Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2025/2026 - See Post #1 for Mod Note

1477478480482483487

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    I don't have confidence in Isak ever being fully fit again myself. He doesn't have that robustness that other top forwards the league has seen over the last decade had. I think this is one of the reasons why Liverpool also committed to also buying Ekitike in the same window as buying Isak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    think you have it wrong and conte told Diego by text while he was in Brazil : thank you for helping us win the title, your services are no longer required. Find a new club.


    Player power is at an all time high but players can’t sit out 4 years of a contracts.

    Newcastle had a lot of power in their position with Isak. They chose a certain course of action. It’s worked out with a terrible league position and an average CL showing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    Another example from last summer was Nicolas Jackson who refused to return to Chelsea after they cancelled his loan. They loaned him to Bayern Munich, then Delap got injured, then they cancelled the loan but he refused to come back

    Interesting to see whether Xabi brings him back to Chelsea's first team now. Delap is absolutely not better than Jackson



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,821 ✭✭✭jacool


    Not unless your name is Winston Bogarde, I'm guessing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    What would he need to do next season to start to justify the fee?

    3 in 14 in the league this season and 0 in 7 in the CL.

    That's a poor return for any striker nevermind one that cost 145m



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,761 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Memories are short in football… if he goes back to anything close to his Newcastle level, this first year will just become a footnote.

    Have to say I'm still really excited to see what he can do when fit… at no point has he been available for more than 4 weeks this whole season, so was always playing catch up, before getting injured again - we've never seen him actually fit.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Isak didn’t have a good season. If you want to call him a flop though I think that’s a bit dumb.


    shearer done his cruciate upon signing for Newcastle. He didn’t end up a flop. Injuries are injuries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    He's obviously not a flop yet but if he doesn't start showing something next season the question is there to be asked.

    You don't get 2/3 seasons at a top end club to find your feet especially after moving for a record fee. He needs to stay fit and start scoring fairly quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    for sure. I’ve heard a journalist call him a flop



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,697 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Isak had a horrendous start, with something like 2 goals in his first 15/16 games for Liverpool and in most of those games he could barely get a touch of the ball, to the point that he had finally been dropped for the 3 PL games just prior to his injury.

    Trying to pass it off as "injuries are injuries" is a bit disingenuous, Isak was awful and it was becoming a huge problem for him and the club, to the point where you could argue that the injury was perhaps a relief for him.

    The fact that he also did **** all when he returned does not give me the same confidence that others have that he will ever actually do well for Liverpool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    I think some of your stats are a bit disingenuous /juiced up also.


    as someone else said, if next season is riven by injuries and poor performances it’ll be a flop. If he scores 15 in the league it’s acceptable. If he scores 18+ it’ll be good business.


    Newcastle’s 120 million is virtually up in smoke with little to show for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,697 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Stats can't be disingenuous, they are either accurate or inaccurate.

    And you are wrong that 15 in the league is acceptable. You don't pay superstar, 120m pricetags for Danny Wellbeck or Calvert Lewin numbers.

    If Isak only scores 15 next year then fans should be saying they could have just bought Oliie Watkins and blew the other 60m on coke and hookers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    They can be disingenuous and inaccurate. Disingenuous in how many of those 15/16 games were starts. Inaccurate in how many games was it actually and not guessing.

    Minutes per goal would be a more accurate measure of his under performance.

    15 in the league would be acceptable to some but you are right that it’s wouldnt be acceptable to all unless it came with 8+ assists. But ideally for Liverpool he would need at least 18 in the league to really be the man.


    I worry for Liverpool next season generally. I think that Ekitike injury means they need to sign another no 9 or loan Nicolas Jackson off chelsea for a year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,697 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    So your problem is that I gave a credible estimate of his stats instead of going and getting the raw data, despite my estimate being on the charitable side for Isak?

    All the stats are here, check them if you want.

    The fact that he couldn't get into the side, and then when he did get into the side he got dropped again only supports the point made that he had an awful start to the season? The stats don't change a single thing here.

    Why are memories so short for some people?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    are we converting to euros and dropping the currency symbol to make our points again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,761 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    He literally was injured though… he first came into the team for his first league appearance on September 20th and played four weeks (3 league starts), was juuuust starting to get up to speed when he then got an adductor injury on October 22nd, and was back out for another full month. Then came back on November 22nd, got 3 league starts, then broke his leg on December 20th.

    It was practically like clockwork in how stop/start it was to begin with - in for a month, out for a month, in for a month — then of course out for most of the remaining season with the leg break, before logging a couple of weeks at the end. Hugely disappointing all round, but there was just no opportunity in there for him to have gotten match fit enough to perform as we'd expect. The sharpest he looked was in that leg break game.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Yeah to add to that, Isak actually only ever started 3 games in a row, in all comps, one time all season.

    The 1st of those 3 games was a 45 mins appearance taken off at half time to mind himself. Ekitike ruptured his Achilles in the same half so Isak was forced into starting the next games by default.

