Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Irelands neutrality stance in WW2 unfairly criticized? (see Mod note 217)

17374767879109

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Verified April 1945

    Shown in Irish Cinemas May- June 1945. After Censorship was lifted May 1945


    Anything else you need? Diagram maybe?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,897 ✭✭✭jmcc


    So now Francis McM is using the Holocaust and wartime media censorship to attack Irish neutrality despite the true extent of the Holocaust not being known until after the war and all countries, including the UK, having a wartime censorship policy? The anti-Irish neutrality and anti-de Valera crusade is obvious and it is sad that the suffering of others are used like this.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    We all know the date of the end of the war in Europe,VE day May 8th.

    As regards when the films or new of the atrocities was allowed to be shown, it was after that. Best some can come up with so far is someone said something about some film somewhere in the Irish Press on June 11th, 1945. So was possibly then.

    As the war in the far east was not over, the atrocities in the far east by the Axis powers there afaik were not allowed to be reported until the war there was over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Have you as link or source for that cinema showing, or is it something you picked out of thin air again?

    You have been debunked so many times, like the other day when you claimed the Americans did not use the word Nazi, and I showed you Eisenhower's speech ( which you had not heard of), full of the "Nazi" words.

    And you say censorship was lifted in May 1945. Was that not only partially, as the war (WW2) would continue for more months in the far east?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Portugal was neutral and gave the Allies the use of the Azores.

    And yes, the Holocaust WAS known about before Hitlers suicide, never mind the end of the war in Europe. Did you not read the links? No excuse for your lack of knowledge.

    The UK did have a censorship policy to protect their forces but they (like most of the world) allowed the use of the Nazis word, and did not hide or conceal the Nazi death camps as they were liberated.

    Edited for spelling typo.

    Post edited by Francis McM on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What's so important about the use of the word Nazi's?

    You could stand on your head about them not allowing 'Champions of Freedom' about the Allies, which along with other phrases wasn't allowed either.

    You refuse to accept Censorship was in force that affected media coverage of BOTH sides because we were NEUTRAL
    There is a wealth of material out there on it and all you can parrot is 'they didn't allow the word Nazi'.

    'Moral Neutrality': Censorship in Emergency Ireland

    "Anyone else have verification for Irish cinemas showing the Bergen Belsen footage in June ‘45? I read it in an RTE article but haven’t found verification."

    Here is that article I read:

    Newsreel footage of the liberation of the Bergen-Belsen and Buchenwald concentration camps was met with "gasps" in Irish cinemas in June 1945. 

    How an Irish Catholic newspaper viewed World War II - & communism

    And here is May mentioned.

    When the censorship was lifted after the German surrender in May 1945, many Irish people found it hard to grasp the scale of the atrocities they had been shielded from during what was officially described as the "Emergency". Some still clung to the belief that it was Allied propaganda at work. A newspaper reader in Kilkenny wrote that the British had faked the newsreel showing victims of Belsen by using "starving Indians".

    Hear no evil, see no evil, speak. . . – The Irish Times

    Censorship was abolished on the 11th of May. Here is the Irish Times welcoming it on the 12th May


    image.png




    VE Day: Irish censorship and the news – The Irish Times



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Shown in Irish Cinemas May- June 1945

    Have you as link or source for that "May-June" cinema showing, or is it something you picked out of thin air again?

    You have been debunked so many times, like the other day when you claimed the Americans did not use the word Nazi, and I showed you Eisenhower's speech ( which you had not heard of), full of the "Nazi" words.

    And you say censorship was lifted in May 1945. Did that really happen then, or was that not only partially, as the war (WW2) would continue for more months in the far east? The first mention you can find is some lad in the Irish Press newspaper on June 11th saying something about something else somewhere. Very vague.

    Anyway, the Nazi death camps were liberated from the summer of 1944. Plenty of filming in January 1945, and by America and Britain to show the world in April 1945. But Dev and his government is thought to have dismissed it as Allied propaganda and would not let the knowledge starved Irish public know about it at all until June 1945.

