Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Bertie Ahern rejoins Fianna Fail

191012141517

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,230 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I'd disagree. Bertie stating that there is an issue with people based on where they're from or the religion they follow is most definitley racist. It is pretty much the definition of racism. But, if you don't see that then that would be an indicator of where your moral compass points!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,307 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    What Bertie said could be construed as racist language, or unwise language, but that doesn't make him a racist!

    coming from what is supposed to be one of the most seasoned and canny politicians in the country though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes, but thee is also context. It wasn't on national tv, or at a debate etc….he was caught off-guard, so to speak. Not saying it was wise what he said, as it wasn't really; but it was correct in my view.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,307 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    okay, one of the most seasoned and canny politicians alive was caught off guard in a context where he would be expecting to find people trying to catch him off guard. i've a bridge i'd like to sell you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    So you missed the part where I said it could be construed as racist langage….not sure what you're disagreeing with….

    My wider point was that labeling people racist has been utterly diluted lately.

    Few days ago there was a very articulate person of color on BOC radio show discussing Berties's comments who said pretty much what I said…that people can say things that can be perceived/construed as racist, but that doesn't always mean that the person is a racist!. This is what has happened to Bertie!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,230 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So he's not racist but comes out with racist comments. And he's not wrong in your view because of some language dilution nonsense. Okay!

    What he said is racist - no ifs or buts. There is no "might be construed" to it unless you want to excuse it.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    you’re exactly what’s all wrong with societal debate on racism. Straight to the racist card, straight to the jugular no matter how innocuous the situation…nobody is saying what he said was not racist, and was perfectly fine. But it was hardly ku klux klan stuff… you want to label him a racist based off this one situation

    MODE EDIT: Warned for attacking poster

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    again.. failing to even consider the context behind what he said. Straight to the “he’s a racist” card



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,230 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Ah so I'm the problem here?

    The thing is, I'm quite happy to discuss immigration, the asylum process and so on but again, I don't need to label an entire country or an entire religion as being in the wrong. To claim that there are issues with the next generation is just taking it to an entirely different level that the likes of Enoch Powell would look up to!

    I'm also confused. Previously you made the claim that "What Bertie said could be construed as racist language, or unwise language" and now you are telling ius that it is not "not racist" but just not in the same league as the KKK. So are you simply saying that he is just a little bit racist?

    As for me labelling him based on this one situation - how many situations would one need to be able to claim that someone who comes out with racist comments is racist?

    Ahern's comments were wholly inappropriate and there is no context that can justify them. I have never had a conversation where I felt the need to come out with comments about the people of a particular country or religion in the way that he did - have you.

    There is no justification for him saying what he said. He could have said that there are issues with the immigration system and how people claim asylum, etc but he didn't. To quote you, he went straight for the jugular with his comments!

    Maybe enlighten us to the context so. Tell us what it exactly was the context that justified him coming out with those comments and if you're tempted to tell us that he was trying to appease the person he was talking to, don't bother because we know he is well able to say something that is not offensive.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Ah so because it's racist comments said in private that's ok?

    Words don't change meaning depending on whether they are said on live tv, at a door while canvassing or down the local, racist comments are still just that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    You're confused because you want to lump in everything said as being racist, or could be construed as racist as the same. It is not the same….there are some truly vile racists out there, and not everything that is said has the same menace and nastiness as regards racism. So there are absolutely levels to racism as regards what is said and done!

    this is the huge issue with society. your take here is that what he said as regards taking refugees into Ireland from the Congo is no different than vile racists out there who say things like black people are sub-human etc…

    You're failing to even consider context here is the problem. Labeling people racist for thinking we should not be so free to allow them access to our country because of bbehaviors in their country, crime statistics etc is wrong..

    My take is simple: Bertie stumbled over what he was trying to say/convey, and used unwise language, (yes, inappropriate), but to label him a racist person based off this is both wrong and dangerous, as it whips up aggro and hostility.

    Ya wana' see actual racism, go watch some insta videos…..some absolute vile people out there



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,230 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You're confused because you want to lump in everything said as being racist, or could be construed as racist as the same. It is not the same….there are some truly vile racists out there, and not everything that is said has the same menace and nastiness as regards racism. So there are absolutely levels to racism as regards what is said and done!

    Again, it is my fault for interpreting racist remarks as being racist?

    There might be vile racists out there, of that I have no doubt. That is irrelevant when discussing what Ahern said though. And what he said was, without a shadow of a doubt, 100% racist.

    this is the huge issue with society. your take here is that what he said as regards taking refugees into Ireland from the Congo is no different than vile racists out there who say things like black people are sub-human etc…

    This is not an issue with society. It is an issue for those who want to be able to push the boundaries of what they deem acceptable.
    You are now trying to compare what he said against some extreme form of racism and tell us that what he said was fine. It wasn't and only a twisted person would think Ahern's comments were acceptable.

    You're failing to even consider context here is the problem. Labeling people racist for thinking we should not be so free to allow them access to our country because of bbehaviors in their country, crime statistics etc is wrong..

    But I didn't label them for that. I labelled him as racist for coming out with racist comments.

    My take is simple: Bertie stumbled over what he was trying to say/convey, and used unwise language, (yes, inappropriate), but to label him a racist person based off this is both wrong and dangerous, as it whips up aggro and hostility.

    So Ahern, who as we all know has never really had an issue telling us what he thought, was unable to put a few coherent sentences together and what he said came out as a racist rant? Ah ok - I must have misunderstood 🙄

    Ya wana' see actual racism, go watch some insta videos…..some absolute vile people out there

    Why TF would I want to see "actual racism"? FFS 🙄

    (even your "actual racism" phrase shows me your line of thinking on racism!)

