Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Irelands neutrality stance in WW2 unfairly criticized? (see Mod note 217)

13839414344109

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Read the book on censorship during the war. Dev deliberately used and had others use the term "the Emergency" instead of "war" . He did not want the media in Ireland using the term "Nazi" because he thought that portrayed them in a negative light! No mention was to be made of the tens of thousands of Irish going to Britain to sign up etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 716 ✭✭✭myfreespirit


    You said in the earlier post which I questioned:

    If you think Aiken had not animosity towards Britain why did he involved in the sectarian killing of 6 innocent protestant civilians in N.I. a few decades previously?

    The BBC report says:

    He was named by one man as being present, but archivist Rob McEvoy believes Aiken was involved in a different ambush that same night.

    However, it is accepted that given his position as divisional commander, he would had to have given his approval for the Altnaveigh attack.

    This BBC report about sectarian murder at Altnaveigh says Frank Aiken was involved "in a different ambush that same night".

    Now, he may have authorised the murders, but again he may not have.

    He is cleared of direct involvement in the actual murders by the BBC report it appears.

    Post edited by myfreespirit on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They were protecting their own shipping..

    Equating a possible invasion of Ireland as the similar risk as Norway or Iceland is farcical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Because it was an Emergency for us, it wasn't a war we were in. Very simple stuff.

    'Nazi', by the time war broke out was a pejorative term and Censorship was designed not to use emotive names or terms likely to enflame for either side. Hence a phrase like

    England’s difficulty is Ireland’s opportunity or Britain’s war is not Ireland’s war were also frowned upon.

    You really need to get up to speed on these things. You've had long enough.

    P.S. Reading the blurb on a book is not the same as reading the book.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    I agree the US was late to the war, same as in WW1. All they did before Pearl harbour was send a few Eagle squadrons to Britain to be based there to fight the Germans, which they did.

    The Eagle Squadrons were Americans who had either joined the RAF or crossed the border into Canada and joined the RCAF. They had nothing to do with the American government and weren't sent there! If you are going to introduce something to further your argument at least research it!

    And while neutral, before Pearl Harbour and joining the war, they patrolled the Atlantic out to 300 miles off their coasts to help protect Allied shipping from U boat attacks. Roosevelt wanted us to do that out to only 50 miles but Dev would not even do that.

    And remember what happened next? I told you the other day.

    The Government of the United States having violated in the most flagrant manner and in ever increasing measure all rules of neutrality in favor of the adversaries of Germany and having continually been guilty of the most severe provocations toward Germany ever since the outbreak of the European war, provoked by the British declaration of war against Germany on September 3, 1939, has finally resorted to open military acts of aggression.

    On September 11, 1941, the President of the United States publicly declared that he had ordered the American Navy and Air Force to shoot on sight at any German war vessel. In his speech of October 27, 1941, he once more expressly affirmed that this order was in force. Acting under this order, vessels of the American Navy, since early September 1941, have systematically attacked German naval forces. Thus, American destroyers, as for instance the Greer, the Kearny and the Reuben James, have opened fire on German submarines according to plan. The Secretary of the American Navy, Mr. Knox, himself confirmed that American destroyers attacked German submarines.

    Furthermore, the naval forces of the United States, under order of their Government and contrary to international law have treated and seized German merchant vessels on the high seas as enemy ships.

    The German Government therefore establishes the following facts:

    Although Germany on her part has strictly adhered to the rules of international law in her relations with the United States during every period of the present war, the Government of the United States from initial violations of neutrality has finally proceeded to open acts of war against Germany. The Government of the United States has thereby virtually created a state of war.

    The German Government, consequently, discontinues diplomatic relations with the United States of America and declares that under these circumstances brought about by President Roosevelt Germany too, as from today, considers herself as being in a state of war with the United States of America.

    Accept, Mr. Chargé d'Affaires, the expression of my high consideration.

    December 11, 1941.

    RIBBENTROP.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The basic knowledge deficit is just amazing really. Or maybe it is a wilful knowledge deficit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Has to be wilful, otherwise the country is f**ked if they can last 40 years in the CS, I hope it wasn't in anything important!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Not entirely sure what's valid about German Propaganda to defend German actions in WW2. It's hypocritical for Germans to complain about violations of neutrality after German actions attacking countries to that point in the war.

    It's also missing Germany attack on the Greer, USS Kearny and the sinking of the USS Reuben James. Not to mention us sailors in the Merchant Marine killed to that point.

    …And what on earth could Ireland protect at Sea in WW2... 50 miles or anywhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    It is the official declaration of war on the US delivered by the German government.

    I posted it to show one of the reasons they declared war on the US and could have used on us if as suggested we did the same. I am in no way defending it, only posting it in a historical sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    100% correct. It did not stop Roosevelt trying to do his best though to get Ireland to keep an eye out for German submarines etc out to a distance of 50 miles. The Americans would have been willing to help out if requested. Thousands wanted to volunteer for the Eagle squadrons in the UK, which consisted of American volunteers before USA joined the war. Before the U.S. officially entered the war, its government quietly "winked at the law" to allow American pilots to travel to Europe, and later granted them formal pardons and military integration.

