Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

18586889091114

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    That's interesting. I know Israeli's recent home games have been played in Hungary. Have any of their recent away games been played in a neutral venue or is the IRL game the first to be proposed as such?

    Just on Hungary, Orban was Israel's staunchest support and a personal friend of the alleged war criminal (at large) and PM of Israel. Orban's gone now. I wonder how long Hungary will allow Israel to play there. I don't think Petér Magyar will be as inclined as Orban.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,381 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Sorry what mod am I challenging PJ, do you know something I don't?

    You can't just say a question is off topic because it makes you look like a hypocrite. Report my post to this phantom mod if you must.

    The reason this game being played is under such scrutiny is because Israel is engaging in what almost all the experts and relevant organizations are telling us is a genocide, a few of which I have listed.

    All the deflection, slander and nonsense being put out by certain posters in this thread, including you and Paddy, conveniently ignores this context it's nuts. Ye bring up anything ye can to delegitimize the motives of those calling for the boycott without addressing the actual reasons.

    If someone like Paddy portrays themselves as neutral whilst denigrating Palestinians only, cannot criticize israel despite these evil acts, and cannot address the premise of the call for boycott, this provides context for their pov.

    Paddy has wracked up hundreds of posts trying to delegitimize the motives of people who not only want to boycott, but also those who support basic human rights. Mods deemed this on topic.

    So why should Paddy's motives not be on topic?

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,381 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    The question is off topic because the thread title isn't "Lets Quiz Paddy". The thread titles provide a clue as to the topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Fifa have just abandoned a Somalian referee who the US has refused to grant a visa to in order to allow him to travel to work at the world cup.

    This despite him having a diplomatic passport which was specifically intended to ease travel for him.

    FIFA released a statement basically saying "Not our problem, nothing to do with us".

    Its further evidence that football administration is entirely morally corrupt.

    If Ireland don't make the decision to not host Israel it is the bear minimum we should do to tell UEFA (FIFA) that they are failing their membership in favour of the whims of powerful nations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    I havent ignored the context.

    The world doesn't stop no matter what is going on. Earlier in the thread I made the case for the game going ahead as there is consequences for an FAI led boycott of two games and those reasons get dismissed as "money isnt important". The CEO of the FAI has stated this quite clearly but that gets dismissed out of hand.

    Money is literally the heartbeat of the entire world, its largely why 24% of this country are non nationals, most of whom came here in the last 15-20 years. The FAI aren't immune to implications a significant drop in income would bring.

    One poster in particular kept dismissing that out of hand, then changed tack to say "if the financials could be overcome" and then threw the Ireland v Celtic game idea out there which was completely debunked but now the narrative is "i dont care about the FAI financials". I never said I did. But I do care about Irish football and the FAI financial position is a key part of the growth and improvement in the game here.

    I met my wife through football, we have 3 girls who all play. We have been involved with their club a long time, and in my job I have dealt with 100s of players of all levels from LOI down. Minor injuries to post surgery rehab. And everything in between.

    When i suggested that people buying tech goods were complicit/supporting genocide i was told thats ridiculous. Then we have a protest at a shop in Belfast where a protestor stated "every purchase enables genocide". So its hypocritical to support these protestors while at the same time dismiss other purchases a person may make as doing the same thing. Especially as purchases at some stores will directly benefit Israel, others where protests have happened, wont.

    The Mary Manning/Dunnes example gets thrown out there, but the one key difference is that was an actual boycott of South African produced goods and services which starved them economically. And when it comes down to it, an economic boycott is going to be far more effective as money talks.

    Im told the government will pick up the tab, despite no evidence to back that up. So there is an acceptance of financial implications, the CEO stated "serious consequences" but then its dismissed as not important. The same people who maKe the statements about the government picking up the slack want evidence when other arguments are put forward. Amazing how that works.

    So are Irish people willing to make the ultimate sacrifice of any product with a link to Israel, because if Ireland play Israel in football is deemed as being complicit/supporting genocide, then surely people financing the Israeli state via goods and services is the exact same?

    They answer is no, as a nation we will not give up the luxuries in life, which tells you everything IMO, It is do as i say and not as i do mentality. Somebody else can make the actual stand against Israel so long as i am not impacted is the attitude.

    The main reason being Largely because half the country think the games shouldn't go ahead, and only 4% less then half think they should be played. Yet last week we were told by one poster on here that "the vast majority of the country wanted the games to be boycotted" which aged very well as two days later the Indo published a poll.

