Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Nuclear - future for Ireland?

1136137138140142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Rather than bad faith I could have said that the idea that France would build a nuclear plant to supply us was absurd as well as fatuous from your comment on Flammanville.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    Well aren't they embarking on a fresh wave of new NPPs? So us paying for 800 MW or 1 GW should be fairly small potatoes for them.

    Realistically they would sell us a guaranteed amount at an agreed price over time. It's not like we'd fence off one reactor and raise an Irish tricolour inside the fence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Why would they be arsed and not tell us to go take a hike and build our own.

    It`s not as if they are desperate to sell their excess generation from nuclear. They are already selling all the can generate to countries needing it to keep the lights on when renewables decide to go for prolonged sleeps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    Ireland Inc would have to approach them and begin negotiations to find out whether they will or not. To answer your question again, the answer is still money 💰



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Due to SNSP limits Wind can’t be dispatched at 100%. Your question makes no sense. So no I’m Not saying they bid in to be 100%, each wind farm is different and they individually bd in . If they are dispatched they will get the SMP. what generator does not bid in to be dispatched. They market is designed so that the participants submit am offer in the hope that they are dispatched.


    SCED will Identify which ones to run the older ones with firm connections will be prioritised.

    Where a WF with a firm connection is not dispatched they will receive constraint or curtailment payments depends on the situation. They may also receive DS3 payments.

    Post edited by ted1 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The question Paddy has always been money.

    Something I and others have asked about here and on other related threads where those that are opposed to nuclear, while being seemingly experts on nuclear, cannot give any detail for what they favour never mind the money it would cost.

    Why you believe the French would be interested in giving us a dig out by building a nuclear plant to facilitate us I really have no idea. It`s not as if they need the business. They have a ready made market for all they can generate as it is due to the intermittent unreliable nature of renewables. They are exporting over 100 TWh, worth over €5 Billion annually, and are selling a further 100TWh to French renewable companies they require to keep them in business.

    But lets say for the sake of arguement the French would be interested. Would it not make logical sense for Ireland Inc to know the cost of any alternatives before even thinking about looking to negotiate ?

    The answer has always been money Paddy. It`s the answer that those here or on any related thread who are opposed to nuclear keep refusing to give.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The only sense your answer makes in relation to what you were asked is the same as your refusing to answer what plan you favour and how much it would cost.

    For both you either do not have a clue, or you do and it shows how this oligopoly of renewable companies have us over a barrel being able to hold us to ransom for whichever terms and conditions they want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    the Celtic interconnecter is going way over budget. That’s for a simple cable. One could only imagine how much over budget a nuclear plant would be.

    Who here is opposed to nuclear?


    what many are saying is that it can’t be delivered within the next 40 years. So we need to look at what can be delivered

    And secondly is the cost. The Loud pro nuclear are avoiding giving costs (or realistic deliver timelines )

    Post edited by ted1 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I believe when somebody starts throwing in 40 years it`s not difficult to see where they stand when it comes to nuclear.

    What we need to look at is what the present plan will cost in relation to the price of electricity to the consumer and the resulting cost to our economy. And that is something that those favouring this plan are jumping through hoops refusing to answer.

    I have given comparative costs to wind and nuclear where even Hinkley C, the wind lobby`s big bad wolf, comes out ahead. But seeing as you could not read back over two days and find posts, I`m not surprised you missed those.

    Even less surprised that you are yet again attempting to distract while refusing to answer what exactly happens when renewables bid €0.00 for 100% of the demand. Who generates what, what are they paid, and what other expenses are added to the consumers bill and at what cost due to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    40 is very reasonable for a project of that size in Ireland.
    the metro was announced in 2006. And still not a turned turf turned.
    and that didn’t have to face legislation change



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I think what is reasonable to assume that at this stage you are floundering in deep water attempting to distract from anything you are asked.

    You going to answer the question or not ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    I answered your hypothetical pointless questions.

    Hinckley points costs are irrelevant as it’s sited on an existing nuclear facility



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    No you did not, and there was nothing hypothetical about my question. Renewable companies bid €0.00 per MW for 100% of the demand multiple times a month.

    You did your usual when asked an inconvenient question.

    The first thing that comes into your head attempting to avoid and distract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    look back on i answered the question.

    Here it is again


    Due to SNSP limits Wind can’t be dispatched at 100%. Your question makes no sense. So no I’m Not saying they bid in to be 100%, each wind farm is different and they individually bid in . If they are dispatched they will get the SMP. what generator does not bid in to be dispatched.?? The market is designed so that the participants submit am offer in the hope that they are dispatched.


    SCED will Identify which ones to run the older ones with firm connections will be prioritised.

