Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

14950525455114

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,692 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Your idea was stupid, not feasible and would solve nothing. Just accept that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Two years ago this week, Bohemian sold out a fixture with a Palestinians women's team in support of the country.

    There is massive support for Palestine in Ireland, and within Celtic Park. And the connections between Ireland and Israel go without saying.

    I'm not saying now, nor did I say it then that it would be straightforward or easy to arrange, but it definitely could be done if the will was there given friendies between clubs and countries have been held even recently. And two fixtures between the teams to avoid Ireland playing Israel, even if it was Jock Stein and Packie Bonnar along with some tea-ladies would receive massive support given the cause.

    Ireland played Grenada this evening on a weekend where there was a full slate of premiership soccer in Scotland and England so dont pretend this game couldn't happen during the regular international break.

    You guys will have to stop saying it was stupid when all you're basing that on is your own biased opinion when in reality, you are no closer to the decision makers with respect to this than I am.

    Even if it was stupid (it wasn't) given it would allow the FAI to take a morally principled stand, it would be more than justified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    1. The Bohemians v Palestine game drew a crowd of 4500. It was in Dalymount, not Croke Park. Context is everything. Yes there is plenty of support/solidarity etc with Palestine. That doesn't translate to desire to watch the Celtic under 19s for €100 a pop.

    2. Two friendly fixtures between Ireland and Celtic would not happen for the multitude of reasons outlined by several people. They are cold hard FACTS, Not opinion.

    3. The will to do this is also not there at any level as the FAI will not go for it. UEFA supply the money to Pay the bills. Thats FACT.

    4. Two friendly fixtures between Ireland and Celtic are not going to generate €15,000,000 for the FAI. Never mind all the other issues a boycott would create going forward.

    5. There is very little appetite for international friendlies anymore. Hence the nations league concept was developed about 10 years.

    6. IRELAND played a Grenada team last night, 100% correct. International Teams can arrange friendlies whenever they chose but the clubs are not obliged to release their players to play these games outside of international windows. Totally irrelevant to your argument. The attendance was 862.

    7. FAI have signed up to the nations league as a UEFA member and are contractually obliged to play Israel, Austria and Kosovo home and away. They cannot go off and play games against Celtic instead.

    8. Your idea was utterly stupid. Has no basis in reality, solved nothing, Was not going to generate money on the scale required, THE Celtic Park game would not be sanctioned by the Scottish FA (a legal requirement) and does not resolve the myriad of other issues a boycott would create.

    9. Thats not a morally principled stance, its just you virtue signalling from your ivory tower. It won't affect you so the FAI should do what you believe is the right thing to suit your own personal beliefs and to hell with the consequences for others, they can just suck it up .

    Post edited by Paddy_Mag on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    You keep stating that opinions are not evidence, yet all you have is your opinion about the idea of mythical fixtures which you expect people to take as some sort of fact based solution. So you are just a hypocrit. You want people on here to accept your idea and you ignore the multitude of major issues that would need to be resolved

    People havent just disagreed with it, they pulled it apart for all the multitude of issues that need to be resolved, issued which you seem to accept exist, but have not offered a single solution to.

    I have never once advocated on behalf of Israel. So you are just a liar. Supporting the FAI decision and Irish football (LOI and international team) does not equate to supporting Israel.

    Given that Austria are the biggest pro Israel country in Europe, should the FAI refuse to play them too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I love the whole “my beliefs are not the subject” yet I will mock you as a virtue signaller in your ivory tower hypocrisy.

    Posters aren’t stupid, it’s clear to see how people feel truly fell about any criticism of the Israeli regime even if they refuse to state it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Wanting the FAI to take a stand that someone themselves is not prepared to take is virtue signalling from their ivory tower.

    If supporting the FAI decision to fulfil the fixtures equates to being Pro-Israel then surely buying products with Israeli developed tech (phones for example) is another example of someone being Pro-Israel? In fact I would go as far to say its literally funding Israel given the money thats generated through phones sales

    Or is it only the causes that suit some peoples agenda that define someone as being pro-Israel?

    Surely if Israel are to be banned on the world stage, then that means anything and everything with a link to Israel needs to be boycotted? So are those on here calling on a FAI boycott willing to be whiter then white in their own lives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Until you state your actual beliefs on the situation that has people calling for a boycott I’m not going to take you as a serious poster, your deflections on the matter are clear for all to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    FiFA are members of the IOC and implemented IOC rules that apply to it as a member.

    The CAS ruling centred on security concerns re: the Russian FA and the orderly running of competitions. It was very clear that the Russian FA were NOT responsible for their government invading Ukraine.

