Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning approved]

1202203205207208212

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    “Galway is going all in, becoming more like a Texan city, wrapped in a shawl of roadside retail parks, paved parking lots and long-distance commutes.” His words, hyperbolic waffle with zero facts other than the long distance commutes, God love those poor people who actually have to go to work for a living. Sure they can pedal in from Oughterard to Parkmore in the pissing rain. A prize procrastinator who has set Galway’s progress back by decades. And sure who cares about the 54 families waiting in limbo along the route, and more than likely some Wicklow based clown will slap in another spurious JR the night before the deadline so they can wait another fews years. Every other town and city of note in Ireland is now effectively bypassed. None of them appear to be overflowing in car parks, retail parks, massive housing developments (which we badly need) etc. So what magical things will happen in Galway. Anyway the bulk of the route has been largely developed despite the lack of a bypass. This one sided nonsense is simply that nonsense. And if you think Galway council is an example to be quoting in terms of planning excellence then you really need a dose of reality. Bike lanes will be added soon to the distributior road in Knocknacarra and will be removed again when the badly needed park and ride goes in. The mess of Eyre square. The never ending saga of the flood defences. Endless reports that never get implemented etc. We need the city bypassed and we need public transport improvements implemented and there is no reason why these are mutually exclusive.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    .. and yet again, when you try and tell us how he is wrong, youre also agreeing with him

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 blunder the bus


    I just read through some of the posts and while remfan is being somewhat emotional I don’t see how the comments show alignment with Ryan’s views. I read the IT article and Ryan is being typically one-sided, no chance of a Gluas if the bypass is built etc. Stripped of the rhetoric, there is a coherent planning argument here that is worth engaging with seriously. Galway’s transport problem is not a simple ideological choice between “roads” and “public transport”, but a structural issue created by geography, growth patterns, and constrained infrastructure. The most defensible position is that the city needs both a bypass to remove through-traffic and major investment in public transport to improve internal mobility. Treating these as mutually exclusive options is the real mistake.

    Galway’s physical layout makes it unusually vulnerable to congestion. The Corrib, the limited number of bridge crossings, and the narrow east–west urban corridor effectively funnel large volumes of traffic through a small number of critical points. That means interurban traffic travelling across the region is forced into the same network as local trips within the city. In this kind of system, even modest increases in demand can produce disproportionate congestion effects because there is no alternative grid to absorb pressure.

    This is where the case for a bypass becomes strongest. A significant portion of traffic passing through Galway is not destined for the city at all, but is moving between the wider west, the midlands, and the Atlantic corridor. Without a bypass, that traffic continues to compete with local movement on already constrained urban roads. Removing through-traffic does not eliminate congestion on its own, but it does fundamentally change the function of the city’s internal network, allowing it to operate as a city rather than a regional bottleneck.

    At the same time, a bypass alone is not sufficient. Galway’s internal transport system still needs to move people efficiently between residential areas, employment centres, and services. Without credible public transport alternatives, demand simply re-accumulates on the remaining road network, and car dependency continues to grow. This is why modern transport planning consistently emphasises multimodal investment rather than single-solution thinking. A bypass deals with external pressure; public transport addresses internal structure.

    The idea that “every other Irish city is bypassed” is broadly correct in functional terms. Cities such as Limerick, Waterford, Kilkenny, and Ennis have all seen significant removal of through-traffic via bypasses or ring road systems, even if the exact form varies between motorway and non-motorway infrastructure. The common outcome is that interurban flows are largely separated from urban circulation, allowing those cities to reorganise their internal transport networks around local demand rather than national corridors.

    There is also a land-use dimension that cannot be ignored. In the absence of clear separation between through-traffic and local movement, cities tend to develop more fragmented spatial patterns: employment clusters on the edge of town, retail parks on arterial routes, and longer commuting distances from surrounding rural areas. This is not unique to Galway, but the city’s constraints make these effects more pronounced. Over time, this increases car dependency and makes public transport harder, not easier, to implement effectively.

    Finally, the governance and delivery issue is part of the reality, even if often overstated in public debate. Large infrastructure projects in Ireland frequently become fragmented across phases, redesigns, and legal challenges, which leads to long delays and uncertainty. That reinforces polarised arguments where projects are framed as either “road building” or “public transport”, rather than integrated systems that should ideally be delivered together.

