Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1944946948949950

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,646 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    A huge lercentage of sicial housing has to be revamped, its lifespan between refurbishment can be as little as 20 years. LL takes all that risk. Refurbishment often costs 30-60% of a new house. Social housing is a perputcost as well.

    I have bern into social housing units that are as little as 6-10 years old. I saw a fob access door replaced with a steel door with a shoot bolt. The other fob door was damaged as well. You had to be carefull in the stairwells.

    HAP unfortunately for LL iz the most cost effective policy where social housing is concerned and the government know it

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 222 ✭✭thenuisance


    I was thinking from a Dublin perspective but I get that a proposed national bond would have to cover the national solution.

    I also understand your point about property tax - however if we were to think of a property bond being used to increase the supply of housing it would still be getting paid assuming that the existing houses would still be in private hands and the new housing would be income foregone from a property tax perspective and would have to come in to consideration when we looked at such a scheme as a whole. Local authorities pay band 1 LPT on social housing but essentially to themselves. How that would be managed in a housing bond situation would be something to discusss - if paid from a bond it might be to the councils advantage.

    So taking your figures the cost is 6400 per annum net of contribution per household. I'm not factoring in property tax here - for the reasons I give above - but factoring it in on your assumed 30m for 68k housing units would be 440 per annum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 222 ✭✭thenuisance


    Agreed. The most important point is that the state can make the decision as to when and whether these properties can be sold at the moment the state (via HAP) is basically paying rent on an asset that it does not and cannot own. We also have to assume (as the market appears to do) that these rents will rise continually. So the state is putting itself in the same miserable state as the renters are - they don't have the capital to own their house - what I'm proposing is that the bond acts as the supplier of the states mortgage on the properties - the income on the bond is equivalent to the mortgage interest rate. The underlying value of the properties being purchased by the mortgage may also be rising. The state may choose to sell properties to increase the fund - using this as both a social tool (increasing the mix of private and public housing) and allowing the scheme to expand - ensuring that sales out of the scheme are matched by new builds - i.e. a 1 out 1 in basis.

    If you doubt that this could work I suggest that you take a look around Dublin's housing schemes in Crumlin, Drimnagh, Walkinstown, Marino etc. These are rapidly improving mixed housing areas. They were built to a very high standard and are still capable of providing good quality housing and can be upgraded to modern environmental standards. They are also well matched to modern housing requirements as we now have smaller family sizes. The problem is that we sold these off without using the income received to build replacements - 1 out, zero in.

    Social housing is not the be-all and end-all of our housing issues but it does provide a buffer that prevents price escalation in a dysfunctional market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I agree about the bond investment but it is also true to say that councils and AHBs are the largest purchasers of new homes in the country.

    Cash flow isnt an issue for them at the moment.

    Council and AHB homes need to have targets for cost rental and affordable homes for sale.

    This is the biggest issue as too many new homes are going to social housing and not enough new homes for cost rental and affordable purchase, which has expanded the squeezed middle group that earn too much for social housing and not enough for private rents or private purchase.

    Councils and AHBs should deliver 33% social homes, 33% cost rental and 33% affordable purchase in their schemes. A true council owned mixed scheme should include 10% private sales but I dont see that happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If you thought giving banks easy money to pump property prices was a bit of a disaster, wait and you see the outcome of giving government easy money to the do the same thing at a time of record wage levels.

    Developers and buyers are subsidised rather than taxpayers money and government policy being focused on increasing supply as is needed for those taxpayers. The demand pre exists it's supply that is the problem

    House prices are determined by cash available to buyers not cost of construction



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Villa05


    What about giving a far greater esg credit to a firm that modernises a pre existing building rather than leaving it to rot and emit far more carbon on building a new one

    If fast fashion is bad for the environment surely fast commercial real estate is even worse

    This is what happens when you put politicians and the finance sector in charge of critical policy, it becomes a disaster



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,890 ✭✭✭straight


    But cost of construction affects supply which is the actual problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,954 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Last year the government backed out of a deal for social housing apartments in city centre Dublin where the cost per unit was over a million a pop. Dunno the outcome of it , the developer probably sharpened the pencil a bit n let them go for 980k!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    in fairness that was a 30 year deal that included repairs and management of the properties, so the headline 1 mil figure was not accurate



