Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

DF Commission Report

14445464850

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Is this separate to the "regeneration plans" that were already meant to have been delivered to the DOD? I mean at this stage forget the President whining about climate change from the "MIC!", she'll be screaming over how many trees we've killed for studies/plans/desk drawer fillers. There's only so many places the DOD can dump all this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    For what its worth, here's the DOD's version of her speech:

    https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-defence/speeches/pdforra-annual-delegate-conference-speech-minister-helen-mcentee-td/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I believe this one is about pay etc and also the new Command and Control systems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    To be fair, seems that DPER has been pulling that **** on all the frontline unions (though I'm going to guess not any that have members in DPER), with Martin announcing at the Fóras conference:

    “I made it clear to all Ministers, and I discussed this very recently with the Minister for Public Expenditure, that I want, and I expect, rapid progress in the coming weeks to resolve outstanding aspects of applying the local bargaining clause.”

    So a more general screwing over the Public Service workers than a focused policy on screwing over the DF, I'm sure they have a specialist unit in DPER to do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    So in the Next 10 days we should see the 3 magic service plans for the 3 services and the pathway for the new commands.

    As @Negative_G has said all that matters to the men in green is the rebirth of the 4th western. Unless there is a serious U turn Athlone will be named the Army HQ.

    One thing i am hearing but not suprised is that if the 4th is reborn the men in green say Athlone , Galway and finner are not enoght bases and a extra base will be needed and in fairness to them the 4th Western always were able to supply the Manpower.

    If the men in green get there way with a new base where would it be? Could Cavan which is still DOD owned and the local ETB will be moving to a new premises in the coming yeara or Mullingar which is still owned by DOD while the LDA have paused there housing plans there so where would be reopened or could a new base be built?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,093 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    All seems a bit previous when there are no units stood up to man new or reopened bases.

    Besides the old Army Brigade structure is completely outmoded now for what the land component is intended to be under the re-org.

    A single, integrated, mechanised division with its constituent battalions and corps under a unified command of a Major General and small staff of planners and adjutants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    As bad as the state of the DF is, I’m going to presume these plans are somehow going to make things much worse.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    That's not what you're getting. Not least, a modern division is the guts of 20,000 personnel. It's also pointless, as I can't imagine the entire force deploying at once. A 4th Bde ain't happening either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Has Manic had a sneaky peak at the the Institute for Security Governance report?

    As for the 4th Brigade you know it dosent have to be real it can be paper based aswell. Once its on paper they can have new roles for Senior Officers. The Colonels have to have some where to go!

    Post edited by roadmaster on


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Although I have my sources, think about it using public knowledge and basic maths..

    A typical modern brigade averages about 4,000 personnel all told. And that's for a unit which is supposed to operate with divisional assets to help them out, a separate brigade is likely larger to make up the difference (Australian brigades are 5,500 strong). Unless the authorised strength of the Army is going to dramatically increase, even just two brigades would be as many as the Army could field if they're going to do it right, whilst still leaving personnel for force generation, administration, etc. The alternative is to make, as you say, paper (or at least understrength) brigades, but does anyone really think it's likely?

    Then you have to equip it. If you're going to send a full Bde somewhere, that's a lot of modern, expensive equipment. Just how far is 400 armored vehicles (Assuming you actually do get the full 400 vehicles) really going to get you? Plus all the assorted supporting assets, think modern artillery, air defence, etc, all of which needs to be suitably sized and assigned to each brigade. The Euros (and infrastructure) are simply not there for it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Even before the 2012 Reorg the Brigades were not true brigades they were paper ones. As for equipment even back then the FARs were also suppouse to have Backhoes something they never had

    My fear is that what the reports say and what is best for the overall defence forces could be hijacked by local politcs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Local Politics, Party Politics, Departmental Politics, all of the above in some god awful hybrid disaster…

    Take your pick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I presume if its "next 10 days", its next weeks cabinet meeting with leaks/briefings/temper tantrums over the weekend?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    What i am hearing behind the scences of what is going on you would make a new series of Yes Minister.

    10 Days in Government Days that is



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Why am I not surprised in the least…

    So maybe before the Summer Recess then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Also aside from the Army being the Army, any hint as to what the NS or AC might have come up with?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Sorry, not my department.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Well with an All Green Leadership now in charge of the Defence Forces they both will be happy at not just becoming a Corps of the Army.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    I have heard it said, on very solid authority, that one of the first iterations of the new 'land component' would require a strength of 18,000.

    That's not a typo - 18,000.

    These people are in dreamland.

    Unless of course it's the usual standard public service way of negotiating and setting the bar out far beyond what is actually achievable and hoping they meet somewhere in the middle.

    Its looking like prime time publication just before the summer recess and low and behold, the Government and DF will be so consumed with the Presidency it'll be kicked down the road long enough for nobody to care anymore.