    No wonder we were the outliers in the world, with the ONLY PRIME MINISTER in the world to express condolences on Hitler's death.

    Keep rooting to find anything to back up your wild claim about the May '45 cinema showing of the Holocaust.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Interesting to note Develera never condemned Hitler, Nazism or the Holocaust. Despite the fact some Irish people were separated by the Nazis from British people and the Irish sent to slave labour concentration camps, where some died. The Irish government knew about that from 1943 / 1944. It makes the Irish governments behaviour then all the more puzzling. Hempel the Nazi party member and friend oof Dev was allowed stay here for 4 years after the war, while no Jewish refugees allowed stay here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,897 ✭✭✭jmcc


    The extent of the Holocaust was not known until after the war. Notice how Francis McM tries to avoid that fact. And as for censorship, it is part of war. Countries will try to control information. And it is particularly sad that the suffering of others would be used by Francis McM like this for a revisionist crusade to attack Irish neutrality and de Valera.

    There is also the geography of the Azores to consider. Its position was a factor in whether Portugal could defend it from the Allies or the Germans. It simply did not have the resources. It was completely different to the Treaty Ports in Ireland which, in the case of Cobh and Berehaven were near to a major city. That made their position vastly more complex for a neutral country like Ireland.

    Had Ireland provided access to the Allies, Germany might well have considered Ireland to be a de facto member of the Allies even if there was no declaration of war. That wuld have harmed Ireland an probably thousands of Irish civilians would have died. But Francis McM doesn't care about them. De Valera and the government did and acted in the interests of the Irish people first. Not the Allies. Not the British. Not some random revisionist over 80 years later trying to claim that they were wrong.

    The one thing about chickenhawks all through the ages is that they will talk tough and say that "we" should fight but you won't find them on the frontlines. They want others to do the killing and the dying. That is why the repeated use of "us" and "we" is quite offensive to Ireland, the Irish and to those who fought, and to those mllions who did die.

    Post edited by jmcc on

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    How do you explain all but one TD supporting neutrality throughout the war Francis? Even to the point of ejecting the disident Dillon?

    And you have been given the worldwide situation re; Jewish refugees. Appalling you are still trying to exploit them in your crusade.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Came across this reading about how Censorship worked both ways. The cutting and subsequent banning of this film on the grounds it was propaganda and it glorified war.

    A YANK IN THE RAF
    perhaps the strangest tale of censorship in Ireland is that of the 1943 film ‘A Yank in the RAF’. The film was released in Ireland and ran for a week at Dublin’s Savoy cinema, during which time 41,000 people saw the film, but had its certificate suddenly pulled. The reason? Well ‘A Yank in the RAF’ was seen to be a fairly standard propaganda film released when World War II was tearing the world apart, but since Ireland was neutral in this conflict, the film was seen to be inappropriate and yanked from Irish cinemas.

    Movies banned in Ireland - articles • Movies.ie - Irish Cinema Site



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Nice little diversionary post, but have you as link or source for that "May-June" cinema showing you wrote about earlier, or is it something you picked out of thin air again?

    You have been debunked so many times, like the other day when you claimed the Americans did not use the word Nazi, and I showed you Eisenhower's speech ( which you had not heard of), full of the "Nazi" words.

    Keep rooting to find anything to back up your wild claim about the May '45 Irish cinema showing of the Holocaust.

    Fact is, the general public here in Ireland was starved of real information about the war. Not unlike how many in North Korea are starved of information about the outside world, the population here was restricted as much as possible in what they knew and hence thought during the war. No mention of the Nazi death camps when the rest of the world knew, no mention of the Nazi word even as it was banned by the media, they did not exist for many people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The Holocaust was well known about before the end of the war. In 1942 people were aware. First Nazi camp was liberated in summer 44 by the Russians, and Auschwitz liberated and filmed in Jan 1945. Other camps were liberated and filmed by Americans and British weeks before Hitler died.