    Isak simply wasn't fit enough to ever get a run of games together. He always seemed to be trying to get back to fitness, before eventually breaking down again. And then the cycle started again of injury - coming back - broke down.

    The only time he ever seemed to look close to any sort of fitness was the run in April which culminated in his scoring against Palace but then didn't start another game after that with 2 separate injuries.

    He only played just over 1000 minutes this season, which equates to about 11.5 games worth. 4 goals in that time. Never managed 90 minutes. Fitness record was absolutely nowhere near good enough, which resulted in an average goal return of a goal every 3 games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,697 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Correction: He came into the team Nov 22nd, got 3 league starts, then was only a substitute for the next 3 games, then broke his leg on Dec 20th.

    You are doing exactly what I said earlier, using injuries to handwave away the fact that when he played he was awful, a complete fish out of water in a way that a 100m player supposedly better than Halaand should never be. It was stark how bad he was but that has now all been forgotten.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    but he did **** all in a team that was crap is the context your missing


    what did Salah do around the same time? Was he banging them in? Gakpo? Ekitike got zero goals from September until Christmas while Isak was out and just about it got double figures in the league. Chiesa looked a shadow of his former self. How did Wirtz do in an attacking sense? Frimpong?

    If everybody was scoring bar Isak I’d agree with you….but the only sparks all we saw all season were a midfielder who got half his goals from direct free kicks and a child who was 16 scoring v Newcastle

    The measure of Isak isn’t a season when he was always coming back from injury and even Salah wasn’t hitting half his usual numbers



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,761 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    That's not a correction, that's just adding colour.

    It's also reiterating my point - when players come back from injury, they're often not very good until they build a few weeks of fitness. He has, at no point in the entire season, gotten past the one month mark without having at least a full month out again.

    He came into the team for a month, wasn't very good and then got injured for a month. He came back after that month out and again wasn't looking fit and wasn't very good, and then broke his leg. And typically, that leg break game (after they'd had the good sense to take him out of the team to train more) was the one he looked sharpest in, before just getting a dose of bad luck while scoring a decent goal.

    I'm not gonna judge someone until they have more time than that to find match fitness (especially in a new team, which itself was in turmoil). I'm not concerned about his abilities when fit… I am a bit concerned about his ability to stay fit though.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    yeah you were pretty accurate on the bare stats. Starts vs appearances from the bench is important.


    He ain’t useless. He was my pick as the best no 9 for 2 seasons at Newcastle. Better than Haaland, maybe injuries will kill him but we’ll just have to wait and see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Transfer market has it listed as 145m euros. I checked the fee there to be sure.

    Take it up with them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,171 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    Bit of context though. Aside from struggling to stay fit and for a lot of those appearances was just back from one of his injuries, he was playing in a Liverpool side that was man-for-man under-performing. I'll not get into the why's of that but Isak was not set up for success last season. There was zero support or creativity on our wings, our midfield was constantly on the back foot, there was no ambition to move the ball forward. I don't think it's a good season to judge Isak and start throwing the word "flop" around. This coming season it's day 1 for the whole squad IMO. New manager and a pre-season where they can focus and not deal with the death of one of their teammates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,697 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Its not colour, its very relevant. When discussing form, coming back into the team and then getting injured is very different to coming back into the team, getting dropped again, and then getting injured.

    I'm not blind to the importance of fitness, but again, we are talking 120m here and the best anybody can say is that he wasn't very good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    Yeah makes sense. Liverpool buying a Newcastle player. Euros.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,761 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    But, like, no one is saying he was ever playing any good… I'm not sure what the fact he was dropped to the bench at one stage during his one fit month has to do with anything? he was rubbish like, why wouldn't he be dropped to the bench? It's also not the wisest to flog a lad who's just back from injury… (the training time out of the team seemed to help too, looked much better in the leg break game before, well, the leg break). So, again, he never at any point stayed healthy for more than 1 month — and I'm just not gonna give a player shït for their performances as they try to build up fitness.

    I don't see what a price tag has to do with anything, fitness is fitness. If someone costs more, I don't particularly expect them to regain fitness and form any quicker.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,697 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    This gets to my real issue with Isak though.

    Pay 120million and you don't get to use the "things weren't set up for him" card.

    United were a basket case for a long time but if we put Kane or Halaand in the team then I would expect them to show something. Not win games themselves but damn sure they wouldn't be as irrelevant as Isak was.

    And Isak is supposed to be better than Halaand?

    I'm happy to be proven wrong but my prediction is that we have seen the best of Isak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    you’ll actually find that a lot of the most expensive transfers in history were flops in fact.

    Maybe Isak will be another but next season we’ll see



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,761 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    For sure. And I think the answer will hinge entirely on if he can get/stay fit.

    I've zero doubt that if he gets back to playing healthy week in week out, he'll provide. He's shown how good he is for too long to have much doubt of that. I'm definitely worried that he might be a bit of a crock though.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



Advertisement
Advertisement