Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Bertie Ahern rejoins Fianna Fail

11113151617

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,634 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Oh but everyone else is at fault , obfuscating, looking for pesky sources to back up these generalisations .

    It would be laughable if it wasn't so pathetic .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,066 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Now who is obfuscating? If you brand and generalise an entire countries population as a problem for yours then you are being racist.

    The Bertie wasn’t qualifying his dogwhistling with stats he was generalising and stereotyping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    it’s not obfuscating. Nobody said all Somalians are thieves and criminals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,066 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If you are judging ALL Somalians (and please don’t pretend Bertie wasn’t doing the same) you are being Racist.

    Somalians, Congolese Irish etc all deserve to be judged as themselves.

    Bertie generalised implying they are all a threat.

    If you want to air concerns target those tasked with vetting (judging) before people arrive here.
    Of course that would mean Bertie targeting his own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,007 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Here's the whe he said in relation to people from a full continent, then country, then a whole religion.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/M57f40MnffA

    It's as racist set of comments as you'll hear - the very definition of the term.

    He wasn't caught off guard - he was either trying to get the persons vote by agreeing with their stance to them one to one (but perhaps not actually believing what he was saying - he has lied about things in the past so this wouldn't be surprising. Or he is genuinely racist, but perhaps usually more guarded about it.

    Either way the guy has lied to the public before and in the past has suggested people "commit suicide" should they pour negativity on the economy and of course doesn't hold a bank account.

    The guy shouldn't be anywhere near the public eye.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,364 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    Is Ahern still pissing it up in "Fagins", believe the heckling got to the point where he had a minder nearby.

    Is he finished with the old legover stuff, think the last charge was an old mate's widow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,936 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Bertie started with a broad "the Africans" which says it all. Then he got more specific with his generalisations e.g. Congo. It was entirely racist.

    How that racist crook avoided prison is beyond me - only in Ireland. Has he a bank account yet?

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    https://africa.ocindex.net/rankings

    Here is an EU-funded ranking system which has Congo as the country with the highest rate of criminality. Somalia is 10th.

    Do you have an alternative index to challenge these statistics?

    Perhaps Bertie was right to be concerned, perhaps he was aware of these statistics, and his concern was based on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,066 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Bertie's racism gets a pass because of his status as a FF member and former Taoiseach/leader of FF. No other reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    The thing is, I never mentioned both sides, I mentioned a continuum.

    There is a continuum from the pure unadulterated non-racist who would admit every refugee into the country, no matter their previous crimes and no matter how many of them are, and no matter how much of a threat they are, at one end of the continuum and Otto Moll at the other end of the continuum.

    Bertie sits somewhere in-between, so do I, so do most people, but we are not racists just because we are not at the very end of the continuum.

    The links I put up were to show that there is an academic debate in genuine academic circles about the effects of immigration on social cohesion. Starting that debate on here would have you labelled as a racist or a troll, but it is a real debate out there.

    If people continue to see every debate in a binary - you are a racist or you are not, you are a partitionist or a republican, you support genocide or you hate Israel - then we can never have meaningful discussion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,936 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Is your point that asylum seekers should be only coming from rich countries with low crime rates? Ideally white?

    What Bertie said was pure racism. People that cannot admit that are dishonest (or don't understand the word).

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,445 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    You alluded to it. You also invoked the holocaust to defend racism. You're even doing the both sides thing again now.

    Using the holocaust to defend racists is not reasonable discussion so you can ditch the fake concern.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    No, that isn't my point. You can argue it many ways. There can be more people coming from the Congo escaping high crime rates (but whether this meets the genuine refugee definition is another issue) or there can be people who have made money from crime economically moving for a better life, but bringing their personal culture of crime with them.

    The thing about asylum is that it is contextual, no two decisions are the same, because the context of the arrival in the foreign country is not the same. That context may include considerations around the high crime rate in the country of origin, and that may influence asylum decision-makers and that may give concerns over arrivals from particular regions or countries. That isn't racism.

    There are also other factors, if someone appeared tomorrow at Dublin Airport from the Congo, a public health question around Ebola might be made by an immigration officer that wouldn't have been asked two months ago. Context matters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    I didn't invoke the holocaust to defend racism. I am not doing both sides, I am explaining a continuum.