    As things stand, there are no similar concerns over the Israeli FA. Their games are being played without much difficulty, albeit some are moved to alternative venues.

    People need to set aside politics when thinking about this. There are plenty of precedents re: countries involved in war, human rights abuses etc etc playing in FIFA competitions. Iran is travelling to the USA for next months World Cup. DPRK has never been expelled. In the past, the USSR, who are beloved by many of posters on boards, were never banned.

    This is not to say that FIFA or anyone else supports these countries - its the way world sport is organised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Am I not allowed to post on boards unless I make a self declaration? Where is that in the forum charter.?

    My deflections are no different to other people who refuse to accept reality. The same people who will no doubt use products or services linked to Israel be it tech, pharma, insurance etc. So they directly fund Israel but want the FAI to take a stance for morals . I may be a lot of things but im not a hypocrit

    .

    .

    1000010931.jpg

    .

    .

    .

    My beliefs are i dont think the FAI should boycott the games and commit themselves to the serious financial implications that brings. I dont for a second believe the FAI boycotting two games will lead to some international swell of support which will result in Sanctions against Israel. I think it is pie in the sky stuff right now.

    Israel has serious political backing from Washington which is why I believe sporting bodies across the World shy away from sanctioning Israel for the last 31-32 months, the same bodies who took a matter of just hours to ban/exclude Russia in 2022.

    Take FIFA, IOC for example. FIFA World Cup starts next month co-hosted by USA, the next Olympics are in Los Angeles in 2028.

    Money talks.

    This very week, National broadcasters of Five countries boycotted the Eurovision, for example. Last night Israel finished 2nd. 50% of that vote is a public vote. The event carried on as normal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    But if Ireland is suspended by FIFA/UEFA, NOBODY will be allowed play them. Celtic are not going to take a ban from competitive football incl. Sciottish PL and CL, to play two friendlies against a banned Ireland.

    You also over estimate the interest in meaningless friendly games.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    Tell Me How - Are you based in Ireland? Boards is zn Irish site. Many of you posts appear to resemble AI type posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,382 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I suppose the idea would be Bohs would arrange a friendly to make up the lost revenue Celtic would have, then Ireland arrange a friendly with Bohs to cover their losses and the trio just keep each other afloat with meaningless friendlies......that'll show Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    But it demonstrates a complete lack of knowledge of how sport works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Yup 100%

    But im in the wrong for suggesting its virtue signalling from ivory towers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Thats not totally true, if Ireland are suspended by UEFA and/or FIFA, they can still play friendlies like Russia have been doing but those games Russia have played have been against South American, African, Middle Eastern or former Soviet bloc teams.

    Serbia the only European team to play them.

    It will be very difficult to arrange games against teams that will attract crowds though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,692 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Unfortunately morally principal led stances don't pay mortgages, rent, bills or put food on the table. Your stupid idea would generate some revenue but it would be a lot less than the Nations League matches. So it would cost the FAI money, endanger future income and people would lose their jobs. Those are the facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,741 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Believe it or not I am in agreement with you

    The FAI is between a rock and hard place over this. If there are financial sanctions applied to the FAI, Eamon and Brian and others opposed to the games going ahead won't be underwriting the losses incurred to an organisation that is in dire straits financially. So that's why I am leaning towards having the game played. Hopefully Ireland repeat what they did against Grenada last night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,894 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    The posters who think we shouldn’t play Israel have no interest in Irish football. The idea 50000 would pay to see Ireland play Celtic twice is ludicrous



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,071 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It was a stupid idea, I'm amazed it's still even being argued about or defended.

    But just to add another item to the it's stupid pile.

    UEFA would never sanction the match and Celtic would be putting their CL participation at risk.

    It's OK if you know 0 about football, you can argue the match on the ethics/morality and whether Ireland should be part of UEFA/FIFA or not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    UEFA dont have to sanction the match.

    The FA of the host country would have to. The Scottish FA won't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    You’re allowed to post whatever you like but doesn’t mean people need to take you in any way seriously.

    The people you argue against have some beliefs, express them and aren’t ashamed to state them. You just want to say “my beliefs aren’t relevant” despite you giving your opinions for pages and pages. If your beliefs are irrelevant why are engaging so much?

    If you said you condemned the genocide but don’t believe that this is the best way to seek real change that would be something but you refuse to do that and instead deflect to “ivory towers”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    I engage because its a discussion which involves something im a massive fan of (Irish football), which would be decimated if the proposed boycott went ahead and the boycott will, IMO, make little to no difference.