    Anyhow, I'd done wasting time with you!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    MOD NOTE: A reminder to focus on discussing the topic rather than making it about other posters’ character or moral judgement.

    Please avoid turning the thread into personal attacks on other posters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Modern discourse has become deeply troubled by absolutes and the need to label. Degrees of difference are rendered meaningless in a context whereby nuance is invisible.

    Bertie Ahern is not a racist akin to the KKK or the Nazi Aryan Supremacy. He has always been clumsy with language, sometimes deliberately so to confuse and take a populist line. What he said was racist, but it was a one-off statement under pressure. It is not sufficient evidence to conclude that he is a racist - a person who believes that a particular race is superior or inferior to another.

    On the next generation issue, again, clumsy, but the point he was trying to make is that there can be issues around ghettoisation, cultural integration and societal cohesion. Those are sociological points rather than pure racism.

    https://www.routledge.com/Social-Cohesion-and-Immigration-in-Europe-and-North-America-Mechanisms-Conditions-and-Causality/Koopmans-Lancee-Schaeffer/p/book/9781138236004

    https://migrationresearch.com/taxonomies/topics-migration-consequences-for-migrants-sending-and-receiving-countries-transversal-consequences-social-cohesion

    Plenty of academic studies around this issue.

    Ahern is not an academic, more of a pragmatist, but his words would reflect some of the issues prevalent across the research.

    The problem is having a rational conversation on these issues, and finding a place to do this. I thought this might be the place, but increasingly, I am seeing that if you depart from the common narrative, from the absolutes (you must call Israel genocidal and you must denounce the US) and try and examine the nuances then you are jumped on.

    And to get to the point of whether Ahern was a little bit racist, yes, there are degrees and a continuum to racism. There is Auschwitz at one end and there are Berties comments at the other. They are not the same, they do not come from the same mindset, they are not equivalent.

    If you believe that all racism is equal, should Bertie be hung for his crimes like Otto Moll?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,445 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Both sides.

    You've dumped two links, one to a very expensive book, and said nothing about either of them.

    Ahern said something racist. Therefore, he is a racist. It's very simple. The only surprising thing is his saying the quiet part out loud. Invoking Auschwitz for your both sides is frankly disgusting.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,987 ✭✭✭yagan


    If the next house had a voter of African heritage bertie would be ingratiating himself with them about how important their contribution is to Ireland. He's two faced.

    Anyone minister of finance who didn't have a bank acc is dodgy as.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,067 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    f the next house had a voter of African heritage bertie would be ingratiating himself with them about how important their contribution is to Ireland. 

    As maybe. But for the few minutes he was at that door, he was racist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,634 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Just on those points b ...where did you get those very specific numbers ?

    Interested to know who or where is the source for that . If it's the immigration thread ,be careful, there have been some very confusing and misleading statistics thrown in there by some posters, since discredited . Also some people posting AI glop without understanding that the source of the statistics and verifiability is important .

    I am sure you have not just copied them from somewhere like that? 🤔 Have you ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,634 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    To encapsulate what you are saying here …

    It's alright for regular people to say racist things as long as they are not really racist .

    And sure in the world today it's not really that important! ???🤯



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    do you disagree with them? This is the kind of obfuscation you’re met with around these immigration debates.

    Does it really need to be spelt out to people in Ireland about Nigeria, a country that is world known as being not the most level of playing fields..

    Anyway, still no idea why lil Ireland, 1000s a miles away on western edge Europe has to be so open here. And what is our attraction to countries from Africa?! That’s why Bertie was spot on, albeit he could have worded it less controversially.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,067 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,634 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    It does need to be spelt out and accurate information posted otherwise it is fuelling misinformation and racist debate.

    So you have nothing to back up your shxxe posting ?

    How would you feel if you had family working in say eg Australia and some no mark was posting that all Irish people were thieves and criminals ?

    Its trash talk .

    If people have genuine reports and data from reliable sources they will be taken seriously and discussed otherwise unacceptable .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Somalia 34th out of 193 countries on the organised crime index and Nigeria 8th..

    So you keep moving goalposts and obfuscating. I’ll rely on statistics. And I’ll agree with Bertie’s take here on immigration to Ireland from some African countries!! And Congo ranked higher than both these countries.

    And to add: how would I feel if Ireland was labeled a country of thieves and criminals? Well, if we ranked very very highly on the crime list, I’d feel we deserved to be called out on it. Why on earth would the truth hurt here? And nobody, Bertie included said any country was a country full of thieves and criminals. You’re bringing this into it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Agreed, but saying we shouldn’t have an open door policy for the Congo is spot on!!! Which is what he said

    Oh, and what exactly was so racist? Did he mention color, did he mention anything that would be seen as dehumanising? Did he say black people are inferior? Or did he simply say that we shouldn’t have an open door to people from the Congo?

    On a scale of racism, how high was he really? I’d think quite bloody low; but to those who want to run with the racist racist angle, of course they’ll not try include any context



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,067 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    He targeted a specific group as a threat to this country. That is racism.

    You can try excuse it, dilute it, handwave, but that is what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,634 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Who's moving goalposts and obfuscating ?

    You have still not posted anything to back up those statistics yet your own statement .

    Come back to the discussion when you do …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    organised crime index figures..it’s listed on there.

    But like I thought, you’re only interested in obfuscating. No matter what statistics are presented, you will not accept. That’s obfuscating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,634 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Organized crime index figures from where ?

    Can you not see that that is the whole point ? Otherwise it's just walshb said this .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,067 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Accept what? That all people from Somalia are criminals?

    That’s the problem with racism (all forms or levels) it’s dangerous generalising.

    Have at discussing concerns, that is legitimate, but don't generalise or indulge racism, whoever does it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Nobody said all people from Somalia are criminals.



Advertisement
Advertisement