Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Waterford Airport.

1167168169171173

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 329 ✭✭lotusm


    Protest in Kilkenny over US billionaire investment in Waterford Airport https://share.google/9qxGqIsbmXIiVhHtV



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭914




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    Nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭robwen


    A bit misleading on the good people of Kilkenny..

    "Greenpeace International activists flew a ‘Stop the Billionaire Takeoff’ message near Kelcy Warren’s Irish estate in Co Kilkenny to what they claim is the “Big Oil bully’s takeover” of Waterford Airport"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,300 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    That only relates to the runway extension and carpark. The terminal is excluded from the application.

    I don't think I would tbh. Maybe a prelim budget. But the the likelihood of getting that right is pretty small. Given the runway cost are triple the estimate, and a hell of a lot simpler than a terminal.

    I'm sure there is something on paper somewhere. There was a masterplan 15 years ago. But it's definitely not at an advantage stage. The planning application happens relatively early on in the design process.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭gw80




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭Qaanaaq


    We could see an maintenance company such as Dublin Aerospace announce plans to build a maintenance facility in Waterford? They had floated the idea in the past and were keen to establish a facility in a regional airport other than Shannon. They would have limited expansion potential in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,986 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    It's certainly possible, and the proximity to the city and potential workforce combined with the availability of land around the airport is helpful in that regards.

    One drawback might be that the new runway wouldn't be able to handle widebody jets which could limit the potential customer base for a maintenance facility, but if it's an operator that already has a widebody capable base elsewhere then it could still work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    They have to design it in detail before they can apply for planning permission. Like I said, I believe it is at an advanced stage of design.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    The new runway will be able to handle widebody aircraft. Aircraft landing and take off performance are largely determined by weight, the lighter the aircraft the less tarmac needed. So a 747 with no passengers or baggage, (which would be the case for an aircraft inbound for maintenance) and not fully loaded with fuel should be able to operate off the new runway comfortably.

    Cork and Knock with similar size runways have handled 747's before with passengers, Knock even catered for a A380 landing for dismantling.

    The current proposed taxiway would be too narrow but a maintenance base built in a remote part of the airfield with a standard widebody Taxiway of 23m wide could work.

    I'm not saying it will happen now or even ever, I'm just saying the new runway even with displaced thresholds, shouldn't be a hindrance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 603 ✭✭✭Neworder79


    “One drawback might be that the new runway wouldn't be able to handle widebody jets”

    Not necessarily an issue as maintanance aircraft manoeuvring empty weight and short positioning fuel, but subject to upgraded taxiway/apron ILS etc. E.g. EirTrade receiving A330, 777 and an A380 at Ireland West which is 2500m.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭JohnC.


    Knock having an A380 landing there is irrelevant. It was a one way trip and would not have taken off again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    Talk about pedantic and splitting hairs, I can't believe I'm actually responding to this.

    That particular A380 was being dismantled so yes you could say it would not have taken off again considering it would be divided into a million pieces!

    With no passengers, baggage and a resonable amount of fuel an A380 would easily depart from Knock's 2300m runway, in fact I'd say it would need far less.

    The point remains that Waterford's new runway will be of sufficient dimensions for empty widebody aircraft to visit for maintenance if ever a facility was considered.

    British Airways widebody maintenance based is Cardiff Airport which has similiar runway dimensions to Waterfords new runway. Cardiff has also had an A380 land and depart previously.

    Either way I don't see one ever being built but then again who knows what the future holds!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭Fox Uniform


    I would expect the planning application to be submitted before the end of June. The priority has been to get the runway project underway, while the plans for the terminal are now largely complete. However, the terminal project has evolved into much more than a simple extension of the existing facility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭Dunmoreroader


    I had a good read of this, interesting reading. I hadn't realised that ther had been an objection from Beacon Hill Stables in Slieverue on the grounds they were situated under the airport approach flight path and the planes and their shadows might spook their horses. They're 10km from the runway, as the crow flies, not sure how high the planes would be passing over that far out. Might have been in the inspector's rebuttal but i didnt see it.

    Anyone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭Deiseen


    They would be surprisingly low, visible and noisy. But not loud enough to traumatise the horses, especially at the frequency they'd be coming in. The horses will adapt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    Aircraft flying an ILS (Instrument Landing System) approach at Waterford would fly a 3.5 degrees glide slope which equates to just over a 1000ft every 3 nautical miles. So an aircraft 10km out is about 5.4 nautical miles so should be at approx 2000ft. I don't imagine aircraft at that altitude would be an issue but I don't know enough about horses to be sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    You imagine the SAR would be much more of an issue, if its an issue at all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,300 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    They have to design it in detail before they can apply for planning permission

    No they don’t. Planning often changes the design (or kills a project) so there no point is designing it in full before it’s approved to proceed.
    Detail design is literally the design stage after planning. Loosely, it goes;

    Concept, Planning, Detail Design, Tender.

    Good to have a date outlined. You’d expect some imagery to be released at the same time.
    I’d imagine it will get tied up for a bit with council, ABP, etc. Terminal will need significant uplift once traffic it going. Makes complete sense to do it right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    I never said it was designed in full. The design is at an advanced stage towards submitting for a planning application. There is an incredible amount of detail in a planning application, hence it is at an advanced stage, it's a little further down the road than a concept drawn on the back of a beermat! Again, I'm a bigger fool for getting into this with you!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    Anyone remember Bergamo before Ryanair startedserving them? It was smaller than WAT. People seem to want Heathrow delivered out at Killowen in one go, before they will be satisfied.

    First principle, "let them land"!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Bards


    Seems as though everyone is looking for the slightest mistype to pick a fight on this topic...wish this was locked to only people from the South East to view and partake as it is on a regional forum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    Yeah my thoughts too, Kramer dissappears once he runs out of road only to be replaced by Mellor, who I suspect is the same person, hmm…anyone ever see the two of them together?..the plot thickens!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    Sometimes it's funnier to just leave ye to it for a few days and then come back in to read the comedy. Ye're expecting 747s and A380s now I see. 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Bards




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭Deiseen


    Interesting to read a previous post from you lamenting Galway Airport losing its PSO subsidy. Here's the direct quote from you. The bit in bold is very relevant to your contributions here:

    "The airport passenger fee seems to be a final effort to keep the airport going, but is there really any future for the facility now? Why the airport wasn't expanded years ago to accommodate bigger jets is beyond me,"

    So seems like risking taxpayers money on airports is fine, so long as they are close to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,728 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    i wont be happy until the space shuttle rocks up, so…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,300 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    The design is at an advanced stage towards submitting for a planning application.

    Except that's not what you said is it? You said the design at an advance stage, not the planning application.
    My first post simply pointed out they were hadn't lodged the planning yet. Would have been logical to point out then if you were only talking about the application and not the actual design. But you didn't, so your backpedalling is pretty transparent.

    There is an incredible amount of detail in a planning application, hence it is at an advanced stage, it's a little further down the road than a concept drawn on the back of a beermat!

    There is a lot of detail in a planning application. There's much more detail in a full design. Hence planning is objectively not an advanced stage. I'm not sure why you're knickers are in suck a twist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,300 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Seems as though everyone is looking for the slightest mistype to pick a fight on this topic...

    What mistype?
    I pointed out that it that the the design was still pre-planning stage. I've no idea why anyone felt the need to pick a fight over that statement. It's a pretty obvious.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Bards


    Here in Waterford (this is the Waterford City Forum) we all know exactly where the desgin is at in terms of planning as we have been following the redevelopment of the airport for years, we don't need others not from here telling us what we know and dont know



Advertisement
Advertisement