    It is not that Galway must choose between a bypass or public transport investment, but that both are necessary components of the same solution. A bypass addresses the structural problem of through-traffic in a constrained urban geography, while public transport improvements address the internal mobility needs of a growing city. One without the other leaves the underlying system imbalance intact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    I think this bypass will enable me to get from M6 oranmore to the eastern suburbs of the city much faster than it does today and ill fight anyone willing to tell me otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 blunder the bus


    maybe to the Western Suburbs the bypass will do nothing for Oranmore to Parkmore etc. I’ll get my coat….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    Indeed the councils’ own modelling suggests the ring road alone will not resolve Galway’s long-term congestion problems and may generate additional traffic over time. Its success depends heavily on whether complementary public transport, active travel and land-use policies are actually delivered alongside it. The 2 are not mutually exclusive.

    Regarding the m50 the first section opened around 1990, when Ireland has a population of about 3.5 million, we are at 5.3 million and there are about 3 million vehicles registered now compared to 1 million in 1990. So as populations grow they do inevitably outgrow the infrastructure. Therefore there is a need for further road development in tandem with better public transportation and better planning. I have yet to see human nature defeated so if you think we will lose our relationship with the motor car good luck.

    So rather than stick your head in the sand consider how we can sustainably exploit both additional infrastructure and public transportation. Population systems reach a point where a ring road is no longer outside the city as it becomes part of the city. The M50 is an example, its nearly 40 years old, Beijing has 6 motorway orbitals now.

    Opponents of the Galway bypass selectively take parts of the planners reports that suit their arguments while choosing to ignore the rest of the commentary to give context and balance. Ryans childish one sided arguments are just more of the same old guff. A major distinction between the council’s view and Ryan’s article is that council planners generally see the bypass as an enabling project rather than a competing project.

    His Texan city comparison is rhetorical and emotionally loaded rather than analytical. Galway is not experiencing North American-style low-density suburban sprawl on anything like the same scale. Its congestion problem is heavily shaped by geography: a medieval core, limited river crossings, constrained corridors, and the fact that national and regional traffic funnels through the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 706 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    Given that serious, game-changing public transport / active travel infrastructure could have been advanced at any point in the past decade, and the Galway Transport Strategy even supported delivering them before the Ring Road, why do you believe they will be delivered after the road has been built?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    Ok so some on this forum must not be Galway based so don’t realise just how much progress has been made over the past decade, Galway has already delivered a set of foundational changes to both public transport and active travel, even if the network is still somewhat fragmented. The most important public transport change was the complete redesign of the city bus network in 2021–2022, which introduced higher-frequency core routes and improved cross-city connectivity, replacing older radial patterns that forced many trips through the city centre. Alongside this, there have been incremental improvements such as upgraded bus stops, better accessibility, and early signal priority measures, but full bus-lane corridors are still largely in development rather than fully in place.

    On the active travel side, completed work has focused on a mix of safer school environments and partial cycling infrastructure rather than continuous citywide routes. The Safe Routes to School programme has improved crossings, traffic calming, and cycle facilities around schools across the city. In addition, various localised upgrades have been delivered along key roads, particularly in the eastern corridors such as Ballybane, Doughiska, and Renmore approaches. The ew bus lane in Parkmore has opened.

    The Bóthar Stiofáin Active Travel Scheme, which has just been completed , has segregated cycle lanes, widened footpaths, raised crossings, and reduced traffic speeds along a key 870-metre route linking residential areas with schools, retail, and employment zones. It is effectively a “missing link” scheme that ties local neighbourhood movement into the wider active travel network and feeds toward future BusConnects corridors.

    Galway is now moving into a much more ambitious phase of delivery through the BusConnects programme. The key near-term projects include the Dublin Road Bus and Active Travel Corridor, which will introduce continuous bus priority lanes and segregated cycling infrastructure, and the Cross City Link, which is intended to form a high-frequency bus spine across the city. Additional planned upgrades include major cycle and bus improvements on the Western Distributor Road, Monivea Road, and in employment hubs like Parkmore. Taken together, these projects represent a shift from isolated improvements to a coherent, citywide system where buses and cycling are structurally prioritised on the main corridors.

    And all this while the most vital piece of needed infrastructure is still years from completion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    I don't live in Galway so really this project doesn't really bother me. However I still don't understand how a road that even its planners and supporters say will increase traffic congestion in the city can be considered a good thing. What am I missing here about this project? This is an honest question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    I think saying its supporters and planners expect congestion to get worse is covered in an earlier post where selective culling of reports etc. are perhaps taking things out of context and putting words into their mouths.

