Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

14344464849114

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Sure - leave it so.

    It's not difficult to understand the points being made but I do know a few could be confused.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Its easy to understand. People are desperate for Ireland to suffer needlessly. The "Spartacus" moment never happened with Eurovision and instead Israel got through to the final. Thats the situation some want to happen again in the football Irelan suffer and Israel continue completely unaffected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,055 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    That's pretty much it, and all under the guise of "we care so much about Gazans."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Nobody refused to play Russia. Several countries indicated they would not play them but only after it was clear and obvious that there was an international groundswell of support for a universal ban on Russian teams and athletes competing on the world stage. Poland announced on February 26th they would not fulfil a fixture v Russia. FIFA banned Russia on 27/02/2022. It was a ban that was implemented along with pretty much every other sport.

    Fro example HAAS F1 team removed the URALKALI livery from tis trucks and cars on 24/02/2022, the same day Russia attacked Ukraine. An American owned team with a major Russian sponsor and Driver immediately responded. The Driver was subsequenelty dropped too. No doubt there was some political pressure applied in the background.

    It was easy for Poland to make such a statement when it was pretty clear Russia was going to be banned. Russia has very few political allies with any real weight on the international front. The biggest and most powerful country on earth, the USA, is a politcal ally of Israel and long time enemy of Russia, so its not difficult to work out why things are as they are.

    For the FAI, they have done all they can, they simply are not in a position to go on a solo run here, if you want an example of the ‘power’ Ireland has on the world stage, the Eurovision semi finals have gone ahead and Israel have qualified “despite” RTE boycotting the Eurovision. Things may change. Who knows what may happen psot World Cup when the political need of FIFA to pacify Trump is no longer there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Yep but they can't admit that.

    Rather than an instant ban like Russia got teams have been playing Israel for years so its utterly pointless tryna drag Russia in but it shows the desperation they are reaching for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    It was used as a concentratiom camp just to house and make the Jewish people work. It wasn't a death camp until near the end of the war. Something like the Israeli prisons now just before they began hanging Palestinians. So similar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Why would we refuse to play Israel when we send TDs to the US every year. Aren't they just as bad? People pick and choose what we should or should not do.

    If people don't want to go to the game don't. If people want to go to the game, go. Who cares what anyone thinks. I don't plan to go myself but I wouldn't think less of someone who wants to.

    Nothing worse than people trying to put pressure on with their online bandwagon outrage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Nothing worse than people trying to put pressure on with their online bandwagon outrage

    Stop with this. There has for a long time been a very strong empathy between most Irish people and the suffering of Palestinians because of our experience of colonialism and oppression. That's just a fact. You might not reflect on the Irish experience in the same way, but to describe people protesting what Israel has been doing as "online bandwagon outrage" is undermining what that experience actually was.

    As for why are we talking about a protest when we send TD's to the US every year? Well that's because a line has been crossed. Sure, there are several examples of bad behaviour by the US but also, for the most part, until recently for most of us, the US hasn't sought to disappear an entire people in the same way that Israel has. The whole world and the societal events within it are various shades of gray. Not the black and white they are portrayed to be. There can be a time when a line is cross and when either individually, or collectively, as in the case of Israel, when people decide that there no longer is any sort of an excuse. Israel crossed that line before the end of October in 2023. They were close to crossing it for a long time before Oct 7th, they had gone close to the line, come back, gone close to it, crossed it for a period and then stepped back again where they could pretend to the world that they weren't doing what we thought they might be doing. Now, for many many people, they are so far past the line it can no longer be seen. They are fully in the Black so to speak, there is no gray, not to mention white that can be seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Do you genuinely believe that I, for example, am motivated by wanting to see Ireland suffer as opposed to being concerned about Gazans being killed? Is that your position?

    One of the traits of narcissism is a lack of empathy, are you honestly telling us you cannot understand people having empathy for Palestinians?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,894 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    exactly, boycott the game and we’ll be hit with bans and fines while Israel happily progress like in the Eurovision. Doing solo runs has no effect unless the likes of EUFA or FIFA act. Israel can just say it shows how anti-semetic Ireland is compared to other European countries



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,055 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I am sure some people have genuine empathy for people in Gaza, but plenty have very little, and their agenda is way more to bash Israel and Jewish people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Really? What makes you say that?

    I feel we've seen a massive increase in public support for Palestinians and disgust at Israel's actions since about November 2023. So I see that as very much an outcome of Israel's actions which have been fully revealed in that time and their actions before that time have come under renewed scrutiny as people look more in to the topic.