    Where a WF with a firm connection is not dispatched they will receive constraint or curtailment payments depends on the situation. They may also receive DS3 payments

    In another reply I also said that when we’ll have a. mix of RES like pumped hydro and Hydrogn which will have. Avasociated and that will set the SMP. We neee inertia in the grid. 100% wind isn’t realistic

    Post edited by ted1 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Not what you were asked and you know it.

    When renewables bid €0.00 per MW for 100% of demand - which they do, something you appeared to be unaware off - who generates what, how are they paid, at what rate and what other charges are added to consumers bills ?

    If you do not know then say so. If you do then answer or stop posting meaningless jargon attempting not too.

    Post edited by charlie14 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Do You want me to copy and paste my Answer again ?

    what part of your question wasn’t answered?

    If there is something you don’t agree with say so



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The part ending with the question mark.

    If you are unaware of what a question mark is, see highlighted in brackets ( ? )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    they were al answered. Do I need to explain Security Constrained economic dispatch to you? I thought you knew everything

    Post edited by ted1 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I really did not think that your constant attempts at not answering anything you are asked could not become even more pathetic yet you managed it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    I answered your questions.. you are fooling no one



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    You are fooling nobody other than yourself that you did what you always do.

    Continually ask questions of other but never answer anything you are asked because it would show inconvenient truths that you want to avoid at all costs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    I have answered your questions. You fail

    To answer the ones that are most relevant to this thread.

    How much would a NPP cost?

    If we decide to build one tomorrow, how long before it gets commissioned ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Plans unveiled for €2bn green energy project outside Tullow - News - Carlow Nationalist https://share.google/SzcXs0s0F1bBveJgT

    Not nuclear , and a bit unclear about exactly how much energy it can take in , how it uses it to produce hydrogen, how much it can store , what the gas loses would likely be , and how they're gonna generate electricity from the hydrogen, and how much electricity they can can actually produce..

    But this type of infrastructure, along with the lime of the proposed silver mines pumped hydro and all the grid level storage would likely be needed as peakers if ever went nuclear anyway , so even if a magic switch could be clicked tomorrow and 3 reactors magically came in to being connected to the grid - all this "new " infrastructure would still be required..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    You have not answered anything I have asked.

    You have point blank refused while trying, as you are now, to distract and changing the subject.

    If you want an answer to any of your question you know what to do. Answer the questions you have been asked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    I answered them several times now.

    On a thread about nuclear you are avoiding the 2 key questions.

    How much will it cost.
    hie long between announcing a plan to no nuclear and commissioning a plant will it take ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    In fairness those are 2 - no one knows - ..questions..

    In theory it could be as little as 15 to 20 years from deciding to go for it to commissioning - all the way up to 40 plus to never ..

    And when you think about how many election cycles that is , and how the world and irelands energy markets ,and priorities have changed since 1995

    All that creates risk ,

    And risk and extended timelines give you open ended price structures..

    Oh the price of steel has doubled , in the last x number of months - oh the price of diesel and construction materials has jumped -

    Or your nuclear construction is maxing out concrete production in Ireland, so the price of all construction has gone through the roof ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    that’s a fair response. My view is 40 years may be achievable and at least treble whatever figure we initially put on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    To be absolutely fair , a project that you initiate now , thats estimated to cost 20 billion ( at 2026 prices ) . is obviously going to have cost inflation, that's pretty much the nature of big projects , and multi-year or multi decade projects those increases can compound massively..

    And it doesn't matter whether its wind or nuclear , theyre both front heavy development and construction costs,

    Nuclear just has the added disadvantage of being multi decade rather than multi year - and that also increases the cost of risk ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    https://www.rte.ie/news/2026/0608/1577361-energy-firm-unveils-2bn-carlow-storage-project/

    "The project is designed to produce a peak power output of 600 megawatts for 70 hours".

    600MW for almost 3 days = 42GWh. And it's from gas turbine so it's synchronous.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Silvermines is like Turlough Hill and batteries for any prolonged period when wind and solar are generating little are all a one shot and they are done because they cannot be recharged.

    This Carlow facility raises more questions than answers.

    Who is going to pony up this €2 billion. The taxpayer/consumer ?

    Converting electricity to hydrogen and back to electricity requires 3 units of electricity input for every unit of output, so how much will the electricity alone cost.

    The general thinking appears to be that they will buy it from the market at a cheaper price than the strike price for the generation that we would not need or want. Problem with that is we have already lost a high court case where we have to pay them for that electricity so why would they bother. We are appealing that €158 million award to the E.U. Court of Justice, but as the High Court`s ruling was based on E.U. law I would not see any great hope of us being successful.

    There is also the Capex and the Opex which will be added to the cost of the electricity, and I cannot see daily stand by charges not being a further expense. How much will all three add to consumers bill ?

    Like everything else with renewables, the devil will be in the detail.



Advertisement
Advertisement