Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dublin GAA Discussion Thread: Mod Note - No 'Dublin Dominance' chat allowed!

1315316318320321327

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,118 ✭✭✭Trampas


    I don’t know what happens or not but do they ask the ref did he see Saint David throw an elbow or Mcguinness push a player etc or do they read the report and says I saw Saint David push someone and mcguinness on field and I handled it all. Makes no sense at all



  • Subscribers Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    apparently the report doesn’t mention any of it, so they should have acted based on the video that everyone could see, but the easy path to let them off was to blame the ref for missing the incidents. No doubt he’ll be demoted for a couple of games now, the only one to get any sanction thanks to cowardly GAA.

    Ger Brennan manning up and apologising was clearly the wrong approach, pushing a player on the pitch then attacking a journalist for asking about it afterward is the way to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,287 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    If the ref didn't put it in his report then any ban would have been overturned on appeal in a heartbeat, regardless of video evidence.

    The real question is what happened to make the ref not put this in his report. I mean, he was well aware of the fuss made over Gers incident, it was all over the sports news for weeks, and the GAA claimed they wanted to clamp down on this type of behaviour. So why did he choose to ignore it and not mention it in his report? Did someone have a quiet word in his ear? Is he just incompetent? Does he like Jim and didn't want to cause a fuss for him?

    Any way you cut it the entire thing stinks.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,389 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I would say Brennan’s ban definitely had a negative impact on Dublin’s performances as well. A team which already lacks enough leadership on the pitch.
    No one would have thought Rock would have ended up on the sideline instead at the start of this year. Maybe he will be full manager in future. But he doesn’t seem like a fella who is ready for it now. I feel sorry for Rock, given the circumstances.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,441 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    So, let me check my understanding.

    Murphy couldn't be dealt with anymore because the ref acted on it at the time (Yellow card when it should have clearly been red)

    McGuniess cannot be sanctioned because the ref didn't deal with it at the time?

    And red cards can be overturned afterwards on appeal, but if the incident isn't mentioned in the report at all nothing can be done as the ref has the final say?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,287 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    100% it's had an impact. The length and scope of the ban means we've effectively had no senior manager this season in the later part of the league and championship.

    I thought the extent of the ban was ridiculous at the time and what we've seen over the weekend just reinforced that IMO. If they were going to be consistent you could live with it but everyone and their dog knew something similar would happen and get brushed under the carpet.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭Dogsdodogsstuff



    Let’s imagine an extreme example and McGuinness was running around pushing and punching a few lads. Are the CCC saying that they’d of dealt with it the same way if the referees report had exact same details ?

    I’d imagine they’d say that’s a far more serious incident that needed intervention. That means their hands weren’t tied.

    But then that means that McGuinness putting his hands on a Kerry player isn’t considered serious enough to act on. But it’s serious enough to ban a manager for effectively a season with a similar rule being applied?

    Whatever way you cut it they absolutely manoeuvred the situation to suit the outcome they wanted.

    I don’t actually mind McGuinness not missing the season, I mind them taking the same sort of “our hands are tied” cop out approach to Brennan. In both cases acting like it was all down to the gods and they had no bearing on outcomes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,287 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Don't forget that the county involved also has a bearing on the outcome. Refs reports can be updated after the fact if there's a blue jersey involved, don't ya know.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,389 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I remember when Brennan got the ban. Thinking ok it was harsh, but if it stops this kind of carry on in the GAA.Changing the cultural norms, grand. But I was naive, it has not being applied consistently or universally.

    Plus it annoys me that many fans on the main GAA forum are more concerned with optics, than the actual rulebook! And the correct application of the rules .

    I mentioned how Connolly got a 12 week ban for push on the linesman . Slightly different rule similar premise “minor physical interference”
    Remember the little push v Carlow linesman in on his arse? And the poster said Connolly should have been “banned for life” for that.

    So not only do we have inconsistent and haphazard application of the rulebook. The fans don’t even know the rules, nor it seems, or even look them up. Which ends up making most of the noise, as officials and administrators make a farce of their own rules. Muddying the water.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,441 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    And they throw out the sop that they want to reduce the number of people on the sidelines. But McGuiness is the manager so the problem wasn't with an extra physio or a stats guy running on the pitch.

    I'm all for banning all non-players from the pitch (save for physio at injuries etc), but then apply it. McGuiness has simply no need to step on the pitch. Pushing the player is almost incidental.