    Then its changed to the vast majority of football people on the FAI motion. A lot of these people sat on their hands and said nothing when John Delaney was financially ruining the FAI, and when it came crumbling down 7 years ago, a lot of them issued statements of support of Delaney because he provided admin support for grants for their new pitches or facilities which came from state grants. So their bought silence is the very reason the FAI are in the financial position they are in ironically.

    Then its Brian Kerr knows more then me. The same Brian Kerr who slated the FAI in March for making people redundant and then went onto say the FAI should boycott the games as its the right thing to do but if that leads to more redundancies when the FAI loses more money he will slate them for that. The boycott wouldn't impact Brian financially so it is just virtue signalling.

    But remember, there is no guarantee of consequences, from the same people who say the government will bail out the FAI, of which there is no evidence.

    The narrative, which is nonsense, is that the FAI have to take a stand, completely ignoring the fact they already did and got no support from any other football association in UEFA, and UEFA Binned the motion.

    I was Asked why i dont support Palestine and the reason ls are I think if they as a "nation" cannot respect their own citizens then i dont see why I should. That then gets twisted into "I don't say anything negative about Israel" so i must support Israel yet I've not said one word to support Israel.

    I also stated elsewhere that i wouldnt support anyone who can do "that" to another human (the link from October 7th and pick up truck) but somehow thats twisted into im pro Israel.

    I stated my support of the FAI decision to play the games which has been twisted into i am pro-Israel. Life isnt that linear. I can go to a Bohs v Rovers games (as a shels fan) and that doesn't mean I now support Bohs or rovers.

    I can go to Ireland v Israel. Doesn't mean I support Israel. Is it really that difficult a concept for people to understand.

    Likewise if I stated support for the FAI boycott of the games, thats would not mean I support Palestine. The world is full of bad stuff. Its a daily occurrence. Qatar, Afghanistan, Iran, Venezuela, the list goes on. I dont see a difference, death is death but there is only outrage because its Israel/Palestine. Which tells me everything.

    The world is full of badness. So leave them at it.

    Football is sport, its to be enjoyed. You may not like that, but that's how i do my life. The boycott of two games wont change a thing.

    If Trump turned off the USA aid to Israel tomorrow, things would change. I live in the real world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    FOR EVERYONE ELSE

    This is at least the second time this poster has introduced personal details about their family in to the thread. Do NOT make the mistake of referring to these family members in any future post or response. If you do, you will likely receive a warning possibly a ban for either attacking them or "making it personal". You don't have to do either of those things, just mentioning them may be all it takes.

    I might deal with the rest of the post later, there's so much that is biased, inconsistent and just plain wrong but right now, work calls.

    Poster warned. Backseat Modding is not permitted.

    -Mod

    Post edited by Rawr on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Paddy is quite happy to answer questions about anything else if it depends Israel or criticizes those who are calling them out, no matter how nonsensical.

    But put him on the spot to criticize israel, he cannot do it, and suddenly become off topic. Give me a break. Ye are all the same, and it is disconcerting how ye can't utter a word of specific criticism against a state that is overwhelmingy alleged to be committing a complaint of genocide and extermination of innocent people.

    If everyone else motives can be questioned by Paddy, then so can Paddy's.

    Poster warned. Stick to the topic and do not derail into discussing a poster. If you have an issue, use the report button.

    -Mod

    Post edited by Rawr on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    Pleaze amend your post - I have never defended any actions by rhe Israeli government.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,381 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    If you arent rabidly against Israel 24/7 you are staunchly defending them, you know this is the rule by now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,055 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    That's pretty much the whole Israel thread…it's a massive pile on…anything perceived as not slating them and you're labeled a genocide enabler….weird..People here who think this match should absolutely go ahead as per the rules in play aren't Israel defenders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,381 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Sure that mask has fallen off in this thread plenty.

    On numerous occassions the thread has been marketed as defenders of Palestine vs Evil Israelis. The concept thats its about Ireland vs Israel and that some people actually support IRELAND rather than Palestine OR Israel is just utterly inconcievable to them, supporting Ireland is just not possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Still unable to provide a specific criticism of the country you say you don't support.

    That whole post is looking for reasons after reason why no-one should care,.or are too impure to speak up, and dressing it up as realism.

