Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Irelands neutrality stance in WW2 unfairly criticized? (see Mod note 217)

11819212324109

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Dublin did not have blackouts, unlike UK cities. That alone would have made Dublin distinctive. The weather was good enough for a RAF plane, piloted by an Irishman ironically, to identify and shoot down a Luftwaffe plane over the Irish sea, on its way back to France.

    Also, during the infamous North Strand bombing of Dublin on the night of May 30-31st 1941, the sky was notably less cloudy than on previous nights. And the Luftwaffe planes circled beforehand and flew lower than any cloud level when dropping the bombs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "Why did the American want to extradite Hempel after the war?"

    They wanted him expelled probably to interview him. The evidence doesn't support any adverse finding that would have led to an indictment or marginalisation in post-war Germany.

    The Americans shielded many because they found them useful, it wasn't a 'moral' question for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The Americans had know that Hempel the Nazi had made thousands of radio transmissions during the war to Germany. Ever heard of "The American Note (1944)": The U.S. formally requested that Ireland expel the German and Japanese diplomatic staff, arguing the legations were actively used for intelligence operations against the Allies. Of course Dev refused.

    N.B. Interestingly, the people bombed in Dublin said they survived the war by (quote) " Listening to the wireless and to the songs that won the war…..”we’ll meet again”, “white cliffs of dover”, “wish me luck as you wave me golodbye”,"

    Quote "The artists they most favoured were, Vera Lynn, George Formby, Judy Garland, Gracie Fields, Bob Hope, Glen Miller, and many more."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    I already answered you on the American note.

    For instance, the intelligence co-operation was such that the OSS decided to ask de Valera for permission to use Irish diplomats in Berlin, Rome and Vichy as American spies.

    Carter Nicholas, the head of the Irish Desk at OSS headquarters, visited Dublin in September 1943 and talked to Joe Walshe, who secured de Valera's approval for the scheme.

    After the military blocked Gray's plan to ask for bases, he persuaded the White House just to ask de Valera to promise to make the bases available if they were needed but the British blocked this because they feared that de Valera would agree. Gray then suggested that Roosevelt should demand the expulsion of the Axis diplomats on the grounds that they were a threat to Allied plans for the D-Day landing.

    The request was purely a political ploy without any security basis, so the OSS felt this was none of its business. The British liked the idea, and a formal note from Roosevelt was read to de Valera by Gray on February 21, 1944.

    The note outlined help that the United States had given to Ireland over the decades and suggested that this was being repaid with an Irish policy that helped the Nazis. As "an absolute minimum", Roosevelt demanded that the Irish expel the Axis diplomats, because they afforded Germany an espionage advantage that was endangering "the lives of thousands" of American soldiers preparing for the Allied invasion of Europe. The note was worded to ensure de Valera's rejection.

    The story was leaked to the American press and a smear campaign was launched against de Valera in America, where the episode made front page news throughout the country during the week leading up to St Patrick's Day. Administration officials contended that the Irish should realise that diplomats were an espionage threat.

    De Valera saw red. Walshe went to London to warn Marlin that if the American divulged that Irish diplomats were being used as American spies, all co-operation would be cut off.

    At that point, the OSS intervened with Roosevelt to impress on him the extent of secret Irish co-operation and the second note was scrapped, but the damage had been done to de Valera's reputation in America. The episode has contributed to two great myths that de Valera was indifferent to the fate of the Allies, and that Ireland was actually neutral during the war.

    So the OSS actually had to reign in Roosevelt to stop him destroying a spy network the had built up in the Irish delegations in Rome, Berlin and Vichy.

    Interestingly, the people bombed in Dublin said they survived the war by (quote) " Listening to the wireless and to the songs that won the war…..”we’ll meet again”, “white cliffs of dover”, “wish me luck as you wave me golodbye”,"

    They were hardly tuning in to Joe Duffy now were they?

    The Second World War was a testing time for Radio Éireann but technological developments in the 1940s would make radio production more flexible.

    The Second World War (known as 'The Emergency' in Ireland) was a testing time for Radio Éireann. Censorship was rigorously enforced over all the Irish media between 1939 and 1945 under the Emergency Powers Act and, as a state run service and accessible overseas, Radio Éireann broadcasts received particularly close attention.

    War reporting was censored because of the policy of neutrality. Bulletins prepared by the tiny newsroom staff consisted of extracts from official communiqués without any comment. Before being broadcast, these news bulletin scripts were read over the phone to Head of the Government Information Bureau, Frank Gallagher. Before 1939, Mr Gallagher had been Assistant Director at Radio Éireann: he was now its censor.

