Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Nuclear - future for Ireland?

1117118120122123142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Thanks for being willing to give a direct answer. I hope others will do the same. I agree the same question should be asked of renewables advocates. For myself I sincerely hope Ireland starts looking at nuclear seriously, while continuing to invest in renewables, ideally with an EU push to inverter independence (Perhaps sweeten the deal for Magyar 'playing ball' by boosting the only real game in town when it comes to EU made batteries too.)

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    French electricity exports

    image.png

    Looks like a nuclear success story ? The ramp up seems to match the roll out of nuclear. Until the mid 2000's.

    Nuclear output was 430 TWh in 2005 but by 2015 had dropped to 416 TWh because Flamanville-3 and it's nominal 14 TWh were late. Nuclear output has since fallen to a "new record" of 373 TWh

    Nuclear output has fallen by the amount of electricity that France used to export. That on it's own proves that France does not export nuclear.

    A more nuanced answer is that nuclear needs spinning reserve, and the grid needs high inertia generators nearer the cities than nuclear would ever be allowed for local stability and voltage control. Which leaves an excess of power. France's exports were never just nuclear. And since the other sources provided more power than France exported it could be argued that France never exported nuclear power.

    image.png

    This is where France's increase in exports are coming from now.

    From the first chart you can seen Exports dropping from 2006 - 2010 as nuclear output drops by And then rising again after that as renewables come on line. By 2011 wind and solar were producing 14.2TWh , more than offsetting the missing Flamanville-3.

    image.png

    Another way of looking at it is historical French exports could have been covered by the equivalent of it's hydro production. It's another way of showing that overall France doesn't export nuclear. Prove me wrong.

    Never forget that France's role in keeping the lights on during the Russian gas embargo was to import electricity and gas from the neighbours.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Last year France generated 547.5 TWh a new record, that's less than the 550.1 TWh produced in 2005.

    Like us they will have to decarbonise. Having subsidised electrical heating in the past they are further down that part, but they will need to decarbonise road transport etc. so they will have to expand generation.

    How long will it take to build new nuclear and how long will it take ? Costs have already increased by 40% cost and delayed by 3 years. And how costs and delays will accumulate won't be known until construction starts.

    Renewables in France are going to have to a lot of heavy lifting for the foreseeable future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Back to this absolute nonsense again.

    "Another way of looking at it is historically French exports could have been covered by the equivalent of its hydro production. It`s another way of showing that overall France doesn`t export nuclear. Prove me wrong."

    2025 French hydro generated 61.8 TWh. 6TWh of that was from pumped storage which required them using 8 TWh to generate as pumped storage is a negative generation game in that it takes more energy to replenish a reservoir that it will generate. So the true figure for French hydro generation in 2025 was 61.8 - 8 = 53.8 TWh. In 2025 France exported 93.2 TWh. Roughly 175% more electricity than French hydro generated.

    To even further compound how wrong you are.

    In 2025 Compagnie Nationale de Rhone (CNR), which generates 25% of French total hydro output (15 TWh), applied for an allocation of nuclear generation under the ARENH mechanism. As did Enercoop and Electricite de Savoie who also generate from hydro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Renewables in France have been doing sfa lifting of anything.

    The ARENH mechanism is keeping them alive. In 2025 they applied for 135 TWh of nuclear generation from it.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Where did you think the record 93.2 TWh came from ?

    Was it the 57 TWh drop in nuclear since 2005 ?

    Or the 30 TWh drop in domestic demand in recent years ?

    Or the massive increase in renewable output while Flamanville-3 was being late ?

    8 TWh is a single digit % of what wind and solar produced in 2025.

    For the years before 2024 hydro is comparable to total exports.

    French Nuclear Output has fallen from 430 TWh in 2005. To keep that level they would needed five new EPR's by now. They have built one and it's producing less energy than it should. And more of the older plants will shut down over time so the six new plants they aren't building won't ever be more than replacements.

    And that's assuming they aren't killed off by costs/delays/renewables.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Will you ever stop with this complete fcuking nonsense.

    Renewables have had an allocation of 100 TWh of French nuclear generation every year for €42 per MWh that keeps them in business. Last year it was over prescribed with them seeking 135 TWh with even those generating via hydro seeking a part of that allocation.

    The mathematics are blatantly obvious. Were they not compelled to supply 100 TWh to renewable companies French nuclear would have had 193.2 TWh to export.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    You hit the nails right on the head of those three problem.

