Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Deposit return scheme (recycling) - Part 2

1173174176178179

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    Should that not be % of containers recycled?

    Is that not the end goal?

    Otherwise this is just moving containers around with a bigger carbon footprint than before Re-Turn.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    For the purposes of this discussion we are talking about collecting vs. not collecting and the effect on the future of Re-turn.

    Obviously some of the non returned containers will be put in green bins and recycled others will end up in general waste not recycled and a percentage will remain in the environment as discarded litter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    No. The previous poster stated that any container not going through an RVM adds to Re-Turn's surplus which is true. They didnt specify collection or recycling.

    It was you (not we) that specifically stated that collection is the measure of success for this scheme.

    If that's true then Re-Turn is an expensive exercise in moving containers around and nothing more.

    Unless you're talking complete nonsense.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭MONarmy


    How have we ended up here? Amazing how schemes/scams like this become normalised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Buffman


    The below is a general 'signature' and not part of any post:

    FYI, if you move to a 'smart' meter electricity plan, you CAN'T move back to a non-smart plan.

    You don't have to take a 'smart' meter if you don't want one, opt-out is available.

    Buy drinks in 3L or bigger plastic bottles or glass bottles or cartons to avoid the DRS fee.

    Public transport user? If you're sick of phantom ghost services on the 'official' RTI sources, check bustimes.org for actual 'real' RTI, if it's on their map it actually exists.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    Money from that 50+ milion euro per year surplus should be spent on a report showing how much extra carbon footprint this DRS is costing the environment and extra expense its costing customers, retailers and the now the Exchequer. Some craic.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    The other poster suggested that it is somehow in the interests of Re-turn that containers are not collected.

    "I'm sure there could be but Re-Turn won't be doing it. Every can that doesn't go through the machine is more money in their account."

    I replied that the opposite is the case

    "At the end of the day the surplus money in the bank account won't be the measure of their success or failure.

    It will be the percentage of containers returned."

    What part of my reply do you have an issue with taking into account the legislation posted below ?

    S.I. No. 33/2024 - Separate Collection (Deposit Return Scheme) Regulations 2024 https://share.google/q7vw5ZhjMD2bZVgXo

    S.I. No. 599/2021 - Separate Collection (Deposit Return Scheme) Regulations 2021 https://share.google/dIdtTPXKygCt0pnPJ



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    My issue is that Re-Turn supporters now saying "collection" is the measure of success is farcical. It should be recycling but since it's now blatantly obvious that was never the case (EU targets are for collection not recycling) I find it a bit rich for you to try to now say Re-Turn is a success based on containers being moved around.

    So are you now admitting Re-Turn is a expensive (additional carbon footprint and cost) exercise in moving containers around?

    Should we not expect some form of recycling accountability here instead of stats on collection in the media?

    As said numerous times this is a scheme that encourages more plastic use not less. Its a running joke at this stage.

    Any update on our recycling plant?

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,633 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    What is false in this statement:

    "Every can that doesn't go through the machine is more money in their account."

    And your post further doesnt explain how it is actually the "measure of success" that will be applied against Return, its board or staff or surplus.

    What are the consequences for Return failing to reach 90%?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭bog master


    Job losses??? Yeah right!

    Maybe start at the top, you know, yer man in charge of this state supported fiasco, the one no one knows how much he is being paid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Re-turn have said in numerous statements that the containers they collect are sent for recycling.

    I've stated here before that if I was running pr. for Re-turn I'd do a promo video or invite media to do one following the containers from shop to recycling plant.

    They haven't done this and I don't know why.

    We only have their public statements to go on and the fact that they are reporting to the Minister at regular intervals.

    Taking that into account I see no reason not to believe them.

    The objective is to teach the targets of the EU directive and they appear to be on the right track.

    I have no more information about the proposed recycling plant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I didn't say it was a false statement.

    Obviously if the containers are not returned the deposit is not paid back.

    Clearly the objective is to make Ireland compliant with the EU directive.

    I don't know the consequences of failure but I hope they don't fail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    You'd most likely only have a supply of non scope containers if regularly travelling to the UK/NI.

    Even if you had I really wouldn't recommend the "cut and paste" job to anyone except as an experiment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,633 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You said that the opposite is the case which clearly implied you took issue with it.

    So it is a true statement after all.

    What is the incentive for Return to increase collection rates rather than their surplus?

    It was your claim that it was in "their" interests i.e. Return.