    Neutrality brought other changes. All three Radio Éireann transmitters at Dublin, Cork and Athlone were synchronised onto a single frequency - this measure was intended to prevent the transmitters being used for direction-finding by aircraft.

    Furthermore, there was a prohibition on broadcasting weather forecasts, which were regarded as strategically important. Apart from the ongoing annoyance for farmers and fishermen, this policy meant, for example, that a sports commentator would have to omit an innocent phrase such as "it's a lovely day here today in Dublin for the football final".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Nothing to do with diplomats in Rome, Berlin or anywhere on the continent. The Americans and British knew from wireless transmissions that Hempel the Nazi in Dublin was relaying information to Germany. They wanted that stopped. It was costing them lives.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The idea that 'songs won the war' is quite something. No harm people talking about their memories, but a 7 yr old liking and enjoying a song is being taken wildly out of it's perspective in a silly emotive way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The elderly people bombed in Dublin said that during the war they enjoyed listening to songs by Vera Lynn etc. Did you think thety were dancing at the crossroads?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The American government officially wrote "Axis agents enjoy almost unrestricted opportunity for bringing military information of vital importance from Great Britain and Northern Ireland into Ireland and from there transmitting it by various routes and methods to Germany".

    They referenced radios being parachuted in to Ireland from Germany etc.

    Here is the full text of just one letter:

    Excellency,1
    Your Excellency will recall that in your speech at Cork, delivered on the 14th December, 1941,2 you expressed sentiments of special friendship for the American people on the occasion of their entry into the present war and closed by saying 'The policy of the State remains unchanged. We can only be a friendly neutral.' As you will also recall, extracts of this speech were transmitted to the President by your Minister at Washington. The President, while conveying his appreciation for this expression of friendship, stated his confidence that the Irish Government and the Irish people whose freedom is at stake no less than ours3 would know how to meet their responsibilities in this situation.

    It has become increasingly apparent that, despite the declared desire of the Irish Government that its neutrality should not operate in favor of either of the belligerents, it has in fact operated and continues to operate in favor of the Axis Powers and against the United Nations on whom your security4 and the maintenance of your national economy depend.5 One of the gravest and most inequitable results of this situation is the opportunity for highly organized espionage6 which the geographical position of Ireland affords the Axis and denies the United Nations. Situated as you are in close proximity to Britain divided only by an intangible boundary from Northern Ireland where are situated important American bases with continuous traffic to and from both countries, Axis agents enjoy almost unrestricted opportunity for bringing military information of vital importance from Great Britain and Northern Ireland into Ireland and from there transmitting it by various routes and methods to Germany.7 No opportunity corresponding to this is open to the United Nations for the Axis has no military dispositions which may be observed from Ireland. We do not question the good faith of the Irish Government in its efforts to suppress Axis espionage. Whether or to what extent it has succeeded in preventing acts of espionage against American shipping and American forces in Great Britain and Northern Ireland is, of course, impossible to determine with certainty.8 Nevertheless, it is a fact that German and Japanese diplomatic and consular representatives still continue to reside in Dublin9 and enjoy the special privileges and immunities customarily accorded to such officials.10 That Axis representatives in neutral countries use these special privileges and immunities as a cloak for espionage activities against the United Nations has been demonstrated over and over again. It would be naïve to assume that Axis agencies have not exploited conditions to the full in Ireland as they have in other countries.11 It is our understanding that the German Legation in Dublin, until recently at least, has had in its possession a radio sending set. This is evidence of the intention of the German Government to use this means of communication.12 Supporting evidence is furnished by the two parachutists equipped with radio sending sets recently dropped on your territory by German planes.13

    As you know from common report, United Nation military operations are in preparation in both Britain and Northern Ireland. It is vital that information from which may be deduced their nature and direction should not reach the enemy.14 Not only the success of the operations but the lives of thousands of United Nation soldiers are at stake. We request therefore that the Irish Government take appropriate steps for the recall of German and Japanese representatives in Ireland. We should be lacking in candor if we did not state our hope that this action will take the form of severance of all diplomatic relations between Ireland and these two countries. You will, of course, readily understand the compelling reasons why we ask as an absolute minimum the removal of these Axis representatives whose presence in Ireland must inevitably be regarded as constituting a danger to the lives of American soldiers and to the success of Allied military operations.