    Dev knew of Irish people dying in Nazi Concentration slave labour camps in 1944 but did not want to anger the Nazi regime. In fact, the Irish government was first notified of Irish merchant seamen being held in German labour camps by March 1943. The Irish Legation in Berlin was fully engaged in the matter by October 1944. But still the Irish seamen died in Nazi camps and the surviving seamen felt abandoned by the Irish government. Ignored by Dev and co.

    Are you claiming that because the full extent of the holocaust was not known on May 2nd 1945, that excuses Dev being the only P.M. in the world to offer condolences? That maybe he thought only 10% of captured Irish merchant seamen were killed in Nazi Concentration camps instead of forty something per cent? That maybe he thought only 4 million Jews died instead of 6 million?

    As regards attacks by Germany on Irish Treaty ports if we had lent any back, bear in mind thet Derry or the port at Derry was not bombed to any meaningful extent during the war, even though thousands of ships arrived there during the war. If Dev lent the Treaty ports to the Allies, he could have got the Americans to protect them. In the last year or two of the war, the Germans had more to do, they had limited fuel and resources and it would not have been safe or worthwhile for them to fly around the UK to get to us anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Fact is, there was Censorship legislation (Emergency Powers Act) (try and take on board what that means re: information) in place designed to protect our Neutrality NOT as you believe in your fantasy crusade to just hide Nazi atrocities from the people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    As regards knowledge of what was later called 'the Holocaust' in the Anglo-American world, the source of information is obviously crucial in how its credibility/authority is assessed. Russia had 'liberated' extermination camps with a few remaining inmates in mid-1944 but their evidence lacked authority and credibility in the west.

    The British and Americans liberated concentration camps and publicised what they found from mid-April 1945 on. While this had more credibility it depended a lot on how receptive the audience was. Receptiveness depended a lot on how the people receiving the information regarded themselves, fellow victims (in 1945 many Germans regarded themselves as 'victims') or innocent onlookers.

    The Americans conducted surveys among the the German population in October 1945 that showed 20% supported Nazi policy towards the Jews and a further 19% were generally in support although believed it had gone too far, source 'The Third Reich in History and Memory' by Richard J. Evans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,008 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The Holocaust was not common knowledge among the general public in Britain or Ireland before the end of the war. Although Auschwitz was liberated by the Red Army in January 1945, the extermination camp had already been evacuated, so there was very little to see.

    The liberation of Belsen in mid-April 1945 where thousands of emaciated inmates were discovered, plus many thousands more dead bodies, was the first indication that something totally horrific had been going on in the German concentration camp system - this came as a major shock to everyone (the level of cruelty and evil and the scale of it).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The Holocaust was not known among the general public in Ireland at the end of the war in Europe, ( we were not even allowed hear the word Nazi, never mind know about their camps), but it was known among the general public in Britain and US.

    Knowledge of the mass extermination of Jews and other groups by Nazi Germany was circulating in the UK long before the war ended, though the sheer, horrific scale of the atrocities was only fully exposed when Allied forces liberated the camps in 1945. About three weeks before the end of the war in Europe the British filmed one of the camps they liberated to show to the public.

    But they were know about years before that even.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Support for Nazi ideology in the United States peaked during the 1930s and completely collapsed once the U.S. entered World War II following the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. Even though there was, and indeed is, a very large German-American community in the USA (Over 40 to 50 million Americans claim full or partial German heritage, more than even us Irish), there were no bombings or real acts of sabotage by Germans in America during ww2. (there were of course 300 bombings/acts of sabotage by IRA in Britain in 1939/40).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I checked there - the Germans weren't occupying part of the US nor did they have a constitutional claim on part of the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I never said the Germans were "occupying" part of America ( although oddballs among the native American population may think otherwise). I said Germany was an even bigger ethnic group that the Irish in America, still is, but despite that America still fought in the war against Germany and helped liberate Europe from Nazism. Someone else brought up Nazi or anti-Jew feeling in America, that has nothing to do with us though. If you want to talk about the US "occupying" somewhere, maybe you got confused and meant they "occupied" Hawaii, thousands of miles from the US mainland, and thats your jusification for Japan attacking Pearl Harbour.