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Anyone who can afford to build houses for themselves and for their siblings is not living on the breadline, is very wealthy compared to the urban homeless poor or the low-wage workers renting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Villa05


    As a child I witnessed, there machinery being repossessed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Thought of your post when I came across this

    It's long but if you download the substack app, you can play it as an audio file. Every Irish taxpayer should read/listen to understand how your taxes are wasted on rental and housing and other subsidies



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭spillit67


    House completions now running at 38,000 for the last 12 months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Rocket ship on our way to Mars! Keep increasing leverage rather than introducing policies to get house prices to drop. Hmm, have we heard this story before?

    https://www.independent.ie/business/money/mortgage-shake-up-as-buyers-can-borrow-five-times-income/a1468347405.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭spillit67


    This appears to be available to a tiny number of people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 FruitSaladGuy


    Will put pressure on the other banks to follow suit. This will end well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Is it only for new builds? If so, its a tiny number of properties as well as a tiny number of buyers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭almostover


    Madness again. Pouring petrol on the fire comes to mind. We're in a state of under supply so increasing demand and buying power via credit will only lead to one thing, increased house prices and higher personal debt levels. We are incredibly stupid in this country. We're addicted to the easy, popular, short term options. Constantly shying away from the more difficult, less popular options that will actually work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,800 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    To be fair, at the moment we have overly restrictive policies for mortgage approval. I know of a couple that were approved for a mortgage of just €135k from one bank because her line of work in the entertainment industry was considered not to be secure enough.

    This coming from one of the banks that literally needed to be bailed out in 2008. The irony is not lost on them



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭almostover


    My only rebuttal to that is 2 wrongs don't make a right. I also think there should be government sponsored shared equity schemes for people like your friend who banks deem to be too high risk. The bank has decided what is fiscally prudent in that case and government should bridge the gap in the name of social cohesion / social contract i.e. entertainment is a financial risky business but government seems it critical to the social fabric of the country and therefore should sponsor it in cases like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,800 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Only one bank deemed them to be high risk, another 3 or 4 mortgage providers didn't so at least they had options. Brokers as well don't touch any "complicated" cases despite supposedly being on your side



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The banks could already go over this, all this seems to he is Nua following suit. It’s for a limited portion of a loan book, I find it hard to believe it will jeopardise the banks first and foremost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭littlefeet


    People seem to only see the headlines or hear the sound bite.

    If anyone has a thorough look at this, they have a small percentage of the market; their interest rates are much higher than those of other lenders. Their clients have issues with their credit or are complicated in some other way; in other words, their clients can't go to any other lender.

    Their strategy is clever in a way; anyone they lend to is going to move to a cheaper lender as quickly as they can, so NUA gets a few years of the profit from a high-interest mortgage but gets rid of the sort of risky client with no choice but to use them.

    I dont think it will push up prices as such, but it's only encouraging risky individuals who can't manage their finances to be more risky.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If we are being honest about it, you could use this post to describe all the taxpayer funded "help to buy" "first home" etc

    Even to qualify for a local authority home loan you have to provide evidence that you have been refused by 2 seperate lending institutions.

    Every scheme/program sole purpose is to maintain unsustainable prices, thus making affordability worse for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭littlefeet


    You would have to get some evidence based data plus agenda/narrative free date first.

    There is a lot of magical thinking around about housing.

    Post edited by littlefeet on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Villa05


    aah here, but where will we find the workers!!!!

    Dublin city council:

    10,000,000 to be spent on energy efficiency, security and electrical upgrades on a building due to be demolished in 2029

    You carbon neutral policy results



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Surely it makes more sense for DCC to move to an existing empty office building and use the cash saved to deliver better services for Dubliners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 board_surfer


    Many people waiting for a crash. The crash is already here: inflation.

    And politicians do not want to do anything about that because the cost is them losing power.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Villa05


    In Ireland the bill would be handed to the taxpayer and the developer awarded more contracts

    https://www.businesspost.ie/legal/uk-judge-orders-irish-contractor-to-pay-e17m-fire-safety-defects-bill-within-days/



Advertisement
Advertisement