    I would more or less be in agreement, but I would prefer if we could avoid using coal.

    But then again, all those countries we would be compelled to buy credits from because they achieved this target would have done so burning wood. The real irony would be that if we did use coal, getting supply and having storage would not be a problem, and our electricity would be cheaper due to the marginal pricing policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭bored65




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,047 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    Considering that nuclear makes up a supermajority of electricity generation in France, the idea that France "doesn't export nuclear" is quite a bizarre one. Are there some silent sentinels on each French border that keep the nuclear electrons in France and let only the renewable ones pass through?

    And since you mentioned gas … what should the energy mix for Ireland look like for the next year? 5 years? 10 years? Should we seek to reduce our reliance on gas specifically?

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭bored65




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    This has nothing to do with generation. And is no longer in operation.

    It was an anti-monopoly measure, EU rules and such, complicated by the fact that EDF which used to have 95% of the market is now effectively state owned. So by agreement reached in November 2023 ARENH ended on 31/12/2025.

    https://www.edf.fr/en/the-edf-group/dedicated-sections/journalists/all-press-releases/edf-expands-the-scope-of-eligible-participants-for-nuclear-production-allocation-contracts-capn

    Since the end of 2023, EDF has been offering long-term partnership contracts linked to the French historical nuclear fleet, known as “nuclear production allocation contracts” (CAPN). These contracts allow partners to benefit from a share of the actual production of the historic nuclear fleet in exchange for sharing the associated costs and risks. Partners thus have access to low-carbon electricity supply for 10 or 15 years in France, at prices reflecting the costs of the nuclear fleet and therefore decoupled from wholesale markets prices.

    And again EDF are nowhere near the 430TWh they produced in 2005 or the 430 TWh they would have produced in 2015 if they could still build a nuclear power plant. In 2022 it had dropped to 276 TWh.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    image.png

    This is the last 8 weeks excluding nuclear.

    The yellow at the top is when non-nuclear dropped below 20GW and you can see there's peaks above 20GW.

    The yellow at the bottom is when exports were below 20GW. There's more yellow at the bottom. France exports less than non nuclear produces. And you can see when yellow peaks align, a drop in renewables matching a drop in exports.

    France was exporting ~60TWh in the early 2000's but nuclear output has since dropped by ~60 TWh. Can you please square that circle.

    We can argue till the cows come home about whether nuclear facilitates exports, but it's share has shrunk and likely to be more plants shut down than opening in the foreseeable future. Meanwhile renewables have expanded massively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Could you at least attempt to read posts before replying ?

    ARENH obligated French nuclear to supply renewables with 100 TWh at €42 per MWh. Renewables were so desperate to get that nuclear it was over subsribed by 35%.

    Nuclear supplied renewables with that 100 TWh and exported a further 103.6 TWh in 2025.

    Mathematics may not be your strong point, but a 6 year old could show you that the French exports of 103.6 TWh being due to renewables is bonkers.

    Seeing as you obviously have so much time on your hands with how often this has been explained to you, put that time to good use figuring out what plan you actually favour and at what cost, rather than this repeated time wasting nonsense..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,047 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    The main issue here is that talking about electricity in/from France "excluding nuclear" is a bit like talking about chocolate "excluding cocoa beans." It's just plan silly.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    I can't believe I have to repeat this but French nuclear output peaked in 2005 at 430TW and dropped to 373 TWh last year

    By coincidence Fossil Fuel also peaked in 2005 at 59.6 TWh but dropped to 18.7 TWh last year despite the 57 TWh drop in nuclear.

    Renewables displace gas. Nuclear doesn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,047 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    The evidence in Ireland seems to show the exact opposite - renewables don't displace gas, they require it.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    image.png

    CO2 goes down when there's more wind. ie. less gas being burnt. And visa versa. It isn't rocket surgery.

    Note our grid can only take 75% SNSP and there's requirements for spinning reserve and high inertial machines near the cities, though the base level for emissions should fall as we get towards 95% SNSP.

    image.png

    Here's last month.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    If you buy your Gas from Electric Ireland it doesn't affect the production or flow of gas and Gas Networks Ireland still get paid.

    The deal was that from 2011 EDF would offer to sell a quarter of it's power via contracts to alternative supplier, mostly fossil fuel and resellers who previously had to take wholesale market rates. That might include companies that had renewables but it wasn't setup for them.