    While it’s possible for overall traffic demand to adjust over time when new capacity is added, the primary effect in the short to medium term is usually a redistribution: fewer vehicles in the city centre and on key radial routes, and more efficient flow on the new orbital corridor. From this perspective, even if total vehicle kilometres change across the wider region, the key success metric is whether Galway city becomes more liveable and functional by removing through-traffic from constrained urban streets. And this then allows for completion of Bus Connects etc. The geography of Galway is key here, the city is a choke point between the lake and the sea, so everything is forced through the centre. And there is major population growth happening in the western suburbs, along the coast from Barna towards Spiddeal and out towards Moycullen. So the scale of the problem increases annually.

    So in summary I don’t believe that the planners and supporters think this won’t make a difference, that would do a great disservice to their intellectual capacity, but there is acknowledgment that as populations grow, and as infrastructure develops, at some point like the M50 today and Beijing’s 6 orbital motorways, demand will exceed capacity. We may need a tunnel then 😀



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It's not selective reading; it's the finding of the traffic modelling. The report states clearly that car traffic will increase, and that mode share for cars will increase too. The former can be explained by population growth, but the latter is a disgraceful admission for something that is supposed to reduce traffic problems.

    Galway has done some things around transport, but they are tiny compared to the snake of the problem, and they've dragged their heels on anything until they got their ring road.

    None of us are saying that a road sold not be built. We're saying that this kind of road should not be built. For the cost of this, you could have a proper urban distribitor and a high quality bus and cycle lane network.

    This road is all for creating sprawling exurban housing and commercial development; it's not about traffic relief at all. Where do you imagine all these new residents will go for their schools, jobs and leisure? And what's the only option they will have to get there? All these new cars won't just drive up and down the ring road, they'll choke the city again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    "Galway has done some things around transport, but they are tiny compared to the snake of the problem, and they've dragged their heels on anything until they got their ring road." I posted a long list of the things that have been done just in the last few years, and not all of the stuff that has been done since the bypass was first proposed. The bus lanes out to the westside, replacing many of the roundabouts with lights and/or redesigned junctions.

    Seems to be a lot of well intentioned people on here that really have ZERO clue about what has been happening in Galway, and the scale of the problems yet to be faced, and all of the superb plans in place for the city that are being progressed. Again trite and simplified responses, there is an old saying "decisions should be based on facts", all you seem to have is opinions. I have presented you with long lists of what has been achieved, factual lists, and also facts about what is already in place along this 26 year old route.

    On that topic have you looked at the route recently. Almost all of the land to the south of it has been developed or includes protected areas such as Barna woods. Almost every field north of it has a house in it, or is not suited to development the bog lands along the Headford road, or the land is protected e.g. the Menlo area, the SAC etc. Have you been out to Barna village recently, horrible sprawling developments such as Burkeways. So where is this urban sprawl going to occur in 10 years from now because of it, there won’t be an empty field anywhere near it. For the majoirty of non Galway people have a look at Google maps in satellite mode, it will give you the clearest indication of how much has been going on and even that is about 2 years behind the reality.

    Have your heard of Ardaun and what is planned for there. The city council already has plans for a major expansion of the city to the East, East of the bypass. Are you aware that the country is in desperate need of housing. Any new major developments should be accompanied by appropriate distributor roads, no problem with that but as long as they are not a developer led mess such as the distributor road to nowhere in Knocknacarra.

    The simple fact remains, we need a proper bypass of the city and we need proper public transport. You appear to think that the council etc. have been playing a collective game of chicken, holding back until the bypass is in. That is simply nonsense, they cannot close off any more roads in our already chaotic city until there is a viable alternative in place. Of course car models show increased volume, we have 3x of them since 1990 and 2x the population, what should we include population control measures too.

    This is what I mean when I say you are selective in your comments, again standard Ryan stuff for years, the master of one-sided spin and selective commentary. The intelligent people of Ireland saw through it all. If our council and our planners are so incapable, pressing ahead with plans they know are destined to fail, then there should be a tribunal of inquiry to expose the scandal. The reality is that we need both and we need it now or I guess we will spend another 25 years gridlocked in a dying city because our unprofessional and shady planners etc. will refuse to budge, really!

    Post edited by remfan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    You still seem to think we’re against “a” ring road. That is very far from the truth. I know that Galway lacks an east-west distributor road that doesn’t go trhough the city centre, and I know that one is needed in order to free up road space for PT and cycleway improvements. But what is being built is not that: it’s an outer orbital that serves only one purpose: create development land to the north of the city. Now, I also have no problem with development land, and we do need housing, but what this road will do is create a string of car-dependent suburbs, and because there is exactly zero in the way of public transport plans that would prevent this from happening, those suburbs will generate more car traffic, and quickly negate any capacity benefit from this ring-road.