    What makes you think that people are motivated more to bash Israel, and particularly Jewish people as you said. What evidence have you to support that view?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Nobody refused to play Russia.

    image.png

    . The biggest and most powerful country on earth, the USA, is a politcal ally of Israel and long time enemy of Russia, so its not difficult to work out why things are as they are.

    Agreed. And that's partly why many Irish people are supportive of Palestine. We know our own history and how we suffered under the heel of the then most powerful country on the planet.

    Things may change. Who knows what may happen psot World Cup when the political need of FIFA to pacify Trump is no longer there.

    Again, I agree. But things have some chance of changing if someone is calling for change. Ireland could go on a solo run and I agree they shouldn't have to but I suspect that they wouldn't be alone if they did make a stand. I do know that Israel has a lot of influence because of America, as you said, for one reason. But that doesn't mean they should be given a pass and not face calls that they be held to account.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Utter rubbish.

    Sounds like someone swallowed the Hasbara hook line and sinker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    It is difficult to ascertain the balance between the two types. Certainly, there are some on here whose agenda is to bash Israel and Jewish people, but I wouldn't be certain how many.

    There are also a cohort of people out there and on here infected with rabid anti-Americanism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,427 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    On the question, yes, Ireland should play Israel. It is up to UEFA to ban Israel, but as that has not happened, Ireland should play them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    What criteria do yiu think FIFA should use fot banning countries FAs from cmpetitions? Can you suggest a legally sound wording that would stand up to challenge - noting that it will have to apply equally to all countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israel can say what it likes - it called the incident in Amsterdam a "Pogrom" after a Maccabi Haifa fan lost a tooth. The boy who cried wolf. That's what they have become. Even prominent Jews have called it out for what it is

    But I agree that Ireland must play the game unless FIFA grow a pair (which seems like they won't). Ireland to drub them on the field of play and fans to respectfully protest from the stands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Poland and Sweden said they would not play. They never refused to play as that decision was taken out of their hands. we will never know what would have happened if FIFA didnt act



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,055 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    said it before.. huge amount these “free Palestine” pests is much more to do with anti Israel/Britain/U.S. and West than it is genuine concern for people in Gaza.

    This latest utterly daft issue about whether or not to play a soccer match against Israel (in supposed solidarity with Gazans) is as much about the above as it is about solidarity.

    Irish people want to take sides.. they’re not really pushing to advocate peace and reconciliation in this conflict…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Who are these posters who only "bash Israel and Jewish people" solely because they are Israeli or Jewish?

    I'd say there over two years of the Israeli Genocide on Gaza there's been probably no more than two posts where that was clear.

    All other posters simply want FIFA to ban Israel because they have exterminated over 70,000 Palestinians.

    Of course, there are plenty here who defend and excuse the slaughter at every turn - I believe you are one of the many.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Yet another stupid post - simply look at the number of States who have recognised Palestine - including the UK.

    As for equating wanting this match to be boycotted with anti anything other than genocide, that's an astonishing display of ignorance or something totally made up (because it suits a narrative).

    As for peace and reconciliation, do you believe the allies should have done that with the Nazis 80 years ago rather than prosecuting and sentencing them?

    There are arrest warrants out for two Israelis for war crimes and Israel is currently before the ICJ for Genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Saying you will not do something is refusing to do something.

    You can nit-pick about whatever your understanding of the term is if you want to, if that's what you're basing your argument on, then that itself should tell you how weak the argument is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,729 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This latest utterly daft issue about whether or not to play a soccer match against Israel (in supposed solidarity with Gazans) is as much about the above as it is about solidarity.

    Irish people want to take sides.. they’re not really pushing to advocate peace and reconciliation in this conflict…

    Have you any sort of objective evidence to support these takes?

    You're entitled to your opinion, I'm wondering how you formed it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    My point is, people pick and choose who to get outraged by.

    I don't see too many boycotting Chinese products. They have a horrendous human abuse record. What about Ukraine? They've been forgotten about. A lot of talking out of both sides of the mouths by compassionate online bs talkers.

    As I said, people should make up their own mind whether they go to the match or not. An empty stadium would send a message imo. Refusing to play is brain dead. It punishes the Irish team.

    Btw, your posts are hard to read. It's like an AI dump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,055 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    evidence to what? Get inside the minds of all these people to tell you how much they really care, or how really compassionate and sincere they are as regards Gazans?

    One thing that struck me was our reaction to October 7. All our concern and condemnation.. lasted a wet week.