    It is hardly necessary to point out that time is of extreme importance and that we trust Your Excellency will favor us with your reply at your early convenience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Funny how the OSS didn't mention that when talking to Roosevelt. Are you suggesting that the Allied secret service had this information and willfully withheld it?

    Who cares what they were listening to, it has no relevance to anything. Are you sure they weren't listening to Marlene Dietrich and Lord Haw Haw seeing as we were all Nazi sympathisers according to you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 716 ✭✭✭myfreespirit


    @FrancisMc Genuine question: How can you be taken seriously when you so frequently post rumours and third-hand reports about what people might have said, as if these were proven facts?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    The German mission's transmitter was by agreement lodged in a bank with joint custody in December 1943.

    Tuesday, the 21st December, 1943
    Dr. Hempel called me on the ’phone this morning to suggest that he should tell Herr Thomsen to make contact with Mr. Boland and that they should jointly complete the terms of the arrangement we had discussed.

    I informed the Taoiseach on the ’phone that the transmitter was being handed over. I also informed G.2.

    Note
    Mr. Boland completed the arrangements with Herr Thomsen. He took Colonel Neligan3 to examine the set before it was put in its container. Colonel Neligan declared that every detail in the set was complete. Later, Mr. Boland and Herr Thomsen deposited the set in the Bank’s safe. The Department key is attached to this file.

    Memorandum by Walshe - Documents on Irish Foreign Policy - Volume 7 - 20/12/1943



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Yiou did not read my post or links, did you? If you did you would be aware there was of course more than one radio the Germans ever had. In the link above the American govt wrote in 1944, ( after your 1943 reference)

    " Supporting evidence is furnished by the two parachutists equipped with radio sending sets recently dropped on your territory by German planes." That is just 2 replacement ones that the Americans knew of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Two parachutists with radios are mentioned in my link as having been captured and in fact this was used to pressure Hempel into surrendering his transmitter.

    You obviously didn't read my link.

    If transmissions from the mission had continued this surely would have been known by G2 as well as Allied monitors.

    The proof of the pudding was in the eating, D-Day wasn't compromised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    As was known to the American officials, it is true that the German Minister had a wireless transmitter. But he had been for a long time debarred from using it, and it has been in the custody of the Irish Government for some months. As regards the two parachutists dropped in Ireland last December, they were apprehended within a few hours. Two other agents dropped here since the war began met with a similar fate. The fifth, who arrived during the first year of the war, remained at large until the 3rd December, 1941, but the police were aware of his presence here almost from the first moment of landing, and successful activities on his part were rendered impossible. The total number of persons, inclusive of these parachutists, suspected of intention to engage in espionage, and now held in Irish prisons, is ten foreign and two Irish nationals. These are the facts, and it is doubtful if any other country can show such a record of care and successful vigilance.

    Devs response.

    And what about Gray's role?

    In January 1943 Joseph P Walshe, secretary of the Department of External Affairs, offered to share Irish intelligence with the OSS. He was acting at the behest of de Valera, but US Minister David Gray objected. He argued that it might be some kind of plot by de Valera to charge the Americans with conspiring against the Irish government. Gray was overruled in Washington, but Marlin found working with him so difficult that he got himself moved to London, and continued his liaison with Irish intelligence from there.

    His own countrymen hated him.

    Carter Nicholas, the head of the Irish Desk at OSS headquarters, visited Dublin in September 1943 and talked to Joe Walshe, who secured de Valera's approval for the scheme.

    After the military blocked Gray's plan to ask for bases, he persuaded the White House just to ask de Valera to promise to make the bases available if they were needed but the British blocked this because they feared that de Valera would agree. Gray then suggested that Roosevelt should demand the expulsion of the Axis diplomats on the grounds that they were a threat to Allied plans for the D-Day landing.

    The request was purely a political ploy without any security basis, so the OSS felt this was none of its business. The British liked the idea, and a formal note from Roosevelt was read to de Valera by Gray on February 21, 1944.

    The OSS were against the Note being sent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    And yet by triagulation the Allies knew there was still radio communications from Hempel the Nazi to Germany. That is why the Allies objected to him so much and wanted to extradite him at war's end.

    As noted already, even in 1944, the Americans officially wrote

    "Axis agents enjoy almost unrestricted opportunity for bringing military information of vital importance from Great Britain and Northern Ireland into Ireland and from there transmitting it by various routes and methods to Germany".