    When people want the FAI to boycott games but are unwilling to hold themselves to the same moral standards, then IMO that makes these people virtue signalling hypocrits and they can hardly be taken seriously when they live their lives using Israeli produced products.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    You make good points about Irish football and the pitfalls @Paddy_Mag but your other shtick makes little sense .

    We live in a global system, stuff we use comes from everywhere. People living in the modern world and participating in it doesn't preclude them from voicing an opinion about a country committing a genocide without any sanction.

    I wouldn't have a clue what countries "tech" is in my phone or laptop, should I? If I was playing an Israeli team I'd be for sure having serious reservations about it though, because it isn't at all the same thing.

    Owning a laptop doesn't make it hypocritical to call out a country butchering tens and thousands of innocent people. Your pov would render anything to mere "virtue signalling" and surely you couldn't be that cynical.

    Is your argument that we cant criticise Saudi or Iran because we use petrol? Can we not criticise Russia because we use natural gas? Or China because we use....well...anything? Id say 99% of Ireland was using British goods in some shape or form when we were fighting them for independence, where does that leave the WOI?

    And even still what is going on in Gaza is different to these countries and scenarios because almost all international investigators/ aid organizations/ human rights groups on the ground are telling us this is genocide, as if we didn't know it already. And nobody is doing anything about it due to fear - but this will make the world so dangerous for us all if this becomes normalized.

    To add legs to the analogies, the Nazis and Japanese horrific experiments on their captives which yielded medical discoveries, should we not take certain lifesaving vaccines, for example, because of their evil origins? Is it virtue signalling to get a cholera vaccine and say the holocaust was wrong? Obviously I'm exaggerating but it's the same logical argument.

    There is a symbolism behind playing an international match that is different than participating in modern life. If you don't use a phone because it has Israeli tech, who cares.
    However, if country A pulls out an international fixture at a serious potential cost to itself (as you are spelling out here well imo), due to a genocide country B getting away scott free with committing genocide, that does matter.

    Israel aren't doing all these hijinks at the Eurovision because they don't care about their reputation. It matters deeply and them getting away with this requires everybody to stay in line.

    And I actually agree we should fulfill the fixture btw, though would 100 percent understand if the players and staff didn't want to.

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,681 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Unless make a stand against genocide, what is the point in playing the genocidal maniacs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Owning a laptop doesn't make it hypocritical to call out a country butchering tens and thousands of innocent people. Your pov would render anything to mere "virtue signalling" and surely you couldn't be that cynical.

    Some poster(s) keep implying because I support the FAI decision to fulfil the fixtures because of the consequences if they dont equates, to me being pro-israel, so by that logic, people who use Israeli good/services are equally pro-Israel?

    Dunnes Stores and the boycott of South African goods in the 80s was brought into the argument in support of the FAI boycotting the games, so why are people being very selective in what gets boycotted (ie only things that dont impact these people are to be boycotted)

    Surely a mass boycott of Israeli products worldwide and the financial losses they would incur would be a far more powerful and direct course of action then the FAI taking the financial hit?

    Why should Irish football suffer the consequences of a boycott when those calling for a boycott are not willing to take the same moral stance closer to home?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,681 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    ^^^

    Why should I take a hit in a boycott if no-one else takes it as well….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Well I don't think you come across like that from what ive seen , but some of the other people backing you up are of an assortment of oddballs on this site supporting Israel mass killing, and slurring people (and this country) for speaking up about it or showing the most basic level of humanity towards Palestinians. I'm sure you are incorrectly getting tarred with the same brush.

    Even still - the arguments against the big playing aren't the same as using a laptop or phone - the symbolism of not playing is damaging to Israel and they'd be **** it if more countries followed, or Ireland's stance gained traction with Irish America - hence their shameful slandering of our country that they engage in, above all others who are even more critical than us.

    They aren't a massive, highly resourced country like Russia or Iran who can go it alone, they need the acceptance and support of the West far more.

    But you make good points of course the fate of the FAI and staff will have to factor into ay decision.

    You are not wrong about hitting Israel in the pocket too - there is a law sitting with the government that targets Israeli made goods on occupied land that would do just that. But we get similar stories about how virtue signalling it is etc. from these same people, so would think people assume you are at more of the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Israel have political backing from Washington, they are a key ally of the USA in that region. So they will maintain that support long term.

    Anything else is largely irrelevant.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Whats the point of a selective boycott?

    Its a bit like going on a diet to lose weight and cutting out Cadbury chocolate but not nestle chocolate.



Advertisement
Advertisement