Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

14647495152114

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    A former Israeli PM, (not sure which one) wrote that the single biggest thing they were afraid would turn public sentiment in Israel against the war effort was if their football teams were banned from international games.

    They absoutely would not be delighted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Ireland going on a solo run boycott while other countries happily play them wont get them banned. It just hurts Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Except you dont know that this would be the case. You just claim it would be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Zero chance of them being banned from international games. You're delusional if you think that. Have you seen the head of Fifa? . He's in the US, and therefore Israels pocket.

    Anyway, the US are hosting the games ffs. Israel aren't a patch on them. Whey didn't they lose the world cup I wonder? 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Being banned by UEFA would also mean they were banned from international games, from the perspective of the Israelis.

    And I'm under no illusion as to Infantino's mindset or influence. I saw the BS he went on it with the Peace award and him going to Trumps Board of Peace announcement. And trying to stronger a Palestinian representative in to a photo shoot with an Israeli.

    Its precisely because of things like that that we are having this discussion. The authorities have failed to act in the way they should have acted and so people must use their voice as they can.

    Ireland refusing to play Israel would force UEFA to act and to either support the genociding nation or stand up to them by acting against a country with moral courage.

    Your position and that of most arguing similarly in here is to give bullies a pass, if they are big enough bullies. What sort of message does that communicate?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    And you claim Ireland refusing to play of their own accord would get Israel punished instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I've never made that claim.

    I've said it would be a step "towards" them getting punished.

    And there are times when you have to take a step in the right direction, even if you don't know the outcome. If you have morals you are willing to stand by.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    UEFA would simply apply their rules and ban the FAI from the Nations League and suspend the club's participation in European competitions.

    SIPTU would then be complaining about job losses, but I can tell you one thing for certain, those that are in favour of the boycott won't pay to keep those people in jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    UEFA "could", not UEFA "would" but in doing that, they'd have to put it on the record that they are supporting a genocidal country which is actively attacking several more of its neighbors.

    And theres no guarantee there would be job losses within the FAI as a direct consequence of UEFA's actions. There "could" be but it is far from a fact that it would happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    They wouldn't be supporting a genocidal country, they would be implementing their own rules on failing to fulfil a fixture. These are the rules from the Euros, a similar rule would apply in the Nations League. No escaping punishment, it is automatic.

    "30.01

    If an association refuses to play or is responsible for a match (including kicks from the penalty mark) not taking place or not being played in full, the UEFA Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body declares the match forfeited by the association concerned. Moreover, if the circumstances of the case so justify, the UEFA Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body may impose any further disciplinary measures deemed appropriate on the association concerned, including the disqualification from the competition.

    30.02

    The UEFA Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body can validate the result as it stood at the moment when the match was abandoned if the match result was to the detriment of the association responsible for the match being abandoned.

    30.03

    If an association is disqualified during the competition, the results of all of its matches are declared null and void, and the points awarded forfeited.

    30.04

    If an association that has qualified for the final tournament does not compete, the UEFA administration may replace it and, if so, decide which association takes its place according to the results achieved by the associations eliminated previously.

    30.05

    An association which refuses to play or is responsible for a match not taking place or not being played in full loses all rights to payments from UEFA.

    30.06

    Upon receipt of a reasoned and well-documented request from the aggrieved association(s), the UEFA administration may set an amount of compensation due for financial loss."

    See 30.05, in bold, there will be job losses if we refuse to play, that is inevitable. Own the fact that you are putting people out of a job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,432 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    Israel is very concerned the "solo run" could become global and broad-ranging across more sports, culture, and economics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    Most of your arguments appear to be centred on a belief that national sports teams represent national governments rather that national sports federations - and so national teams can be held accountable for the governments actions.

    At the moment world sport is largely organised on the basis that national sports federations must be independent from their governments. Is this something you believe should change?

    For example, in the case of soccer, do you believe Irish international teams should be fielded directly by the Dept of Communications, Culture & Sport and/or Sport Ireland instead of the FAI?

    In past eras this was the case in some communist countries. But I dont think there is any appetite in the sporting community to have apply this worldwide in all sports, so your flogging a dead horse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You're going to quote rules on this?

    How about this one?

    Article 64 (2) of the FIFA Statutes (“Member associations and their clubs may not play on the territory of another member association without the latter’s approval.”)

    That is what people are asking for, that FIFA, UEFA (who sit under FIFA in the hierarchal structure of Football governance) apply their rules.

    If they are ignoring this rule but enforcing other rules to punish countries who refuse to play Israel, then let them own that irrefutably. Not this insistence of what would happen when that is only threats at this point and even if it were to play out like this, then it doesn't mean that should be the choice taken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    International sports is very much instances of teams "representing" their nation states.

    And as long as they do so wearing national colours, flying the national flag, singing the national anthem, receiving funding from tax payer funds and being invited to the offices of national leaders then they absolutely can be seen as being intertwined.

    Stop trying to build a strawman by suggesting that I want governments to be involved in the operational management of sports, no one is suggesting that is, or should be the case. It's a ludicrous attempt to deflect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    FIFA dismissed the territory thing months ago. This would just make the FAI look thick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Exactly.

    I don't think that poster gives a **** about the Irish football team tbh.

    Refusing to play Israel would be a disaster for our football team, and would not save a single life in Gaza.

    We're playing Qatar in a few weeks. Where's the clamour to boycott? Oh yes, we've moved on from them and Ukraine to Gaza where's there's more virtue signalling brownie points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Norway made noises about not playing Israel last November and Israel should be banned, the game went ahead and the game was a sell out.