    Hempel and by implication his friend Dev had the blood of Allied boys on their hands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Where was all this evidence when they had Hempel in custody? Non existent as they cleared him at the lowest level available.

    So German agents had access to various routes and methods to transmit to Germany? It doesn't seem to say the German legation was one of them.

    If the OSS were aware of this why did they object to the Note? If they could triangulate a signal to the Embassy why didn't they contact anyone about it? They had no problem asking to use Irish diplomats as spies and were glad of the help so asking us to shut down a German spy ring would have been easy.

    Maybe because Gray was a loose cannon that even his own people transferred away from him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Dev granted Hempel and other members of his staff asylum. Dev allowed him a week or two to destroy his records. He resisted requests from the Allies to extradite him, which would have led to a long internment in Nuremburg. Hempel did not return to Germany until 1949, until which time the heat of WW2 had died down and the Allies had enough to do trying to rebuild their economies and combatting the new threat - Communism and the threat from Moscow - and had little to gain from punishing Hempel at that stage.

    Americans wanted action from Dev when they wrote to him / his government in 1944


    "Axis agents enjoy almost unrestricted opportunity for bringing military information of vital importance from Great Britain and Northern Ireland into Ireland and from there transmitting it by various routes and methods to Germany".

    The milk was well spilt by the time the war had ended, and even more so by 1949.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    But according to you the Allies had proof he had blood on his hands. You say they had little to gain from punishing Hempel but the were prosecuting war criminals up until 2024 (a secretary at Stutthof got 2 years) but he was cleared.

    Gray was prone to Hyperbole also

    Gray caused a major diplomatic incident in December 1942 when he told a visiting American journalist that Ireland had “scores” of consular attachés from the Axis powers of Germany, Italy and Japan who were there solely for espionage purposes. He estimated that 80 staff alone worked in the German Legation

    The actual figure was 6 in total.

    Lets look at that info that was being sent

    German diplomats in Dublin had identified 600 air installations in England. Carter Nicholas, the head of the Éire Desk at OSS headquarters, noted that it “looked to me at first as though there was a serious leak from Éire”. The OSS promptly shared this alarming information with its British counterpart, MI5, but the British explained that the reports from Dublin

    were part of a British deception plan. MI5 had been feeding misinformation to the German legation. In an effort to ensure that the Germans believed the distorted information, the material was buried in a wealth of accurate information that the Germans already knew.

    When MI5 explained the situation, Nicholas realised that the Irish security “situation was even better under control that I had previously thought”.

    MI5 feared that the proposed American note demanding the expulsion of Axis diplomats from Dublin would actually endanger Allied security, as the Allies had already broken the German codes and were reading all the messages from the legation in Dublin. If the diplomats were expelled, however, the Germans might infiltrate a useful spy.

    Gray tried to sabotage Dev and nearly sabotaged his own side!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Thre were other ways to get information from Hempel in Dublin to Berlin rather than through various radio messages, as you are well aware. Hence the reason tthere were numerous radios, and roughly 12 German known spies were sent to Ireland during the war. These had to be parachuted or smuggled in by sea. There were other people as well collecting information for the Germans, for example extremist Republicans. The were other extremist Republicans in Ireland at the time other than collaborator IRA man Sean Russell, who died ( some would suspect was killed) on a German u-boat in mysterious circumstances. It is quite possible that the Germans had 80 people collecting information.

    Hence why the Americans officially said in 1944 "Axis agents enjoy almost unrestricted opportunity for bringing military information of vital importance from Great Britain and Northern Ireland into Ireland and from there transmitting it by various routes and methods to Germany".

    Note they said "by various routes and methods".

    And they wanted it stopped.

    And after the fiasco at Dieppe, the Canadians were furious too. All the Allies were furious at Dev. No surprise Dev sympathised with his good friend Hempel on the death of Hitler and refused the Americans access to Hempels records until Hempel had a week or two to destroy them. He then gave Hempel asylum and would not extradite him, as he knew he would be jailed in Nuremburg for a long time.

    Birds of a feather..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Source for this figure of 80 people collecting information ?

    The 12 spies were arrested within hours of landing apart from one who the kept under observation.

    Axis agents enjoy almost unrestricted opportunity for bringing military information of vital importance from Great Britain and Northern Ireland into Ireland and from there transmitting it by various routes and methods to Germany".

