Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning approved]

1206208210211212

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Page 13 here is the source of this

    https://www.n6galwaycityringroad.ie/sites/default/files/media/N6%20EIAR%20-%20Chapter%206%20Traffic%20Assessment%20and%20Route%20Cross-Section.pdf

    Edit: traffic counts look like 2012/2013. I'd say the figures now are very different in absolute terms but it's hard to know if the proportions of traffic would be hugely different.

    Also I don't know if it would be good for anyone on here to discuss the veracity of the original dataset because it plays both ways and has no endpoint. People in favour of the project would say there's probably greater volumes of traffic now. People against the project would say that basing a design on incorrect figures makes the proposed design invalid. Probably better for us all on here to accept them as accurate approximations rather than speculating on current conditions ourselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    I don't see a proper argument against this road tbh.

    If zero extra public transport measures are put in place to compliment this road then fair enough, that's an argument, but that will hardly be the case.

    Build the road

    Increase public services on all routes around the the city and suburb towns.

    Continue to upgrade existing roads to allow safer cycling sections.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 706 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    Or: take the estimated cost of the road, put that money into transforming public transport in Galway and its commuter belt (including a Luas, BusConnects, and proper cycle network), measure the subsequent effect on traffic, and then if justified build a stripped-down bypass with whatever cash is left over.

    I don’t see any argument against this approach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    You can just say none. We all know it's the case. Limerick is the main bridging point of the Shannon going north-south so a bypass makes sense. Not equatable to Galway.

    Not sure who the "you must not live in Galway" comment is aimed at but if it's me you couldn't be more wrong. Born, bread and out and about daily. It just comes across as a desperate attempt to nullify discussion because you've no actual analysis other than how you feel things should be. I get how frustrating it is sitting in traffic every day but we should be looking to build actual solutions built on hard data and engineering.

    This is a bad plan and we should be demanding better for out city and county



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Why not do both? Transform the public transport and build the road.

    Although I'm not sure about the Gluas. Crackpot pipedream idea really, although it would be brilliant.

    The road is the only show in town it seems.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 706 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    Absolutely, do both, within financial reason. Take the road’s funding, use it to build the Gluas, BusConnects etc first, then use what’s left to build a stripped-down bypass - not a distributor. Much better results for the same amount of taxpayer money. No need to spend more by doing it the other way round.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Ok, but is scrapping the road and going with a Gluas even on the table? If not forget it, it isn't happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Avon8


    Of all the things ive read in this thread, I think the final paragraph here is my favorite. I wonder how quickly your view would flip if the 99% of the country who aren't ideologically opposed to private car ownership were also chiming in with their views on building the Galway ring road

    Unfortunately those people don't give a toss about whether a road in Galway gets built. They've no motivation to contribute to a debate that doesn't affect them, unlike some



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    There is only one thing on the table - the road. Anything else will be looked at after the road has been built (assuming there will be both money and political will to do that).
    The people of Galway are being sold a mouldy lemon with this!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    That's where the problem lies.

    Personally I want to see both. Road and vastly improved public transport.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Agreed - it needs a coherent plan that works for Galway, not some pet project overseen by bull headed council leaders.
    The core thing is that if there was an efficient public transport system with decent active travel routes then the numbers requiring a new road would drop significantly. The people are not being given this option.
    What is even worse is that this could already be well underway, if not complete, had the council prioritised the movement of people of Galway from the outset and not stuck to their 1970s vision of the future!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Avon8


    Whether the people of Galway are being sold a mouldy lemon or not, they have been fully sold.

    The project has massive public support. Of the 5 elected Galway west TD's, all 5 are now in favour of building this. It's about time we started respecting people's wishes



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The people of Galway want to see improvements to their commutes.
    Are they aware that the council have said that the road is expected to make traffic worse and are they happy with that? I presume your answer will be "no" because those that they've elected aren't telling them this little nugget!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    You've kinda just proven my point again. The fact that actual analysis is so often dismissed in this thread because "they're not from here and my mom said we're special" just shows how lacking the arguments in favour of it are. I'll reiterate for the millionth time; I want my infrastructure based on solid analysis and engineering, not the feelings of random Joe Soaps. I formed my opinion based on reading the engineering reports because I'm not a road engineer, not by sitting in my car pontificating about how I think things should work. If they had concluded that it would help I'd be fine with it.

    TDs should also be following the engineers advice because they aren't qualified to understand how this works. But their job is to be popular enough to get re-elected so that's what they focus on. Easier to spin a dream of grand solutions with a shiny new road



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Avon8


    Ah ok, the rest of the general public, bar a select few warriors, are just too thick to understand it.

    Unfortunately we live in a democracy. The anti side have had the guts of 30 years to convince the general public of a better alternative, and they've failed miserably. Public and political support is higher than ever. Probably time to move on to the next crusade



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭Juran


    I agree with developing public transport en par with European cities, more frequent buses, tram system, train lines, cycle paths, etc.. and affordable puclic transport. i would love to see it for the city and barna to athenry and Oranmore and all connecting to the factories in parkmore, ballybrit, etc. The country has plenry of money to do this. But at the same time, built a ring road. I visit Rennes & Brest in France every year, they can do both and both are close to Galway city & suburbs size wise. I travel a lot to Germany for work, to small towns comparable to galway, they can do both, and have done for 30+ years. Look at Spain, they had nothing years ago, poor roads, donkeys, wrecks of roads, no rain network to mention. Look at Spain today, best train system & high speed in Europe, excelkent motorways, trams, metro and commuter trains in every major city. They managed to do this in the past 20 or so years.

    I dont understand why Ireland cant improve transport and infrastructure. We are always told me have billions extra in tax revenue every year. Its not the 70's and 80's when we were piss poor and couldnt afford to fill potholes. Where is all the money going ???