    It is the culture in the GAA that Managers see themselves as the 16th player. It is high time a small box, like in soccer, is introduced so that all non-playing members must remain at all times. Any breach is a yellow card and a 13m free.

    Like JRant, I thought the Brennan suspension was excessive but if laying down a new marker for all teams it would be good for everyone in the long-term. This makes a complete farce of the idea.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    Let’s take this post at face value because it reflects the nonsense and lack of knowledge that has been circulating since the weekend.
    There are already restrictions on who can be on the sideline at inter county level.
    The dressing rooms in Killarney are at the bottom end of the pitch. It is impossible to access the dressing rooms other than by using the pitch.
    There is already a “small box “ for managers at inter county level.
    Finally Ger Brennan received a red card for his actions. The only individual that the officials believed reached the red card threshold on Saturday was a Kerry player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,287 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Restrictions that aren't worth the paper they are written on. Ger got banned for pulling the ear piece from a lad who was on the pitch interfering with players and wasn't even part of the match day team. He had no business being there yet got less of a ban than Ger.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,287 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    This has always been the way though. They pick and choose who to throw the book at and who the let off. The same year Connolly got his ban there was a similar incident in the hurling that was also caught on camera but because of who was involved it got brushed aside.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,441 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Are managers allowed on the pitch and to interfere with players? No, yet that is being brushed off. Now, either the ref didn't understand the rule, or he deemed it not important.

    As for saying there is no way to get to the dressing rooms. Wow, so we can't ask mentors to walk around the pitch, or at least to wait until all players and officials have left the pitch?

    I do understand the rules, as did the GAA apparently with Brennan, but now they aren't so sure. An incursion onto the field of play is supposed to carry a yellow card, yet none was issued.

    Do you know what rule Brennan was sanctioned for, and why that rule is not being applied here?

    The GAA have shown with this cowardice that while restrictions may technically be in place, it all depends on the mood of the ref, or the location of the dressing rooms and whether the ref thinks a manager pushing a player is deemed to even warrant a vote in the report.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,479 ✭✭✭FullBack Jam


    Ya/ It's all become so vague now. The GAA/CCCC have really dug a hole for themselves now. There are all of these subjective issues in the air now - minor interference, has the ref dealt with already, what should the ref put in his report and how does that apply to the wording in the GAA rulebook - that I think they will need to tear up the part of the rules that all of this relates to, and re-write the sanctions re mentors getting involved etc. And also the issue re the question of whether or not a ref has dealt with it already on the pitch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 384 ✭✭VONSHIRACH


    image.png

    Panel vs Louth announced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Good to see CoC back, and Gannon on the bench. PoCB out is a blow, still no Murchan, Clancy didn't have a great game against Westmeath but he'll be a miss too.

    I feel O'Sullivan deserves a chance in goal but they seem wedded to Comeford.

    Notwithstanding the disaster against WM, I think Dublin will beat Louth though wouldn't be putting much on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,389 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It’s probably the one of the worst things GAA are at besides marketing the games. The bit that riles me up is there are still an undercurrent of lads who admire this sort of thing. Darragh O’Se calling for Kerry to be “manly”. They deliberately stir it up.
    And there also seems to be an undercurrent of “ah lads they are volunteers amateurs”

    But the real irony about the Brennan ban is I view the Dublin team as “softies”. Not a Philly McMahon, Kieth Barr, Brian Mullins type among them. All “nice lads” on the pitch! The complete other extreme to today’s Kerry/Donegal or Harte’s Tyrone.

    I know full well that other countries are laughing at the Dubs now. A team that is nice, But the manager gets banned!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,389 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The spidey sense is kicking in. I am actually worried about this match. Can’t even relax and “enjoy” the build up to a game these days. Surely Louth won’t be as bad as the last day ?

    I think the last 70 minutes I was happy with was in Salthill, in the championship v Galway.
    That was a whole year ago. Clever tactics late win. And probably the last great ball I remember Cluxton finding his man. Seems like another world now already.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,389 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I see what you are getting at.


    It all comes down to how the GAA implements Rule 7.3 (Disciplinary Jurisdiction). The rule book essentially ties the hands of the CCCC if a referee brandishes any card during a multi-person row.
    The system creates a massive loophole depending on whether an incident is treated as isolated or part of a wider melee:

    • Ger Brennan: His altercation with the Galway coach was spotted directly by the match officials at half-time. He was shown a straight red card on the pitch. Because it was explicitly recorded as an individual infraction by the referee, the standard 12-week suspension went ahead seamlessly.