    A “bypass” is not what was needed: there is nothing beyond Galway that can generate the traffic that would justify a bypass. The project’s own traffic surveys showed this, and that’s why it was renamed to “M6 Galway Ring Road”. I’m going to repost the traffic breakdown again, because it’s important in understanding what’s fundamentally wrong with this road project (“East” and “West” refer to areas outside of the city):

    3% - East/West - regional traffic, no interaction with city. This is “Bypass” traffic
    5% - West/Urban, stays west of Corrib
    5% - East/Urban, crosses Corrib
    7% - West/Urban, crosses Corrib
    20% - Urban/Urban, crosses River. “City” traffic.
    20% - East/Urban, stays east of Corrib
    22% - Urban/Urban, west of Corrib. “City” traffic.
    18% - Urban/Urban, east of Corrib. “City traffic.

    (source: N6 Galway City Ring Road Project - Design Report - survey is from 2012, but percentage breakdowns will not have changed much).

    Note how much of the city’s traffic never crosses the Corrib. Look at how much is within the city. 60% of all trips along the corridor originate and terminate within the city area, and two thirds of these completely urban trips never cross from one side of the city to the other.  A new road around the city is not going to help that.

    A new distributor at the edge of the city was what was needed, but it absolutely did not have to be a motorway. Rather, one or two bike+bus+car roads like the Limerick Northern Distributor to add needed capacity, then retrofit the N6 into the city to the same configuration once traffic shifts. Roads like this make it easier to get around, plus they enable better public transport. The proposed design is hostile to any kind of bus service because it takes the long way around, and buses must drive slower than cars on it: also, buses end up stuck in the same traffic, so there’s zero improvement.

    At the cost of this road (including the ridiculously expensive tunnelled section included because nobody had the spine to tell the Racecourse owners no), there was so much more that could have been done in terms of roads in Galway. This is a bad answer to an urgent problem, and it’s more about civic vanity than any attempt to improve things for people in Galway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    Let’s break it down then:

    "it’s an outer orbital that serves only one purpose: create development land to the north of the city." What land to the north of it is available, Arduan (which to more the northeast is already planned), the bogs along the Headford road? If you mean north of Barna well 2 points on that a) lots of land that is not suitable for development (lakes, bogs etc.) and b) the new road from Furbo to Knocknacarra is a 2-lane road, effectively a distributor road.

    "Note how much of the city’s traffic never crosses the Corrib.". It is 2012 data and I am not sure how this was collected, but what I see daily are massive tailbacks from Renmore to the Wolfe Tone Bridge, and from the Crescent to the Wolf Tone bridge, massive tail backs from Moycullen right through to both the Quincentennial bridge and the Salmon Weir bridge, and from Shantalla to the Salmon Weir Bridge. And then tailbacks from the Cappagh road to the Quincentennial bridge and from the end of the M6 motorway to the Quincentennial bridge. I assume these are cars that need to cross the river. And if that is represents just the 35% (and I am using your data) than where the heck are the other 65%, hiding in plain sight?"

    "60% of all trips along the corridor originate and terminate within the city area, and two thirds of these completely urban trips never cross from one side of the city to the other." Your own numbers are not adding up here but despite that. The section from the Moycullen interchange to the M6 will serve as a distributor also. Traffic from the N59 will be able to use the route to get to Salthill, Knocknacarra etc. This will also reduce the traffic crossing the Quincentennial and heading through the west side etc. They can use the bypass, and exit for Knocknacarra at the N59 junction and head towards Millers Lane etc. That opens the potential for continuous bus lanes from the Cappagh Road to the east of the city, all the way. Traffic destined for the major employment areas at Parkmore, Ballybrit will be able to access these areas by a new junction that facilitates the old N17 Tuam Road and traffic coming from the M6 and all points East and from the west (over the Corrib).

    “A new distributor at the edge of the city was what was needed, but it absolutely did not have to be a motorway. Rather, one or two bike+bus+car roads like the Limerick Northern Distributor to add needed capacity” – Limerick has a proper motorway bypass to the South and the East, it allows traffic from the northwest, south and east to fully bypass the city and it also has proper distributor roads, either built or in the process.

    The same goes for Waterford, motorway bypass to the north allowing traffic from the northeast, Kilkenny and Cork to bypass, while having a southern ring road also.

