Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Arsenal Team PL Champions Talk/Gossip/Rumours 25/26!

1100310041006100810091053

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    Any sign of Timber coming back? Think he'll be crucial to the run in if Arsenal are going to win anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭ronjo


    I agree with this. Hincapie has probably been our best defender the last few months but would like to see the switch.

    Mosquera will come in right back if Timber out and they slightly shift over I reckon to allow Calafiori more freedom going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,758 ✭✭✭G1032


    Same. I managed about 2 minutes of Cunningham at HT and switched it to mute. Turned TV off when final whistle went. Literally can't listen to their sh!t any longer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,758 ✭✭✭G1032


    Eze needs to start for sure. Odegaard needs to be dropped



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,758 ✭✭✭G1032


    He doesn't offer enough in an attacking sense. He's a great guy to bring on when 2-0 up and 20 minutes to go. We really miss what Calafiori brings to the attack



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭FixitFelix




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭FixitFelix


    Ødegaard being hooked that early is a bad sign for him going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭ronjo


    supposedly he was getting treatment at end of first half. Dont know if it had any bearing on the sub but we will need a lot of mins from him over next 5 (hopefully 6) games



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 750 ✭✭✭al87987


    Way too much talk of anti-arsenal this and that in here, really spoils the thread with conspiratorial nonsense.

    Didn't think it was a penalty on Eze, a little surprised it was overturned but the right decision in the end I think.

    Football, especially in Europe, has a 'penalty' problem anyway. It's way too big a factor in games.

    Would hope for us to have too much for them at home, bring in Eze/Saka and should be enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,667 ✭✭✭DenMan


    I just can't stand RTE's pundits and I can guarantee you they'll be micro-analysing all of our players in the World Cup with every dig thrown in. It's going to be insufferable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,499 ✭✭✭youtheman


    I was watching the game and I thought it was funny how animated Arteta was when Arsenal got in the opposition half. The same hand gesticulating, the same pose, every time!. Surely the players are just immune to his actions!. Can't see how it achieves anything. I reckon it is more 'stress relief' on his part rather than game management.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 966 ✭✭✭FLOOPER


    Think he's urging players to a) press/close 2) drive forward especialy/occassionally when we are 1 and not sit back up d) or move into specific areas when the opp are in possesion but think the guys should know where they should be whether they actually see him or react is another question. Never hear any negative reflections on Simeone when he's going ape on touch line BTW.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 810 ✭✭✭unichick


    “Tensions rose as White walked over Atletico’s badge and was taken to task by Giuliano Simeone for what was seen as a sign of disprespect.

    Diego Simeone then pulled his son away before speaking to White, slapping him on the back multiple times and shoving the Arsenal defender.”

    I presume they’ll get away with this? If this isn’t motivation for us I don’t know what is.

    All over social media it’s anti-Arsenal stuff so I don’t think it’s in our heads. We are entitled to free speech. It’s not spoiling the thread if people are speaking their truths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,347 ✭✭✭✭DvB


    Saw that earlier, simple thing to stop opponents 'disrespecting' a crest is to not put the thing on the ground in front of the tunnel for people to walk on.

    Petty BS from them really.

    "I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year" Charles Dickens


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Benny Blanco knew 100% what he was doing I expect too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,212 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    that not walking on the crest is absolute nonsense. If you put the crest in the middle of a walkway someone is going to step on it. It’s one of those things that started because social media showed people respecting it.
    if it’s on the ground on the way to the pitch it’s meant to be stepped on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,770 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Rice walked straight over it 20 seconds later and they didn't go near him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,698 ✭✭✭omega man


    was 100% a pen. No attempt to play the ball and he clearly clipped Eze. The real issue though is it was not a clear and obvious error and VAR should not have intervened. We were scammed and I hope it doesn’t cost us a place in the final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 750 ✭✭✭al87987


    It's either incredible bias or just trolling, I can't for the life of me believe anybody could really think this is '100% penalty'.

    https://packaged-media.redd.it/thhswgpdeayg1/pb/m2-res_858p.mp4?m=DASHPlaylist.mpd&var=sgpssan&v=1&e=1777582800&s=f6dd2f1c63449175bbdd17558252a2db1e31288a

    We were very fortunate Ben Whites tackle on Lookman wasn't reviewed as that had much more contact than Eze.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,698 ✭✭✭omega man


    The bias seems to be from the Arsenal haters.
    Many ex players and refs have said it was a clear pen. Just listened to Shearer talk about it, he was raging about it and VARs intervention in particular.

    OK I’ve heard some ex pro’s say it was ultimately the right call (minimal contact, a dive - take your pick) but again I’d argue that it wasn’t a clear and obvious error by the ref so VAR should have stuck with the on-field decision.
    Anyway it’s done now so it doesn’t matter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,770 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    It doesn't matter if it is 100% a penalty.

    In fact it's the opposite. The penalty was given. So for it to be overturned the referee has to come to the conclusion that it is 100% NOT a penalty.

    If you are willing to declare that it is 100% not a penalty then it's clear who is biased and/or trolling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,758 ✭✭✭G1032


    The very fact that there is so much debate about it is pretty much concrete proof that in awarding the penalty that ref did not make a clear and obvious error. The VAR had no business intervening. Ref absolutely bottled it. There is nothing he could have seen in the replay that made him think he made a clear and obvious error and needed to overturn his decision. We were done out of a penalty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,395 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    I was surprised it was overturned and I still think it was a home town decision, but are we putting too much importance on "clear and obvious"?

    Someone can correct me here... But is that an actual criteria, or is just a convention that we have become used to from watching English football. And does the criteria of clear and obvious override all, in other leagues - is that even taken into account at all in Uefa competition?

    Just saying because I don't know Uefa's actual position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,698 ✭✭✭omega man


    per UEFA website.

    The VAR team will check all match-changing situations, but will only intervene for clear and obvious mistakes. The referee can hold up play while a decision is being reviewed. If the VAR review provides clear evidence for a serious mistake in one of the game-changing situations, the VAR can then ask the referee to conduct an on-field review. The final decision can only be taken by the referee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    Palace have one foot in the conference league final which takes place a few days after Arsenal's trip to Selhurst Park on the last day of the season. Villa who play City on the last day could be in a final of their own but I reckon they'll roll over at City either way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,667 ✭✭✭DenMan


    If Villa come back and beat Forest and go on to win the Europa League, finish fifth in the leaue then the sixth placed team will qualify for the Champions League next season. The commentator said that last night. They may have to go through a qualifying round though or could go straight through to the league phase. Thankfully the sides we have to play are in the bottom half of the table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,395 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Fulham are two points off sixth. They'll be playing for an outside chance of CL qualification.

    IMO the league will come down to the next two games. Fulham at home is tricky - coming off a European tie - and then WH away, after a European tie.

    WH will be so up for it: fighting relegation, stopping Arsenal and stopping Declan Rice and their form is good lately. Even before the Newcastle away game last week I thought WH away was probably the toughest game of the run in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,701 ✭✭✭✭OmegaGene


    every team will be up for it against Arsenal no matter what their reason even just for bragging rights

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,701 ✭✭✭✭OmegaGene


    Arteta hopes havertz will be back for Tuesday but won’t be available for tomorrow

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,758 ✭✭✭G1032


    I read earlier this week that there is a scenario that could quite conceivably develop whereby Brentford need to go to Liverpool on the last day of the season to lose in order to qualify for CL. Mental if true.



Advertisement
Advertisement