    Jim McGuinness: The Kerry v Donegal row was a massive multi-person half-time brawl. Referee Seán Hurson handled the flashpoint by issuing a single red card to Kerry’s Micheál Burns. Under Rule 7.3 (aa)(2), because a card was issued to resolve the melee, the incident was officially "adjudicated upon". The moment Hurson confirmed to the CCCC that he saw and processed the row, McGuinness was legally shielded from a retrospective video ban for pushing Diarmuid O'Connor, because the referee technically "handled" the overall flare-up on the day.


    The system actively rewards things being absorbed into a single card. If a manager has an isolated row, he gets a red card and a 12-week ban. But if a manager gets involved in a massive brawl, as long as the referee picks out just one player for a card (like Burns) and tells the CCCC he dealt with the situation, everyone else who ran onto the pitch or threw a push gets off scot-free because the GAA rules forbid "re-refereeing" a melee that a referee has already carded.

    Rule 7.3 (Disciplinary Jurisdiction). The rule book essentially ties the hands of the CCCC if a referee brandishes any card during a multi-person row.
    The system creates a massive loophole depending on whether an incident is treated as isolated or part of a wider melee:

    • Ger Brennan: His altercation with the Galway coach was spotted directly by the match officials at half-time. He was shown a straight red card on the pitch. Because it was explicitly recorded as an individual infraction by the referee, the standard 12-week suspension went ahead seamlessly.

    • Jim McGuinness: The Kerry v Donegal row was a massive multi-person half-time brawl. Referee Seán Hurson handled the flashpoint by issuing a single red card to Kerry’s Micheál Burns. Under Rule 7.3 (aa)(2), because a card was issued to resolve the melee, the incident was officially "adjudicated upon". The moment Hurson confirmed to the CCCC that he saw and processed the row, McGuinness was legally shielded from a retrospective video ban for pushing Diarmuid O'Connor, because the referee technically "handled" the overall flare-up on the day.

      The system actively rewards things being absorbed into a single card. If a manager has an isolated row, he gets a red card and a 12-week ban. But if a manager gets involved in a massive brawl, as long as the referee picks out just one player for a card (like Burns) and tells the CCCC he dealt with the situation, everyone else who ran onto the pitch or threw a push gets off scot-free because the GAA rules forbid "re-refereeing" a melee that a referee has already carded.

    “Free the Salthill One, repeal Rule 7.3 (aa)(2)” could be a catchy chant on the Hill!? 🤣 🤔

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,287 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The simple solution is for our players to just pile in next time and not stand back like good boys. Play the rules if they aren't going to fix them.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,389 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    And I definitely get the online vibe that if Ulster sides are done for “indiscipline”. Suddenly it’s because it is anti Ulster v “The South”.

    Kerry ? They have it sussed. As usual.

    The Dubs have no “Ah yerrah, lookit” solid equivalent in vocabulary.
    Major drawback, it doesn’t work in a Dublin accent. Would not be able to keep straight face ! Dubs are too honest!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,614 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Tell us the one about the blonde girl and the three bears it sounds better.

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,651 ✭✭✭dunnerc


    Why not just ignore ? instead of posting childish nonsense !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,248 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    Louth are very limited outfit I think they win that Leinster from Meath being young and naive more than anything. Let’s not forget all the bull around 2010 final in run up to that final last year. Louth former manager and players still crying over it just to make sure they got any 50/50 descions . Think it was set up nicely for them to win. Dublin will win by 5 points



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭Gael85


    Can't see winning if that team starts. Major issues with goalkeeping and midfield. Con not fit. Louth won't be as bad as last day and are great odds at 2/1 to win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Comerford dropped (assuming) O'Sullivan starts...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,201 ✭✭✭Patser


    Croker barely at 15% full, a day like today everyone should just be offered access to Premium level, to say thank you for coming and have at least section, level jammed.

    Less staffing costs, everyone gets glass pints - everyone a winner. If people want to go on Hill they can



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭Dogsdodogsstuff


    They should give kids free tickets like they do with hurling.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 797 ✭✭✭Tomaldo


    no



Advertisement
Advertisement