    You keep saying you don't support Israel, yet whenever people object to what Israel is doing, you're there to mock them, dismiss them, or tell them to stay quiet because they aren't "pure enough". When asked directly if you condemn Israel's actions, you can't answer. yet happy to say Gazans are rapists etc.

    You try to put yourself across as some neutral football pragmatist, but your behaviour and stances are far from neutral.

    Half your argument comes down to money. But if people only take a stand when it costs nothing, then it's not much of a principle. Every boycott in history had financial consequences. That's the point.

    The comparison with people buying phones or shopping in stores is just a nonsense distraction because you are trying to find reasons to stop people speaking up. Nobody except you is claiming people can avoid every connection to Israel.

    Nobody can avoid every connection to anything they protest against, be it marriage equality, abortion referendum, fuel protests, that is life. People protesting for gay marriage and abortion rights still went to mass, had communions, went to weddings. They still used hospitals that refused to carry out abortions when they were sick.

    Fuel protesters blocked local circle K and apple green garages that had nothing to do with their actual grievances. I know some who did government and country council work some days and protesting others.

    It doesn't mean their message was wrong, that they were hypocrites in ivory towers, or they were all illegitimate to give their pov. This is exactly what you are saying with anti Israel protesters.

    The question here is whether Irish football should participate in a public act of sporting normalisation with a country who international experts are telling us are carrying out a genocide. Those are completely different issues. You demand that boycott supporters be perfectly consistent, but you can't even clearly say whether Israel's conduct deserves criticism. Hypocrisy.

    The “football is just sport” line is cowardly nonsense imo. Sport has never existed outside politics because states like Israel,and Ireland, and everyone else use sport for legitimacy.

    Russia was excluded. The principle is not mysterious - states committing mass warcrimes like these should not get the comfort of normal international fixtures while their victims are buried under rubble.

    You say “leave them at it.” That is not neutrality, it is permission. And easy to say when it's somebody else's families, somebody else's children being exterminated?

    People aren't speaking out because they think a football match will end the war. They're speaking out because staying silent in the face of mass suffering is wrong. That's a moral position.

    Pretending nothing can be done and everything should carry on as normal, whilst being unable to criticise the country carrying the fecking thing out, is not neutral, and is also a moral position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    ??? it isnt Fifas problem, what do you propose they do ? it is the decision of the usa who they let in or not .

    FIFA explained, "Immigration procedures, including visa issuance, are the exclusive authority of the host country's government," and added, "We have been notified by U.S. authorities that this decision will not be overturned."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,741 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Posters have said they shouldn't be banned, but they claim it's out of concern for the FAI

    If you are aware of their posting history you may well draw the same conclusions. I can't 100 prove their motivations, and seeing as they'll never admit to it, it's a pointless exercise naming them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,741 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    FIFA are breaking their own rules by allowing the match to go ahead. However, i agree the match should go ahead now as Irish soccer will suffer, not Israel at this stage. The FAI did what they could in bringing the motion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    I gave the list about the accusations put out about what they are doing in Gaza. It is overwhelming. That is the basis for the boycott. Not their religion, not peoples "other motives" as you alluded to. It isn't antisemetic to want them banned from sporting competitions for their behaviour.

    If you are unable to criticise israeli actions, or even acknowledge what they are doing to millions of starving people trapped behind a fence, tens of thousands burries under rubble whilst partaking in slander, nonsense delegitimization, and use whataboutery to somehow normalize these acts, you are defending them, whether that is intentional or not only you know.

    If you support Ireland and don't want the game to go ahead due to the affect on Irish football, I will happily listen as I did to paddy until his mask fell off. If you engage in the above nonsense, you will be challenged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,681 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    It is their problem as they allowed the USA to ride roughshod over established procedures (just like UEFA are doing with the terrorist state of Israel). The tournament should never have gone to Trumps US but we know the brown envelopes were too large.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Not forgetting the awarding of the FIFA Peace Prize to Trump.

    FIFA getting involved when it suits them and simultaneously hand-waving away the crescendo of calls to ban Israel

    "Politics and sport shouldn't mix" - an altruistic stance but clearly a busted flush, especially when governing bodies are up to their eyes in politics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    This thtead is about a football game between teams representing the FAI and Israeli FA - in a UEFA tournament.

    This thread is NOT about the Gazs situatiion - there is another thread about this in CA.

    Neither the FAI, Israeli FA or UEFA has any hand or part in the Gaza conflict. If you are so blind that you cannot see that - well that's on you.

