Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1199719982000200220032007

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    What is "you lot". What do I need to get over? What exactly are you "calling out"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭Randycove


    there are bigger geo politics at stake though.

    Europe is rearming because it can no longer rely on the US. Germany, along with Norway, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Lithuania and Sweden are all buying the next generation of Leopard tanks, which has been demonstrated in Ukraine, are vulnerable to drone attacks. So they are installling the tried and tested Trophy defence system on them. As the UK is on the Challenger 3. Trophy is made by Rafael.

    14 European countries are working on the European sky shield initiative. Europe’s answer to David’s Sling. Germany has selected the Arrow head missle system for this, which is made by Israel Aerospace Industries.

    I am Open to correction, but the Irish defence force is looking to buy new and more capable drones. Last I heard, Israeli manufacturers have not been excluded from this.

    In short, Europeans rearming, it doesn’t want to rely on US weapons and this significantly reduces the supply options. Israeli weapons, like it or not, are tried and tested, so they are an obvious choice. In terms of governments meeting their prime objective of protecting their citizens, Israel are unfortunately a strategic partner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I probably wasn't clear enough. I could not care less what you think and I have no interest in engaging with you. Next step is for you to come back with what you think is some cutting edge take down of me expecting me to reply. I won't, because I couldn't care less what people like you think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    I don't even know what you're talking about with the whole "people like you" thing!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    well stop replying to me then, problem solved.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Is this not a discussion forum, with rules around engaging with posts and not attacking posters? You've attacked me as a poster, and can't even discuss your reasoning as to why. Why did you post just to attack me?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I'm not attacking you, where did I do that? You seem to be obsessing about replying to me. I suggested you stop replying to me but you won't, should I take this as you harassing me?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    I'm not attacking you, where did I do that?

    here:

    As always I admire your commitment to trying to engage with this lot,
    but this one just seems to be intent on doubling down on the the 'just
    asking questions'-style dog whistling routine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I was talking to another poster, not you. As I said, you need to get over yourself, you are not the main character. Please stop replying to me and trying to engage with me. It's weird and borderline creepy so please just stop harassing me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    You were talking about me to another poster. You're the one who made me "the main character" of your post. And you expected me to not pick up on this, or not respond to this. And you think I'm the one that's weird and borderline creepy!!! And you think I'm harassing you?!! I think you could do with a little self-reflection there. A top tip here: if you don't want posters to engage with your posts, don't post on a discussion forum about those posters.

    I had been engaging with other posters about the content of posts, not about posters. Is there a reason you were not able to simply join the discussion if you had an issue with the content of my posts, which is, after all, the whole purpose of this website.

    The only reason I'm engaging with you is to try to find out what your issue with me is, which you seem completely unable to articulate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,049 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Meanwhile, back on the actual topic - states giving incentives to its population to move to territory under it's occupation is explicitly forbidden under the Geneva convention.

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-politics/2026-06-04/ty-article/.premium/knesset-approves-controversial-bill-granting-tax-breaks-to-dozens-of-settlements/0000019e-92ef-d7f7-a5de-b2fff42a0000



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,360 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,962 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I'm pointing out that as a world policeman type role in the security sphere, it is effectively useless

    But so would every entity that engages in such a task. Especially one that would use it for purely their own advancement, a la the US, who have even been largely useless to their own self interest in many cases.

    That's not an excuse to throw the baby out with the bathwater (I recognise you're not in favour of dissolution). It is, however, a reason for reform of some kind, which isn't outside the realms of reality as the UN has reformed numerous times since it was created.

    As for advocating for a "talking shop", that alone is a reason for such an organisation. If, at the very least, it can be used to highlight the wrongdoings of a specific nation, then that is worth something, irrespective of all the other worthwhile endeavours that the various UN organisations carry out that largely go unsung. Setting a precedent, a record or a line in the sand is better than the free-for-all that would result in its absence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Per @Odhinn and recent news items, there appears to be increasing toxicity within Israeli society of late.

    The aggression, particularly of the three years, and the attention of the world plus the looming ICJ ruling on Genocide must be major factors. I wouldn't say Israel is imploding but it's not a million miles away from it. The brain drain and younger Israelis leaving in droves (as posted here by others) is also symptomatic of a failing society.

    Here's another distasteful example of that aggression, violence and lawbreaking (as ever, and totally in keeping with the Hasbara, it's not the fault of the anarchists but of the judiciary):


    Harretz straplines (free by email):

    Sixty-two suspects were arrested during a violent protest in front of the West Bank home of Israel's Supreme Court Deputy President Noam Sohlberg against the arrest of ultra-Orthodox who have ignored IDF draft orders.

    The demonstrators came to Sohlberg's home in the settlement of Alon Shvut and tried to break into the property, vandalized the entrance to the house, smashed flowerpots and windows, and shattered the windows of his car. Some scattered leaflets in the street reading: "Sohlberg, take your hands off ultra-Orthodox Judaism." 

    According to a police source, most of the detainees are refusing to cooperate and are attempting to obstruct the investigation. Some of them also hid their identity cards, exchanged them, or provided the details of other suspects.

    Overnight into Thursday, the leaders of ultra-Orthodox Shas and Degel HaTorah parties jointly said they were"pained and shocked by the ongoing persecution and trampling of Torah students by Supreme Court justices." The parties added that they had warned "time and again that these steps" – meaning the enforcement of Israeli law against draft dodgers – "would lead to extremism and anarchy, and unfortunately, we are seeing those fears materialize."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,962 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Fine. But saying it's "useless" implies that there's a better option. So far I haven't heard of a better option.