    You keep posting this whilst ignoring the fact that it was M15 who were feeding this info as a diversion and that the OSS didn't realise this. In fact the American letter nearly destroyed all the good work they had done and MI5 had to dissuade the Americans from pursuing the expulsion lest the Germans sent someone competent.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I don't think anyone in the country can deny that Dev's decision to remain neutral set the bedrock on which our role in the world has been built - as neutral peacekeepers who have done far far more good than bad.
    The majority are hugely proud of that record hence the fear of any government since to over rule or ignore it.

    Ireland suffered in the post WW2 war era as did many, neutral and combatant alike. However within a few years we had put WW2 behind us and so did the reasonable people of the world.

    If you disagree please tell us specifically with backed up fact why?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I said "It is quite possible that the Germans had 80 people collecting information". Considering the Germans landed 12 known spies in to Ireland, the IRA were collaborating with the Nazis - as we know from the Sean Russell episode - why would it not be possible? Was there internment here of German citizens do you think, similar to internment of Japanese in the States?

    If you have links on what M15 fed or did not feed the Nazi Hempel and his comrades in Dublin, for transmission by various means to Berlin, do provide those links.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    This thread is about our neutrality in ww2, which culminated in Dev being ridiculed around the world for being the leader who sympathised on the death of Hitler, 3 weeks after newsreels of Hitler's death camps were exposed to the world. Not our finest hour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    How many times have you said this now?

    I'm sure I'm not the only one sick and tired of you parroting it over and over again.

    Move on from it, the rest of the world has.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The thread title:

    is-irelands-neutrality-stance-in-ww2-unfairly-criticized

    Quite obvious from the thread that the decision and events can be spun if your goal is unfair criticism.

    If the stance specifically caused us long term harm, then point that out specifically, because it seems to me Ireland would have faced the same post war circumstances as any small newly sovereign country would have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Was correcting FrancieBrady post 622, who was trying to turn the debate in to post WW2 about neutrality - neutrality since WW2 - and obviously did not read all the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    By repeating something you have said probably 20+ times across this thread?

    I think everyone knows your views on it at this stage, the world has moved on, you should too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Part of the criticism is that Dev's decision 'held us back'.

    When asked for tangible examples of this that were directly related to staying neutral there seems to be silence coming from the critics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    It's also quite possible that it was nowhere near that number.

    Ireland was required under International law to arrest and intern belligerents who landed here.

    269 Germans were held in the Curragh and 45 Allied aircrew. The difference in figures was due to Allied crews being helped to cross the border into the North.

    There were few if any German civilians living here at the time as most of the Germans on the 1926 census had returned home following the completion of the Ardnacrusha power station.

    Let's look at what the OSS thought of Ireland during the war,

    Amidst this hysterical coverage, de Valera was depicted as indifferent to the Allies’ plight. Joe Walshe visited London and “protested vigorously” to J. Russell Forgan, who was acting head of European operations for the OSS in David Bruce’s temporary absence.

    “Although I agreed with him completely,” Forgan wrote to me in 1970, “I had to say that if we told the actual facts, all of the wonderful work that his intelligence services had been doing with the Allies would be ruined. He saw the point immediately.”

    The Irish had provided some “very useful” co-operation on intelligence matters, Forgan assured me. “In general, despite the American news media,” he emphasised, “the Irish worked with us on intelligence matters almost as if they were our allies. They have never received the credit due them.”

    Walshe proposed that the US station agents in Ireland “to keep in constant touch with Irish authorities on the problems, to receive reports from them, and to make recommendations for improving methods of surveillance.” Gray opposed this. It could be used “as a political means of wiping off the record” the stigma of de Valera’s refusal to dismiss the Axis diplomats, he warned Roosevelt on April 14.

    The OSS decided to station Ed Lawler in Dublin for the rest of the war.

    “The co-operation and information we received from the Irish was every bit as extensive and helpful as it would have been if Ireland had been a full partner with us in the war effort,” Lawler assured me.

    When the State Department considered a follow-up note, General William Donovan intervened. He informed the president about the secret Irish intelligence co-operation.

    “The co-operation in intelligence matters offered and given by the Irish has been very full,” Donovan stressed, adding that help from Irish diplomats on the continent had important potential. The second note was therefore scrapped.

    General William "Wild Bill" Donovan went on to found the CIA.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    And other criticism was his controversal condolences on Hitler, condemned around the world. And the fact the mid Atlantic gap cost the un-necessary loss of Allied lives.

    Post war we were given the cold shoulder, even the Russians stopped us joining the UN until 1955 even though we applied in 1946.



Advertisement
Advertisement