Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

How many of us think that unification is no longer a priority and don't really want unification ?

1171820222340

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    UK is our nearest neighbour, you don't move politically away from them, we need to have excellent relations.

    The Common Travel Area is going nowhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,005 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    you do move politically away from them and we are doing that because they are not a reliable and stable neighbour.
    upcoming british border controls will make the common travel area mute because realistically britain doesn't require the large scale amounts of irish workers that it did when the area was brought in.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,997 ✭✭✭.Donegal.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,061 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    We’ll be hearing more from Paisley and his southern allies about super majorities soon, no doubt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,289 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Again, I’d like to defer it until it doesn't matter viscerally to more than a handful anymore and is merely a matter of money. That clearly is not yet the case in Northern Ireland where significant divisions remain between the communities. Just take a trip up there and see for yourselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    What do you think would happen to those civil servants in a U.I. Many of them would find themselves out of work, and not just the ones in call centers for UK government etc. That is why many Catholics in N.I. do not want a U.I.

    The U.K. is still a G7 economy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,392 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The bit that annoys me is that the diehards who want a UI dance around the real reason they want a UI. They dance around it trying to find “sensible” but vague sounding reasons for it economically, practically etc. There is never much analysis of the likely actual consequences cumulatively on all sides. For all sides. Design of flags, anthems, what happens those of the Unionist persuasion?

    For all the Republican talk of a border poll. I have never heard any discussion about what happens after that!? Which is very odd, given the time the diehard Republicans have had to dream about a NI.

    To me the truth is the main reasons are emotive and symbolic. As with all things involving NI. They are not being honest with themselves nor others. Even the likes of “Kneecap” once commented “we could have a UI but keep the NHS…..”

    Dream on lads…..dream on….

    Plus the more sensible Republicans know that even if there is a border poll, they will effectively have to wait for a 60/40 for a UI or more. Anything in the 50’s would be too tight and a sign that tensions would more likely reignite and/or the border poll would/could fail. And what then?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,061 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    There's the 'super majority' chat.🙄

    See any of the Future Ireland conferences or even Arins for speculation on what happens after.

    Only a percentage of stuff that happens can be written in stone and guaranteed.

    A UI will proceed otherwise just like any other modern country.
    Come a border poll, diehard partitionist negativity will get pretty unattractive very quick by the way. They are faced with the same problem as those who will be their allies (whether they like it or not - Unionists, moderate and belligerent) - selling a failed dead duck.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 6,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭irish_goat


    Not how democracy works, if anything in the 50s is enough to keep us in the UK, then it is enough to have a UI.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 11,253 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Well most people in NI and in particular those demanding a border poll have no idea how Ireland's direct democracy works! They are used of a very simplistic system - vote, walk away and leave someone else to implement it. But that won't work in Ireland. The voters make the final decision and naturally (as in the past) will want to know the nuts and bolts of making such a decision. I expect voters in Ireland will either reject the idea of a UI or change the structure to such a point that most of those in SF supporting it today will be completely against the idea, becasue the UI of 1922 can no more be delivered today than it could be back then.

    When it comes down to it, Ireland will have to decide if they want to join a UI containing nearly 2m conservative Christians who would be in a position to reverse many of the decisions made in recent years: Divorce, Gay Marraige etc or even take us out of the EU… and pay for the privilage! Maria Steen might even get to be president!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Thats the worrying part. Those arguing for a U.I. have no plan. Not even for small simple things, like design of flags, anthems, what happens those of the Unionist persuasion? You said before those of a unionist persuasion will be paid to leave the island by the British. Can you not come up with a better plan. Will you be forcing out people from the 26 counties who you perceive to be "west Brits" too, in your glorious new socialist 32 county Ireland?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    The majority of people in N.I are not conservative christians. Most are ordinary people who you"ll find have very similar views on most social issues to the rest of the country. For most it will be a relief to get away from bigoted religious politics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    You can call it the "super majority" chat, others would call your position the "sectarian baby headcount" chat.

    The only people who need to reduce the discussion to labels like that are those who are afraid of real debate on the issues.

    We had divisions for decades over close-run referenda in Ireland, the UK have had similar problems with the Brexit referendum. The GFA itself put a caveat in that the UK SoS must believe it is likely a border poll will pass, not that it is a 50/50 chance, but that it is likely, that means something more than 50% in the polls, more than 50% voting nationalist, how much more is for the UK SoS to decide, but if he does something based on a narrow interpretation, he will be challenged in the courts and will "likely" lose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,997 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    A majority in NI voted to stay in the EU.

    Also

    • 2015: An Ipsos MORI poll found 68% of adults in Northern Ireland supported same-sex marriage.
    • 2016: A subsequent poll found 70% of respondents supported marriage equality.
    • 2017: A LucidTalk poll indicated 61% support
    • 2018: A poll showed 76% of the public supported same-sex marriage.

    Your last paragraph is just nonsense to be fair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Did someone actually post that those of a unionist persuasion should be offered money to leave the island? Really, to leave their homeland? I can't believe that someone would be so callous.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The vast majority of the population in NI are not conservative Christians. The evangelical population is over-represented in Stormont as a result of the DUP overtaking the UUP in the last few decades, but we have seen a significant shift towards Alliance from the DUP. In terms of the Catholic population, it's a mixed bag. My mother, almost in her 80's and a lifelong SDLP voter breaks from Church ranks on things like abortion, same sex marriage and gender identity. Her group of friends and family are largely in the same camp and I believe this comes from their involvement in the Civil Rights era in the North. It's obviously not 100% and anecdotal but in general this has been my experience, with maybe the exception of abortion being the most contentious issue.