    The objective of the Government in establishing the scheme and the incentives of those operating Return are not the same thing. This is a quasi quango. We have many examples in public and private sector of disconnect between lofty objectives of Government / stakeholders with schemes and initiatives versus priorities of implementing bodies and personnel.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭bog master


    If our ehmmm collection rates or is it recycling, hypothetically were to reach 100% then would the quasi quango need to exist it its current form? Could be job losses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,007 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    They haven't done it because they cannot show that this is actually happening, at least not in any verifiable way with concrete numbers attached. Collections stats are much easier to calculate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,633 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Or the opposite… rates are dropping, let's not do anything with our surplus to fund initiatives, let's not get councils involved in operating RVMs at depots, let's not look at online delivery solutions, or making the machines more wheelchair accessible, let's not look at the large exemption size… let's increase the deposits!

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I took issue with the implication that money in the bank account was an indication of achievement for the company.

    Like I said clearly if the money isn't paid out as returned deposits it's in the account.

    The reason the company exists is to ensure Ireland teaches ithe targets.

    I take onboard your comments in the last paragraph and hope that any such issues, if they arise, will be dealt with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Should be simple enough.

    All the collected containers end up in one depot.

    They are shipped onward and the final destination must be known.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    "Sent for recycling". So is that the new measure for Re-Turn's success instead of "collection"? Case close then so 😆

    Let’s remember that for the first year-plus of Re‑Turn, their own website claimed the scheme existed “to achieve EU recycling targets”. A line so wildly inaccurate that someone on their media team eventually realised how absurd it looked and quietly removed it.

    Now we’re down to “sent for recycling.”

    Give it time and we may end up with just “sent,” because at the moment that’s the only part anyone can actually verify.

    Everyone knows there's no update on the recycling plant. It wasnt a serious question.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Turns out you may not be far wrong there 🙂

    Experts call for Re-turn infection control measures https://share.google/BtMCsQRBlcaPOit3M



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,007 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    If it was that simple wouldn't it have been done?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    Government minister for climate, energy and environment Alan Dillon changes his mind. Doesn't want 60 million euro from Re-Turn's deposit fund to be spent on a recycling plant. Should be pumped back into the government's circular economy fund instead 🤣

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41851059.html

    Its grand lads sure we only ship 90% of PET plastic out of Ireland at the moment.

    Out with the old gombeens in with the new

    1000013016.jpg

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,633 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It does raise some concerns... questions not mentioned is how much would such a plant cost build and run. Seems like it would have high energy needs, how would they be met.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    Seems like another fine mess olrite. Nothing planned properly except get a bare bones DRS in to satisfy collection targets and let producers off the hook for continued plastic usage.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I would like to see à proper business plan for the proposed facility.

    Maybe it would make more sense to let the market provide it rather than it becoming part of the DRS business.

    Re-turn planning to use some of its €89.8m to build bottle-to-bottle recycling facility https://share.google/LLWeyBV1c144i0MKJ

    Re-Turn says plastic-to-plastic bottle recycling in Ireland is not 'financially viable' - for now https://share.google/WVE4HjywRZHfBvwpe



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭jj880


    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/government-urged-to-reform-or-disband-shambolic-re-turn-scheme-after-e500000-bin-raiding-bill-1905390.html

    The local authority’s waste management section estimated that three hours in every 24-hour cleaning cycle were being diverted to deal with “bin interference” as a result of the DRS.

    The installation of bin surrounds specifically for the collection of these containers at a cost of €40,000 had proven to be of limited use, according to internal briefing documents.

    A further €115,000 had been spent replacing locks on bins at a cost of €115 per receptacle after they were broken open by people looking for containers that are worth between 15 cent and 25 cent per item.

    And the bills keep piling up.

    Same going on all round the country no doubt. Shambles.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭redshift-rider


    In the last couple of weeks i've seen multiple negative articles - about the rubbish created, the risk of infection, the lack of recycling facility, fees being too high for shops etc.

    My first thought is they are several years too late, all this was known and predicted.

    My second thought is that these bodies/agencies see the unclaimed deposits piling up and just want a cut of the grift. They're not actually worried about infections, they just want a few mil to run a nonsense study.

    A skeptic might wonder where the interest on the €150m is going.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,007 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    These were all indeed predictable but a very very poor public consultation phase coupled with a very eager to abscond from their responsibilities industry meant they were never factored in. Not the only things that were brought up early on that wasn't factored in either but now we have a situation where some of the significant issues with the scheme are getting highlighted and instead of asking the producers to spend a few hundred million of their own money from their profits, people have their eye on the consumers money to improve the scheme.

    A great situation if you are a shareholder and all the whole the amount of plastic in circulation increases.



Advertisement
Advertisement