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Ah ok, the rest of the general public, bar a select few warriors, are just too thick to understand it.

    I disagree with your above perspective on the public. I believe that the public just have been gaslighted and misinformed about the project. To counter my point, maybe you can point to some media articles that inform the public that this costly project will not improve Galways traffic?

    Unfortunately we live in a democracy. The anti side have had the guts of 30 years to convince the general public of a better alternative, and they've failed miserably. Public and political support is higher than ever. Probably time to move on to the next crusade

    Firstly it is not a popularity competition. Those who are wish to see a coherent plan for Galway have followed the appropriate channels and, so far, have been shown to have been correct.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    No, it's journeys that both start and end outside the city but cross the river. So travelling from Moycullen to Clonboo would be included in the 3% even though someone doing this journey would only stay on the ring road between the two junctions either side of the river.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    What arbitrary endpoint? It's a pretty clear definition; journeys that both start and end outside the city boundary but cross the river. Why does it matter if the start or end point is Moycullen or Clifden on one side, and Oranmore or Dublin on the other?

    And, why do you believe it is "dangerously outdated". They actually re-did the analysis for the 2023 resubmission and the proportion of car movements that were fully 'bypass' journeys had decreased from 3% to 1% since the 2018 submission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    We would probably agree on lots of things having a face to face chat. Intricacies lost on the internet and all that.

    I think this thread can be summed up by a lot of people frustrated at nearly 20 years without progress (based on the date of the first post)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭Juran


    Imagine if the state invested the extra billions in infrastructure for the future. In every county, not just major cities. It shouldnt matter if the population of Donegal or Roscommon isnt as big as Cork and Limerick, the residents in those counties counties pay taxes, contribute to the country, and are every bit equal to residents of the bigger cities.

    If we did invest like every other western European country, it would be a country to be so proud off, the standard of living would be ranked high up there with Norwary, Sweden and Switzerland. If the tax income from mutilnationals dry up in 30 or 50 years time, we'd have public transport, roads, rail networks, hospitals, schools, public sports facilities, etc to show for it. The infrastructure would be there for our kids and the next generations, even if the economy was to shift downwards with external global influences.

    I dont intend to turn this discussion into an illegal immigration / refugee, but in 20 years time when the EU and UN changes refugee agreements and puts a halt to the whole thing (thats been realistically going in for over 20 years now), and countries can finally take control of their borders and enforce rejections & removals, all Ireland will have is empty run down hotels to show for the 40+ years which will have passed By then. And Ireland will still be debating a metro for Dublin, a rail network to Donegal, a traffic solution for Galway, a new hospital for Waterford, Cork, Athlone, Castlebar, Galway ... and the debates on urgently needed infrastructure will never end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭Westernview


    "I dont intend to turn this discussion into an illegal immigration / refugee, but in 20 years time when the EU and UN changes refugee agreements and puts a halt to the whole thing (thats been realistically going in for over 20 years now), and countries can finally take control of their borders and enforce rejections & removals, all Ireland will have is empty run down hotels to show for the 40+ years which will have passed By then"

    Why bring that up then? Immigrants have absolutely nothing to do with the Galway Ring road. Maybe Irish people living abroad should be returned here so. That will sort out all these congestion and hotel problems eh?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭Juran


    I said it in relation to the spending involved, money which could be used for infrastructure in our own country to improve the quality of people's lives. We're spending billions are will have nothing to show for it regarding infrastructure investment and developments .. like by-passes for cities, like motorways, like trams, metros, trains, road upgrades, cycle lanes, walking paths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭Westernview


    That spending has nothing to do with infrastructural development. You could close every Ipas and it won't deliver infrastructure any quicker. We are spending more than ever. The problems are planning and labour resources to get projects done. Cheap shots at immigrants are just that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭Juran


    @western You constant snide remarks and jibs at posters is being ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭Westernview


    Snide remarks for calling out immigrant talk on an infrastructure thread? Yeah im very snide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    There must be a thousand other boring immigration threads to suck the life out of you.

    This thread is bad enough at times without introducing that horse manure



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    That chart says 20% of traffic will transfer to the bypass. 3+5+5+7%.
    Journeys that will transfer include journeys going from one end to a midpoint. This is longer distance wise but will be shorter time wise. This is exactly what happened with Dublin’s M50.

    Post edited by spacetweek on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Avon8


    What are you on about? You've literally just responded to my point with gibberish here and then changed the subject. How on earth did my original post prove your point?

    You're encouraging outsiders to get involved in this debate because every single one of them agrees with your viewpoint. It allows you to exist in your own little echo chamber. No actually normal person from elsewhere in the country is going to come onto a Galway forum arguing for taxpayers money to be spent on a road they'll never use

    I personally think public transport options should be expanded for Donegal. I believe that's both logical and those people in particular probably deserve it. But I'm never going to go onto a Donegal thread arguing for it because ultimately it doesn't affect me and I care very little. Anyone from outside of Galway who doesn't experience trying to get from Barna to Oranmore for work, or out to Spiddal for a match etc on a semi regular basis can go take a running jump as far as I'm concerned



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,613 ✭✭✭wassie


    The funny thing about spending on infrastructure is that after it is built, people stop moaning about costs and just use it.

    Shure the childrens hospital is shambolic the way the contract to build it was let and has been managed since, but when it is open and operating, there wont be one parent whose kid is in that hospital moaning about the cost.

    When the the metro line is finally open, all those northern suburbs commuters & airport passengers who use it wont be moaning about the cost.

    When I can finally drive around the city instead of wasting an extra 45-60 mins in peak time do my cross city journeys to get to the other side and beyond I wont be moaning about the cost. I'll be spending the time savings with my kids.



Advertisement
Advertisement