Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

18687899192114

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,055 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    excellent post, and something I’ve saidbefore. We are so so wanting to take sides . So consumed by it that we don’t even want the prospect of peace at this stage, as that would be seen as maybe having to ease off on the big bad Israelis. Eurovision to OTB to a fooking soccer match. We can’t let up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Did they? Maybe they had reasons other than just the person in question’s nationality do you think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    You're being untruthful again. Those of us who believe sport should be independent from politics are consistent in that view - it applies to all countries.

    Its good that you have admitted you think sports and polittics should be linked. So how come you've no issue with the likes of DPRK, Qatar, Afghanistan and Iran? Surely you should also be advocating against Palestine's participation due to their treatment of women and minorities?

    In the end of the day, if you take sides in an armed conflict, you contribute to the death and destruction. Support peace, not war.

    Support Ireland, not some middle eastern regime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Wrong again. Calling out civilian deaths does not contribute to civilian deaths. Opposing collective punishment does not contribute to collective punishment. Demanding accountability does not contribute to war. Illogicial nonsense.

    Wanting civilians protected is not "taking sides". It's taking the side of civilians. You trying to blur that simple premise says a lot about you.

    Claiming "peace" while arguing that everyone should stay quiet and carry on as normal is not a peace argument. It's an argument for indifference at best, or to keep this whole thing going at worst. Only you know the truth.

    And cmon, ye lads love doing this. simply declaring "I'm consistent" doesn't make it true when your posts dispute it.

    If your position is genuinely that sport and politics should always be separate, then fair enough. But that's not an argument against people who disagree. It's just a statement of your own belief. The rest is nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    From my time in sport Im aware of it happening on 3 occasions. All non-EU European referees. On one occasion, a visa was initially refused, but granted at short notice after a contact with Dept of Foreign Affairs. No explanation for the other two - both were granted visas but stopped at the airport.

    In all 3 cases, the referees frequently did games in a variety of EU countries, so was not an EU issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    But you"re NOT targeting or calling out those responsible. You"re targeting a sports organisation who has no role in what you're calling out. You"re blaming the wrong people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,255 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    You want no sports boycotts, you are consistent in that. Boycott can be peaceful as is the boycott against Russia, as was the boycott against South Africa. In the latter case I dont see anything wrong with preventing a deeply racist state from playing sports on the international arena.

    In the case of Russia it appears that it was mostly the case that international sports people did not want to be forced to play Russia whe they were killing civilians in Ukraine that forced this ban.

    You are in no way supporting peace by objecting to a sports boycott against any nation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    If anyone is having difficulty between wanting to choose the side that supports a Genocidal Nation being included in world sports, or pressuring FIFA to ban said Genocidal National, they need to question their moral standards.

    Everybody wants peace - Israel has broken every ceasefire in Gaza and is now carrying out Gaza II in Lebanon. You think Israel wants peace? Not a chance. They have to be forced into it. Part of that is ostracising them in the International sports arena.

    People can't let up because they subscribe to "never again" or "not in my name" principles. Those who do not subscribe are on the wrong side of history.

    The ball is clearly in FIFA's court.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,682 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    They are representing the genocidal state of Israel



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    The CAS ruling on Russia makes it very clear that they are not responsible for the actions of their Government - their exclusion was for other reasons.

    Suspensions should be given out when a sports federation itself is not adhering to the rules. The SA exclusion was due to the sports organisations themselves having racist rules/policies.

    A sports federation that is fully inclusive and respects human rights can have a very powerful positive influence in a country where the government does not respect human rights.

    In the current day, I would question the following:

    Should Afghanistan be suspended from cricket because they wont hold home test matches for their womens team?

    Should Iran be suspended from soccer because of that episode in Australia?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,059 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Similar to the ban on South African sportspeople during Apartheid, it is part of a wider process of ostracisation of a country to generate pressure for change within that country.

    This can also include people in arts (White South African artists not being booked outside the country, non-South African artists not performing there), academia, etc.

    Now, of course there may have been individual South Africans who were tarred with a brush they didn't deserve, but overall, I'm sure you'd agree that the end justified the means.

    There's nothing hard to understand about a sports organisation being targeted as part of this process of ostracisation.

    Post edited by osarusan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,255 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think a case should be made for either but you seem to have a strange view that if a society is immoral the sports association should still be allowed to compete but there should only be a ban if the sports association is somehow immoral.

    So if a country was actually committing a genocide they should only be banned in your mind if their sports association is corrupt. It feels alot like you support sportswashing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    what’s your point here exactly? Are you trying to equate 3 isolated incidents of officials not being allowed to enter Ireland for reasons unspecified with Trump’s travel ban laws applying to citizens of 75 countries.


    The Somalian ref in this instance was also not allowed in to the USA for unspecified reasons but it’s in the context of wide ranging bans against citizens from some of the countries on the travel ban list. We’re talking about FIFA here, this guy was one of their referees and all they have to say is “not our laws…nothing to do with us”. They approved him and picked him to be a World Cup ref, they might not be able to do anything about it but they could do more than just wash their hands of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Its an extremely simple premise, so much so that you must be arguing in bad faith by not understanding it.

