Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning approved]

1204205207209210212

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    €600 million was the cost estimate in 2016. Average global construction inflation since 2016 would put the figure at €1 billion today.

    Leaving aside whether it was a good idea or not, this road was always going to be expensive (did I mention that f__king tunnel they’re going to build under the racecourse?)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    If I remember correctly the "€600m in 2016 is over €1bn today" argument was first put forward in 2022. We've had four further years of construction inflation since then, which will likely be 6 years by the time ground is broken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Should we have a little raffle/sweepstake on how many JRs will be lodged?

    My guess is three.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    I am looking at the length, the need for tunnelling, the bridge etc. and the number of interchanges (N17, tie in at the end of the existing N6 and the N59). The Dunkettle, while a much shorter length, took 4 years and was quite a complex project. So, assume something along the same lines in terms of timeline. But I am no expert.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think you're optimistic. All the land around Dunkettle was effectively available for use before scheme start and they started clearance early if I remember correctly. But I'm not involved in road construction so I'm not well informed here. I just feel 2034 sounds very soon, looking at progress of projects like M28.

    I'm thinking 2 JR's Chris!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Surely they'll pay whatever the going rate is. If it's 600m or 1B. That's what it will be cost.

    If the money is there and ring fenced for a road project, what's the problem?People get too hung up on the cost of stuff that they can't control.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    What happens if the final cost is not just the money but also worse traffic congestion for Galway and no funds available to build efficient public transport?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    At that point…is there anything to be said for another road?

    I'll get my coat



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    I'm talking about purely financials for the project.

    Are funds being taken from public transport projects to pay for it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    In general yes. In specifc, no.

    The current PFG has re-oriented expenditure away from sustainable transport and towards roads building. A lot of sustainable projects have been quietly shelved or creatively delayed, and some roads projects such as this one have been prioritised and expedited. In general in the past we've unfortunately seen a kind of "one for everyone in the audience" approach to infrastructure spending where different areas get transport infrastructure spends based on political balancing efforts. What this has meant in practice local to me is that when Cork got the KRR & BRR upgrades, everything else local was delayed/shelved (including important roads projects). It's just how politics works. They can't be seen to throw the kitchen sink at one city, while neglecting other areas, no matter how much its needed.

    I don't think this one's a constructive discussion for this thread though, most here will agree that infrastructure spending should be segregated from politics. And I agree with you that money/funding should be a lesser concern than getting technical details of the infrastructure right. That is to say "who cares what the cost is, if it's necessary". But yes I would be reasonably confident that there won't be large PT projects in Galway until a bit after this road is done. If at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    we can expect a flurry of JRs over the long weekend then ;-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,590 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Ya and its ONLY really used 2 weeks of the year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'm just thinking of 2 previous objectors, I've no idea what to expect!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    That's a bit vague.

    I'd be interested to know what Galway public transport projects are being shelved due to this road project.Specifics rather than hear say. Otherwise it's impossible to debate the point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Nobody can possibly say: just like nobody can tell you the cost of the road project. People can give you best-guess hand-wavey answers on both only I'm afraid. We don't even know if the project will move forward or what amount of time it will take at present unfortunately.

    It's not unreasonable for you to want specifics about related sustainable transport projects, but there are currently none in this space. When looking for detail, we can only look at this road as an isolated project unfortunately, please bear in mind that it is you that has been asking people about other theoretical "sustainable" projects which could theoretcally progress in parallel!

    As I have said before (for too many posts now, sorry!) they should have just linked this road project to the other specific projects like the M20 team did. It would have really helped to progress the road project. They didn't do it. I don't know why. It's baffling. They essentially did the same hand-wavy thing you're already complaining about and said "some projects in the GTS will mean this road is a success".

    For more "holistic" view of the Galway transport system it might perhaps be better for us to reference the GTS (I'm not sure if there's an associated thread?) rather than trying to discuss it within the thread for this specific project.

    Edit: I'm genuinely not trying to deflect here. You keep asking "why can't we have sustainable transport at the same time as they progress this road". A reasonable question. But the answer is "We don't know why. But that's what you're getting". We have a situation where significant political capital has been expended over time on this project while others are shelved. Think of the stupidly long timeline of this project to-date. In a logical world you'd have had cycle infrastructure delivered quickly and cheaply in Galway but it's apparently been impossible. Oranmore would have had the urgency and ambition that Cork Area Commuter Rail has. Bus connects would have delivered higher frequency and segregation. Trams… Work on the existing "ring road" to make it a distributor…there's so many schemes in GTS that could have been done by now. It was a 2016 publication.

    According to GTS Galway was supposed to have (by now): Radial bus priority, Core bus network, Core cycle network, Walking network, P&R Phase 1. The road we're discussing was supposed to be one of the final things completed.

    So maybe let's turn this on its head slightly: what do you think is the reason we apparently can't have both?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 778 ✭✭✭GBXI


    Infrastructure in Ireland is savagely slow in general. I'm not sure why. Part of the reason I am happy that this got approval is because I just want to see capital investment, especially in the west of Ireland. It's so rare. It's 2026, we've been running budget surpluses for the best part of 10 years and Galway city doesn't have double train tracks to Oranmore or Athenry!! Now that's the real evidence of public infrastructure failings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,103 ✭✭✭Juran


    I went to university of limerick 1989-1993. Limerick was a gloomy dirty city. Roads were shite like Galway and most Irish cities and suburbs. The galway student bus used to have come through the city to get to UL, it took forever, and they didnt have the car traffic of today.