    It was under subscribed until 2018. It really only peaked when wholesale electricity prices rose in recent years for reasons (Russia, EDF maintenance omnishambles)

    EDF's failure to replace plants as they were shutdown meant the 100 TWh went from below a quarter of their output to well above a quarter. Especially in 2022. Still better than being split into multiple competing companies.

    re Nuclear exports you should use the Nett figures, as for example Spain exports almost as much back to France as it imports. IIRC it's 0.2 TWh in the difference and I can see that gradually happening with some of the neighbours over time.

    Since our interconnector cables are immersed in a conductive fluid they behave like giant capacitors and AC losses would be horrible so we are limited to 10MW/min ramping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,047 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    Yet, somehow, Ireland is almost totally dependent on gas fired generation. How did that happen? It's almost like a series of awful policies have led us to this point.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The Gross figure is what they generated and exported. What is so difficult to understand in that.

    Actually never mind. Just go away and play your little deflection games with someone else rather than answer anything you are asked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Incidentally- people talk about just casually extending the life of french nuclear power plants - its not cheap,

    To extend their life by between 10 and 20 years is estimated to be in the region Of 100 billion euros - in today's money

    In comparative terms its pretty damn cheap ,compared to building new reactors , and environmentally its a way better use of resources,as well as deferring the clean up costs ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    When you see a headline figure of €100 billion it certainly does not look cheap, but when you see that the total capacity is 63 GW it gives it a bit more perspective.

    That is ~€1.6 billion per GW, and you are not going to get much wind generation for that money

    The Dublin Array with an installed capacity of ~775MW is now estimated to cost €2.1 billion (€2.7 billion per GW).That is €1.1 billion more per GW for a wind farm with less than half the capacity factor of nuclear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭bored65


    cherrypicking again (but mysteriously still not offer any costings for current path Ireland is being dragged down)


    You do realise that electricity usage dropped right across Western Europe due to

    1. Outsourcing all heavy industries to China that the greens love
    2. Flat populations

    Ireland is very much an outlier with our rapidly increasing population in last three decades

    IMG_6872.jpeg

    Europe as a whole has deindustrialised with Greens being delighted that they can now greenwash away the true cost of wind and solar via China whom use coal and slave labour for these

    Post edited by bored65 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yeah, Let's ignore the massive improvement in device efficiencies and blame energy use on immigration and the Chinese. Is this the Daily Express?

    Domestic energy consumption has fallen in total in Ireland, electricity is taking an increasing share of that total energy use but that increase does not track population growth. https://www.seai.ie/data-and-insights/seai-statistics/residential



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,728 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    its rather childish to completely blame green polices for our de-industrialisation, again, this has been largely due to decisions made at western corporate levels, in order to 'maximise shareholder value', i.e. very little to do with green polices!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭bored65


    90% + of wind and solar and related equipment now comes from China whom have absolutely destroyed the European industry

    the same China who not only uses slave labour but coal to manufacture and refine these

    The same China openly threatening Europe if we actually make anything in Europe including green equipment


    by cheering on wind and solar you are openly advocating for selling out of European jobs and destroying any self reliance left

    and to add insult to injury increase our reliance on gas as backup (and yes China also has the whole battery market cornered)

    We were sold multiple lies which reality on ground demolished

    • we were told renewables would make us co2 free, they haven’t
    • We were promised cheap electricity, it’s the opposite
    • We were promised self sufficiency, we ended up with reliance on China and gas producers
    • We were promised jobs, where are they, if anything Europes de-industrialisation has now intensified with auto manufacturing next on chopping block

    Lies lies and more lies



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,728 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    and again, the main reasons why China now dominates global manufacturing is the fact we handed it to them over the last few decades by out souring this manufacturing, ultimately leading China into this dominance, i.e. the problem is with ourselves, yes we should be doing everything we can to try create strong manufacturing capabilities one again, but knowing competing with China is gonna be bloody difficult as we re now an extremely expensive part of the world in comparison. its clearly obvious renewables and nuclear is where we need to go, China has been significantly investing in renewables compared to us, so we re seriously on the back foot here, and we clearly need to shut off fossil fuels asap, or your kids and grand kids will die prematurely, so…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭bored65


    200 billion!


    we finally got an answer from the green lobby for questions long asked on this thread



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭bored65


    So because the western world in the past had stupid policies you think we should double down on said policies? That’s mad stuff

    Thanks for at least admitting that selling out to China is a huge problem



Advertisement
Advertisement