    If you believe that Governments and sport should not be separate and sport should be used for politcal reasons then be honest on this thread and come out and say it.

    You have no right to accuse people, like me, who believe sport should ve seperated from politics and be used as a way of bringing people together as being on any side in any war.

    If it wasnt for pacifists where would the world be today?

    Why are you supporting conflict and war? Why are YOu takiing sides in a bitter and horrible scenario where people are dying?

    Support peace, support bringing people together.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,381 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I havent seen anyone say Israel shouldn't be banned. I have however seen multiple point out that Ireland havent the power to ban them from international competition so I guess thats seen as the same for some who struggle with comprehending whats in front of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    It’s a nonsense. Trump apparently has banned citizens from 75 countries IIRC from travelling to the United States. Somalia is one, so is Iran and Brazil and Egypt? Iran have a team playing in the competition but are forced to fly in and out of the US on the same day while staying in Mexico. Brazil and Egypt face no such restrictions and I’m guessing their supporters are allowed to travel in as well?


    Blatant discrimination against the ref from Somalia and what a shower of cowards FIFA and UEFA are hiding behind Trump’s blatant discrimination. You’re right it’s the same attitude that has led to Israel continuing to escape a ban from international competition.


    FIFA/UEFA do make decisions on political matters when they feel enough pressure to do so. FIFA and UEFA are Cowards, like posters here arguing that Ireland must play Israel because “dems the rules” and it might be bad for people that work in the FAI (with no evidence of this) etc etc etc.

    Edit; apparently Brazil fans don’t face an outright ban even though their citizens face a travel ban that Trump brought in last January. Haiti, Iran, Senegal and Ivory Coast supporters aren’t allowed in. They couldn’t ban Brazil fans from a World Cup. So the Trump Travel Ban rules just apply to those smaller countries and to the ref from Somalia. “Dems the rules”…etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    The Irish government sometimes refuses visas for International referees in sports from time to time. Ive come across it myself in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    no that’s just what you see, or what you want to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,381 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    So you can do what nacho refused and show these posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    This is exactly the kind of disingenuous framing people are objecting to.

    You say the thread is about a football match and not Gaza. But the only reason anyone is discussing a boycott of the match is because of Gaza. You cannot separate the two and then declare Gaza off limits because it is inconvenient to your argument.

    Nobody is claiming the FAI or UEFA or Israel FA is conducting military operations. The argument is whether sporting bodies should carry on as normal when a state is accused of genocide against civilians. That's the issue. Pretending people are blaming the FAI or Israeli fa for the war is nonsense.

    You ask people to "be honest" and admit they think sport and politics are linked. Fine. Of course they are. Sport and politics have always been linked. That's why Russia was suspended. That's why countries use sport to project legitimacy in the first place.

    What's dishonest is acting as though sport is magically apolitical only when Israel is involved.

    And please spare us the lecture about peace. Opposing the killing of civilians is not "supporting conflict". Calling for accountability is not "taking sides". Wanting pressure applied to stop mass suffering is not warmongering. How does any of this genuinely make any sense??

    In fact, the strange thing here is that people repeatedly ask you and those employing the same.nonsense whether ye condemn israel's conduct and you all refuse to answer, it's bizarre. Why can a simple question not be answered? yet somehow those condemning civilian deaths are the ones accused of taking sides??

    Supporting peace does not mean pretending everything is normal. Sometimes it means refusing to normalise what is happening

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,224 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    you’re saying you’ve seen people say Ireland haven’t the power to ban them, did anyone say they did? That’s what I mean when I say you’re seeing what suits you and leaving out what doesn’t.

    What people in Ireland are trying to do is create pressure on FIFA/UEFA to ban them through protest and debate. A spotlight on this game could lead to pressure on a FIFA/UEFA ban of Israeli football teams. It won’t immediately or directly stop Israeli genocide and warmongering either but it could lead to international isolation from sporting events. You already know that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Sport and politics are inextricably linked. Always have been, always will be.

    FIFA/UEFA suspended Russia even though The Russian FA had no hand, act or part in the war with Ukraine. So going by your logic, Russia should be reinstated. But they haven't been. Why not?

    And by the way, Genocide is not "politics". Exterminating Palestinians is not "politics".

    The Israeli FA has no issue rubber stamping Israeli players who have and are serving in IDF combat units. Some would call that being "complicit" in said Genocide. You said they are not involved, but they are.



Advertisement
Advertisement