    I suspect phone calls took place involving UEFA and the NFF who were told what would happen if they boycotted the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    What usually happens when a financially challenging company with massive debts loses even more money?

    Look at Munster rugby currently for a sporting example close to home

    the FAI would be in major financial trouble if they boycotted the game. Its a different story if UEFA banned Israel as the FAI would be fulfilling their obligations.

    They would potentially have a chance to find a different opponent if given enough notice to fulfil a fixture that would bring in revenue and they wouldnt be sacrificing TV money from the nations league as a result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    That made me laugh.

    FIFA dismissed the territory thing.

    Are you for real? That's like Donald Trump saying he had nothing to do with the Epstein files.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Funny, your post reminds me of someone who was very active on this thread a couple months back who was all talk about how much they cared about the Irish football team and that was the only reason they were posting so forcibly that the game shouldn't be boycotted.

    Funny thing was, they hadn't a single post in any of the Irish Football threads to do with any discussions around players, performances, the manager etc. They had I think 3 posts in one thread, all saying the Israel game should go ahead.

    And they were trying to dismiss the argument in favour of a boycott in the same way you are doing.

    "virtue signalling brownie points" Is that supposed to be an insult? It is meaningless, and even more so coming from someone going to a lot of effort to make sure Israel face no negative impact because of their actions.

    Tell me, do you think Brian Kerr, Eamon Dunphy, James McClean and the likes care about the Irish Football Team? All of them think the games shouldn't be going ahead.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Norway donated profits from the game against Israel to aid agencies working in Gaza.

    Would you be in favour of Ireland doing the same?

    The FAI just lost out on World Cup qualification and the sky didn't fall down.

    I already posted a suggestion to overcome the loss of income from two games earlier in the thread. Finance is an issue, I will grant that, it is not, and should not be the deciding factor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭scottser


    True indeed. However, it's FIFA's breach of it's own Article 64.2 and it's refusal to apply it's own governance commitments that is at the very core of this issue. If the FAI were in any way cute they would refuse and contest any sanction arising from boycotting the matches with Israel because FIFA themselves are ultimately in breach of their own statutes. Any lawyer worth their name should have FIFA backing down on sanctions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    The FAI already said they would follow the Norwegian FA in donating to Palestinian aid charities.

    The FAI DO NOT budget for world cup qualification. They budget for games they know they have, not for games they MIGHT have.

    Your idea was a pile of nonsense with zero basis in reality and was completely ripped apart by several people including myself. Its not my fault you cannot accept that your idea was total rubbish.

    For the FAI and its employees, money is a deciding factor. Money pays wages which is used to pay rent, bills, mortgages, puts food on the table. Thats the single sole reason the FAI have decided to fulfil the fixtures. And rightly so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Your idea was a pile of nonsense with zero basis in reality and was completely ripped apart by several people including myself. Its not my fault you cannot accept that your idea was total rubbish.

    You're priceless. If I said Messi had signed a private agreement to play two games in Lansdowne, you'd all still have said it was a pile of nonsense. That was always going to be the case.

    And if the FAI have survived years without major championship qualifications, Covid and the bould John Delaney, they are not about to go under because of one lost home game and one lost away fixture.

    Stop using that as an excuse, it just enforces the view that you will do anything to avoid acknowledging that Israel should be treated as they deserve to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Ya get credit for eventually coming up with an idea but lets no pretend it was good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    1000010880.jpg

    The FAI received a significant amount of money from the state in 2020, they also implemented sliding pay referrals as a result of covid19 and the cancellation of games.

    You clearly dont know how football revenue works. TV rights are significant amount of money to the FAI. The nations league alone is somewhere in the region €10m.

    Again, the FAI dont budget for major championship qualifications. They budget on the basis of games they know they will have such as qualifiers and nations league. There is zero appetite for international friendlies anymore which is why the nations league was established.

    Read the article above, the "continued viability of the association". Thats what John Delaney caused.

    The FAI is clinging on for Euro2028 and the financial rewards that brings as a co-host.

    Oh And Messi signing up to play two games in Lansdowne would be a pile of nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    It's fine. He has it all worked out.

    Nothing worse than someone that can only see through one lens.

    Imo, the beat thing that people can do in Ireland is boycott the match. I'll be doing that. I'll get hit in the pocket but it's not much in reality.

    It means that the FAI don't lose out as most of the tickets are probably sold as seasons tickets. Plus, it will be obvious the Irish public have not turned up due to Israel being there.

    The Irish football team therefore won't get punished. This is the soccer forum at the end of the day so that's probably a reasonable stance…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I had that idea from the first time I was asked for it, but the guy demanding it refused to say he'd support a ban if FAI Afinances were removed as a concern. Thats why I held off posting it so long. And of course, he never said he'd support a ban in such a case because he doesn't care about their finances any more than I do.

    It was never about that.

    Look at the support Bohs get for their Palestine support initiatives. You can't pretend there wouldn't be an appetite in the country to make up a shortfall for the FAI IF the only factor was income from 2 games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    And what about potential for further punishments?

    You have no idea that is workable solution. Thats the problem. The FAI are bound to UEFA abd whatever the draw throws up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    (1) UEFA do not enforce FIFA statutes, FIFA do, so that rule is of zero relevance to the Nations League competition.

    (2) In the case of that rule, have you any evidence that the Palestinian FA has objected to the arrangements?

    (3) Article 65 provides

    "Associations, leagues or clubs that are affiliated to a member association may only join another member association or take part in competitions on that memberassociation’s territory under exceptional circumstances."

    Presumably, the precedent established by Derry playing in the League of Ireland would be used by Israel to justify the arrangements.



Advertisement
Advertisement