    As soon as Israel responded we showed how insincere we were. Straight to full on anti Israel and “free Palestine.” That’s all evidence I need to know that this was never really about the welfare of Arab Muslims in Gaza



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,960 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    An interesting article from Ken Early re: Russia/Israel from Feb 16th…

    __________________________________

    The question of whether Ireland should play against Israel in the Nations League appears academic, as the FAI has already stated they will fulfil the fixtures, which Taoiseach Micheál Martin describes as “the correct decision”.

    Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald disagrees: “The FAI needs to do the right thing and boycott these fixtures and send a powerful message to the rest of the world ... Israel should not be in this competition. UEFA correctly expelled Russia from all club and international competitions following the invasion of Ukraine and the same standard should be applied to Israel.

    ”The point about the apparent double-standard in the treatment of Russia and Israel has been made many times and it is worth analysing. Why was Russia banned from football, and Israel not?

    In September 2023, UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin said that “UEFA’s continuing suspension against Russian adult teams reflects its commitment to take a stand against violence and aggression”.

    But UEFA and FIFA did not jointly decide to suspend Russia because of their shared stance against violence and aggression. They did it because they had been placed in an otherwise impossible position by the direct action of member countries.

    In February 2022, the Russian national team was preparing to face Poland in the 2022 World Cup playoffs, due in March. If they beat Poland, they would face either Sweden or Czech Republic in the playoff final.

    But on February 24th, Russia launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. On February 26th, the Polish and Swedish FAs announced that their teams would refuse to play against Russia. On February 27th, the Czech FA announced they too refused to play against Russia.

    Only then, on February 28th, did UEFA and FIFA declare Russia’s suspension. What else could they do? Disqualify Poland, Sweden and the Czechs and hand Russia a bye to the World Cup?

    If Poland, Sweden and Czech Republic had not acted as they did, it’s quite possible that FIFA and UEFA would have continued as though nothing were happening. “War is regrettable but football unites the world,” etc.

    Remember that by that point, the Russo-Ukrainian war had already been ongoing for eight years – that’s why the escalation of February 2022 is described as the “full-scale” invasion. They had been kept apart in the playoff draw for this very reason. Yet even as the conflict simmered, Russia had hosted the 2018 World Cup and Ukraine the 2018 Champions League final, while the 2022 Champions League final had been awarded to St Petersburg.

    The GAZA conflict exploded on October 7th, 2023, when Hamas militants killed more than 1,200 Israelis. By early February 2024, Israeli forces had killed a reported 28,000 Palestinians. On February 9th, 2024, UEFA general secretary Theodore Theodoridis was asked why Israel had not been suspended as Russia was.

    “They are two completely different situations between the two countries,” he said. “Don’t forget the start of the war ... and the start of what is happening now ... in the Middle East.” Theodoridis’s point here appeared to be, essentially, “Hamas started it”. But another difference with Russia was that none of Israel’s football opponents had refused to play against them.

    By August 2025, UEFA’s attitude was shifting. At the Super Cup between PSG and Spurs, UEFA displayed banners reading: “Stop Killing Children, Stop Killing Civilians”. In September 2025, a UN commission of inquiry concluded that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza. Towards the end of that month, the London Times reported that UEFA sources were saying a move to suspend Israel was under way.

    Then, on September 29th, US president Donald Trump and Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu announced the Gaza peace plan. The ceasefire came into effect on October 10th. The mood at UEFA flipped from “suspend Israel” to “give peace a chance”.

    FIFA, as everyone knows, were so enthusiastic about the peace plan’s prospects that in December, president Gianni Infantino presented Trump with the FIFA Peace Prize.

    As Infantino told Sky News: “I mean, how many – 60,000 people were killed, died, in Gaza?” (Infantino was underreporting the numbers killed, which currently stand at more than 73,000 Palestinians, and more than 2,000 Israelis). “And then it stopped. It did stop.”

    “It stopped.” What stopped? The illegal expansion in the West Bank has not stopped. The killing has not stopped. On Sunday it was reported that 11 Palestinians were killed in two separate air strikes in Gaza. According to Gaza’s health ministry, at least 600 people have been killed since the ceasefire went into effect. That would be an average of between four and five killings a day since, in Infantino’s words, “it stopped”.

    In the same interview, Infantino said he would like to see a ban on bans: “I even think we should look into our own statutes as FIFA, in the future, and see whether we should not enshrine in our statutes that we should actually never ban any country from playing football because of the acts of their political leaders. Because somebody needs to keep the ties open.”

