking, so there's no offence taken. And the odd time there is someone, they get the warning, and mostly don't seem to take offence that much. It's ringing it at people in scenarios where it can be construed as an instruction to get out of the way that seems to offend people, in my experience, even when that's not your intention.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,288 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i want a speaker playing the 'woop woop' from this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 738 ✭✭✭bbbbb


    I use a bell and wish more cyclists did also.

    I do agree however that many see them as passive agressive. I changed my bell to one with a “softer” sound, but I’m not sure how the general perception issue can be changed.

    I use the fairview cycle lanes, and agree at times there are volume issues. People expect congestion when they’re in a car, but not when cycling. I’m lucky that I’m not travelling far in general so I can afford to be patient, but I can see how faster cyclists and those travelling longer distances might get frustrated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,572 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    What ever about the legislation. A lot of cyclists don't obey any of the rules and laws. The best majority often aren't enforced by the cops either. So I reckon the legislation is the least of the issues.

    When they tried to up date the legislation with cyclists staying in the cycle lane it was a disaster for cyclists. Then there there's passing legislation. Is that enforced…

    I wouldn't be in a rush to push for change unless it serves a purpose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Ordered a new bell, just to be sure I keep within the law.

    IMG_3793.jpeg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    I'd be fairly confident that updating the laws/ regs around lights on bikes would serve a valuable purpose. Unfortunately the obsession seems to be around builders vests.

    Would also agree with your sentiment around the pointlessness of amending laws if they don't serve a purpose (and I'd add, aren't going to be enforced). That's something that should apply across the board generally.

    We seem to have an "ah, shur it'll be grand, no need to change things" attitude to progress in this country at every level. We need to be dragged kicking and screaming for meaningful change to be brought about. Of course there are exceptions, but if you look at anything from housing to health, transport, energy, environment, sport, childcare… the pace of change in the face of the obvious is pathetic. I wouldn't mind if say cycling was neglected but public transport was excellent. Or if housing was poor but healthcare gold standard. But it's across the board, a general consensus of "careful now, don't rock the boat".

    End of somewhat-cycling-related rant!



Advertisement
Advertisement