    Roosevelt was having his forces patrol out to 300 miles in the search for German u boats, before USA entered the war.

    From the Irish notes of the meeting with Roosevelt 1941

    "The President said we should try and find a formula by which we could assist in patrolling our coast – a formula which would obvi- ate any German attack. He spoke of his bases on the British possessions in this hemisphere, and on the fact that he had extended the territorial waters of the U.S. to a belt 300 miles off the coast. He was considering increasing that belt. He had been told before taking certain of these measures that the Germans would use it as a pretext, but he judged differently. Mr. Aiken pointed out the difference of Ireland's position which would be right under the guns. The President repeated that a formula might be found. For instance, he said, in the patrolling of the area over here they were watching out for German submarine activities or surface craft. Why could you not institute an air patrol service extending, say, 50 miles off the Irish coast to spot these engines of destruction which are preying on your ships. Mr. Aiken said that any endeavour to get us committed would be turned down by the Irish Government.."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    My point entirely, the Eagle squadrons were volunteers from the US who volunteered to join the fight against Nazism, before America joined the war. I referred to them a few days ago as well. There was a lot of support in America for them. There were 6,700 applications from Americans to join the RCAF or RAF.

    After Pearl harbour and the war the USAF was very glad to have these experienced pilots to draw from, and to teach others lessons learned in combat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Rubbish. On paost 562 of this very thread some days ago it was ME who educated some others here - not looking at anyone in particular - about the Eagle squadrons.

    I wrote, and I quote

    " Yes, we know the US only officially joined WW2 after it was attacked by Japan. It could resist no longer. It did know war might come. Did you ever hear of the Eagle squadrons for example?

    The Eagle Squadrons were three World War2 RAF fighter units formed entirely by American volunteers. They operated in combat from UK bases prior to the U S entering the war. These American pilots flew missions from UK aifields before transferring to the U.S. Army Air Forces in 1942, bringing vital combat experience to American units."

    I suggest you look at your own lack of knowledge before making accusations about others. You, and some else with the same posting style as you, have been proven wrong yet again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    16% of Americans suppirted entering the war after Germany invaded Poland

    That was the ACTUAL feeling not the spin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    So they invaded 11 countries and the US breached their neutrality by being mean to u-Boats after they attacked US ships and sailors.

    That's not reason thats insanity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    You stated America sent them, you were wrong. It seems you followed my advice and bothered to actually research them.

    They have absolutely nothing to do with this conversation only to deflect from the shocker of day you've had!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Ireland couldn't patrol its own coast then or now.

    US defended its coast. What was the expectation here, they do nothing…like Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Nobody ever mentioned or asked about the level of support in America for entering the war in the very beginning ( after Germany invaded Poland ).

    I said that America was late for both World wars. That was a fact, same as most of what I say are facts.

    After WW1 many people were weary of war. But someone had to stand up to the Nazis (and other Axis countries) some time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    US ’breached their neutrality’

    What do you mean?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You were trying to spin a picture Francis that support was higher than it was. America didn’t send squadrons. Because there was no popular support for it. All those invaded countries could swing until it was in America’s interest. Same as why GB entered the war. Fact



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Roosevelt would have known that we has not the means to patrol our own coasts out to 50 miles then. But he clearly wanted the coasts patrolled out to 50 miles with our co-operation, against the German threat. Of course, Aiken would not co-operate.

    Its not hard to join the dots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Because we were Neutral.

    What are you not getting about that?

    We remain Neutral to this day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I stated a week ago on this very thread, post no. 562

    The Eagle Squadrons were three World War2 RAF fighter units formed entirely by American volunteers. They operated in combat from UK bases prior to the U S entering the war. These American pilots flew missions from UK aifields before transferring to the U.S. Army Air Forces in 1942, bringing vital combat experience to American units."

    How much clearer could I have been than that? They had permission to go and get the combat experience. They did not face charges when they came back.

    Another quote what I said : I said the US government " quietly "winked at the law" to allow American pilots to travel to Europe, and later granted them formal pardons and military integration".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    I know full well what you told me last week, it has no relevance to anything we are talking about! As I told you then Ireland had between 70,000-100,00 volunteers during the war so I don't know what point you're trying to make!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    How much clearer could I have been than that? They had permission to go and get the combat experience. They did not face charges when they came back.

    Another quote what I said : I said the US government " quietly "winked at the law" to allow American pilots to travel to Europe, and later granted them formal pardons and military integration".

    To address your ninja edit. If they had permission why were they granted pardons then?

    Another post that contradicts itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Because it would have helped a tiny bit in the war against the armed forces of Nazism which was attacking shipping in the Atlantic, which invaded neutral countries, deported millions to extermination camps and broke the law a million times worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The US ignored what the Nazis were doing as did the British right through the 30’s right up until they were in Poland for the British and until Japan bombed Pearl Harbour for the US

    Freedom of small nations my eye.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Who broke the law worse is not how society works! Can I go around doing whatever I like because someone, somewhere is doing worse than me?



Advertisement
Advertisement