    Cork is badly in need of a northern ring road to that would link the N28, M8, N20, N22, and the N40. Having a motorway terminate at what was the old Dunkettle roundabout was a testament to bad planning.

    "what this road will do is create a string of car-dependent suburbs, and because there is exactly zero in the way of public transport plans that would prevent this from happening" - This road won't open this land up, its already open and being developed. There won’t be any left once this is done. Can you please give me some examples of this land to be opened. And I agree with you planning for any new developments should be contingent on proper public transport, I am in favour of public transport.

    "At the cost of this road (including the ridiculously expensive tunnelled section included because nobody had the spine to tell the Racecourse owners no), there was so much more that could have been done in terms of roads in Galway." Sadly, the cost is huge, if it has been done 20 years ago it would have been for a fraction. And I agree the racecourse should have been put in its box, it's dying anyway in terms of attendances etc.

    and how is this a civic vanity, we have been mired in insane traffic for years, if fixing that is vanity then fair enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @remfan
    The figures do add up. Look again: Urban to Urban = 20% + 22% + 18% = 60% of all trips. Urban trips not crossing the Corrib = 18%+22% = 40% = two thirds of the urban total.

    Yes, the figures are old, but the proportions will not have changed so much that through-city traffic now outweighs purely urban.

    The other cities that have motorway bypasses are irrelevant. They have them because of National and Regional traffic demands, not the needs of car commuters or a desire to look good.

    Yes, Cork needs a northern ring-road (that alone should be a warning to Galway: N40 was supposed to be a the only bypass that would be needed…). But Cork needing such a road doesn’t mean that Galway does. Cork is a major interchange node in the national road network: N22, N20, N25, N8 all meet here, plus N27,N28 serving Cork’s airport and seaport. Lots of traffic arrives at Cork because it’s a waypoint on a much longer journey. What onward journeys would someone be taking if they arrived in Galway from elsewhere in the country?

    Limerick is similarly the interchange node for journeys between north Munster (N21), Connacht (N18), south Munster (N20), Leinster (N7) and the South-East (N24). That’s why it has a bypass: I live in Cork. If I want to go to, say, Westport, I have to go to Limerick first, but I don’t want to go in to Limerick. Incidentally, I also would also bypass Galway on that trip by taking M17.

    Waterford is the same thing. It would not have had a “motorway” bypass except that that bypass ties the Cork, Waterford Port, Rosslare and Dublin roads together. Like Cork and Limerick, Waterford is an intermediary point in the national road network: a lot of traffic has no business in Waterford and just needs to get to the other side of it. (Waterford also has a ring-road, incidentally: it’s a modest 2+2 with roundabouts that runs from N25 around to the eastern side of the city. It’s exactly the sort of road Galway should have built instead of starting this whole nonsense)

    Sligo actually needs a bypass, as it’s the interchange between Donegal (and thus Fermanagh and Derry) and the whole Western side of the country, but it doesn’t have one. It should.

    The civic vanity is insisting on a road type that was absolutely not needed. Galway did not, and still does not need a motorway-style bypass road - there’s nowhere for such a bypass to go. Other cities have those “motorways” around them because they are not just destinations, but also waypoints on the way to somewhere else; Galway is not - it’s in a pocket. The councils could have spent the same amount of money just on other roads and got much better value for it, but that wouldn’t look as impressive. The planned road is stupid, needlessly expensive (at least we agree about the appalling waste of money at the racecourse), and it won’t even fix the problem: its own traffic modelling even says so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    N40 was supposed to be a the only bypass that would be needed…)

    Game show wrong answer buzz

    Who ever said such a thing? There is no way in hell that anyone thought the existing link from Limerick side was sufficient. Not now, not in the 90s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    The land being opened for development, where is that exactly? Because I don’t see the argument for that as I cannot see where the opportunities to build unplanned sprawling estates is.

    In terms of traffic volumes:

    • 80,000 trips are made daily across the Corrib (47%).
    • 92,000 are made into the City, but do not cross the Corrib (53%).
      • That is 172,000 journeys per day.
    • The M50 has 166,000 journeys per day on a 4 lane and in some parts 6 lane motorway. Galway city between internal and cross river traffic has more journeys than the M50 every day and boys do we know that (we who actually live here).

    The daily traffic volume on the N4/N15 arterial corridor passing Sligo town ranges between 25,000 and 30,000 vehicles per day. And you said that Sligo needs a bypass! The Quincentennial Bridge handles 44,000 vehicles daily.

