Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1663664666668669678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,972 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I see the conversation here has veered into the root causes of the UK's current woes. For a really thorough examination of this topic I'd recommend last year's Adam Curtis documentary series Shifty. It covers the Thatcher era and on through the 90s right up until the turn of the century.

    If anyone's familiar with some of his other documentaries this is a good companion piece to both Hypernormalisation and TraumaZone as it focuses on roughly the same time period except this focuses purely on the UK.

    It's all done in the usual b-roll Curtis style and the whole thing is up on YouTube.

    Here's the first episode:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Worthy? The Labour Party is a political party, not some quasi-religious group or morality police.

    You should look up the meaning of the word worthy.

    Honest question, but why do you think that is? Why are voters leaving left-wing parties and moving to the right and populist right?

    I don't deny that some people have solid foundations for immigration concerns. I've never argued that there should be unlimited immigration.

    But the reason it has become such a hot topic in the UK (and also the US) is because a narrative on the topic is pushed from populist individuals and a significant portion of the media who are intent in pushing their own narrative for their own reasons. And quite simply, most of the people in the country don't understand the root causes of why it is they are suffering in their lives (and they are suffering). Any one of these reasons (cost of living/education/employment/housing) could each have their own thread to discuss in detail, but while immigrants do influence them, they are in no way the reason the issue exists in the way that they have been represented as being.

    Large political parties like Labour exist to be in power. 

    You seem to be of the opinion that I am speaking on behalf of or for Labour as to their motivations and policies. I am doing neither. I am commenting on these things obviously, but I as an individual have the right to judge them as I wish and vote accordingly (ignoring the fact I don't vote in the UK aside).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Do you still think that the UK can compete in heavy industry in today's world, honestly? Do you think workers in China get paid more to make steel and cars than those of the UK?

    De-industrialisation was going to happen regardless of Thatcher being in power or not.

    No one is suggesting the UK can compete with heavy industry right now, today. That doesn't mean that the manner in which Thatcher effected change is to be applauded, or called for again as you are doing.

    Look at how the Netherlands economy has behaved versus the UK one in say the last 50 years. And while the Netherlands has its own issues and some similar to the UK, from a societal perspective (infrastructure/citizen led policies) it is literally decades ahead from the UK.

    This is just whataboutery and doesnt refute what I am saying. The proof? The UK is about to have its 6th leader in 7 years. Is that an example of strong leadership?

    Tell us again of all the u-turns done by Starmer and Labour.

    Starmer had a chance of doing actual structural reforms, which may be unpopular but are needed. Instead they shat the bed, and pretended that it was business as normal.

    Again, I'm not a spokesperson for Labour.

    The UK has had 6 leaders (about to be 7) in 7 years because all of them have ignored the reality of the UK's standing in the word and to varying degrees pandered to the same populism that put them in the hole they are in (Farage/Brexit).

    But as I said, maybe they are nearing an endline in this respect if Farage comes in and proves all his talk was just that. I'd love to say I believe that will be the turning point, but unfortunately having seen how populism has been facilitated in the US, there is no guarantee that that will be the case.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The UK has had 6 leaders (about to be 7) in 7 years because all of them have ignored the reality of the UK's standing in the word and to varying degrees pandered to the same populism that put them in the hole they are in (Farage/Brexit).

    Correction: The UK has had 6 leaders (about to be 7) in 10 years...

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,006 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Brexit seemed to be the start of all their problems. Imagine staking their entire future on an advisory referendum: in law, it was little more than a glorified opinion poll that was not binding on the government. But the lurch towards right wing populism backed by a rancid media and becoming an unserious country was probably well underway even before June 2016.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    He's like the British Simon Coveney, fatal combination for a politician of being gaffe-prone but somehow at the same time deathly dull…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,958 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    …and now one of the chief cheerleaders of Brexit is enjoying a massive surge in votes and popularity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Yeah I just went with the dates from the previous poster without stopping to check them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭Randycove


    apparently the UK should go back to 1979 because they produced world leading stuff as nationalized industries back then, like the Advanced Passenger Train, the Austin Maxi and the VC10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,972 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I don't believe anyone is arguing for that. There were more than one pathway to proceed from that point onwards though and it's clear that the one that was chosen has led to rampant inequality, the hollowing out of many regions of the country and the atomisation of society.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,304 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Makerfield in Greater Manchester shall be ground zero for the next month

    Labour MP Josh Simons: "Today, I am putting the people I represent and the country I love first and will be resigning as MP for Makerfield. I am standing aside so that Andy Burnham can return to his home."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    That just scuppered Streetings plans.

    What are they going to do now, wait until Burnham is elected, if he is elected, before having a contest for the leadership.

    Simmons won with an 18% margin in 2024 and in the borough in which Makerfield is located, Labour lost 26% in last weeks local elections from the previous one.

    Reform/Farage/GB News/Daily Mail are going to be all over the area until the byelection is held. Very tenuous for Labour/Burnham. If Burnham were to lose an election there, could it be enough to collapse the government?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    If Burnham lost the by-election it would be proper funny.

    I don't think he'd do a whole lot different. Everyone talks a big game until they get their feet under the desk and have to actually make decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 983 ✭✭✭midlander12


    Reform got 46% in Wigan last week and all but one of the seats that were up (the odd one out went to an Indo, Lab got 25% but lost all the seats it was defending). I know this is a different election but I cannot see how Burnham wins it, and if not he has handed Farage the propaganda coup of the decade, as I cannot see Lab holding the Greater Manchester mayoralty either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 983 ✭✭✭midlander12


    I don't recall anything remarkable about him as a minister.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Me either, but have seen some potential banana skins for him associated with loans of public money to a building firm in Manchester. I think the loans in question were granted before he became Mayor but there's suggestions he has delayed a report in to how effective they were versus what they were proposed to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,833 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    He seems a very capable communicator. Able to articulate what and why he does things. A bit like Sadiq Khan but without the baggage of being a brown guy named Sadiq.

