Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Irelands neutrality stance in WW2 unfairly criticized? (see Mod note 217)

16791112109

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,244 ✭✭✭growleaves


    That wasn't very sporting of them?

    If my best friend was in trouble and needed my help I wouldn't make him re-mortgage his house and sell everything he owned in return for my helping him.

    Of course Roosevelt needed Britain to be severely weakened for the United Stats to effectively replace British and European power on the world stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    He played no one.

    German couldn't have held Ireland it, they didn't have the appropriate resources. England didn't need to.

    The ports would have been useful for a short while but were not essential.

    People try to big up Irelands (and Devs) wartime importance, it was mostly irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They didn't want a single dominating power in Europe…never did and they intervened to stop it happening.

    Didn't matter if the Germans rolled into Poland or anywhere else.

    Read history without the union jack specs on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,005 ✭✭✭almostover


    One has to take a nuanced viewpoint of our Neutrality during WWII. Ireland in 1939 was a nation of agrarian paupers. It was less than 100 years after the famine. Less than 20 years after a very bloody war of independence which was followed by a short but bitter civil war. We then were economically blockaded by Britian, and yes much of that was the fault of our own government. The decision to stay out of the war has to be viewed in that context.

    I lean towards the Neutrality decision being the lesser of two evils, but only just. It was what was right for Ireland at the time even if that meant staying out of what was a genuinely just war effort in Europe by the allies. There was too much distrust in Churchill too whose behaviour during the negotiations of the Anglo Irish Treaty probably made that decision easier for the Irish government of 1939.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Germans rolled into a few places before Poland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes. And eventually the British, who had a foreign policy of preventing the domination of Europe by a single power moved to stop them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I think nobody except the Axis powers wanted a big country like Nazi Germany dominating Europe? I do not think we even here in Ireland wanted that, even though one of your fellow Republicans, and someone commemorated by the party you follow S.F., Sean Russell, did try to co-operate with Nazi Germany, before he was killed (or at least died) on a german U-boat?

    I do not think even Dev would have wanted Europe dominated by Hitler, although he did go out of hios way to express condolences on his death, which took some guts when the rest of the world was after watching the horrors of the extermination camps on News Reels. Maybe if you take off your green tinted specs you can see that? (you accused me og u.j. specs).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Except he didn't do that. He went to Hempel's house to offer asylum which he took up! You've called him a Murder and a Holocaust denier without any proof. You just want to turn this into your soapbox against Dev.

    Again I'll ask what form should Ireland's participation in the War took?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Dev's administration interned IRA members without trial and established military tribunals that executed several IRA men during the war.

    It is also well known that De Valera offered condolences on the death of Hitler. It caused outrage around the world.

    I think the prudent thing for Ireland to have done in the war, if we were to have sat on our hands during the first few years of the war, would have been to allow the Allies ( perhaps the Canadians or Americans) build an airfield near Belmullet or West Cork if they wanted to ( airfields were frequently built during the war ) in mid or late 1943 when it was becoming apparent the Allies would probably win the war. They may have said f*** you to Dev at that stage, but it would still have saved Allied lives and been a nice gesture. We would not have been so isolated in the world in the 10 year period after the war, after Dev expressed his condolences over Hitler, when most of the free world hated us and even Russia blocked our entry in to the UN.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,244 ✭✭✭growleaves


    "Dev's administration interned IRA members without trial and established military tribunals that executed several IRA men during the war."

    Okay and what do you think about that?

    You're throwing it out there but what exactly is your opinion on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,244 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Why do you keep repeating that DeValera is responsible for executing members of the IRA?

    Are you sad he executed members of the IRA?

    Are you glad he executed members of the IRA?

    Are you opposed to capital punishment? Why do you keep bringing it up? What does it mean?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The question I posted / implied is if it was wrong for the British / northern authorities to do it, then surely it was wrong for Dev and his government to do it?

    I think in those desperate times internment of some sort was necessary, because the IRA in 8 months alone caused roughly 300 acts of sabotage and explosions, leading to 10 deaths and nearly 100 injuries.

    Executing some IRA in jail seemed to have worked as a deterrent because Dev did it and it seemed to work? There was little or no outcry. And much less if any trouble in the final years of the war than in 1939 / 40? Perhaps Dev had been instructed by Churchill / the Canadians and Americans to stop IRA violence and sabatage, because the free world had much bigger things to concentrate on? What do you think?

    Would like to know what others thought of internment but I guess nobody will think it was a good idea or necessary.

    I do answer questions, unlike some other posters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    How has this anything at all to do with our neutrality?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The thread title is about Irish neutrality during the war. We were speculating that perhaps Dev had been instructed by Churchill / the Canadians and Americans to stop IRA violence and sabotage ( there were about IRA 300 explosions / sabotage in 1939 / 1940 in Britain ), because the free world had much bigger things to concentrate on? Hence perhaps why internment without trial happened by Dev, and some IRA were executed. The other poster asked me what I thought about it.