    Nobody thinks the FAI/ Israeli FA/ uefa caused the genocide in Gaza. The question is whether sport should carry on as normal in response to it, that other countries should have to legitimize Israel when they are doing such atrocious crimes. This has been answered again and again. Both the atrocious crimes and the fact international sport symbolically legitimizes countries always somehow allude you

    You're arguing against a position nobody is actually taking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    Except what Im pointing out is the basis on how modern sport is organised and it is the stance that most countries are taking. As we can see from the reaction to the FAIs UEFA motion, Ireland is very much the outlier hete.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Doesn't mean it is wrong. Doesn't mean it won't lead to.pressure on both Uefa to act, add political pressure on Israel to stop the butchery. I'm open to legitimate arguments genuinely, but engage in smear, ignore the context of genocide, and use whataboutery , twist simple logical and moral positions, it will be pushed back on.

    The sporting boycott of apartheid South Africa wasn't because rugby unions /fas / cricket teams created apartheid, that is what you are saying using your logical argument.

    The boycott contributed in a big way to the end of apartheid, logically you are arguing that the boycott against SA was wrong. Is that what you genuinely think?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    I think it would have been a lot more powerful had the bigger sports in SA come out and said they'd no longer be racist and become fully inclusive. But they chose not to and rightly so were excluded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    not true. Belgium is one example of a team that have also not played Israel in their home venue with fans. You’d already know that.

    Some in Ireland would like to see the game completely cancelled in the hopes that it would trigger an outright ban on Israel which is what should happen. These things that need to happen have to start somewhere. Russia got banned after Poland said they wouldn’t play them and that was followed by an official UEFA/FIFA ban IIRC. You’d know more about that than I would (from your time in sport) and you spend a lot more time on this thread.

    Also to add when you say “Ireland very much an outlier hete (sic)”, you make it sound like a bad thing. Being an outlier some times is a good thing and a necessary show of leadership to bring about necessary change.

    You really come across as someone who’s got the wrong end of the stick here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    if you know as much about this as you claim to then you know that Israel Football clubs have violated UEFA regulations by setting up clubs in disputed territory. You know this. As another poster says you appear to be arguing in bad faith.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    This is a completely different issue to the Gaza one!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    The rest of the world carries on as normal anyway so why should sports be any different?

    The world cup on 2022 carried on as normal despite the previous decade or more with regard to the deaths, and subsequent cover up, building the facilities.

    We live in a social media age so its not like your advocating using sports events as a platform to raise awareness of what's happening in the world because everybody knows what's going on in the world on any given day.

    So you want symbolical gestures and not any meaningful action which will impact on Israel, thats how this reads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Russian got banned but it wasn't because Poland and Sweden issued statements saying they wouldnt play them. Russia got banned because of political pressure from Washington.

    Do you think, if Sweden and Poland said nothing, russia would not have been banned?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    Leaders Questons is on RTE News right now.

    The Taoiseach referred to FIFA rules re: football associations being independent from their governments in a reslonse to Ivana Bacik. So it seems like our Governent understands what Ive been saying on this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    So you've moved from 'sport should never be political' to 'the South African boycott was justified because South African sport was part of the problem.'

    That's a concession that sporting boycotts can be legitimate.

    The argument is now about where to draw the line, not whether the principle exists.

    One of the criticisms, repeated here a lot, is that clubs based in Israeli settlements on stolen land are fully permitted to compete by the Israeli FA. You accept this right? So are they not on some level complicit in the ethnic cleansing of these areas, as SA FA was in apartheid? Aren't they somewhat part of the problem? Surely there is a case for this argument, using your logic.

    Either sporting boycotts can be legitimate tools in some circumstances, or they can't. You've already admitted they can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,960 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    Sporting suspensions are legitimate for sports federations who are breaking the rules of their International Federations, which include inclusiveness. You appear to be failing to understand that national.sports federations are independent from their governments and accountable for their own actions.

    In theory you could have a non-inclusive sports federatiion in a fully inclusive country suspended for being non-inclusive. Likewise, a fully inclusive federation in a non-inclusive country would not be suspended.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    But Israelis who are critical of the regime are also part of the Israeli public. Are they complicit in Genocide? Are the journalists of Ha'aretz complicit in Genocide? Collective punishment catches everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,255 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Israel as a nation agrees with collective punishment of the Palestinians. They have voted for years for governments that have taken land in settlements from the Palestinians. Is the ban of Russian teams acceptable to you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    It was for show. 100%

    But earlier you said they were delivering Aid to Gaza. Now you are saying it was 100% for show. Can you please stop lying! Just pick a lane and stick to it. This must be the 4th or 5th time you've contradicted yourself on this point. You're totally undermining your own credibility.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    It’s a reason for Israel to be banned on the grounds of violating UEFA’s own regulations. If UEFA imposed their own rules Israel would be banned from international and European club competitions. Are you disputing this?



Advertisement
Advertisement