    An average of 17,500 to 18,500 vehicles use the N25 Waterford Bypass daily to travel around the city. The River Suir Toll Bridge (data from the CSO) racking the tolled section of the bypass show a steady baseline of 18,100 to 18,300 private cars per day during standard commuting weeks. So, they need a bypass too, your words. And they also have a distributor road.

    An average of 23,000 to 26,000 vehicles use the Limerick Tunnel daily to cross the River Shannon and bypass Limerick City. And they also have a northern distributor road.

    When you add Sligo, Waterford and Limerick bypass traffic it equals Galway’s daily river crossings. So somehow Galway is magically different to these. And by the time the bypass is built we will see an increase of about 20% based on population growth etc. Facts matter….



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The land being opened for development, where is that exactly? Because I don’t see the argument for that as I cannot see where the opportunities to build unplanned sprawling estates is.

    https://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/150332/the-ring-road-decision-that-could-reshape-galways-housing-future

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Just to double check: are your last few posts written using AI assistance?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    No but I do use Google search, and is there a problem with using AI assistance anyway, surely that's the future too. And by the way most of the search engines now defer to an AI created set of results, but I still took any data and put it together in my own posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    0% I can actually read and write myself thanks - Moderator please note this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    The ring road decision that could reshape Galway’s housing future

    From this article - The Galway Metropolitan Area Strategic Plan identifies Ardaun, Briarhill and Garraun as key growth areas where the ring road is explicitly required to unlock delivery at scale, areas where road capacity constraints have previously stalled progress. These are not theoretical zones. They represent a pipeline of homes that has been waiting, commercially unviable, for precisely this infrastructure signal. These lands are already earmarked for the developement of the city, the bypass along with all of the other transport initiatives are linked together in support of this. I had already referenced Arduan, and these others are all in the same bucket. In fact they are all in the same area, as part of a planned future growth zone for the city. So nothing new here.

    Sources for those who maybe are not able to keep up with me.
    The article refernced and my own little AI powered fingers…

    So now we are using AI as an excuse when the facts are being presented. Come on we can surely do better than that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    and Dr Robert (who maybe a BOT who knows) this is what an AI post looks like and this is 100% AI generated - just so as you can tell the difference in future. Now if we all start using AI in these forums, it will be the end of them. Less of the personal attacks and more actual facts….

    Apparently using an AI post to highlight what one actually looks like is AI slop. Fair enough, and what I wanted to show here is what AI slop actually looks like. So I have deleted the slop. But I want to reiterate that my posts and my posts, and yes I use Google search to check facts etc. But that is that.

    Post edited by remfan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    You got a machine to produce that spew. There’s no way I’m going to bother even reading it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    excatly and I don't blame you - but that is what AI spew looks like and for the benefit of Dr Robert who seems to think my posts were AI spew too, what I type is what I type. And if people start using AI for these types of forums they will be destroyed. My reponses to your posts were my own and I suppose I am really struggling to understand why the Galway situtaion deserves to be addressed differently to every other city and town etc I referenced. Galway has a chronic traffic problem, anyone who lives here (and yes I am a real person) knows this. The same traffic in the city every day as goes up and down the M50. That is just incredible. And even more so is that places like Castlebar and Westport get dual carriageway connectivity and bypasses. This simply does not add up.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭remfan


    That was posted to highlight what AI slop is, my own posts are not AI slop. And I clearly noted that at the top of the post by the way. How do I report that I am being accused in the wrong?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I’ve told you the one major difference between Galway and every other city with a motorway bypass. This will be my last time repeating the same thing: Galway doesn’t get a “bypass” for the simple reason that there’s nothing much on the other side of it to justify a bypass. Almost all of the traffic on N6 just east of Galway is going to Galway.

    Galway’s traffic is overwhelmingly local. Most of it never leaves the city boundary. A road around the city will do exactly zero to help that situation. The solution to traffic inside the city is to improve roads inside the city, and that does not mean motorways - it means proper distributor roads that can function as bus and bike ways as well as traffic relief roads. This road is the wrong thing. Even the people who proposed this road said that it will make traffic worse within 15 years of opening. I am not anti-roads by any stretch, but I can see this is a colossal waste of money that would be better spent on any other road projects within the city.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    A road around the city will do exactly zero to help that situation. 

    If you coming from Barna to Parkmore in the morning and evening, as an example, it'll do wonders.

    Too many doom merchants regarding this road.



Advertisement
Advertisement