    This places him at odds with the Irish football community, which made clear in the general assembly vote at last November’s FAI emergency general meeting (EGM) that it did not think Israel should be permitted in UEFA competitions.

    That, of course, is a different question to whether Ireland should play against Israel if drawn against them. What might be the consequences of refusing to play?

    On the football front, UEFA would declare Ireland had forfeited the two games against Israel. That might well be the extent of the immediate football punishment, since UEFA is itself in a questionable legal position, having failed to enforce its own rules against Israeli breaches, which was the whole basis of November’s EGM vote.

    Football, though, is the least of it. Israel fears sporting isolation and would react furiously against an Irish boycott.

    Ireland would quite likely have to face this alone. Poland’s direct action against Russia was effective because it was immediately backed by Sweden and Czech Republic. It’s hard to see the other countries in Group B3, Austria and Kosovo, backing an Irish boycott. Austria has been among Israel’s stronger European supporters through the Gaza genocide. Kosovo, which was the first country to play against Israel after October 7th, owes its independence to NATO’s 1999 bombing of Serbia, and seems unlikely to pursue any action that would anger Washington.

    And boycotting Israel would anger Washington. The day the FAI general assembly voted on the Israel motion, Republican senator Lindsey Graham went on X to threaten punishment: “If these attacks against Israel continue, I will do everything in my power to make those who participate in this effort to marginalise Israel in sports, and elsewhere, pay a heavy price when it comes to access to the American economy.”

    Just as FAI’s independence is compromised by its debts, much of which are owed to UEFA and FIFA, the Irish Government’s independence is compromised by economic reliance on US multinationals, which means threats such as Graham’s have to be taken seriously.

    In summary: a boycott would probably be lonely, expensive, ineffective in terms of sparking wider action against Israel, and frowned upon by the governing bodies, with wider risks that are hard to predict.

    And yet, it’s always easy to talk yourself into doing nothing. Despite all these risks, a boycott may still be what a majority in Irish football want. That is why the FAI board and the Government will not want the question to go back before the FAI general assembly, and also why it should.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/2026/02/16/ken-early-why-football-has-boycotted-russia-but-not-israel-yet/

    _________________________________

    So the thrust of it is that UEFA and FIFA only moved to ban Russia because Poland, Sweden and the Czech Republic refused to play against them and UEFA and FIFA have a so called "commitment to take a stand against violence and aggression".

    However, they continually drag their feet about Israel's violence and aggression, a country that has engaged in genocidal warfare against the civilians of Gaza, routinely murder medical personnel and journalists, carry out ethnic cleansing against civilians in the West Bank and the Lebanon, and have illegally attacked Iran…all within the last couple of years.

    Regardless of how one feels about the difficulties that may or may not occur if Ireland were to stand up and refuse to play against Israel because of the behavior of that country, there is an appalling double standard at play that should be clear to anyone who's honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    25000 people had bought Dublin Marathon entires for the 2022 event yet only 15000 turned up on the day. Saying you will do something doesn't equate to actually doing it.

    Loads of people buy gym memberships but dont go to the gym. Its one of the single biggest waste of money in households.

    By the time Poland and sweden said they wouldnt play, it was widely known Russia were about to be banned from sport worldwide. Poland and Sweden were hitching their name to the ban russia bandwagon which was largely worldwide and had huge political support from those who really matter (USA for example). Poland and Sweden were not going on an solo run in the same way you advocate the FAI do.

    As we have seen with eurovision, it has gone ahead and Israel are doing quite well even though RTE have gone down the virtue signalling route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Russia were getting banned worldwide. UEFA and FIFA were never going to go against the political movement to cut russia off. On the same day Russia attacked, the America owned HAAS F1 team removed the livery of their Russian main sponsor from their trucks and Car for the final day of F1 testing in Bahrain.

    There has been absolutely no support for the motion the FAI brought about Israel 6-7 months ago. Which was 3 years after the current situation began.

    Think about that. It took hours for the F1 Team to strip the Russian sponsor from their trucks and cars. And a few days after Russia attacked it was clear they would be banned from sport worldwide

    The FAI probably would prefer to not play the game. But the repercussions would be severe for them and their employees. But it's easy for Brian Kerr, LOI team captains, coaches etc to demand a boycott. They dont have to deal with the consequences.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,960 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Russia were getting banned worldwide.

    Which only serves to show how extensive the double standard is.

    Russia's violence and aggression is rightly met with banning from events. Israel's violence and aggression is met with hemming and hawing.



Advertisement
Advertisement