    Fast forward to today, when I go to Limerick shopping centres maybe once a year, go to Cork again maybe once a year and bypass Limerick city, I see the massive changes, improvements to local roads, new roads linking Dublin rd to Cork/tipp/kerry road and a Limerick by-pass that seem to be built without delays or years of planning appeals. In fact I never heard about that by-pass till I saw it on the news being opened. Galway ring rd is on the national news for the past 20+ years. Also, in Limerick city massive regeneration projects to replace rough social housing estates and upgrade them. It might not be perfect to the Limerick locals, but to me, I see the progress by Limerick local authorities a million miles ahead of Galway city and suburbs. I say hats off to them.

    When I drive through Galway, no new roads bar the motorway, which was NTA not galway councils. No significant changes other than demolished Rahoon flats and the rest is private ventures eg. new Knocknacarra shopping area, Briarhill shopping, oranmore shopping and private housing estates east and west of the city.

    We need external bodies to take over Galway city and county councils badly.

    Post edited by Juran on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    What city are you heading to west of Galway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    The only defence of this project seems to be wanting it because other places built thing so we should build things. No defence of the design. Which isn't surprising because it's a bad design. Building bad things is not better than doing nothing as it locks us into something that'll make things worse



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    I keep seeing the 3% of all traffic figure that will require the bypass, and from what I can gather is the proportion of all daily trips in the wider Galway metropolitan transport model that would fully transfer onto the new ring road corridor. Apparently, the data comes from the Galway transport modelling and Environmental Impact Assessment that was done for the council (all the data is here https://www.n6galwaycityringroad.ie/ )

    From the same assessments the data shows that for 2030 the new ring road river crossing traffic will have a projected AADT for the BAU scenario (43,224 vehicles/day) and for the BAU with some Climate Actions (37,367 vehicles/day). The updated project documentation states that “On an average workday, the combined AADT on the four bridges is approx. 80,000.” See Part IV s15 CALCD Act and CAP Report.pdf

    The same official modelling projects AADTs for the Corrib crossings as: Quincentenary Bridge (~30k–36k), New Ring Road Crossing (~37k–43k), Wolfe Tone Bridge (~7k–15k) and O’Brien’s Bridge (~3k–8k). I assume that the Salmon weir bridge will be closed to general traffic by then, O’Brien’s is basically a very localised crossing option given the local and narrow road network etc.

    So, if I take the lowest estimate the total is 77k AADT. So, the new crossing will be 48% which is a lot higher than the 3% number I see everywhere. For comparison to the 37K AADT for the Galway ring road, here are some other AADTs: M50 (150,000–187,000), N18/M7 Limerick (45,000–70,000 for the Tunnel section), N25 Waterford City Bypass (14,000–30,000), N4/N15 Sligo Inner Relief Road (20,000–35,000) and many think that Sligo needs a bypass, N22/N69 Tralee Bypass (18,000–30,000). AADT sources: https://www.tii.ie/en/roads-tolling/operations-and-maintenance/traffic-count-data/

    My view is that this is a ring road, in addition to being a strategic regional bypass. The 3% number is a at best 2-4K crossings a day. So it will serve the 3% longer distance and the 45% shorter journey traffic (using 2030 numbers).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 15,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Is the 3% an end to end figure? Traffic that’s going from the start of the bypass at the R336 end and continuing all the way to the M6?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    This is a visualisation of the movement percentages…

    image.png

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 15,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    This would be a similar movement to M1 → M11 in Dublin or N25 → N22 in Cork. I’m not surprised it’s such a low percentage of overall movements.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    But the point is that many of those non-3% trips could be handled by an efficient public transport system which will more than likely never become a reality if the road is constructed.

    From a transport perspective, Dublin is buggered because of the M50. We now are in a situation where we're spending hundreds of millions talking about a metro yet not one sod has been dug. Busses are assigned second place to the private car. Travel around Dublin is completed by car to the extent that any attempts to change this are met with massive opposition and the result is that people will spend more and more time sitting in traffic while the cost of fuel just keeps rising.
    Galway is in a position to start with a clean slate and is instead demanding to copy Dublin's failures.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,103 ✭✭✭Juran


    A huge suburb west of Galway city, the busiest Regiinal rd in Ireland R366 and gateway to Connemara, Wild Atlantic Way and the Gaeltacht - areas the tourist boards and government gaeltacht bodies are constantly trying to promote to visitors at home and abroad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,103 ✭✭✭Juran


    You obviouly dont sit in Galway traffic every working day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    I am not sure if the 3% an end to end figure and again don't know how this was calculated, I have seen that graphic before also but the percentages don't match with the data from the reports that I can access. Who did the graphic/visualisation and what is the source data for it (from seth brundle post)?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Avon8


    While it was always a heavily disputed figure based on an arbitrary endpoint, its now also dangerously outdated. That report is from pre-covid times

    The idea that the ring road wouldn't promote heavy future development west of the city is also nonsensical



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yes….the whole problem is that there's no good business case for a "ring road" that's not primarily a distributor. And if they designed a distributor….like so many of us keep saying….then there wouldn't be an issue. Instead they designed another catch-all N40/M50 "ring road" that's absolutely not a distributor.

    You're arguing for promotion of development West of the city. That sounds great. Is there any way we could do that without a car-only approach though?

    Like, again, over and over….why can't Galway have a bypass and a distributor? Why was this outdated design the only show in town?



Advertisement
Advertisement