    As I said, I do answer questions, unlike some other posters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Isolated? Wasn't protectionism Ireland own policy. It held the country back until it was abandoned. Took Ireland a while to realise it need to trade with England and others to move forward. Maybe time needed to pass. Ireland seemed to be stuck in the past after WW2. Maybe I'm mistaken. But it seemed a backwards place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,174 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    in 1939 what did our military consist of ?

    Sources differ but one suggests we had as few as about 19,500 active personnel. We had a chronic shortage of weapons and other equipment too at that time for those 19,500. Our economy at that time was in a depression, so given those factors what could we have done ?

    All the above basically in no small part down to the way we’d been treated by the British…

    So not unreasonable that we sat it out. Beyond sending men in a cannon fodder, what could we have done ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    What was the alternative to Internment in wartime in neural country? Seemed common practise at that time in history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    No, You were speculating for reasons best known to yourself



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I do not think there was any alternative but for Ireland to intern IRA people then, which Dev's government did do. Perhaps there should have been some sort of a trial though?

     I wonder did Churchill and/or the Canadians and/or the Americans put pressure on Dev to stop IRA violence and sabotage then though, by introducing internment and even some executions?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    But the weren't executed for being IRA members. They were executed for the murder's of Gardai, and there were 9 other executions of non IRA murderers during the war, were they on Churchills wishes also?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I do not think your link details the executions during ww2, or even says there were 9 other executions on non-IRA during the war? On wiki it says

    Increased IRA activity during the state of emergency in World War II led to six executions. "

    "Five were shot by firing squad after sentence by military tribunals under the Emergency Powers Act 1939.  Of these, Maurice O'Neill (Irish republican) and Richard Goss had shot but not killed Gardaí": 

    Elsewhere on wiki it says  O'Neill was one of seven IRA men executed in Ireland between September 1940 and December 1944

    Whatever about executions ( and executing IRA men who had shot but not killed Gardai is a pretty tough deterrent ) , the question wondered was did Churchill and/or the Canadians and/or the Americans put pressure on Dev to stop IRA violence and sabotage then, by introducing internment and even some executions as a deterrent? It greatly seemed to have stopped the number (about 300 in 1939/40) of IRA bombs and sabotage in Britain anyway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Why would they build an airfield in Belmullet in 43 when they had Base One Europe in Derry since 1941 (where my wife's grandfather was based).

    You keep posting that Times article but all it shows that the Irish government received letters over the rumor that Dev signed a book of condolence. Here is the actual account of what happened from the man himself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,059 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    you are just entertaining a poster who has lost the main argument and who now wants to pivot to wild speculation based, yet again, on nothing but fantasies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Not sure about the distance from Belmullet to Derry as the crow flies, but by road it is 261 km. From Derry to west Cork would be even further. Planes could have narrowed the mid Atlantic gap that bit sooner if they were based further west.

    I said "I think the prudent thing for Ireland to have done in the war, if we were to have sat on our hands during the first few years of the war, would have been to allow the Allies ( perhaps the Canadians or Americans) build an airfield near Belmullet or West Cork if they wanted to ( airfields were frequently built during the war ) in mid or late 1943 when it was becoming apparent the Allies would probably win the war. They may have said f*** you to Dev at that stage, but it would still have saved Allied lives and been a nice gesture. We would not have been so isolated in the world in the 10 year period after the war, after Dev expressed his condolences over Hitler, when most of the free world hated us and even Russia blocked our entry in to the UN."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 716 ✭✭✭myfreespirit


    Anyone who believes that Great Britain "acts in the interests of the free world" is living in cloud cuckoo land. British leaders and the British military have always and will always act in the interests of Britain. As the saying goes - countries do not have friends, they have interests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,125 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Why would road distance between them matter when we're talking about airbases? US planes were travelling via the North Atlantic route via Greenland so would have to pass over Derry to reach Belmullet/West Cork. As it was the US and UK were allowed to use both Shannon and Foynes for non-military purposes and many officials transited through both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Range south matters covering the southern convoys and U-boat transits from France.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Was declaring war on Nazi Germany after Germany invaded Poland not in the interests of the free world? The Polish certainly thought so. Those who the Nazi did not send to the extermination camps.

    Second question - which I am sure you will not answer either - is what would the world be like if nobody challenged Hitler? If the British had sat on their hands like Dev did?

    Third question: Would Hitler have expressed his condolences on the death of Dev if Dev were to have died first?

    Fourth question: did Hitler ever express condolences on the death of any of the 6 million plus victims of the extermination camps?

    No wonder even the Russians shunned us for 10 years after the war.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,555 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Sometimes they align. It's why countries ally with each other.



Advertisement
Advertisement