    The younger generations are becoming more liberal in general and identify less with religion but also there appears to be less of an Irish/British identity. Many of the moderate Unionists I know (including some relatives) saw Brexit as the death knell for the Union, as they interacted with business south of the border more than Britain.

    The shift is happening, and there will always be hardline Unionists/Christians in tow but they certainly won't amount to 2 million.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 6,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭irish_goat


    You're ignoring the fact that those in favour of staying in the UK (who have been in power for 100 years) have never come up with a plan. We have a flag and anthem that half the population refuse to use and never will use.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's not in their interest to have a plan. Modern Unionism is based on retaining the status quo and not looking forward, even if something workable is tabled the hardliners will refuse because any kind of progress is bad. The exception here is the possibility of the UUP re-creating itself into something more forward focused but it seems the Alliance may have beaten them to the punch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,987 ✭✭✭yagan


    The problem is all NI unionist branded parties become political anachronisms once London offloads its colonial legacy.

    The DUP managed to turn May's backstop from an insurance to actual policy under Johnson. Johnson did his tour in NI, expressed his deepest unshakable ardour for the sanctity of the union and then stuck the customs border in the Irish Sea.

    I believe what will happen over time is security incidents will be used to allow London turn the screw more on moving the CTA to join the customs border in the Irish Sea.

    As for the religious fundi's of NI they're already taken a liking to spouting damnation from PA systems on Henry street. Plus some of the Brazilian immigrants have their own Christian fundi culture to add to the mix.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,061 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It’s hilarious really that these folk want to be considered as democrats.

    First we have the ‘No UI until the people are united first’ crew, effectively handing a veto to those who are flat out opposed to even the mention of constitutional change. Then we have the ‘super majority’ crew frightened that their democratic vote for the GFA is coming back to bite.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,392 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    What’s this this “Super majority” phrase you have invented? Is this more Republican lingo I have to learn?

    So you are telling me that Republicans would willingly risk losing a close border poll? That would be a disaster. Plus imagine the tension caused by a tight count! To me there seems to a whole new subset of young people in NI who see themselves as Northern Irish and don’t seem too exercised about the Nationalist/Unionist stuff. What will that subset vote for? I get the impression a certain chunk of the new generation are not really bothered about border polls at all.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,061 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If you pay any attention to the north’s politics you’d have heard Paisley Jun try to get a requirement for a super majority through the British Parliament.
    Died like the undemocratic squib it was.
    It’s when you raise the bar when what you fear comes closer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Yes, that was FrancieBrady, who supports S.F. ( or is it the othr way round, seriously?) and who has close to 80,000 posts arguing for a U.I. He says that in the event of a U.I. then unionists should be paid to leave the island. When pressed on who would pay, he said it would be the British of course. His justification for that was that if there were people like Arlene Foster who could afford to go to mainland Britain in the event of a U.I., then unionists from a poorer background should be financially helped to do so too.

    That is one of the few glimpses he has shown us of what his vision for a U.I. would look like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,061 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I proposed assistance for people who said they could not live in a UI and who WANTED to leave but couldn’t.
    Empathy and a refusal to abandon people.
    At no time or in any post ( quote the post if you disagree) did I suggest ‘paying people to leave’ which is the altering or slant those with zero ideas for helping those people are reduced to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    It was financial assistance to relocate to mainland Britain - that is what you proposed for unionists who felt they could not live in a U.I. You were asked who would pay for that : you said it would be the British of course.

    Giving someone of a political persiasion you do not agree with "financial assistance to move from the island of Ireland" is the same, in anyones book, as being "paid to leave". Same effect. Same cost to the British taxpayer. I suppose requiring universities applicants to have Irish language, as happened here, is another "stick" - and just one of the sticks - to encourage people to leave: interesting you propose the carrot for whom the stick does not work.

    I suppose it is just one of your ideas for a 32 county socialist Republic of Ireland. You seem very cagey on revealing any of your other ideas on how things would work out. Others have said that is cowardice, you are afraid to say. Tell us your vision for even simple things like the flag, anthem etc, and do you think your comrades in S.F. would agree with your vision?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,061 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    This is nonsense. They have already decided they want to leave.

    Here’s your problem - what do you propose to do for people who want to leave but cannot?
    Your answer is ‘tough, you have to stay’.

    Appalling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    If people have already been intimidated or find life uncomfortable and want to leave, they can pay about 20 or 30 quid and get an Easyjet flight or a ferryride across the water. Nothing new there. Nobody has ever not left because they could not afford a ticket on the ferry.

    What you propose is appalling. But an interesting insight in to the mind of a SF supporter who has almost 80,000 posts on boards.ie advocating a U.I. but no plans as such, except to get the British to pay the unionists in the case of a U.I. to leave ( those who were not encourage to go beforehand).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,987 ✭✭✭yagan


    If brexit can pass by 2% then so can ending partition. I'm sure the Unionists who celebrated that democratic win would respect the same result if it ended partition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,392 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It is a bit of a false equivalency though isn't it? There was no former threat of arms if Brexit happened. The NI mindset on both sides on the hardline are the problem. Let them simmer instead of boil is my attitude. But keep an eye on the temperature.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,987 ✭✭✭yagan


    The event that's far more likely is NI being offloaded by London before we even get to a democratic vote on ending partition.

    The Belfast Agreement ended the conflict, but the DUP never supported it, so are in effect still in a state of objection to the democratic path. It is weaselly that they will always say "we never agreed to peace", but it doesn't nullify the adherence of those parties who did sign up to it.



Advertisement
Advertisement