    Could you occupy your brain to find a link or source for that wild claim you made about the Holocaust cinema showing earlier, or is it something you picked out of thin air again?

    You have been debunked so many times, like the other day when you claimed the Americans did not use the word Nazi, and I showed you Eisenhower's speech ( which you had not heard of), full of the "Nazi" words.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    No, I was referencing your inability to work out why the IRA might be bombing in Britain. It was you who made a trite comparison after all.

     there were no bombings or real acts of sabotage by Germans in America during ww2. (there were of course 300 bombings/acts of sabotage by IRA in Britain in 1939/40).



    It doesn't require rocket science qualifications.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    If your only defence or excuse for our Prime Minister being the only P.M. in the world to express condolences on the death of Hitler is " someone else was occupying us", then that is a pretty poor excuse.

    Any sign of you finding a source or link for your extraordinary claim about the cinema or is that yet another thing you made up?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Many posts ago I said the optics of what Dev did were not great. I don't think anyone here feels any different. Even Hempel worried for Dev and his strict adherence to diplomatic protocol.

    Ho HUm, the world got over it and it was not the defining act of our neutrality.

    *I supplied sources that satisfy me that the cine reels were shown sometime after 11th May 1945 when Censorship was abolished.

    If you know different and have sources, let's see them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    No, no no…you provided a tiny newspaper clipping saying Dev had decided to abolish the censorship of newspapers on May 12 1945. But when was it actually abolished? And when was film about the Holocaust allowed to be shown. You said it was shown in May 1945. Lets see your sources because the other day you were asking when was censorship abolished.

    You say Hempel worried about Dev - but did either Dev or Hempel worry about the 50 Irish seamen sent to a slave labour Nazi concentration camp, and of whom 22 of them died there?

    Dev and the government knew about them in 1944 - they had a year to worry about them - or do more - but did not. Why?

    Post edited by Francis McM on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Emergency censorship was lifted on the 11th May 1945.

    Military Archives | Office of the Controller of Censorship

    Grow a pair and learn to walk back from your claims when they are routinely debunked.

    I have supplied sources that 'satisfy me' that the Bergen Belsen cine-reels were being shown here in May-June 1945.

    If you can debunk that work away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    You made a claim that a film about the holocaust was allowed to be shown, and you said was shown, in Irish cinema or cinemas in 1945. Have you a link or source for that? You are aware that what happened on May 11th did not end censorship entirely in the country? Strict, pre-existing literary and film censorship overseen by the Censorship Board remained in effect.

    Now grow a pair yourself, you have been debunked so many times, like the other day when you claimed the Americans did not use the word Nazi, and I showed you Eisenhower's speech ( which you had not heard of), full of the "Nazi" words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    So do you have back up for that? Censorship relating to wartime ended on 11th may 1945.

    Maybe you can unsatisfy/debunk what I think happened and claimed.

    All eyes on you Francis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    General Dwight D. Eisenhower 'Ike' (Later President) was himself of German ancestry, the family name was originally Eisenhauer (a miner of iron ore in German). The German and Italian population were never treated with hostility like Japanese-Americans were. Many American GIs felt more affinity with German civilians they 'liberated' than the French they actually did liberate who often gave them a lukewarm reception despite what you see on newsreels.

    Did the average American, then or now, feel shame that they only entered the war with Nazi Germany after Hitler & Mussolini declared war on them?

    Personally I doubt it very much.

    Has Ireland (Éire/RoI) anything to be ashamed of or to apologise for regarding our neutrality in WWII, definitely not IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,541 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    It was you who said the Holocaust newsreel was shown in May 1945. The only record of when a Holocaust newsreel was first shown in Ireland films was the fellow in the Irish Press mentioning it in June 1945. So you have no source, record, link or proof of what you claimed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes, in my opinion based on what I've read the cine-reels were shown sometime after censorship of wartime matters was lifted on 11th May and into June.

    If you know different - debunk away.

    You claimed it was 'months after' and still haven't told us how many 'months'.



Advertisement
Advertisement