    Something Starmer has been terrible at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 983 ✭✭✭midlander12


    I agree re Starmer's communication skills but not convinced Burnham is much use at anything other than optics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,833 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    What does a PM need to be really. Someone who can pick the right team and can sell the message to the public.

    Some unpopular choices need to be made and Starmer avoided them to stay popular but was still woefully unpopular. What's needed is spine and charisma to make these tough changes work. Burnham is as good as any I can see out there right now.

    Ppersonally I want Rayner but there would be so many knives coming from all direction sif she was PM that I don't see her getting the nod.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Rayner would be well served if she had a strong Labour leader she would work under for 5-10 years. She is still very young from a PM age perspective.

    Should Burnham become an MP and then PM, he will have to find a strong policy position and then stick to it like a limpet to wash away the image of Uturns that had become popular under Starmer.

    I would hope that Burnham would be a much better communicator against Reform than Starmer has been, but time will tell.

    There's a lot to happen before any of this is even likely to play out. Right now it isn't even confirmed that he will win a by-election. Labour will be hoping that the Parliamentary investigation in to payments to Farage will still be in the public space until the election is held I feel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,304 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    How many ordinary folk get a chance to vote for Prime Minister? This has never happened before, and the poor folk of Makerfield will be hounded by politicos & media for the next month



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,527 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    So Burnham now has to fight a by-election in Makerfield ( Labour Josh Simons relinquishing his seat ) against everyone else Inc Reform to get his seat. The voters will have a huge say in this, not a foregone conclusion at all. He then goes forward to try get 81 to support his leadership challenge against Starmer. But also has to become leader of the Labour party? Sounds pretty insurmountable to me?

    SO do we now have two labour seats exposed? Makerfield by-election and Burnham's own seat in Manchester? No guarantee labour will win both or any of them?

    Now it seems we have a 3 maybe 4 way leadership challenge. Starmer, Streeting, Burnham, Rayner.

    This will take weeks, months to sort surely? Meanwhile what will this do for the good ship UK, as in a gov running it properly?

    Could all this result in an earlier GE??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 983 ✭✭✭midlander12


    I don't see any of the current contenders doing much better than Starmer. The events of the last week have compounded what was already significant damage. It's not clear to me that they can recover at this stage.

    Ironically they had relatively good GDP and waiting list figures today, but who heard? Maybe the Farage millions will finally hit the fan and make a difference, but no doubt he and his friends in the Mail and GB News will sell it as a left-wing conspiracy founded on someone hacking his computer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If I was a 'traditional Labour voter' in this constituency my back would be up at being expected to turn out for this contrived by-election just to advance Burnham's career. labour only marginal favourites with bookies



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,988 ✭✭✭its_steve116


    Some reckon Keir would be gone by now were Andy Burnham already a sitting MP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Dont think he'd be gone, but he'd definitely be packing his bags.

    Some news going around Simon's being a hater of Jeremy Corbyn. Apparently Corbyn has requested any information relating to him in emails/texts etc. Simon's was involved with Labour Together so probalt would have been expected to be a Starmer ally you'd imagine.

    Interesting to know why he's giving Burnham a route in. Wonder if they're going to try to have him lose the by-election?

    Better than Coronation Street this…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,290 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Last week

    "VOTE REFORM TO GET STARMER OUT"

    This week

    "VOTE REFORM TO KEEP STARMER IN"

    Crazy times



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,349 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    When you look at a lot of the labour seats, its clear their are many where a potato with Labour label would win , but tbf what's the point in picking a gimme seat ? He wants to say " I took on Farage in a battleground seat and won" . I think he got 60%+ as mayor in this area as well so he is clearly liked in the area.

    It won't be easy, but with his populariity locally, and Restore likely siphoning votes away from Reform, Andy should win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭Randycove


    there are many things that has brought the UK to those things and selling off BAe isn’t one of them.
    globalization has meant a huge number of manufacturing jobs have gone over seas, online shopping has gutted the high streets and vast amounts of immigration with zero integration has meant some areas of the UK are unrecognizable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,728 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    One of the things I think the UK has massively failed on, and as a consequence it has significantly negatively impacted the perception and pysche of the country in a real way, is what has happened it's town centre's and high streets.

    I mentioned the Netherlands yesterday as a country that has had mich better success in transitioning through the last 50 years than the UK has had and it's town centres compared to the UK's are a perfect example of that.

    Im not saying there aren't run down or underprivileged areas, Im sure there are, but on the whole, what I've seen when I was there, is that they are much more vibrant, well maintained and esthetically pleasing.

    One of the differences between the countries is the absolute scurge that is the highstreet gambling shop present in every UK town or city. Gaudy obstrusive signage, and an air of despair around the doorways. They are a financial and positivity black hole and to have them in central town areas as they are in much of the UK just sets the wrong vibe.

    I dont know how they did it, it's a cultural thing that has come to pass and existed over decades im sure but the Dutch town centre's seem to make you want to live or spend time there in an appealing and inviting way. And they online shop as much as anyone.

    There's a lot of similarities between the countries, region of the planet, climate, historical "achievements", recent changes in industry etc, and I would love to see the UK appeal to citizens and visitors in the same way in understand the Netherlands does. I dont know why it couldn't, but it seems locked in to practices and a mindset that prevents it from making real positive change.



Advertisement
Advertisement