    "World policeman" ain't gonna cut it and there's ample proof throughout history to show why and that's before we even get to the US in the 20th/21th centuries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,014 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Interestingly, even Herzog (a dodgy enough character himself) referred to this toxicity in Israeli society recently. I guess if you engage in three years of genocide, war crimes and warmongering, you can't help but become coarsened and brutalised as a people and as a society. Israel is in a very bad place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,049 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    True, but the brutality of the occupation dates back to 1967. That's near on six decades of enforcing a vicious apartheid regime. The current savagery is that mind set let entirely off the leash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The current savagery is that mind set let entirely off the leash.

    If you could sum up the last 60 years of Israel in one sentence, this nails it. Spot on.

    And before the jibes kick off, this is a tragedy for Israel and those Israelis who abhor a govt. and a military who are dragging them into the depths of depravity and hell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    As a follower of domestic news in Israel, the last month or maybe two have shown a shocking rise in internal tensions.

    I think the Settler violence, the war with Iran, the current state of Gaza, the extension of war in Lebanon, the gaze of the world's media, the UN Blacklist for sexual violence, Trump's potty mouthed tirades at Netanyahu, the ICJ case, more ICC warrants and most recently, the massive own goal Ben-Gvir inflicted on Israel has been a perfect storm in a short period of time. This has started a spiral into anarchy and lawlessness that Israel may not recover from.

    And that's before any of the above list are resolved. Imagine Israel, in this spinning spiral of chaos, being judged as having committed Genocide by the ICJ I think it will just implode.

    I hope it doesn't happen but I'd bet people in the field and in the know are strategising all of this even as I type.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Oh I agree with all of that.

    Reform is absolutely necessary. It's based on the power structure of the world immediately post WWII, and the world is a very different place now. I just don't think it's likely to be reformed in the kind of way that would be most useful, realistically.

    And yeah, I can't see the possibility of any more effective entity being created on a global scale. The UN is as good as it realistically gets. But its not good enough to be useful in a situation like the Israel/Palestine conflict. The UN presence in South Lebanon is little more than a speedbump in preventing either Hezbollah or Israel from going at each other, and hasn't been able to prevent the population of South Lebanon from bearing the consequences of that.

    I'd actually say it's one of the few upsides for the Palestinians that no one is currently advocating for them to be put under UN protection. Any agreed resolution will hopefully be enforced by forces with much stronger rules of engagement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    I don't think there is a realistically better option globally. I'm not saying there's one, or intending to imply that one could <realistically> be created. It's as good as we're going to get. But if my family were in Gaza right now, I would be hoping for a much more effective force than anything the UN could authorise to come to enforce any resolution of the conflict. (having watched in horror the effectiveness of the UN forces deployed to Rwanda, Bosnia etc)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭Roman Emperor


    And even if the veto was abolished, what practical difference would it make ?

    Israel is already the subject of more resolutions of condemnation than any other nation - 140 General Assembly resolutions in the past twelve years alone.

    The Security Council has passed dozens of resolutions criticizing Israeli actions, policies, and the occupation of Palestinian territories.

    And Israel simply ignores them.

    Israel enjoys absolute impunity and is continually testing the boundaries of that impunity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Israel isn't, and never has been, a monoculture. There have always been tensions between the more liberal and the more conservative members of society there. And the extremes on the conservative side seem to be getting worse, and are definitely becoming a larger proportion of the population (which is reflected by the results of Israeli elections trending more rightward over its history). IMO, objectively speaking, they are the biggest threat to Israel's existence. Israel needs to reverse the direction it is heading in. The next election might reveal if this possibility realistically exists. If the current extremists in government get returned, they've got a big long-term problem, and they will be heading for an even worse place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Israel, and anyone else who chooses not to care.

    In theory, with the abolition of the Veto, the UN could authorise the kind of force with adequate terms of engagement, that was sent to fight the Korean War. In practice, I doubt it would happen, as I couldn't see many countries being willing to provide the number of soldiers necessary to fight and die for such a force now.

    Israel stands out for the number of resolutions. But the likes of Russia, China, and of course the USA, can completely ignore the UN as they choose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Enduro


    I posted my reply to Strazdas before reading your two subsequent posts. It sounds like, broadly speaking, we see the same thing.

    The only thing I'd disagree with there is that I think the current government would just completely ignore the ICJ, and I wouldn't foresee it having a consequential impact on Israeli politics. It'd be just another stone added to the pile. The domestic issues are what are more likely to seriously undermine the state and society, IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,014 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Ori Goldberg and others think Israel is on an irreversible slide into hell. The whole country seems to have gone mad essentially, seeing themselves totally as 'victims', that accusations of genocide and war crimes are nonsense and that everyone hates them because they (the world) are all anti-Semitic. It seems to be the biggest basket case country on the planet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    Again: Genocide is a two-part crime - the Prohibited Acts must be backed by genocidal intent. The definition - as well as practical examples of things that are NOT genocide - e.g. otherwise Prohibited Acts committed in the pursuit of legitimate aims - make this clear.

    This is where the pretence comes in - proponents of an Israeli genocide have to airbrush Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah, and all the times Israel has been attacked, out of the story so that it looks like Israelis are just bombing things for **** and giggles.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭Roman Emperor


    Don't think anyone suggests Israel is bombing and starving it's opponents just for the fun of it.

    Everyone understands that Israel is fighting Hamas and Hezbollah in order to defend and retain stolen property.

    Israel is fighting a battle against highly motivated and aggrieved individuals whose ancestors were murdered and robbed in 1948 in furtherance of the Zionist settler colonial experiment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    If you're going to try to insult me at least articulate yourself in a better manner. Also, I don't care what you think either so you're wasting your time trying.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    Stop pretending that you either (a) have any understanding of the definition of Genocide under International Law and/or (b) that you could actually give a **** whether it is being committed or not. Your posting history is clear that you couldn't care less even if you actually understand what's going on.



Advertisement
Advertisement