    Lets not forget that the 11,500 target (set in 2022) was to be achieved by 2028 for LOA2. The Dept themselves admitted that this wont be realistically achieved until the mid 2030s at best. And that's the most realistic forecast. Nevermind LOA3 and beyond.

    Despite the effort to be perceived as "joint" and the plethora of tri-service appointments and promotions that have come about because of same, the DF will continue to be run through a green lens because it has been for the last 100+ years.

    Theres a reason those in green have been actively involved in trying to land grab and silo various aspects of the radar project.

    Its not just green dysfunction though, its across the board.

    The AC for years silo'd aspects of UAS and drone training leveraging that GOCAC was the Director of military aviation. However the time and resources were a token only as they continued to focus on conventional aircraft. Then when certain sub-units amongst the other services started acquiring certain kit and capabilities, the mickey swinging started again to try and silo that capability.

    Much blame and dissent lands at the feet of the Dept, and rightfully so. However, DF leadership has alot to answer for aswell.

    It will be interesting to see where the Army hangs its hat now that the biggest drain in manpower is being wound down. Its a double edged sword because for a lot of personnel, the opportunity to serve overseas is a significant motivator to join and for retention.

    Nobody joins the DF with the ambition to spend months lifting a barrier at the camp entrance to other nations, which despite all the gucci kit, is more or less all the latest battle group was. Except for course for the chosen few who got to spend a few months in the HQ in Strasbourg.

    UNIFIL/UNDOF/EUTM etc - all gone

    Portlaoise - gone

    Cash/prison/XO Escorts - long gone.

    but of course if you listen to some commentators, having two consecutive years where the strength barely stayed the same is seen as an achievement.

    HLAP, DIPs, Updates. Etc etc. All noise designed to feign progress while kicking the big issues to the side.

    Meanwhile the most impactful change to every day members was changing the regulations to allow for beards and colored watches. And that took over 2 years. Go figure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,153 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    Have you already forgotten the last time you claimed Cavan Barracks is still DoD owned and were informed it was sold in 2012?

    Also, as you were informed last time, the Cavan/Monaghan ETB aren't moving anywhere. The campus in the town under development is an expansion to the Cavan Institute.

    Departmental Properties – Thursday, 7 Feb 2013 – Parliamentary Questions (31st Dáil) – Houses of the Oireachtas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭sparky42


    stretch it all the way to the Recess means you’re already deep into the Presidency assuming the normal rising in Mid July, so 6 weeks in before releasing anything? Particularly as by that point whatever foreign support we are going to need (all of it) will likely already be somewhat in the public domain.

    Have to admire the “ambition” of whoever floated 18k for the Army though, as Manic pointed out even the basic infrastructure for such an expansion would be a massive undertaking, let alone actually getting to that number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Well if the Army are looking for a land force of 18k there going to.need somewhere to put them!

    Listen i use a lot of just for men so i am aloud make some mistakes on property ownership. I taught with the ETB in cavan town they wanted to centralise everything as one of the pitches for the new campus.

    An dont forget that Brendan Smith wants to be a FOB!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Is the Scorpian buy mainly for the Cavlary, Artillery and other support units while the infantry will be looking for another APC?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,093 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    SCORPION is three vehicles, the Jaguar 6x6 wheeled armoured recon / combat fire-support, the Serval 4×4 light tactical / SOF car, and the Griffon 6x6 multi-role APC.

    General infantry will use the latter and it will replace the GDELS Mowag Piranha.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Bullpup


    If you read the French news article that broke the news on buying French armoured vehicles, it said the Irish are looking to buy just "some Griffons", and the official Irish government press release mentioned new 8x8 armoured vehicles.

    So they won't be replacing the infantry Mowag fleet, which is the majority of the whole fleet.

    My money is on the VBCI T40.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    @sparky42 we are back to weeks for the plans according to PQS

    A draft Strategic Workforce Plan prepared by the Defence Forces has recently been submitted to me for consideration. The draft plan, recommendations, and modelling tool will be considered over the coming weeks.

    Also someone in the defence forces have been writing very detailed PQs for Ken o Flynn to ask over the last few weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    "strategic workforce plan"

    Throw that in with th

    CoDF

    HLAP

    DIP

    If There is one thing the Dept are masters of, its writing non-commital nonsense publications that amount to nothing and do nothing other than serve as a basis to launch another working group/focus group etc etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Two important points from the DOD/DPER point of view

    1. Only 6 months before the EU presidency is over.
    2. The Government is nearly 2 years through there current Term

    So they kick back and wait it out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    Separate to this folly, I was told on good authority that the medium/super-medium helicopter project has been kicked down the road indefinitely and is effectively dead in the water before 2030.

    An interesting one to keep an eye on as time progresses.



Advertisement
Advertisement