    No matter how you paint it, there is a huge difference between Otto Moll who was responsible for the racist genocidal elimination of thousands of Jews, and Bertie Ahern who has some concerns about criminality from the Congo. That is a continuum, that is not both sides.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,066 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    'The ones I worry about are the Africans, I agree with you on the Africans'

    'Meaningful discussion' or racism?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,445 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    So now you're pretending that people are comparing Bertie with actual Nazis? Who said this? Quote please.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,936 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are you on about? You clearly don't know anything about the asylum processing system.

    Firstly, do you actually think that asylum processing involves questions such as "what are the crime rates in your country?". They don't. The process focuses on the their reasons for seeking protection, fears of persecution (if returned home) and personal experiences in their home country. It's about individual risk and their personal situation. The conditions in a country are taken into account but only to see if their fears are well-founded. Nobody can be refused because their country is third world or has problems. The state carries out security and criminal screening checks but again that's individual.

    What Bertie said was blanket racism. The fact you are trying to deny that is mind boggling. Is there a single thread where you don't get out of your depth and run away?

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,362 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    There are different types of actions surely when it comes to racism. Criminal is one, attitude is another. Youre trying to deflect between Berties mindset attitude and criminal actions of violence, like beating up, unlawful imprisonment, murder, genocide etc. A racist mindset is dangerous in that those statements makes the violent ones feel empowered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    I didn't say that, I just explained the difference between binary views of the world and the continuum of viewpoints.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,445 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    You did. You're making up nonsense nobody said in order to defend a racist.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    No I am not, I am saying that there are different degrees of racism and a blurring of the lines where somebody might or might not be a racist, or might just have made some atypical racist remarks, and that a simple label of racist doesn't cover all scenarios.

    I have a problem with blunt labelling and blunt depictions which are common on here that do not reflect the blurred and opaque reality we live in outside of social media.

    Not all situations are therefore the same. If you disagree with me, and think all racists are the same, you are equating Duke and Moll to Bertie by implication.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,445 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There it is again. Making up more crap nobody said.

    The man's a racist, plain and simple. If you want to play silly games to defend him, go for it but it's quite obvious you're posting in bad faith.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    I am not making up crap, I am saying that I see the world as a continuum, that Bertie Ahern is no Duke or Moll. What is strange that those who just straight up label him a racist and condemn him from a lofty height, using the same invective they would against a Duke, can't tone down some of what they say about him.

    You may not understand my nuances, but I am not posting in bad faith.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,066 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What he said was racist, as pointed out by many.

    When he was talking he was a racist.


    What needs to be toned down?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,445 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    In other words, you were twisting other posters' words, ie posting in bad faith to defend a racist.

    Feel free to link the post comparing Bertie with Duke and/or Moll.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    No, I was not twisting other posters' words at all, you are misinterpreting my posts.

    At no point did I say that any poster directly compared Bertie with Duke or Moll. What I did say was that a person who sees things in black and white, i.e. either you are a racist or you or not, without any caveats, that person is putting Bertie in the same place as Duke and Moll, if they called him a racist.

    For people like me, who avoid generic labelling, and prefer a continuum or spectrum of thinking or behaviour, it is not useful to label Bertie as a racist and then shout down anyone who contextualises it and accuse them of defending a racist.

    Bertie Ahern is no Duke or Moll, can we agree on that? If we do agree on that, can we discuss degrees of racism, and spectrums of views?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,445 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    So you can't link any post of anyone actually saying that, ie you're talking sh*te.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,884 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Poster never claimed anyone actually said that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Folks don't want caveats here. It ruins their wanting to slate the man as an out and out racist, no different than some really vile career racists.

    Unless I am wrong, I can't recall any clear incidents with Bertie ever that would have any half educated person label him a racist.

    He has been slated now for this ONE incident where he clumsily worded what he was trying to convey, and of course, we have mischievous people jumping all over him, and not even able to discuss it with any type of context.

    To some he's a racist now forever, and screw his past and screw the fact that in decades of public service he never displayed any racism whatsoever. It's a horrible way for people to be, really. To be so damning of a person who said a few sentences and they now are taking glee is calling him a racist

    I said it earlier, there was a lady of color on a few days ago who said it perfectly….she said what he said could be perceived as racist, and was inappropriate, but that she would not auto-label him a racist based off it. She looked at it with context and logic. Too many people want to run with the hard line you're a racist!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,066 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What caveats are required?

    What he said was racist.



Advertisement
Advertisement